Problems with 8.1, PPPoE server, and Cisco client

2010-10-19 Thread Paul Thornton
Hi all,

I'm hoping that someone can point me in the right direction to get
enough debug to troubleshoot a very annoying connection problem with
PPPoE to a Cisco.

I have a freshly installed 8.1-RELEASE amd64 box with a very simple
PPPoE daemon setup on it.  This works fine for a test WinXP and Mac OS X
client so I know that fundamentally that side of things should be OK. I
have also used a similar setup (under 7.0) with all sorts of consumer
routers doing PPPoE and it "just works".  The server I'm testing with
has VLANs on top of igb interfaces, and I haven't seen any other network
issues.

Using a Cisco 800 series as the client, however, things start off
working fine - connects up OK, authenticates, etc. but then it
immediately disconnects.
There is no clear error as to why the disconnect happens at either end -
hence my confusion.  I've tried several routers (some direct Ethernet
link, some via VDSL) and have upgraded to the latest IOS in an attempt
to make this work, nothing changes.

Have also tried with 7.2-RELEASE in case it was an 8.X issue - again,
same problem seen.

Any hints to help debug this (from either end) would be much appreciated.

Thanks,

Paul.


Info follows:


FreeBSD vdsl02a 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #0: Tue Oct 19 14:48:21
UTC 2010 r...@vdsl01a:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/PPPOE-ROUTER-2  amd64

ppp.conf:

default:
 set log Chat Command Phase#turn on some logging. See man ppp.conf
 enable pap#turn on chap and pap accounting
 enable chap
 allow mode direct #turn on ppp bridging
 disable proxy #turn on ppp proxyarping
 disable ipv6cp#don't currently support v6
 set mru 1492  #set mru below 1500 (PPPoE MTU issue)
 set mtu 1492  #set mtu below 1500 (PPPoE MTU issue)
 set timeout 0
 enable lqr echo
 set echoperiod 5
 accept dns
 set dns 217.65.160.42
 set radius /etc/ppp/radius.conf
 set ifaddr 217.65.168.254/32

# access VLAN PPPoE definitions

cv1004e:
 set device PPPoE:vlan1004:test

cv1005e:
 set device PPPoE:vlan1005:test


The daemon is running with the following command:

> /usr/libexec/pppoed -P /var/run/pppoed-1005.pid -a test -l cv1005e vlan1005

The RADIUS plumbing works as expected, and the router gets past
authentication and gets the correct IP address.

ppp.log shows:

> Oct 19 20:05:33 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: Using interface: tun0
> Oct 19 20:05:33 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: deflink: Created in closed state
> Oct 19 20:05:33 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Command: default: enable pap
> Oct 19 20:05:33 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Command: default: enable chap
> Oct 19 20:05:33 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Command: default: disable proxy
> Oct 19 20:05:33 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Command: default: disable ipv6cp
> Oct 19 20:05:33 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Command: default: set mru 1492
> Oct 19 20:05:33 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Command: default: set mtu 1492
> Oct 19 20:05:33 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Command: default: set timeout 0
> Oct 19 20:05:33 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Command: default: enable lqr echo
> Oct 19 20:05:33 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Command: default: set echoperiod 5
> Oct 19 20:05:33 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Command: default: accept dns
> Oct 19 20:05:33 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Command: default: set dns 217.65.160.42
> Oct 19 20:05:33 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Command: default: set radius 
> /etc/ppp/radius.conf
> Oct 19 20:05:33 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Command: default: set ifaddr 
> 217.65.168.254/32
> Oct 19 20:05:33 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Command: cv1005e: set device 
> PPPoE:vlan1005:test
> Oct 19 20:05:33 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: PPP Started (direct mode).
> Oct 19 20:05:33 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: bundle: Establish
> Oct 19 20:05:33 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: deflink: closed -> opening
> Oct 19 20:05:33 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: deflink: Link is a netgraph node
> Oct 19 20:05:33 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: deflink: Connected!
> Oct 19 20:05:33 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: deflink: opening -> carrier
> Oct 19 20:05:33 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: deflink: carrier -> lcp
> Oct 19 20:05:33 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: bundle: Authenticate
> Oct 19 20:05:33 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: deflink: his = none, mine = CHAP 
> 0x05
> Oct 19 20:05:33 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: Chap Output: CHALLENGE
> Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: Chap Output: CHALLENGE
> Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: Chap Input: RESPONSE dropped (got 
> id 1, not 2)
> Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: Chap Input: RESPONSE (16 bytes from 
> vt123456...@vdsl01)
> Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: Radius: Request sent
> Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: Radius(auth): ACCEPT received
> Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase:  IP 217.65.167.1
> Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase:  Route: 217.65.167.64/29 
> 217.65.167.1 1
> Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase:  MTU 1492
> Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase:  Netmask 255.255.255.255
> Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: Chap Output: SUCCESS
> Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]:

Re: Problems with 8.1, PPPoE server, and Cisco client

2010-10-19 Thread Julian Elischer

 On 10/19/10 1:32 PM, Paul Thornton wrote:


Hi all,

I'm hoping that someone can point me in the right direction to get
enough debug to troubleshoot a very annoying connection problem with
PPPoE to a Cisco.

I have a freshly installed 8.1-RELEASE amd64 box with a very simple
PPPoE daemon setup on it.  This works fine for a test WinXP and Mac OS X
client so I know that fundamentally that side of things should be OK. I
have also used a similar setup (under 7.0) with all sorts of consumer
routers doing PPPoE and it "just works".  The server I'm testing with
has VLANs on top of igb interfaces, and I haven't seen any other network
issues.

Using a Cisco 800 series as the client, however, things start off
working fine - connects up OK, authenticates, etc. but then it
immediately disconnects.
There is no clear error as to why the disconnect happens at either end -
hence my confusion.  I've tried several routers (some direct Ethernet
link, some via VDSL) and have upgraded to the latest IOS in an attempt
to make this work, nothing changes.

Have also tried with 7.2-RELEASE in case it was an 8.X issue - again,
same problem seen.

Any hints to help debug this (from either end) would be much appreciated.

Thanks,

Paul.



