Help with new llvm-gcc4 port
Hi there, The LLVM project (http://llvm.org/) is currently in 1.9 prerelease. FreeBSD currently has a devel/llvm port, maintained by Hye-Shik Chang (perky@) (CC'd), but this port installs a "tools-only" LLVM. LLVM is much more useful in conjunction with llvm-gcc4 (GCC 4.0.1 acting as a front-end to LLVM), but the process of building llvm-gcc4 from source is a little bit hairy. I've given it my best: http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm-gcc4-1.9-r4.tar.bz2 (4KB) Unfortunately, my ports-fu is weak and I'm sure I've done some really horrible things in that Makefile (I have tried to clearly mark them with FIXMEs). It'd be really nice if someone with more ports experience could help me polish this port and get it into the ports tree sometime after 1.9 release comes out. -=- More details (duplicated in a big comment in the Makefile): The process for building LLVM with the gcc4 frontend is roughly: 1. Build a tools-only LLVM and don't install it, just leave the object dirs there. 2. Configure llvm-gcc4 against the results of the previous step and build. 3. Install llvm-gcc4. 4. Re-configure LLVM so that it finds the now-installed llvm-gcc binary, build and install LLVM. Hye-Shik and I think a good way to handle this would be to have two ports: * devel/llvm-gcc4 port does #1 through #3 (maybe it should be *lang*/llvm-gcc4?) * devel/llvm port depends on llvm-gcc4 and does #4 We could add a CONFIG knob to the devel/llvm port to let the user choose whether to build a tools-only LLVM or one with a full-blown cfrontend. I don't think this would entail anything more than a dependency in the port Makefile for llvm: building llvm after llvm-gcc4 is installed --Emil ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Ports with a broken PKGORIGIN: textproc/py-lucene
** The following ports have an incorrect PKGORIGIN ** PKGORIGIN connects packaged or installed ports to the directory they originated from. This is essential for tools like pkg_version or portupgrade to work correctly. Wrong PKGORIGINs are often caused by a wrong order of CATEGORIES after a repocopy. Please fix any errors as soon as possible. - *textproc/py-lucene* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: devel/py-lucene | revision 1.3 | date: 2006/11/07 15:37:00; author: laszlof; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1 | Update my email address in all ports that I maintain. | | Approved by: flz (mentor) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Building Mailman w/ Qmail
Rachel Florentine escreveu: 76Hi; I went to install the port of Mailman and got presented with a screen asking me to select if I was going to build this with: 1) Sendmail 2) emix3 3) emix4 4) postfix 5) a chinese mailing list 6) htdig integration packages Huh? Where's qmail? TIA, Rachel Hi, If you it will be using the vpopmail with the qmail is enough to edit the Makefile of port of mailman in 0 variable MAIL_GID? = to place 89, representing the vpopmail. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Building Mailman w/ Qmail
- Original Message From: Márcio Luciano Donada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > If you it will be using the vpopmail with the qmail is enough to edit > the Makefile of port of mailman in 0 variable MAIL_GID? = to place 89, > representing the vpopmail. Okay, done that, but the screen comes up again. Should I just accept "Sendmail" and move on? TIA, Rachel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: OS-BS replacement
In response to Arnold Shade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > In the /tools directory of all FreeBSD distribution there is an old > program named OS-BS written by Thomas Wolfram. It is a multi-OS boot > loader for MBR (there are two versions: osbs135.exe and osbsbeta.exe) > It is rather old, works only under DOS, does not support 1024 cylinders > boundary limitation, partitions hiding, etc.. Moreover os-bs has been > evolved into commercial SystemSelector so it is no longer maintained by > Thomas. However at the time being I continue the development of os-bs > under the name "mbldr", see: > > http://mbldr.sourceforge.net/ > > It is under BSD license, has many cool features, ported under Linux, > BSD and Windows, supports extended partitions, etc. I would like to > suggest replacing os-bs with the mbldr at some point for FreeBSD > distribution if it is acceptable. Could someone recommend me who I > should contact (or what mailing list should I use) to discuss this > opportunity? I've copied [EMAIL PROTECTED], but I doubt there's any need to discuss this at length. I recommend doing the following: 1) Read the FreeBSD Porters Handbook: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/ 2) Create a port for your program. 3) Submit a PR based on the guidelines in #1, be sure to note in the PR that this port supersedes the old os-bs port, so the committer can do the right thing. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Ports with a broken PKGORIGIN: textproc/py-lucene
** The following ports have an incorrect PKGORIGIN ** PKGORIGIN connects packaged or installed ports to the directory they originated from. This is essential for tools like pkg_version or portupgrade to work correctly. Wrong PKGORIGINs are often caused by a wrong order of CATEGORIES after a repocopy. Please fix any errors as soon as possible. - *textproc/py-lucene* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: devel/py-lucene | revision 1.3 | date: 2006/11/07 15:37:00; author: laszlof; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1 | Update my email address in all ports that I maintain. | | Approved by: flz (mentor) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: fetch info
On Thursday 09 November 2006 16:14, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > Run > > > > make fetch > > > > in the directory of each of the ports you want to prefetch. > > Or simply ``make fetch-recursive''. "make checksum" and "make checksum-recursive" are better since they fetch and verify the files, fixing any broken downloads and identifying any checksum problems. These are what portupgrade actually uses with the -F and -FR options, as does Portmaster. The naming of these targets unfortunately follows implementation, rather than the intuition of end-users. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: how to keep PORTVERSION from going backwards?
