Current unassigned ports problem reports
Current FreeBSD problem reports The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Bugs can be in one of several states: o - open A problem report has been submitted, no sanity checking performed. a - analyzed The problem is understood and a solution is being sought. f - feedback Further work requires additional information from the originator or the community - possibly confirmation of the effectiveness of a proposed solution. p - patched A patch has been committed, but some issues (MFC and / or confirmation from originator) are still open. r - repocopy The resolution of the problem report is dependent on a repocopy operation within the CVS repository which is awaiting completion. s - suspended The problem is not being worked on, due to lack of information or resources. This is a prime candidate for somebody who is looking for a project to do. If the problem cannot be solved at all, it will be closed, rather than suspended. c - closed A problem report is closed when any changes have been integrated, documented, and tested -- or when fixing the problem is abandoned. Critical problems Serious problems S Tracker Resp. Description s ports/52079 vmware3 hangs when nmdm(4) is used as COM1 device o ports/72149 [PATCH] heimdal with LDAP backend - bad slapd socket p f ports/90399 vmware2 port not working on FreeBSD 6.0 f ports/92706 vmware3 panic on 6.0-RELEASE o ports/94044 emulators/vmware2: running $PREFIX/etc/rc.d/vmware.sh o ports/94894 multimedia/fxtv causes freeze and reboot on DGA failur o ports/95081 Problem with enabling logwtmp on POPtop o ports/95492 repocopy request: math/vtk-headers to math/vtk43-heade f ports/98893 cc error at -O2 on amd64/6-STABLE compiling port ucspi o ports/99286 ruby-ldap broken on amd64 s ports/99466 GPA fails to sign newly imported GPG key (GPGME libra s ports/99518 security/gpa crashes when attempting to encrypt multip s ports/99623 ksh93 dumps core on FBSD 6.1 o ports/100024Port mail/drac coredumps on runtime if compiled for ex o ports/100067New port: devel/gdb65 GNU GDB 6.5 o ports/100358sysutils/portmanager: OpenOffice.org 2.0 Requires Conf f ports/100501squid rc.d script should set the pidfile o ports/100582x11-toolkits/xview's msgfmt conflicts with devel/gette o ports/100748www/oscommerce: fix some dependences o ports/102005[maintainer] sysutils/fvcool f ports/102179ipsec-tools won't compile on RELENG_6 f ports/102272net-mgmt/arpscan has unnoted runtime dependency on lib o ports/102427Apache 2.0.59 with www/mod_python3 core dumped f ports/102462gallery and squirrelmail falsely determine php not ava f ports/102629devel/icu TestOtherAPI failed. f ports/102641lookupd_ldap not compiling on FreeBSD 6.1 f ports/102651[patch] New command-line option for jabberd port start o ports/102765New port: multimedia/pvrxxx. A patched version of pvr2 o ports/102809x11-fm/evidence do not build on AMD64. o ports/102817Update ImageMagick to 6.2.9-3 30 problems total. Non-critical problems S Tracker Resp. Description s ports/57502 ports that define USE_* too late s ports/59254 ports that write something after bsd.port.mk s ports/65794 net/ripetools is obsolete s ports/67815 graphics/ImageMagick no longer recognizes FlashPix p ports/76116 PORT UPDATE: graphics/lcms (with PATCH) o ports/76695 RPM complaints on installation of linux_base-rh-9 o ports/82634 heimdal port conflict with base heimdal s ports/84819 [MAINTAINER] math/coq: enable on ia64 s ports/86401 new ports multimedia/zapping f ports/87204 [UPDATE PATCH] net/coda6_server dependencies port up s ports/88900 www/flashplugin-mozilla causes Firefox to crash o ports/89097 security/dsniff does not build when net/libpcap is ins o ports/89098 security/dsniff does not build f ports/92133 [PATCH] comms/spandsp: 0.0.2p22 fixes various bugs. o ports/92651 graphics/gmt - WITH_EVERYTHING doesn't fetch f ports/92755 databases/slony1: Add ability to run slon as a differe f ports/93318 New port: x11-toolkits/swt32, Eclipse SWT 3.2M4 Suppor f ports/94016 new port mail/contactsmenu o ports/94074
intrested in maintaining a sane C++ wrapper for MySQL port ?