Immediate things to look at:

Wireshark understands all the protocols in question so get packet 
captures of good and
bad sessions (as similar as you can) and see what is different. 
(wireshark reads

tcpdump files so it's easy to capture).

also for fun you might look at the documentation for running mpd.. I 
dont' remember if it

can do a pppoe SERVER but I vaguely remember that it can.




http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"



___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Problems with 8.1, PPPoE server, and Cisco client

2010-10-19 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb

On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Paul Thornton wrote:


default:
set log Chat Command Phase#turn on some logging. See man ppp.conf


increase the log level for your test.  According to the Cisco debug
log the O(ther), which would be the FreeBSD to my understanding, sends
a TERMREQ and closes the connection.



Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Warning: iface add: ioctl(SIOCAIFADDR, 
217.65.168.254 -> 217.65.167.1): File exists


Not sure why that happens.


Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: deflink: lcp -> open
Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: bundle: Network
Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: deflink: open -> lcp
Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: bundle: Terminate


And here it goes but the missing, probably lcp, information is
missing in the log due to our log level.



*Oct 19 20:19:52.139: Vi2 LCP: State is Open
*Oct 19 20:19:52.147: Vi2 CHAP: I SUCCESS id 1 len 13 msg is "Welcome!!"
*Oct 19 20:19:52.147: Vi2 PPP: Phase is FORWARDING, Attempting Forward
*Oct 19 20:19:52.147: Vi2 PPP: Queue CCP code[1] id[1]
*Oct 19 20:19:52.147: Vi2 PPP: Queue IPCP code[1] id[1]
*Oct 19 20:19:52.151: Vi2 PPP DISC: Lower Layer disconnected
*Oct 19 20:19:52.151: Vi2 LCP: O TERMREQ [Open] id 2 len 4


And here it goes away.  And thanks to Cisco you cannot say why either
here.   The line above could be a hint if you can find it but ...

/bz

--
Bjoern A. Zeeb  Welcome a new stage of life.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Problems with 8.1, PPPoE server, and Cisco client

2010-10-19 Thread Alireza Torabi
Just out of interest, Could you post the relevant Cisco configs.

On 10/19/10, Bjoern A. Zeeb  wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Paul Thornton wrote:
>
>> default:
>> set log Chat Command Phase#turn on some logging. See man ppp.conf
>
> increase the log level for your test.  According to the Cisco debug
> log the O(ther), which would be the FreeBSD to my understanding, sends
> a TERMREQ and closes the connection.
>
>
>>> Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Warning: iface add: ioctl(SIOCAIFADDR,
>>> 217.65.168.254 -> 217.65.167.1): File exists
>
> Not sure why that happens.
>
>>> Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: deflink: lcp -> open
>>> Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: bundle: Network
>>> Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: deflink: open -> lcp
>>> Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: bundle: Terminate
>
> And here it goes but the missing, probably lcp, information is
> missing in the log due to our log level.
>
>
>>> *Oct 19 20:19:52.139: Vi2 LCP: State is Open
>>> *Oct 19 20:19:52.147: Vi2 CHAP: I SUCCESS id 1 len 13 msg is "Welcome!!"
>>> *Oct 19 20:19:52.147: Vi2 PPP: Phase is FORWARDING, Attempting Forward
>>> *Oct 19 20:19:52.147: Vi2 PPP: Queue CCP code[1] id[1]
>>> *Oct 19 20:19:52.147: Vi2 PPP: Queue IPCP code[1] id[1]
>>> *Oct 19 20:19:52.151: Vi2 PPP DISC: Lower Layer disconnected
>>> *Oct 19 20:19:52.151: Vi2 LCP: O TERMREQ [Open] id 2 len 4
>
> And here it goes away.  And thanks to Cisco you cannot say why either
> here.   The line above could be a hint if you can find it but ...
>
> /bz
>
> --
> Bjoern A. Zeeb  Welcome a new stage of life.
> ___
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Problems with 8.1, PPPoE server, and Cisco client

2010-10-19 Thread Ian Smith
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Paul Thornton wrote:
 > I'm hoping that someone can point me in the right direction to get
 > enough debug to troubleshoot a very annoying connection problem with
 > PPPoE to a Cisco.
 > 
 > I have a freshly installed 8.1-RELEASE amd64 box with a very simple
 > PPPoE daemon setup on it.  This works fine for a test WinXP and Mac OS X
 > client so I know that fundamentally that side of things should be OK. I
 > have also used a similar setup (under 7.0) with all sorts of consumer
 > routers doing PPPoE and it "just works".  The server I'm testing with
 > has VLANs on top of igb interfaces, and I haven't seen any other network
 > issues.
 > 
 > Using a Cisco 800 series as the client, however, things start off
 > working fine - connects up OK, authenticates, etc. but then it
 > immediately disconnects.
 > There is no clear error as to why the disconnect happens at either end -
 > hence my confusion.  I've tried several routers (some direct Ethernet
 > link, some via VDSL) and have upgraded to the latest IOS in an attempt
 > to make this work, nothing changes.
 > 
 > Have also tried with 7.2-RELEASE in case it was an 8.X issue - again,
 > same problem seen.
 > 
 > Any hints to help debug this (from either end) would be much appreciated.

Just to add to what Julian and Bjoern said .. something about addressing 
/ routing looks maybe odd to me, without knowing your network setup or 
much at all about vlans.

Adding both lcp and ipcp to ppp logging should confirm success (or 
indicate problems) at those levels.

 >  set ifaddr 217.65.168.254/32

 > > Oct 19 20:05:33 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Command: default: set ifaddr 
 > > 217.65.168.254/32

 > > Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase:  IP 217.65.167.1
 > > Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase:  Route: 217.65.167.64/29 
 > > 217.65.167.1 1

Does that all look right?

 > > Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Warning: iface add: ioctl(SIOCAIFADDR, 
 > > 217.65.168.254 -> 217.65.167.1): File exists

>From memory, 'File exists' means more like 'route exists'

 > > Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: deflink: open -> lcp
 > > Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: bundle: Terminate

Bang.