David Symonds wrote: > Use PORTEPOCH. Thanks to all who replied. I had looked right at the relevant section in the handbook and thought it didn't apply to my situation, but clearly it does :) Sorry for my confusion. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: emulators/qemu-launcher: unable to launch
Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Oops; never mind. I can reproduce this also. I'm guessing that configure isn't picking up library locations properly for p5-Gnome2-VFS, but I could be way off (GTK really isn't my thing). ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
WRKDIRPREFIX with portmanager
*Hallo ports team, I had the problem that # portmanager databases/firebird2-server won't install because of the following:* portmanager 0.4.1_6 FreeBSD testFreeBSD.test.lan 6.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: Sun May 7 04:32:43 UTC 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 autoConflicts 0 autoMoved 0 backUp 0 buildDependsAreLeaves 0 forced 0 interactive0 log1 pmMode 1 pristine 0 resume 0 Wed Nov 15 15:17:55 2006 firebird-client-2.0.0_2 /databases/firebird2-client MISSING dependency of firebird-server-2.0.0_2 /databases/firebird2-server Wed Nov 15 15:19:00 2006 firebird-client-2.0.0_2 /databases/firebird2-client failed during make, adding to ignore.db Wed Nov 15 15:19:00 2006 portmanager 0.4.1_6 INFO: finished with some ports not updated if --log was used see /var/log/portmanager.log Wed Nov 15 15:19:00 2006 end of log *I asked then [EMAIL PROTECTED] to help me and he answered:* Firebird must not be builed under 'root' account because it may cause > serious troubles with SysV semaphores. You can build any port under non-privileged account, if you set WRKDIRPREFIX environment variable. See "man ports" for more details. To install port 'root' privileges are required of course. In this case ports system calls "su" to switch to root and install files. Or you can use "sudo" - just add to /etc/make.conf: SU_CMD= /usr/local/bin/sudo /bin/sh -c I don't know how to build under non-root with portmaster, please ask the author. *This answer helped! I build a directory with all permissions under my non root account and compiled with the command: $ make WRKDIRPREFIX=/home/oliver/ports/firebird install clean This worked but is it possible to use the portmanager program for this task? I use it for all other installations with success (ISC-DHCP, Samba, etc...) I would appreciate if you can help me. Sincerly Oliver Grenz* -- Heinz Huber Internationale Spedition GmbH & Co. Fraunhoferstr. 9 85301 Schweitenkirchen Phone : 08444/9194-96 Fax : 08444/9194-518 SMS : 08444/9194-528 Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW : www.huber-spedition.de Public key : www.huber-spedition.de/edv.html ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ftp/proftpd - Need some advice
Yesterday, I approved a patch rolled by "Alex Samorukov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> which fixes a buffer overflow vulnerability (ports/105510). I tested the patch in 5.4, 6-STABLE and -CURRENT and didn't see any problems. This morning I had a couple of emails from people telling me that after upgrade they can't connect and the port is exiting with signal 11. How should I proceed with this? as I said I can't duplicate the problem. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ftp/proftpd - Need some advice
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 10:12:49AM -0900, Beech Rintoul wrote: > Yesterday, I approved a patch rolled by "Alex Samorukov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > which fixes a buffer overflow vulnerability (ports/105510). I tested the > patch in 5.4, 6-STABLE and -CURRENT and didn't see any problems. > > This morning I had a couple of emails from people telling me that after > upgrade they can't connect and the port is exiting with signal 11. > > How should I proceed with this? as I said I can't duplicate the problem. This just in... -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networkinghttp://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | === SNIP === shaun 2006-11-15 19:22:23 UTC FreeBSD ports repository Modified files: ftp/proftpd Makefile ftp/proftpd/filespatch-main.c patch-sample-configurations_basic.conf Log: - Fix the last imported patch (which came from proftpd's CVS repo), as it was causing segfaults prior to login. - Add the new CommandBufferSize variable into the default config file to stop proftpd complaining. Reported by:many Revision ChangesPath 1.92 +1 -1 ports/ftp/proftpd/Makefile 1.2 +4 -4 ports/ftp/proftpd/files/patch-main.c 1.2 +12 -3 ports/ftp/proftpd/files/patch-sample-configurations_basic.conf ~ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ftp/proftpd - Need some advice