Hi, I own a PR for a new port PR which the submitter doesn't want to maintain it. If you are interested please drop me an email. I will close the PR in a few days if nobody wants the port. ports/97275 : New port: databases/mysqlwrapped, sane C++ wrapper for MySQL: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/97275 Thanks, -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable as Intellect Love sometimes expresses itself in sacrifice. -- Kirk, Metamorphosis, stardate 3220.3 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
portmaster deletes failed ports
Hi, I ran my approx. daily portmaster -a -d run this morning. It started upgrading sysutils/bsdstats, but failed because pkg-install was not present. When that file got committed later this morning, portmaster didn't upgrade the port because ... (huh ?) ... bsdstats was not installed anymore. Just reinstalling bsdstats solved it, but this can be problematic if some heavily dependent-on port fails and gets erased. Regards, Rene -- GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6 (subkeys.pgp.net) It won't fit on the line. -- me, 2001 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: World-writable files installed by ports
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 08:48:26PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: On 9/1/06, Andrew Pantyukhin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/1/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 10:19:24AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 06:15:18PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: Under no circumstances should a port install world-writable files or directories. In most cases this opens the system to all kinds of attacks. A simple grep brings the following list of makefiles to attention. I imagine that samba ports are somehow justified, as for the other ones, I hope secteam and committers will do something about them. The install process will warn about this (as well as group writable), so you can also grep for the warning message in the pointyhat logs. Here's the list of world-writable from the last i386 6.x build: Thanks, Kris! I'll be working on patches for some of them this weekend. Actually... I wonder if maintainers were already notified about this. I prefer to send out mass mail, wait for a little while and go fix some of the ports. Generating individual patches is a bit overstrenuous for me. I haven't notified them. Most of those files are harmless though (score files for games). All of the pips* ones probably have a common source too. Kris pgpAb2LiUfq1g.pgp Description: PGP signature
can't install gaim from port
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 at the time of compiling gaim, my pc is rebooter for physical problem. After reboot i had to run fsck manuly. Then i tried again. BUt now getting some error messege at the time of run make in /usr/port/net-im/gaim gmake[4]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net-im/gaim/work/gaim-1.5.0/src/protocol s/jabber' Making all in msn gmake[4]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/net-im/gaim/work/gaim-1.5.0/src/protoco ls/msn' .deps/servconn.Plo:1: *** missing separator. Stop. gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net-im/gaim/work/gaim-1.5.0/src/protocol s/msn' gmake[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net-im/gaim/work/gaim-1.5.0/src/protocol s' gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net-im/gaim/work/gaim-1.5.0/src' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net-im/gaim/work/gaim-1.5.0' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/net-im/gaim. [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net-im/gaim]# How can i solve this /? - -- S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu) Home page: http://lavluda.tripod.com Blog: http://lavluda.tk Yahoo!! ID: lavluda MSN ID: lavluda Skype : lavluda -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE/GF1zpD0S6mRD54RAqLCAJ9pYTjpofgpML2jUtlxolq/XTQYWgCg3OhA tHXmYf22BvAXg5gYxDomuk4= =stXT -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: World-writable files installed by ports
On 9/4/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 08:48:26PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: On 9/1/06, Andrew Pantyukhin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/1/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 10:19:24AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 06:15:18PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: Under no circumstances should a port install world-writable files or directories. In most cases this opens the system to all kinds of attacks. A simple grep brings the following list of makefiles to attention. I imagine that samba ports are somehow justified, as for the other ones, I hope secteam and committers will do something about them. The install process will warn about this (as well as group writable), so you can also grep for the warning message in