Re: Usage of IFQ_DEQUEUE vs IFQ_DRV_DEQUEUE
On 8/24/11 11:42 AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: > On 24 August 2011 22:12, Patrick Mahan wrote: >> Can somebody confirm my assumption on the following: >> >> If I am supporting ALTQ in a driver, then I should use the >> IFQ_DRV_DEQUEUE() macro. If I am not supporting ALTQ then >> it is okay IFQ_DEQUEUE() macro? If not what's the difference? >> >> Slightly confused... >> > > Just in case, have you read man 9 altq? It has a good description of > these macros. > Sergey, That is exactly what I was looking for. Don't know how I missed that (sometimes get caught up in looking at the source) Thanks, Patrick ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Usage of IFQ_DEQUEUE vs IFQ_DRV_DEQUEUE
On 24 August 2011 22:12, Patrick Mahan wrote: > Can somebody confirm my assumption on the following: > > If I am supporting ALTQ in a driver, then I should use the > IFQ_DRV_DEQUEUE() macro. If I am not supporting ALTQ then > it is okay IFQ_DEQUEUE() macro? If not what's the difference? > > Slightly confused... > Just in case, have you read man 9 altq? It has a good description of these macros. -- wbr, pluknet ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Usage of IFQ_DEQUEUE vs IFQ_DRV_DEQUEUE
Can somebody confirm my assumption on the following: If I am supporting ALTQ in a driver, then I should use the IFQ_DRV_DEQUEUE() macro. If I am not supporting ALTQ then it is okay IFQ_DEQUEUE() macro? If not what's the difference? Slightly confused... Thanks, Patrick ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