 > And every time the router attempts to reconnect, the same thing is seen.
 > 
 > Here is the log from the router's perspective:

Maybe add IPCP logging on the Cisco too?  No addressing info shown here.

 > > *Oct 19 20:19:52.139: Vi2 LCP: State is Open
 > > *Oct 19 20:19:52.147: Vi2 CHAP: I SUCCESS id 1 len 13 msg is "Welcome!!"
 > > *Oct 19 20:19:52.147: Vi2 PPP: Phase is FORWARDING, Attempting Forward
 > > *Oct 19 20:19:52.147: Vi2 PPP: Queue CCP code[1] id[1]
 > > *Oct 19 20:19:52.147: Vi2 PPP: Queue IPCP code[1] id[1]
 > > *Oct 19 20:19:52.151: Vi2 PPP DISC: Lower Layer disconnected
 > > *Oct 19 20:19:52.151: Vi2 LCP: O TERMREQ [Open] id 2 len 4
 > > *Oct 19 20:19:52.151: Vi2 LCP: Event[CLOSE] State[Open to Closing]
 > > *Oct 19 20:19:52.151: Vi2 PPP: Phase is TERMINATING

Definitely looks like LCP, but that could come from IPCP layer .. I've 
been using mpd for so long I hardly remember ppp logging.

Just another stab in the dark,

Ian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Problems with 8.1, PPPoE server, and Cisco client

2010-10-19 Thread Julian Elischer

 On 10/19/10 10:06 PM, Ian Smith wrote:

On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Paul Thornton wrote:



  >  >  Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Warning: iface add: ioctl(SIOCAIFADDR, 
217.65.168.254 ->  217.65.167.1): File exists

> From memory, 'File exists' means more like 'route exists'


yes
in 8.x the routing code changed somewhat.
it is possible it is trying to put in a route that we now already put 
in automatically.



  >  >  Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: deflink: open ->  lcp
  >  >  Oct 19 20:05:36 vdsl02a ppp[2234]: Phase: bundle





___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Problems with 8.1, PPPoE server, and Cisco client

2010-10-20 Thread Paul Thornton
Hi,

On 19/10/2010 22:06, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Wireshark understands all the protocols in question so get packet
> captures of good and
> bad sessions (as similar as you can) and see what is different.
> (wireshark reads
> tcpdump files so it's easy to capture).

As is often the case, the packets on the wire start telling the story of
what is happening... still not sure about the why, but progress is being
made.  Thanks for that nudge.

With a Windows XP client (I know, it was nearby though) the following
things happen:

Server -> Client  PPP CHAP Success (Welcome!! message).
Server -> Client  PPP CCP config request
Server -> Client  IPCP Config request (setting IP address of server end)
Client -> Server  PPP CCP config request
- and they carry on here working fine -

With the Cisco client, things break at this point:
Server -> Client  PPP CHAP Success (Welcome!! message).
Server -> Client  PPP CCP Config request
Server -> Client  IPCP Config Request (setting IP address of server end)
Client -> Server  Termination request
Server -> Client  Termination ack

So either that CCP request or the IPCP request is upsetting the Cisco.
However, even with its debugging fully on for PPP, it isn't clear why.
Initially, my server was requesting deflate compression and VJ
compression - so I disabled all compression options in ppp.conf but it
made no difference.  The tcpdumps were taken after compression was disabled.

The cisco config being used on the WAN interface and Dialer interface
for testing is as follows.  This is an 891 and so is an Ethernet WAN
port (no VDSL or other cable interface to add problems):

interface GigabitEthernet0
 no ip address
 ip accounting output-packets
 duplex auto
 speed auto
 pppoe enable group global
 pppoe-client dial-pool-number 1
 !
interface Dialer0
 description PPPoE dialer
 mtu 1492
 ip address negotiated
 no ip redirects
 no ip proxy-arp
 ip accounting output-packets
 encapsulation ppp
 ip tcp adjust-mss 1452
 dialer pool 1
 dialer-group 1
 ppp mtu adaptive
 ppp authentication chap callin optional
 ppp chap hostname vt123456...@vdsl01
 ppp chap password 0 LetMeIn123
 !
!
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0
!
dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
!


In terms of the routing, the route being added as a result of the
Framed-Route radius attribute does have the correct syntax.  For some
reason, it had failed to add the /29 route to the routing table in my
logs taken yesterday - although that now works fine.  That may still be
a potential issue but I don't think it is relevant now.

To describe what addresses are what (and two of these have changed since
yesterday as I was using some that were already occasionally used
elsewhere on the network):

WAN IP address of router: 217.65.167.128 /32 - set by RADIUS
Framed-IP-Address value.
LAN subnet of router: 217.65.167.160 /29 - set by RADIUS Framed-Route
value.  Router's LAN interface has 217.65.167.161/29.
IP address of PPPoE server's end of PPP link: 217.65.168.254

VLAN 1005 is just the access side; it has the clients attached to it and
has no IP address.  Everything happening on there is PPPoE only.  The
server has another interface which is network side that carries traffic
to and from the rest of the world.


> also for fun you might look at the documentation for running mpd.. I
> dont' remember if it
> can do a pppoe SERVER but I vaguely remember that it can.

I did once try mpd in the past - I remember it being hard to find any
decent documentation for it; especially around PPPoE as a server.  It
looks very flexible as an option so I may have another crack at it if I
can't make the standard ppp work.  Does anyone know of any good howto
for mpd and pppoe servers?  My google skills have lacked severely so far.


