Re: How to construct this port?
Interesting: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: host mail.is-root.com[195.64.89.117] said: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [82.103.104.21] blocked using bg.countries.nerd.dk; Your IP is in bg, rejected based on geographical location (in reply to RCPT TO command) Do you really block all mails coming from Bulgaria? -- Vasil Dimov [EMAIL PROTECTED] % If you accidently end up inside vi, you can quit it by pressing Escape, colon (:), q (q), bang (!) and pressing return. pgp45TxtZ9AEg.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: How to construct this port?
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:36:16 +0200 Vasil Dimov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Interesting: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: host mail.is-root.com[195.64.89.117] said: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [82.103.104.21] blocked using bg.countries.nerd.dk; Your IP is in bg, rejected based on geographical location (in reply to RCPT TO command) Do you really block all mails coming from Bulgaria? Romania also. Dec 28 14:48:57 it postfix/smtp[42226]: 05C3A1711B: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=mail.is-root.com[195.64.89.117]:25, delay=14, delays=0.2/0.15/2.6/11, dsn=5.7.1, sta tus=bounced (host mail.is-root.com[195.64.89.117] said: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [81.196.204.98] blocked using ro.countries.nerd.dk; Your IP is in ro, rejected b ased on geographical location (in reply to RCPT TO command)) Nils, you're a port maintainer, please fix this $^*@ Since I saw others doing this, I'd really like a statement from portmgr (BCC'ed) that commiters and maintainers are not allowed to reject mail like this. I, for one, would commit via instant maintainer timeout to ports belonging this type of maintainers. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable as Intellect BOFH excuse #76: Unoptimized hard drive signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: How to construct this port?
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 02:57:28PM +0200, Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu wrote: On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:36:16 +0200 Vasil Dimov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Interesting: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: host mail.is-root.com[195.64.89.117] said: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [82.103.104.21] blocked using bg.countries.nerd.dk; Your IP is in bg, rejected based on geographical location (in reply to RCPT TO command) Do you really block all mails coming from Bulgaria? Romania also. Dec 28 14:48:57 it postfix/smtp[42226]: 05C3A1711B: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=mail.is-root.com[195.64.89.117]:25, delay=14, delays=0.2/0.15/2.6/11, dsn=5.7.1, sta tus=bounced (host mail.is-root.com[195.64.89.117] said: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [81.196.204.98] blocked using ro.countries.nerd.dk; Your IP is in ro, rejected b ased on geographical location (in reply to RCPT TO command)) [...] Since I saw others doing this, I'd really like a statement from portmgr (BCC'ed) that commiters and maintainers are not allowed to reject mail like this. I, for one, would commit via instant maintainer timeout to ports belonging this type of maintainers. Yeah, you can assume timeout has triggered if you get such a bounce - if you cannot inform a maintainer obviously he will not reply in 14 days... -- Vasil Dimov [EMAIL PROTECTED] % A: Yes. | Q: Are you sure? | | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. | | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? pgpKC7Sqo7UKn.pgp Description: PGP signature
patch for databases/pxtools, BLOBs in pxtools-0.0.20
Hi!
I've had a paradox database to convert and found some issue with BLOBs:
If a file defines BLOBs, but the BLOBs do not contain data,
the PXBLOBtoBinary does not correctly defines s and s_size and
then binary_to_sql() fails.
It can be fixed with the following patch.
Hope this helps.
-
diff -u pxconvert.c.orig pxconvert.c
--- pxconvert.c.origThu Dec 28 18:40:39 2006
+++ pxconvert.c Thu Dec 28 18:37:29 2006
@@ -513,7 +513,11 @@
#ifdef DEBUG
fprintf(stderr, [BLOB] offset: %08lx, length: %08lx, mod_number: %04x,
index: %02x\n, offset, length, mod_number, index);
#endif
- if (index == 0x00) return 0;
+ if (index == 0x00) {
+ *binsize = 0;
+ *binstorage = NULL;
+ return 0;
+ }
if (!blobname) {
fprintf(stderr, [BLOB] offset: %08lx, length: %08lx,
mod_number: %04x, index: %02x - do I need a BLOB-filename '-b ...' ?\n,
offset, length, mod_number, index);
-
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 171 310137214 years to
go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD lang/ruby18 pthread question
I originally sent this email to the ruby maintainer but haven't gotten a response so maybe someone else can enlighten me as to what is going on here. If I install lang/ruby18 with the pthread option turned off (which is the default) I get: # ruby -rrbconfig -e 'puts Config::CONFIG[LIBS]' -lcrypt -lm -rpath=/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib -pthread If I turn pthreads on I get: # ruby -rrbconfig -e 'puts Config::CONFIG[LIBS]' -pthread -lcrypt -lm -rpath=/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib -pthread Either way it looks like I get pthread support, unless I am interpreting the output wrong. Any thoughts on this? -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to construct this port?