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 10:12:49AM -0900, Beech Rintoul wrote: > > Yesterday, I approved a patch rolled by "Alex Samorukov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > which fixes a buffer overflow vulnerability (ports/105510). I tested the > patch in 5.4, 6-STABLE and -CURRENT and didn't see any problems. > > This morning I had a couple of emails from people telling me that after > upgrade they can't connect and the port is exiting with signal 11. > > How should I proceed with this? as I said I can't duplicate the problem. > I got a number of messages too, since I committed the patch. I was able to determine the cause of the problem, so I went ahead and fixed it. Shaun -- Shaun Amott // PGP: 0x6B387A9A "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds." - Ralph Waldo Emerson pgpGI3n27siOg.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: ftp/proftpd - Need some advice
On Wednesday 15 November 2006 10:38, Shaun Amott wrote: > On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 10:12:49AM -0900, Beech Rintoul wrote: > > Yesterday, I approved a patch rolled by "Alex Samorukov" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> which fixes a buffer overflow vulnerability > > (ports/105510). I tested the patch in 5.4, 6-STABLE and -CURRENT and > > didn't see any problems. > > > > This morning I had a couple of emails from people telling me that after > > upgrade they can't connect and the port is exiting with signal 11. > > > > How should I proceed with this? as I said I can't duplicate the problem. > > I got a number of messages too, since I committed the patch. I was able > to determine the cause of the problem, so I went ahead and fixed it. > > Shaun Thank you much. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Need some help with www/cherokee
I adopted this port a few days ago. The only changes I've made was to add options knobs. The port builds fine, but when started exits with this error: stargate# cherokee module_loader.c:226: ERROR: dlopen(/usr/local/lib/cherokee/libplugin_cgi.so): /usr/local/lib/cherokee/libplugin_cgi.so: Undefined symbol "fr_atoll" module_loader.c:378: ERROR: Can't open "cgi" module ERROR: Loading module 'cgi' Couldn't read the config file I've been talking with the developer and he said the problem was with cherokee/files/patch-cherokee-handler_cgi_base.c, but didn't offer much beyond that. This is a bit above my head. Would someone take a look at this. I'd like to get this port running. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com --- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Ports with a broken PKGORIGIN: textproc/py-lucene
** The following ports have an incorrect PKGORIGIN ** PKGORIGIN connects packaged or installed ports to the directory they originated from. This is essential for tools like pkg_version or portupgrade to work correctly. Wrong PKGORIGINs are often caused by a wrong order of CATEGORIES after a repocopy. Please fix any errors as soon as possible. - *textproc/py-lucene* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: devel/py-lucene | revision 1.3 | date: 2006/11/07 15:37:00; author: laszlof; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1 | Update my email address in all ports that I maintain. | | Approved by: flz (mentor) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Needs help with testing of port...
Hi, I'm the maintainer of the port x11-fm/evidence. The port are mark broken for some time and I finally have some time to fix it! I need some help with testing. There are some things about the pkg-plist that I can't figure out! Sometimes there are some files that are missing and sometimes there are files left behind so that the @dirrm fails! Please use the attached shar for testing! Thanks!!! Anders Trobäck Sweden -- How many Microsoft employees does it take to screw in a light bulb? None, they declare darkness a new standard. Anders Trobäck http://www.troback.com/ - evidence Description: Binary data ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
GNUCash 2.0 port
Hello, I was searching the list archives and came across a post by Peter Jeremy. He stated that he has a GNUCash 2.0 port. Does anyone know the status of the port? I couldn't find it querying the PR database. -- Regards, Doug ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: how to keep PORTVERSION from going backwards?