the pointyhat logs. Here's the list of world-writable from the last i386 6.x build: Thanks, Kris! I'll be working on patches for some of them this weekend. Actually... I wonder if maintainers were already notified about this. I prefer to send out mass mail, wait for a little while and go fix some of the ports. Generating individual patches is a bit overstrenuous for me. I haven't notified them. Most of those files are harmless though (score files for games). All of the pips* ones probably have a common source too. Well, a most innocent world-writable file can bring a system down. While that would require a combimation of other unfortunate circumstances, I believe an attempt to eliminate one factor is not a lost effort. BTW, I wonder why www/phpmyfaq is not in your list. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thunar and Xfce-4.4
Hi! Im new at the list and I would like to know why arent Thunar and Xfce-4.4 in the FreeBSD's ports tree. Is there any reason? I would do the ports myself but I am almost newbie at FreeBSD so Im afraid that I dont know how. Anybody can? Thank you. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: World-writable files installed by ports
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 09:35:03PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: On 9/4/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 08:48:26PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: On 9/1/06, Andrew Pantyukhin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/1/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 10:19:24AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 06:15:18PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: Under no circumstances should a port install world-writable files or directories. In most cases this opens the system to all kinds of attacks. A simple grep brings the following list of makefiles to attention. I imagine that samba ports are somehow justified, as for the other ones, I hope secteam and committers will do something about them. The install process will warn about this (as well as group writable), so you can also grep for the warning message in the pointyhat logs. Here's the list of world-writable from the last i386 6.x build: Thanks, Kris! I'll be working on patches for some of them this weekend. Actually... I wonder if maintainers were already notified about this. I prefer to send out mass mail, wait for a little while and go fix some of the ports. Generating individual patches is a bit overstrenuous for me. I haven't notified them. Most of those files are harmless though (score files for games). All of the pips* ones probably have a common source too. Well, a most innocent world-writable file can bring a system down. While that would require a combimation of other unfortunate circumstances, I believe an attempt to eliminate one factor is not a lost effort. BTW, I wonder why www/phpmyfaq is not in your list. What a+w file does it install? Kris pgpcnxQt7hBhe.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: World-writable files installed by ports
On 9/4/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 09:35:03PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: On 9/4/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 08:48:26PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: On 9/1/06, Andrew Pantyukhin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/1/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 10:19:24AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 06:15:18PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: Under no circumstances should a port install world-writable files or directories. In most cases this opens the system to all kinds of attacks. A simple grep brings the following list of makefiles to attention. I imagine that samba ports are somehow justified, as for the other ones, I hope secteam and committers will do something about them. The install process will warn about this (as well as group writable), so you can also grep for the warning message in the pointyhat logs. Here's the list of world-writable from the last i386 6.x build: Thanks, Kris! I'll be working on patches for some of them this weekend. Actually... I wonder if maintainers were already notified about this. I prefer to send out mass mail, wait for a little while and go fix some of the ports. Generating individual patches is a bit overstrenuous for me. I haven't notified them. Most of those files are harmless though (score files for games). All of the pips* ones probably have a common source too. Well, a most innocent world-writable file can bring a system down. While that would require a combimation of other unfortunate circumstances, I believe an attempt to eliminate one factor is not a lost effort. BTW, I wonder why www/phpmyfaq is not in your list. What a+w file does it install? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ find /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq -perm -a+w /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq/inc /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq/images /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq/attachments /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq/data /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq/pdf /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq/xml [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ find /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq -perm -a+w | xargs ls -ld drwxrwxrwx 2 www www 512 Sep 4 22:19 /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq/attachments drwxrwxrwx 2 www www 512 Sep 4 22:19 /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq/data drwxrwxrwx 2 www www 512 Sep 4 22:19 /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq/images drwxrwxrwx 2 www www 1024 Sep 4 22:19 /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq/inc drwxrwxrwx 2 www www 512 Sep 4 22:19 /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq/pdf drwxrwxrwx 2 www www 512 Sep 4 22:19 /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq/xml ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Thunar and Xfce-4.4
Nadow wrote: Hi! Im new at the list and I would like to know why arent Thunar and Xfce-4.4 in the FreeBSD's ports tree. Is there any reason? I would do the ports myself but I am almost newbie at FreeBSD so Im afraid that I dont know how. Anybody can? Thank you. There is a patchset for xfce4.4 which is right now being reworked for rc1. It is not in the tree because xfce 4.4 isn't released yet. -- Oliver Lehmann http://www.pofo.de/ http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: World-writable files installed by ports
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 10:25:09PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: BTW, I wonder why www/phpmyfaq is not in your list. What a+w file does it install? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ find /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq -perm -a+w /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq/inc /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq/images /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq/attachments /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq/data /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq/pdf /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq/xml [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ find /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq -perm -a+w | xargs ls -ld drwxrwxrwx 2 www www 512 Sep 4 22:19 /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq/attachments drwxrwxrwx 2 www www 512 Sep 4 22:19 /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq/data drwxrwxrwx 2 www www 512 Sep 4 22:19 /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq/images drwxrwxrwx 2 www www 1024 Sep 4 22:19 /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq/inc drwxrwxrwx 2 www www 512 Sep 4 22:19 /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq/pdf drwxrwxrwx 2 www www 512 Sep 4 22:19 /usr/local/www/phpmyfaq/xml Hmm, I wonder if the security-check target is broken with plist substitutions. Kris pgpC7cavL6XOD.pgp Description: PGP signature
gnu-automake and libtool.m4
I have a problem using automake/autoconf under /usr/local/gnu-autotools with a certain software project (not a port) and it seems that there is a problem with expanding AC_PROG_LIBTOOL macro in configure.ac. I have very limited experience with gnu autotools, but I think that libtool.m4 needs to be found for that macro to be understood. I have one libtool.m4 in /usr/local/share/aclocal/ and there is no libtool.m4 in /usr/local/gnu-autotools/share/aclocal-1.9. Is that the problem ? -- Andriy Gapon ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kbtv application: I'm looking for someone who wants to take over maintainership/development
FYI: Kbtv is a small TV app for FreeBSD/KDE. It works with Brooktree/Conexant and with Philips SAA713x based analog TV cards (I actually recommend using the latter). AFAIK, it is the only properly working app that uses SAA (and unlike bktr, saa never freezes or panics). Also supports webcams that work with the pwcbsd driver. The tarball and some blahblah are now hosted at sourceforge (also still at my website). I also put a recruitment message on SF: http://sourceforge.net/people/viewjob.php?group_id=176370job_id=26247 I want to withdraw from this project, and would love to pass it on to one or more people who are interested in this kind of app, rather than just abandoning it. There is a port for it as well, it would seem logical to hand over maintainership to that as well. It is in a good working state. SF project page for kbtv: http://sourceforge.net/projects/kbtv My web page for kbtv: http://freebsd.ricin.com/kbtv Relevant buzzwords: Python, PyKDE, SWIG, SDL, C, bktr, saa, pwc If interested, let me know. I will gladly help you to get started. I crossposted to have maximum exposure, if replying and CC'ing mailing list, please CC to multimedia@ only. Cheers, Dan ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fwd: Thunar and Xfce-4.4
