Re: Ethereal not listed
Carlos Ramirez wrote: > Why Ethereal is not in the ports list? It has been renamed to wireshark: http://www.freshports.org/net/wireshark/ -- Armin Pirkovitsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: Ethereal not listed
Thank you very much -Original Message- From: Spadge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Miércoles, 04 de Octubre de 2006 05:20 p.m. To: Carlos Ramirez Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Ethereal not listed Carlos Ramirez wrote: > Hi.- > > > > Why Ethereal is not in the ports list? > > > > How can I install it? > > > > Thankz port moved to net/wireshark on 2006-07-17 REASON: Project name has changed http://www.freshports.org/net/ethereal and ... http://www.freshports.org/net/wireshark/ -- Spadge "Intoccabile" www.fromley.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
FreeBSD Port: python-2.5.c2
Any ETA on when python-2.5 final will be part of the ports tree? Thanks, Dan Allen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
arpwatch and arpwatch-devel
Hello. arpwatch 2.1.a15_3 arpwatch-devel 2.1.a13_1 Is there a sense in arpwatch-devel port? -- WBR ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Ethereal not listed
Carlos Ramirez wrote: Hi.- Why Ethereal is not in the ports list? How can I install it? Thankz port moved to net/wireshark on 2006-07-17 REASON: Project name has changed http://www.freshports.org/net/ethereal and ... http://www.freshports.org/net/wireshark/ -- Spadge "Intoccabile" www.fromley.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Ethereal not listed
Hi.- Why Ethereal is not in the ports list? How can I install it? Thankz ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: [asterisk-dev] autoconf issues for FreeBSD]
any autoconf guru here who can help me with the problem described below ?
basically, what is the proper way to tell configure.ac to set CPPFLAGS
and LDFLAGS properly (i.e. according to platform conventions) without
having to put platform-specific code in configure.ac or invoking
./configure with these values set ?
I suppose the problem is common to many ports...
cheers
luigi
- Forwarded message from Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 12:32:23 -0700
From: Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [asterisk-dev] autoconf issues for FreeBSD
To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List
Looking in more detail at autoconf issues with asterisk on FreeBSD
(but i believe the problem is more general) i noticed that several
tests fail because /usr/local and /usr/local/include are not in the
compiler/linker flags.
I added such defines to configure.ac for FreeBSD, but they were
removed in svn 40335 (i am not sure why).
http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk/trunk/configure.ac?r1=40335&r2=40722
I am pretty sure that the code below (which was my patch at the time)
is NOT a proper fix - i would expect autoconf to deal with platform issues
without having us deal with them on each and every port.
On the other hand, i am no autoconf expert so i don't have better ideas,
so unless someone steps in with a better solution i'd be inclined to put
it back into SVN.
suggestions anyone ?
cheers
luigi
Index: configure.ac
===
--- configure.ac(revision 44374)
+++ configure.ac(working copy)
@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@
case "${host_os}" in
freebsd*)
ac_default_prefix=/usr/local
+ CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include
+ LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib
;;
*)
ac_default_prefix=/usr
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
- End forwarded message -
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: irssi doesn't build with the new perl (Still)
On 10/3/06, Anton Berezin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If this does not help you right away, it should at least help you to debug the problem further: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?id=A025299E-A85E-4455-B902-1C96091CDA75%40deniau.org&db=mid For what it worth, it does not appear to be a problem related to perl. \Anton. -- Indeed, rebuilding glib-2 does fix it! Thanks much. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ruby18 won't install, gets stuck in 'sread'
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:53:45PM +0200, Jacques S. wrote: > The problem I have now is that I cannot get the latest Ruby18 port will > not install in one of the FreeBSD systems I look after. After an > otherwise apparently normal make and make install, process ruby18 stalls > at "Generating RI" in "sread" state, thrashing the hd or paging memory > in an apparently endless I/O loop. > Under top, swap stats are: > Swap: 512M Total, 126M Used, 386M Free, 24% Inuse, with In and Out > changing like crazy. > > Computer in question is a very old box: (i386/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron) > with very little memory. FreeBSD is version 5.5p8 > > From archives, Google, etc., it appears others sometimes have this > problem--process stalled in 'sread' state--but I didn't find anywhere an > explanation of the problem or a solution. "sread" (actually I think you meant "swread") means "reading from swap". You're trying to run an application which is too big to fit in RAM, so your computer grinds to a halt trying to swap bits in and out to disk. Kris pgpu6PPGLU2DH.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Incredibly slow mirror site