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 05:25:21PM -0700, Mike Brown wrote: > > How should I handle this? > > The software vendor version numbers go like this: > 1.0b3 (older release) > 1.0 (current release) > 1.0.1 (upcoming release) > > The port currently has PORTVERSION = 1.0.b3, and has not made use of > DISTVERSION. > > What's a good way to set PORTVERSION (and DISTVERSION, if needed) when I > update the port to the current and upcoming releases? I don't want the > PORTVERSION to go backwards. I assume that's what would happen if I set > it to just match the vendor's version numbers, and I assume that's bad. > In this case, there is nothing special required, if you want to continue with the versions listed -- just set PORTVERSION. You can verify that the numbers sort correctly like so: % pkg_version -t 1.0.b3 1.0 < % pkg_version -t 1.0 1.0.1 < -- Shaun Amott // PGP: 0x6B387A9A "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds." - Ralph Waldo Emerson pgpOYhjzTtZP2.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: GNUCash 2.0 port
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Doug Poland wrote: > Hello, > > I was searching the list archives and came across a post by Peter > Jeremy. He stated that he has a GNUCash 2.0 port. Does anyone know > the status of the port? I couldn't find it querying the PR database. > See ports/93216 and ports/94826. Cheers, Frank -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) iQIVAwUBRVkZ3a1QwXwBI2DsAQjm4g//W8qEddVyapKE2dQj6kKONaSO2NXI8EF6 GpyfSDRdpL3vJ5D7pJSTlRrRb34zeF4ILrz95uI4ZevdyycM32WQAROLpiwkvfE9 hwwRlr40kHY7s5yocEqJr3xJcPhKY9E1/NnL6lNtWHES9jvEJ6qbyLGBNLjDKZYl qzYLeKc8SnJ6KFQmbxl4UVT8VS6vQMq8XlUF8WwtGzm+X+7YU5EaSA5hRYhgw088 dDzYgRHAlR/jqfYkDXk1YoILoEMSX8H8N2Uu2D+cmYUwUxMr0+20H6+zIFDYS6ZU O2EvwJfP3Bj7tY79d7YqkLVWaAe24HI7AnRfOBjAAAlW7FbpEq/LgIwsawUms6kg FFUOYUiqG+nyN9pL/v9xi2pSJZfGh3HAQlL4KNCl6wzWPMEeQNEHEUhEgE4/sPtD W/f5rhvrpjvArZve7cF/esXcyq+Ku2k++FRm7HzdbJzOVOLqBepa23CLTCkigZRt qzckfH8pUPWjIATG6+VimadEik9LEvxkbOwaVWmh1wiAqyrjFgOs6IdRe9MVU9X8 XBLBWxFJC1Qy5gwspYLkYqD7spPb7Hv3KAK3TWckvWNpilgP3DZwXGbW+/0KusOn U3Svj9YOhAXB7s5gjJL/01QwqHaDQ5WRUtZPARBZT90wsM3UO/ASzkBJ4gyGXkrC qOJiMD1EsME= =YCHp -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Python meta-port deinstall failing with custom PREFIX & LOCALBASE
If I first do this:
mkdir /var/tmp/tmptree
mtree -U -f /etc/mtree/BSD.local.dist -d -e -p $/var/tmp/tmptree
cd /usr/ports/lang/python
make install PREFIX=/var/tmp/tmptree LOCALBASE=/var/tmp/tmptree
...then this fails ('python not installed, skipping'):
make deinstall PREFIX=/var/tmp/tmptree LOCALBASE=/var/tmp/tmptree
...but this succeeds:
cd ../python24
make deinstall PREFIX=/var/tmp/tmptree LOCALBASE=/var/tmp/tmptree
Shouldn't the deinstall work from the meta-port directory?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
FreeBSD Port: p5-FuzzyOcr-2.3.r1
I started using this a few days ago, got a coredump today. Any of you interested in the dumpfile or other debug? I'm tracking 6.stable, currently at the 6.2-PRERELEASE stage. Brian ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
I Will PAY Someone To Install OpenLDAP
I've had it. I've wasted too much time on this. I will pay someone to install openldap with the env and options I want on FreeBSD 6.1. Please contact me outside of the discussion list. TIA, Rachel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