Here is part of the tcpdump with the XP client, starting at the CHAP
success message.  I've included quite a lot as there seems to be
something going on with IPCP and setting DNS addresses - is this normal?
(address ending 5e:ed is the server):

> 14:40:27.733755 d8:d3:85:c1:5e:ed > 18:a9:05:db:8e:5c, ethertype PPPoE S 
> (0x8864), length 35: PPPoE  [ses 0x20] CHAP (0xc223), length 15: CHAP, 
> Success (0x03), id 1, Msg Welcome!!
> 14:40:27.733764 d8:d3:85:c1:5e:ed > 18:a9:05:db:8e:5c, ethertype PPPoE S 
> (0x8864), length 26: PPPoE  [ses 0x20] unknown (0x80fd), length 6: unknown 
> ctrl-proto (0x80fd), Conf-Request (0x01), id 1, length 6
> 14:40:27.733770 d8:d3:85:c1:5e:ed > 18:a9:05:db:8e:5c, ethertype PPPoE S 
> (0x8864), length 32: PPPoE  [ses 0x20] IPCP (0x8021), length 12: IPCP, 
> Conf-Request (0x01), id 1, length 12
>   encoded length 10 (=Option(s) length 6)
>   0x:  8021 0101 000a
> IP-Addr Option (0x03), length 6: 217.65.168.254
>   0x:  d941 a8fe
> 14:40:27.741765 18:a9:05:db:8e:5c > d8:d3:85:c1:5e:ed, ethertype PPPoE S 
> (0x8864), length 60: PPPoE  [ses 0x20] unknown (0x80fd), length 12: unknown 
> ctrl-proto (0x80fd), Conf-Request (0x01), id 6, length 12
>   encoded length 10 (=Opt

Re: Problems with 8.1, PPPoE server, and Cisco client

2010-10-20 Thread Julian Elischer

On 10/20/10 7:23 AM, Paul Thornton wrote:

Hi,

On 19/10/2010 22:06, Julian Elischer wrote:

Wireshark understands all the protocols in question so get packet
captures of good and
bad sessions (as similar as you can) and see what is different.
(wireshark reads
tcpdump files so it's easy to capture).

As is often the case, the packets on the wire start telling the story of
what is happening... still not sure about the why, but progress is being
made.  Thanks for that nudge.

With a Windows XP client (I know, it was nearby though) the following
things happen:

Server ->  Client  PPP CHAP Success (Welcome!! message).
Server ->  Client  PPP CCP config request
Server ->  Client  IPCP Config request (setting IP address of server end)
Client ->  Server  PPP CCP config request
- and they carry on here working fine -

With the Cisco client, things break at this point:
Server ->  Client  PPP CHAP Success (Welcome!! message).
Server ->  Client  PPP CCP Config request
Server ->  Client  IPCP Config Request (setting IP address of server end)
Client ->  Server  Termination request
Server ->  Client  Termination ack

So either that CCP request or the IPCP request is upsetting the Cisco.
However, even with its debugging fully on for PPP, it isn't clear why.
Initially, my server was requesting deflate compression and VJ
compression - so I disabled all compression options in ppp.conf but it
made no difference.  The tcpdumps were taken after compression was disabled.

The cisco config being used on the WAN interface and Dialer interface
for testing is as follows.  This is an 891 and so is an Ethernet WAN
port (no VDSL or other cable interface to add problems):

interface GigabitEthernet0
  no ip address
  ip accounting output-packets
  duplex auto
  speed auto
  pppoe enable group global
  pppoe-client dial-pool-number 1
  !
interface Dialer0
  description PPPoE dialer
  mtu 1492
  ip address negotiated
  no ip redirects
  no ip proxy-arp
  ip accounting output-packets
  encapsulation ppp
  ip tcp adjust-mss 1452
  dialer pool 1
  dialer-group 1
  ppp mtu adaptive
  ppp authentication chap callin optional
  ppp chap hostname vt123456...@vdsl01
  ppp chap password 0 LetMeIn123
  !
!
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0
!
dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
!





Here is part of the tcpdump with the XP client, starting at the CHAP
success message.  I've included quite a lot as there seems to be
something going on with IPCP and setting DNS addresses - is this normal?
(address ending 5e:ed is the server):


[...]


And here is the similar section from the Cisco router, it all goes
downhill quickly (address ending 5e:ed is the server):



have you tried to connect this cisco router to anything else pppoe?
(take it home and make it connect to your ISP for example?)
The command from the server to set an address seems ok
so I wonder if there is some setting on the cisco that doesn't like it.
Unfortunately, despite having worked for cisco, my IOS
foo is pretty weak.


14:59:44.053482 d8:d3:85:c1:5e:ed>  54:75:d0:38:ca:7a, ethertype PPPoE S 
(0x8864), length 35: PPPoE  [ses 0x21] CHAP (0xc223), length 15: CHAP, Success 
(0x03), id 1, Msg Welcome!!
14:59:44.053491 d8:d3:85:c1:5e:ed>  54:75:d0:38:ca:7a, ethertype PPPoE S 
(0x8864), length 26: PPPoE  [ses 0x21] unknown (0x80fd), length 6: unknown 
ctrl-proto (0x80fd), Conf-Request (0x01), id 1, length 6
14:59:44.053498 d8:d3:85:c1:5e:ed>  54:75:d0:38:ca:7a, ethertype PPPoE S 
(0x8864), length 32: PPPoE  [ses 0x21] IPCP (0x8021), length 12: IPCP, 
Conf-Request (0x01), id 1, length 12
encoded length 10 (=Option(s) length 6)
0x:  8021 0101 000a
  IP-Addr Option (0x03), length 6: 217.65.168.254
0x:  d941 a8fe
14:59:44.059344 54:75:d0:38:ca:7a>  d8:d3:85:c1:5e:ed, ethertype PPPoE S 
(0x8864), length 60: PPPoE  [ses 0x21] LCP (0xc021), length 6: LCP, Term-Request 
(0x05), id 2, length 6
14:59:44.059739 d8:d3:85:c1:5e:ed>  54:75:d0:38:ca:7a, ethertype PPPoE S 
(0x8864), length 26: PPPoE  [ses 0x21] LCP (0xc021), length 6: LCP, Term-Ack 
(0x06), id 2, length 6
14:59:44.060925 54:75:d0:38:ca:7a>  d8:d3:85:c1:5e:ed, ethertype PPPoE D 
(0x8863), length 60: PPPoE PADT [ses 0x21]
14:59:44.060939 d8:d3:85:c1:5e:ed>  54:75:d0:38:ca:7a, ethertype PPPoE D (0x8863), length 
38: PPPoE PADT [ses 0x21] [Generic-Error "session closed"]




___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Problems with 8.1, PPPoE server, and Cisco client

2010-10-20 Thread Ian Smith
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010, Paul Thornton wrote:

[..]