--On Wednesday, October 04, 2006 10:29:33 +0100 Florent Thoumie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The problem i think is that many ports with multiple mirrors will use mirrors from 3rd world countries first, and the mirrors with real bandwidth will always be last on the list. Can anyone explain to me why that is? Doesn't it make more sense to try the fastest one first? Belgium == Third world? Now that's new :-) I don't know about that, but that site is unbelieveably slow, and it appears to be the first choice for all kde downloads. I'm thinking there must be something wrong, because kde upgrades have worked fine in the past. I wonder if there's a way to add code to the ports stuff that checks download speed and aborts if it's below some configurable number and tries the next site in the list? Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
Re: ruby18 won't install, gets stuck in 'sread'
VANHULLEBUS Yvan writes: > I recently (a few days ago) sent a pr about a problem with ruby: > it uses *lots* of RAM to generate some "RDOC" during install, and > it will cause some memory problems with old computers. Would it be advantageous to divide things into "ruby" and "ruby-doc"? Robert Huff ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ruby18 won't install, gets stuck in 'sread'
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:53:45PM +0200, Jacques S. wrote: > The problem I have now is that I cannot get the latest Ruby18 port will > not install in one of the FreeBSD systems I look after. After an > otherwise apparently normal make and make install, process ruby18 stalls > at "Generating RI" in "sread" state, thrashing the hd or paging memory > in an apparently endless I/O loop. > Under top, swap stats are: > Swap: 512M Total, 126M Used, 386M Free, 24% Inuse, with In and Out > changing like crazy. > > Computer in question is a very old box: (i386/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron) > with very little memory. FreeBSD is version 5.5p8 Hi. I recently (a few days ago) sent a pr about a problem with ruby: it uses *lots* of RAM to generate some "RDOC" during install, and it will cause some memory problems with old computers. Stanislav Sedov commited this week a new version of the port which has an option to disable doc generation, and now ruby installs quickly on small computers. Yvan. -- NETASQ http://www.netasq.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ruby18 won't install, gets stuck in 'sread'
The problem I have now is that I cannot get the latest Ruby18 port will not install in one of the FreeBSD systems I look after. After an otherwise apparently normal make and make install, process ruby18 stalls at "Generating RI" in "sread" state, thrashing the hd or paging memory in an apparently endless I/O loop. Under top, swap stats are: Swap: 512M Total, 126M Used, 386M Free, 24% Inuse, with In and Out changing like crazy. Computer in question is a very old box: (i386/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron) with very little memory. FreeBSD is version 5.5p8 From archives, Google, etc., it appears others sometimes have this problem--process stalled in 'sread' state--but I didn't find anywhere an explanation of the problem or a solution. Maybe someone here at freebsd-ports can help? I hope so. Thanks. -- Jacques "You can't always get what you want." - Mick Jagger ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Incredibly slow mirror site
On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 19:52 -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: > Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 05:48:11PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: > > > >> I'm building kde3 from ports, and the koffice install attempts to download > >> the tar.bz2 file from ftp.scarlet.be. The download is about 2 BYTES per > >> second! > >> > >> I stopped the download and fetched the file from somewhere else. > >> > >> Maybe someone should check that site? > >> > >> Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > >> Adjunct Information Security Officer > >> The University of Texas at Dallas > >> http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ > >> > > > > I can confirm this. Passive vs. active FTP doesn't matter either. > > Would the owner of this mirror please take ownership? > > > > > > The problem i think is that many ports with multiple mirrors will use > mirrors from 3rd world countries first, and the mirrors with real > bandwidth will always be last on the list. Can anyone explain to me why > that is? Doesn't it make more sense to try the fastest one first? Belgium == Third world? Now that's new :-) -- Florent Thoumie [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD Committer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