Nadow wrote: Excuse my ignorance but, Cant be beta or RC versions of programs in the ports tree?. You know, like enlighteenment-0.17 which has been (and It is still) a beta for 5 years and it is in the ports tree as enlightenment-0.16.999.0.2 Thank you for your time Problem here is that right now there are 47 ports I've changed or added for xfce 4.4 (rc, beta). And I find it kinda bloated to duplicate each of those ports to create a -devel version. Think about it, this would include every xfce component and plugin and so on... I like it more the way gnome folks are doing it by only checking in final releases, and providing the in between states online as I do... http://people.freebsd.org/~oliver/xfce/ Right now, as mentioned, I'm working on a rc1 patchset/shar archive and I'll post the link here as I did it since xfce 4.0 was beta -- Oliver Lehmann http://www.pofo.de/ http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Thunar and Xfce-4.4
Oliver Lehmann schreef: There is a patchset for xfce4.4 which is right now being reworked for rc1. It is not in the tree because xfce 4.4 isn't released yet. Just curious, will xfce4.4 install in LOCALBASE ? Regards, Rene -- GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6 (subkeys.pgp.net) It won't fit on the line. -- me, 2001 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Thunar and Xfce-4.4
Rene Ladan wrote: Oliver Lehmann schreef: There is a patchset for xfce4.4 which is right now being reworked for rc1. It is not in the tree because xfce 4.4 isn't released yet. Just curious, will xfce4.4 install in LOCALBASE ? Right now, I'm not planning to do it, but I'm open (as in I don't really care ;) for suggestions. But please no new LOCALBASE - X11BASE bikeshed here... -- Oliver Lehmann http://www.pofo.de/ http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Thunar and Xfce-4.4
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 22:21 +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote: Rene Ladan wrote: Oliver Lehmann schreef: There is a patchset for xfce4.4 which is right now being reworked for rc1. It is not in the tree because xfce 4.4 isn't released yet. Just curious, will xfce4.4 install in LOCALBASE ? Right now, I'm not planning to do it, but I'm open (as in I don't really care ;) for suggestions. But please no new LOCALBASE - X11BASE bikeshed here... FYI, GNOME 2.16 will install into LOCALBASE. This includes gtk20, so all GTK+ modules and themes will also need to install into LOCALBASE. That said, I'm not sure how this will affect Xfce (if at all). Joe -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Odd distfile download
On Sunday 03 September 2006 02:21, Loren M. Lang wrote: I have a port I am writing which uses an unusual way of distributing tarballs. The only download for official sources that I can tell is through their web source control interface. They have a URL which provides a tarball of a tagged version from their source control software. The URL is http://new.openspf.org/source/software/sendmail-spf-milter/tags/1.42.1.tar. gz?view=tar This causes fetch and wget to save the file as 1.42.1.tar.gz?view=tar, but netscape removes the ?view=tar. Just out of curiosity I ran fetch http://new.openspf.org/source/software/sendmail-spf-milter/tags/1.42.1.tar.gz; and it fetches the same file without using the ?view=tar part. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portmaster deletes failed ports
RW schreef: On Monday 04 September 2006 16:15, Rene Ladan wrote: Hi, I ran my approx. daily portmaster -a -d run this morning. It started upgrading sysutils/bsdstats, but failed because pkg-install was not present. When that file got committed later this morning, portmaster didn't upgrade the port because ... (huh ?) ... bsdstats was not installed anymore. The old version of a package must be deleted before a new one can be installed. Build tools like port[upgrade|manager|master] create a backup package file from the existing installed files, which is supposed to be reinstalled, if the port install fails. I forgot to mention in my original mail that I did: # portsnap fetch update # portmaster -a -d (build failed, pkg deleted) (...) (read mail about bsdstats being fixed) # portsnap fetch update # portmaster -a -d You're seeing a bug rather than a missing feature. I know. Regards, Rene -- GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6 (subkeys.pgp.net) It won't fit on the line. -- me, 2001 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gnu-automake and libtool.m4