 > With a Windows XP client (I know, it was nearby though) the following
 > things happen:
 > 
 > Server -> Client  PPP CHAP Success (Welcome!! message).
 > Server -> Client  PPP CCP config request
 > Server -> Client  IPCP Config request (setting IP address of server end)
 > Client -> Server  PPP CCP config request
 > - and they carry on here working fine -
 > 
 > With the Cisco client, things break at this point:
 > Server -> Client  PPP CHAP Success (Welcome!! message).
 > Server -> Client  PPP CCP Config request
 > Server -> Client  IPCP Config Request (setting IP address of server end)
 > Client -> Server  Termination request
 > Server -> Client  Termination ack
 > 
 > So either that CCP request or the IPCP request is upsetting the Cisco.

My money's on IPCP or maybe LCP so far .. 

 > However, even with its debugging fully on for PPP, it isn't clear why.
 > Initially, my server was requesting deflate compression and VJ
 > compression - so I disabled all compression options in ppp.conf but it
 > made no difference.  The tcpdumps were taken after compression was disabled.

Good idea, keeps the logging reasonable meanwhile ..

 > The cisco config being used on the WAN interface and Dialer interface
 > for testing is as follows.  This is an 891 and so is an Ethernet WAN
 > port (no VDSL or other cable interface to add problems):
 >
 > interface GigabitEthernet0
 >  no ip address
 >  ip accounting output-packets
 >  duplex auto
 >  speed auto
 >  pppoe enable group global
 >  pppoe-client dial-pool-number 1
 >  !
 > interface Dialer0
 >  description PPPoE dialer
 >  mtu 1492
 >  ip address negotiated
 >  no ip redirects
 >  no ip proxy-arp
 >  ip accounting output-packets
 >  encapsulation ppp
 >  ip tcp adjust-mss 1452
 >  dialer pool 1
 >  dialer-group 1
 >  ppp mtu adaptive
 >  ppp authentication chap callin optional
 >  ppp chap hostname vt123456...@vdsl01
 >  ppp chap password 0 LetMeIn123
 >  !
 > !
 > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0
 > !
 > dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
 > !

Left to those who speak cisco ..

 > Here is part of the tcpdump with the XP client, starting at the CHAP
 > success message.  I've included quite a lot as there seems to be
 > something going on with IPCP and setting DNS addresses - is this normal?

Looks pretty normal.  Omitting 'unknown ctrl-proto (0x80fd)' MPPC stuff:

 > (address ending 5e:ed is the server):
 > 
 > > 14:40:27.733755 d8:d3:85:c1:5e:ed > 18:a9:05:db:8e:5c, ethertype PPPoE S 
 > > (0x8864), length 35: PPPoE  [ses 0x20] CHAP (0xc223), length 15: CHAP, 
 > > Success (0x03), id 1, Msg Welcome!!
 > > 14:40:27.733764 d8:d3:85:c1:5e:ed > 18:a9:05:db:8e:5c, ethertype PPPoE S 
 > > (0x8864), length 26: PPPoE  [ses 0x20] unknown (0x80fd), length 6: unknown 
 > > ctrl-proto (0x80fd), Conf-Request (0x01), id 1, length 6
 > > 14:40:27.733770 d8:d3:85:c1:5e:ed > 18:a9:05:db:8e:5c, ethertype PPPoE S 
 > > (0x8864), length 32: PPPoE  [ses 0x20] IPCP (0x8021), length 12: IPCP, 
 > > Conf-Request (0x01), id 1, length 12
 > >encoded length 10 (=Option(s) length 6)
 > >0x:  8021 0101 000a
 > >  IP-Addr Option (0x03), length 6: 217.65.168.254
 > >0x:  d941 a8fe

we want this address.

 > > 14:40:27.741992 18:a9:05:db:8e:5c > d8:d3:85:c1:5e:ed, ethertype PPPoE S 
 > > (0x8864), length 60: PPPoE  [ses 0x20] IPCP (0x8021), length 36: IPCP, 
 > > Conf-Request (0x01), id 7, length 36
 > >encoded length 34 (=Option(s) length 30)
 > >0x:  8021 0107 0022
 > >  IP-Addr Option (0x03), length 6: 0.0.0.0
 > >0x:   
 > >  Pri-DNS Option (0x81), length 6: 0.0.0.0
 > >0x:   
 > >  Pri-NBNS Option (0x82), length 6: 0.0.0.0
 > >0x:   
 > >  Sec-DNS Option (0x83), length 6: 0.0.0.0
 > >0x:   
 > >  Sec-NBNS Option (0x84), length 6: 0.0.0.0
 > >0x:   

it's open to persuasion for all these.

 > > 14:40:27.742107 d8:d3:85:c1:5e:ed > 18:a9:05:db:8e:5c, ethertype PPPoE S 
 > > (0x8864), length 38: PPPoE  [ses 0x20] IPCP (0x8021), length 18: IPCP, 
 > > Conf-Reject (0x04), id 7, length 18
 > >encoded length 16 (=Option(s) length 12)
 > >0x:  8021 0407 0010
 > >  Pri-NBNS Option (0x82), length 6: 0.0.0.0
 > >0x:   
 > >  Sec-NBNS Option (0x84), length 6: 0.0.0.0
 > >0x:   

we don't do NBNS.

 > > 14:40:27.742559 18:a9:05:db:8e:5c > d8:d3:85:c1:5e:ed, ethertype PPPoE S 
 > > (0x8864), length 60: PPPoE  [ses 0x20] IPCP (0x8021), length 12: IPCP, 
 > > Conf-Ack (0x02), id 1, length 12
 > >encoded length 10 (=Option(s) length 6)
 > >0x:  8021 0201 000a
 > >  IP-Addr Option (0x03), length 6: 217.65.168.254
 > >0x:  d941 a8fe

it's happy with our IP addr.

 > > 14:40:27.756230 18:a9:05:db:8e:5c > d8:d3:85:c1:5e:ed, ethertype PPPoE S 
 > > (0x8864), length 60: PPPoE  [ses 0x20] IPCP (0x8021), length 24: IPCP, 
 

Re: Problems with 8.1, PPPoE server, and Cisco client

2010-10-20 Thread Alireza Torabi
have you tried pap instead of chap on Cisco dialer?

On 10/20/10, Ian Smith  wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Oct 2010, Paul Thornton wrote:
>
> [..]
>
>  > With a Windows XP client (I know, it was nearby though) the following
>  > things happen:
>  >
>  > Server -> Client  PPP CHAP Success (Welcome!! message).
>  > Server -> Client  PPP CCP config request
>  > Server -> Client  IPCP Config request (setting IP address of server end)
>  > Client -> Server  PPP CCP config request
>  > - and they carry on here working fine -
>  >
>  > With the Cisco client, things break at this point:
>  > Server -> Client  PPP CHAP Success (Welcome!! message).
>  > Server -> Client  PPP CCP Config request
>  > Server -> Client  IPCP Config Request (setting IP address of server end)
>  > Client -> Server  Termination request
>  > Server -> Client  Termination ack
>  >
>  > So either that CCP request or the IPCP request is upsetting the Cisco.
>
> My money's on IPCP or maybe LCP so far ..
>
>  > However, even with its debugging fully on for PPP, it isn't clear why.
>  > Initially, my server was requesting deflate compression and VJ
>  > compression - so I disabled all compression options in ppp.conf but it
>  > made no difference.  The tcpdumps were taken after compression was
> disabled.
>
> Good idea, keeps the logging reasonable meanwhile ..
>
>  > The cisco config being used on the WAN interface and Dialer interface
>  > for testing is as follows.  This is an 891 and so is an Ethernet WAN
>  > port (no VDSL or other cable interface to add problems):
>  >
>  > interface GigabitEthernet0
>  >  no ip address
>  >  ip accounting output-packets
>  >  duplex auto
>  >  speed auto
>  >  pppoe enable group global
>  >  pppoe-client dial-pool-number 1
>  >  !
>  > interface Dialer0
>  >  description PPPoE dialer
>  >  mtu 1492
>  >  ip address negotiated
>  >  no ip redirects
>  >  no ip proxy-arp
>  >  ip accounting output-packets
>  >  encapsulation ppp
>  >  ip tcp adjust-mss 1452
>  >  dialer pool 1
>  >  dialer-group 1
>  >  ppp mtu adaptive
>  >  ppp authentication chap callin optional
>  >  ppp chap hostname vt123456...@vdsl01
>  >  ppp chap password 0 LetMeIn123
>  >  !
>  > !
>  > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0
>  > !
>  > dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
>  > !
>
> Left to those who speak cisco ..
>
>  > Here is part of the tcpdump with the XP client, starting at the CHAP
>  > success message.  I've included quite a lot as there seems to be
>  > something going on with IPCP and setting DNS addresses - is this normal?
>
> Looks pretty normal.  Omitting 'unknown ctrl-proto (0x80fd)' MPPC stuff:
>
>  > (address ending 5e:ed is the server):
>  >
>  > > 14:40:27.733755 d8:d3:85:c1:5e:ed > 18:a9:05:db:8e:5c, ethertype PPPoE
> S (0x8864), length 35: PPPoE  [ses 0x20] CHAP (0xc223), length 15: CHAP,
> Success (0x03), id 1, Msg Welcome!!
>  > > 14:40:27.733764 d8:d3:85:c1:5e:ed > 18:a9:05:db:8e:5c, ethertype PPPoE
> S (0x8864), length 26: PPPoE  [ses 0x20] unknown (0x80fd), length 6: unknown
> ctrl-proto (0x80fd), Conf-Request (0x01), id 1, length 6
>  > > 14:40:27.733770 d8:d3:85:c1:5e:ed > 18:a9:05:db:8e:5c, ethertype PPPoE
> S (0x8864), length 32: PPPoE  [ses 0x20] IPCP (0x8021), length 12: IPCP,
> Conf-Request (0x01), id 1, length 12
>  > >  encoded length 10 (=Option(s) length 6)
>  > >  0x:  8021 0101 000a
>  > >IP-Addr Option (0x03), length 6: 217.65.168.254
>  > >  0x:  d941 a8fe
>
> we want this address.
>
>  > > 14:40:27.741992 18:a9:05:db:8e:5c > d8:d3:85:c1:5e:ed, ethertype PPPoE
> S (0x8864), length 60: PPPoE  [ses 0x20] IPCP (0x8021), length 36: IPCP,
> Conf-Request (0x01), id 7, length 36
>  > >  encoded length 34 (=Option(s) length 30)
>  > >  0x:  8021 0107 0022
>  > >IP-Addr Option (0x03), length 6: 0.0.0.0
>  > >  0x:   
>  > >Pri-DNS Option (0x81), length 6: 0.0.0.0
>  > >  0x:   
>  > >Pri-NBNS Option (0x82), length 6: 0.0.0.0
>  > >  0x:   
>  > >Sec-DNS Option (0x83), length 6: 0.0.0.0
>  > >  0x:   
>  > >Sec-NBNS Option (0x84), length 6: 0.0.0.0
>  > >  0x:   
>
> it's open to persuasion for all these.
>
>  > > 14:40:27.742107 d8:d3:85:c1:5e:ed > 18:a9:05:db:8e:5c, ethertype PPPoE
> S (0x8864), length 38: PPPoE  [ses 0x20] IPCP (0x8021), length 18: IPCP,
> Conf-Reject (0x04), id 7, length 18
>  > >  encoded length 16 (=Option(s) length 12)
>  > >  0x:  8021 0407 0010
>  > >Pri-NBNS Option (0x82), length 6: 0.0.0.0
>  > >  0x:   
>  > >Sec-NBNS Option (0x84), length 6: 0.0.0.0
>  > >  0x:   
>
> we don't do NBNS.
>
>  > > 14:40:27.742559 18:a9:05:db:8e:5c > d8:d3:85:c1:5e:ed, ethertype PPPoE
> S (0x8864), length 60: PPPoE  [ses 0x20] IPCP (0x8021), length 12: IPCP,
> Conf-Ack (0x02), id 1, length 12
>  > >  encoded length 10 (=Option(s) length 6)
>  > >  0x:  8021 0201 000a
>  > >IP-Addr Option (0x03), length 6: 217.65.168.254
>  > >  0x:  d

Re: Problems with 8.1, PPPoE server, and Cisco client

2010-10-26 Thread Paul Thornton
I've been taking another look at this after being dragged off onto other
things for a few days, and hopefully have some more information that
might help point in the right direction for a fix / where to debug next.