On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:45:18 +0300 Andriy Gapon [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned: I have a problem using automake/autoconf under /usr/local/gnu-autotools with a certain software project (not a port) and it seems that there is a problem with expanding AC_PROG_LIBTOOL macro in configure.ac. I have very limited experience with gnu autotools, but I think that libtool.m4 needs to be found for that macro to be understood. I have one libtool.m4 in /usr/local/share/aclocal/ and there is no libtool.m4 in /usr/local/gnu-autotools/share/aclocal-1.9. Is that the problem ? Yes, you should provide -I usr/local/share/aclocal argument to aclocal. For autoreconf you can do this by defining env. ACLOCAL variable. /usr/local/gnu-autotools/share/aclocal-1.9 is used only to store stock .m4 files for autoconf/automake, while /usr/local/share/aclocal contains all .m4 file external apps installs, e.g. xmms, pkgconfig, guile and, of course, libtool. -- Stanislav Sedov MBSD labs, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Россия, Москва http://mbsd.msk.ru If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts. -- A. Einstein PGP fingerprint: F21E D6CC 5626 9609 6CE2 A385 2BF5 5993 EB26 9581 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Samba upgrade, users cannot connect
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 03:45:20PM -0400, Lee Dilkie wrote: Anyway, I cannot connect to a share anymore. Correction. I can connect to a share that has users = somelogonid but connecting to a share that has users = @agroup fails. Samba seems to be deteriorating with each release. I'm not sure how much is a Samba issue and how much is a FreeBSD ports issue. Here's my current set of workarounds in rough chronological order of when I started using them. You may want to give some of them a try in your samba config and see if it helps... I'd try the fam change notify = no first since you mentioned FAM errors, but it doesn't sound like the same symptoms that I had. I see that the 3.0.23c commit message mentions something about changes to valid users, so I suspect I may have to add yet another workaround when I upgrade to it. Craig -- smb.conf -- # (circa 2004) # Something broke with oplocks between Samba 2.x and Samba 3.x # Anything that uses Installshield will fail to install from a samba # share, dying with a cryptic error message. Use with caution on # readwrite shares fake oplocks = yes locking = no # 8/16/2006 # Samba uses FAM now, but it's broken. Lots of errors about being # unable to launch gamin and long delays connecting to shares. Polling # works good enough, just shut it off. fam change notify = no # 8/28/2006 # Apparently Samba now defaults everything to being a DFS root whether # you're using DFS or not. Software installs via group policy # mysteriously fail claiming they're unable to find the source when the # installation source is a DFS root. Revert to previous default. host msdfs = no ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Samba upgrade, users cannot connect
On Sunday 03 September 2006 07:45, Lee Dilkie wrote: Hi Folks, This one has got me a bit stumped. I just upgrade my samba (3) in ports. It was minor upgrade (version letter bumped to 'b.1'). Anyway, I cannot connect to a share anymore. Correction. I can connect to a share that has users = somelogonid but connecting to a share that has users = @agroup fails. The user keeps getting prompted with a password. Nothing in the logs except FAM file change notifications not available but that log is issued for both cases. The logs for the specific machine show the success of connecting to the first (user specified) share but no log at all for the second (group specified). Ideas anyone? This was working great before the upgrade (and I didn't see anything special in UPDATING). thanks, -lee The location of the smbpasswd file has changed from /usr/local/private to /usr/local/etc/samba. Tom Munro Glass ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portmaster deletes failed ports
On Monday 04 September 2006 22:05, Rene Ladan wrote: RW schreef: On Monday 04 September 2006 16:15, Rene Ladan wrote: Hi, I ran my approx. daily portmaster -a -d run this morning. It started upgrading sysutils/bsdstats, but failed because pkg-install was not present. When that file got committed later this morning, portmaster didn't upgrade the port because ... (huh ?) ... bsdstats was not installed anymore. The old version of a package must be deleted before a new one can be installed. Build tools like port[upgrade|manager|master] create a backup package file from the existing installed files, which is supposed to be reinstalled, if the port install fails. I forgot to mention in my original mail that I did: # portsnap fetch update # portmaster -a -d (build failed, pkg deleted) (...) (read mail about bsdstats being fixed) # portsnap fetch update # portmaster -a -d You're seeing a bug rather than a missing feature. I know. I don't use portmaster myself, but I just took a look at the script and, unless I'm missing something, it does appear that this feature is missing from portmaster. There an option to create backup packages, but nothing to automatically restore the previous version if the install fails. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