On 20/10/2010 17:16, Julian Elischer wrote:
> have you tried to connect this cisco router to anything else pppoe?
> (take it home and make it connect to your ISP for example?)

The Cisco client does work to a Cisco router acting as a PPPoE server -
I used a 891 (client) to a 3945 (server) and using an established setup
that is known to work, I collected a happy tcpdump.  Of course that
doesn't tell us why there was such an issue with the FreeBSD ppp server
and it looks very similar to me.

I'm also going to give mpd a go and see if that works - but if it tries
the same config options as pppoed then I may be straight back to where I
am now.

Thanks to everyone for their help with this.

So here is the dump from a known good setup, IOS at both ends - starting
from the CHAP success point again.  This time, both ends play the game
and agree amongst themselves what they will and won't do as expected
(many thanks to Ian here for the commentary as to what was going on in
the exchanges I have):

> 20:29:10.200860 PPPoE  [ses 0x13] CHAP, Response (0x02), id 1, Value 
> 8f917e3cd84fd4b3a5e8b705655bf16772d0cd1462392eed8bb4ab0ccb7f75bb2d01695ac26cdc07127b4fb3435a279a01,
>  Name vt123456...@vdsl01.v
> 20:29:14.501312 PPPoE  [ses 0x13] CHAP, Success (0x03), id 1, Msg 
> 20:29:14.501702 PPPoE  [ses 0x13] IPCP, Conf-Request (0x01), id 1, length 12
>   encoded length 10 (=Option(s) length 6)
>   0x:  8021 0101 000a
> IP-Addr Option (0x03), length 6: 109.71.168.123
>   0x:  6d47 a87b
> 20:29:14.504344 PPPoE  [ses 0x13] IPCP, Conf-Request (0x01), id 1, length 12
>   encoded length 10 (=Option(s) length 6)
>   0x:  8021 0101 000a
> IP-Addr Option (0x03), length 6: 0.0.0.0
>   0x:   
> 20:29:14.504497 PPPoE  [ses 0x13] unknown PPP protocol (0x8207) 
>   0x:  0101 0004
> 20:29:14.504669 PPPoE  [ses 0x13] IPCP, Conf-Ack (0x02), id 1, length 12
>   encoded length 10 (=Option(s) length 6)
>   0x:  8021 0201 000a
> IP-Addr Option (0x03), length 6: 109.71.168.123
>   0x:  6d47 a87b
> 20:29:14.505200 PPPoE  [ses 0x13] IPCP, Conf-Nack (0x03), id 1, length 12
>   encoded length 10 (=Option(s) length 6)
>   0x:  8021 0301 000a
> IP-Addr Option (0x03), length 6: 109.71.174.50
>   0x:  6d47 ae32
> 20:29:14.505290 PPPoE  [ses 0x13] LCP, Prot-Reject (0x08), id 2, length 12
>   encoded length 10 (=Option(s) length 6)
>   0x:  c021 0802 000a
> Rejected unknown Protocol (0x8207)
> Rejected Packet
>   0x:  0101 0006  
> 20:29:14.505800 PPPoE  [ses 0x13] IPCP, Conf-Request (0x01), id 2, length 12
>   encoded length 10 (=Option(s) length 6)
>   0x:  8021 0102 000a
> IP-Addr Option (0x03), length 6: 109.71.174.50
>   0x:  6d47 ae32
> 20:29:14.506753 PPPoE  [ses 0x13] IPCP, Conf-Ack (0x02), id 2, length 12
>   encoded length 10 (=Option(s) length 6)
>   0x:  8021 0202 000a
> IP-Addr Option (0x03), length 6: 109.71.174.50
>   0x:  6d47 ae32
> 20:29:23.247975 PPPoE  [ses 0x13] IP (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 35, offset 0, 
> flags [none], proto ICMP (1), length 100)
> 109.71.174.50 > 217.65.161.4: ICMP echo request, id 10, seq 0, length 80
> 20:29:23.257872 PPPoE  [ses 0x13] IP (tos 0x0, ttl 61, id 51771, offset 0, 
> flags [none], proto ICMP (1), length 100)
> 217.65.161.4 > 109.71.174.50: ICMP echo reply, id 10, seq 0, length 80

The ping here is the start of real data flowing - I used this setup for
about 30 minutes of web browsing with no problems.

Paul.

___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Problems with 8.1, PPPoE server, and Cisco client

2010-11-09 Thread Paul Thornton


On 26/10/2010 18:55, Paul Thornton wrote:
> I've been taking another look at this after being dragged off onto other
> things for a few days, and hopefully have some more information that
> might help point in the right direction for a fix / where to debug next.
>
> On 20/10/2010 17:16, Julian Elischer wrote:
>> have you tried to connect this cisco router to anything else pppoe?
>> (take it home and make it connect to your ISP for example?)
> The Cisco client does work to a Cisco router acting as a PPPoE server -
> I used a 891 (client) to a 3945 (server) and using an established setup
> that is known to work, I collected a happy tcpdump.  Of course that
> doesn't tell us why there was such an issue with the FreeBSD ppp server
> and it looks very similar to me.
>
> I'm also going to give mpd a go and see if that works - but if it tries
> the same config options as pppoed then I may be straight back to where I
> am now.
>
> Thanks to everyone for their help with this.
>
> So here is the dump from a known good setup, IOS at both ends - starting
> from the CHAP success point again.  This time, both ends play the game
> and agree amongst themselves what they will and won't do as expected
> (many thanks to Ian here for the commentary as to what was going on in
> the exchanges I have):
>
>> 20:29:10.200860 PPPoE  [ses 0x13] CHAP, Response (0x02), id 1, Value 
>> 8f917e3cd84fd4b3a5e8b705655bf16772d0cd1462392eed8bb4ab0ccb7f75bb2d01695ac26cdc07127b4fb3435a279a01,
>>  Name vt123456...@vdsl01.v
>> 20:29:14.501312 PPPoE  [ses 0x13] CHAP, Success (0x03), id 1, Msg 
>> 20:29:14.501702 PPPoE  [ses 0x13] IPCP, Conf-Request (0x01), id 1, length 12
>>  encoded length 10 (=Option(s) length 6)
>>  0x:  8021 0101 000a
>>IP-Addr Option (0x03), length 6: 109.71.168.123
>>  0x:  6d47 a87b
>> 20:29:14.504344 PPPoE  [ses 0x13] IPCP, Conf-Request (0x01), id 1, length 12
>>  encoded length 10 (=Option(s) length 6)
>>  0x:  8021 0101 000a
>>IP-Addr Option (0x03), length 6: 0.0.0.0
>>  0x:   
>> 20:29:14.504497 PPPoE  [ses 0x13] unknown PPP protocol (0x8207) 
>>  0x:  0101 0004
>> 20:29:14.504669 PPPoE  [ses 0x13] IPCP, Conf-Ack (0x02), id 1, length 12
>>  encoded length 10 (=Option(s) length 6)
>>  0x:  8021 0201 000a
>>IP-Addr Option (0x03), length 6: 109.71.168.123
>>  0x:  6d47 a87b
>> 20:29:14.505200 PPPoE  [ses 0x13] IPCP, Conf-Nack (0x03), id 1, length 12
>>  encoded length 10 (=Option(s) length 6)
>>  0x:  8021 0301 000a
>>IP-Addr Option (0x03), length 6: 109.71.174.50
>>  0x:  6d47 ae32
>> 20:29:14.505290 PPPoE  [ses 0x13] LCP, Prot-Reject (0x08), id 2, length 12
>>  encoded length 10 (=Option(s) length 6)
>>  0x:  c021 0802 000a
>>Rejected unknown Protocol (0x8207)
>>Rejected Packet
>>  0x:  0101 0006  
>> 20:29:14.505800 PPPoE  [ses 0x13] IPCP, Conf-Request (0x01), id 2, length 12
>>  encoded length 10 (=Option(s) length 6)
>>  0x:  8021 0102 000a
>>IP-Addr Option (0x03), length 6: 109.71.174.50
>>  0x:  6d47 ae32
>> 20:29:14.506753 PPPoE  [ses 0x13] IPCP, Conf-Ack (0x02), id 2, length 12
>>  encoded length 10 (=Option(s) length 6)
>>  0x:  8021 0202 000a
>>IP-Addr Option (0x03), length 6: 109.71.174.50
>>  0x:  6d47 ae32
>> 20:29:23.247975 PPPoE  [ses 0x13] IP (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 35, offset 0, 
>> flags [none], proto ICMP (1), length 100)
>> 109.71.174.50 > 217.65.161.4: ICMP echo request, id 10, seq 0, length 80
>> 20:29:23.257872 PPPoE  [ses 0x13] IP (tos 0x0, ttl 61, id 51771, offset 0, 
>> flags [none], proto ICMP (1), length 100)
>> 217.65.161.4 > 109.71.174.50: ICMP echo reply, id 10, seq 0, length 80
> The ping here is the start of real data flowing - I used this setup for
> about 30 minutes of web browsing with no problems.
>
> Paul.
>
> ___
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Problems with 8.1, PPPoE server, and Cisco client

2010-11-09 Thread Paul Thornton
Hi folks,

Keeping the list archives updated for any poor soul that has a similar
problem in future...

On 26/10/2010 18:55, Paul Thornton wrote:
> I'm also going to give mpd a go and see if that works - but if it tries
> the same config options as pppoed then I may be straight back to where I
> am now.

The verdict with mpd is exactly the same - the Cisco takes exception to
the IPCP request immediately following the successful auth, and tears
down the connection.

I'm going to take this to the Cisco TAC and see if they can suggest
anything that may be causing this as it makes no sense at all when all
other clients I try work.

Paul.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Problems with 8.1, PPPoE server, and Cisco client

2010-11-09 Thread Paul Thornton
On 09/11/2010 20:16, Paul Thornton wrote:
> 

Sorry for that unedited copy of the last mail to the list.  Finger
trouble in mail client.  Must try harder!

Paul.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Problems with 8.1, PPPoE server, and Cisco client

2010-11-09 Thread Julian Elischer

On 11/9/10 12:18 PM, Paul Thornton wrote:

Hi folks,

Keeping the list archives updated for any poor soul that has a similar
problem in future...

On 26/10/2010 18:55, Paul Thornton wrote:

I'm also going to give mpd a go and see if that works - but if it tries
the same config options as pppoed then I may be straight back to where I
am now.

The verdict with mpd is exactly the same - the Cisco takes exception to
the IPCP request immediately following the successful auth, and tears
down the connection.

I'm going to take this to the Cisco TAC and see if they can suggest
anything that may be causing this as it makes no sense at all when all
other clients I try work.


take especial care with netmasks and network definitions if you have any


Paul.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"



___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Problems with 8.1, PPPoE server, and Cisco client

2010-11-18 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb

On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Paul Thornton wrote:


Hi folks,

Keeping the list archives updated for any poor soul that has a similar
problem in future...

On 26/10/2010 18:55, Paul Thornton wrote:

I'm also going to give mpd a go and see if that works - but if it tries
the same config options as pppoed then I may be straight back to where I
am now.


The verdict with mpd is exactly the same - the Cisco takes exception to
the IPCP request immediately following the successful auth, and tears
down the connection.

I'm going to take this to the Cisco TAC and see if they can suggest
anything that may be causing this as it makes no sense at all when all
other clients I try work.


Unfortunately I have never seen the full ppp debug log I had initially
asked for.  Can't help without that.  It would tell you why it didn't
work.

/bz

--
Bjoern A. Zeeb  Welcome a new stage of life.
 Going to jail sucks --  All my daemons like it!
  http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"