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 12:53:34 -0500 Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ... ] However, sometimes mail systems go down or block traffic for whatever reason: postmaster's job is a thankless task, and this was true even before spam and viral email appeared. Nowadays, it's harder to get things mostly right (nevermind perfect), so postmasters make imperfect decisions because they are faced with undesirable tradeoffs. Indeed :-( However banning a hole country isn't a tradeoff in my book, it's just plain [inset_the_word_here]. And sine it's giving a 5XX code there's really no way to reach the person in question. It has not been my observation that insisting people not make any mistakes commonly results in fewer mistakes being made, or much less, in zero mistakes being made. :-) Rather than try to insist they are not allowed to do something, I'd prefer to let people make their own decisions and learn which ones are mistakes. YMMV The problem is that, IMHO, this kind of rejecting affects us all as I think that being a port maintainer implies receiving and replying to users' email. I don't use any of the ports maintainer by Nils so I could not care, but I think it's my responsibility as commiter to point out that this is a mistake. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable as Intellect Fascinating, a totally parochial attitude. -- Spock, Metamorphosis, stardate 3219.8 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: How to construct this port?
In response to Ion-Mihai \IOnut\ Tetcu [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 12:53:34 -0500 Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ... ] However, sometimes mail systems go down or block traffic for whatever reason: postmaster's job is a thankless task, and this was true even before spam and viral email appeared. Nowadays, it's harder to get things mostly right (nevermind perfect), so postmasters make imperfect decisions because they are faced with undesirable tradeoffs. Indeed :-( However banning a hole country isn't a tradeoff in my book, it's just plain [inset_the_word_here]. And sine it's giving a 5XX code there's really no way to reach the person in question. I disagree. There are certain countries where the people in charge simply don't seem to care whether or not they're spamming or not. It takes a while for me to get ticked off enough to block an entire country, but there are three or four on my list right now. Besides, it's _his_ mailserver. He has the right to accept to deny mail as he sees fit. Trying to tell him otherwise is like trying to tell me that I have to eat a certain type of food. On the flip side, if you're unable to get in contact with him, why not just file a PR? At that rate, the standard timeouts go into effect. It has not been my observation that insisting people not make any mistakes commonly results in fewer mistakes being made, or much less, in zero mistakes being made. :-) Rather than try to insist they are not allowed to do something, I'd prefer to let people make their own decisions and learn which ones are mistakes. YMMV The problem is that, IMHO, this kind of rejecting affects us all as I think that being a port maintainer implies receiving and replying to users' email. No, it doesn't. Port maintainer is a volunteer position. If you start dictating too many things about what they must and must not do, you're going to run short of willing volunteers. I only maintain a few ports, but I'd quit maintaining those if someone were to tell I had to reconfigure my mailserver. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to construct this port?
Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu wrote: On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 12:53:34 -0500 Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, sometimes mail systems go down or block traffic for whatever reason: postmaster's job is a thankless task, and this was true even before spam and viral email appeared. Nowadays, it's harder to get things mostly right (nevermind perfect), so postmasters make imperfect decisions because they are faced with undesirable tradeoffs. Indeed :-( However banning a hole country isn't a tradeoff in my book, it's just plain [inset_the_word_here]. And sin[c]e it's giving a 5XX code there's really no way to reach the person in question. I agree that blocking a whole country is a mistake. Short of posting to the mailing list, there's no way to reach whoever it is. Although I've CC:ed him on the thread. It has not been my observation that insisting people not make any mistakes commonly results in fewer mistakes being made, or much less, in zero mistakes being made. :-) Rather than try to insist they are not allowed to do something, I'd prefer to let people make their own decisions and learn which ones are mistakes. YMMV The problem is that, IMHO, this kind of rejecting affects us all as I think that being a port maintainer implies receiving and replying to users' email. Certainly true. People doing stuff with FreeBSD ought to whitelist @freebsd.org in particular; that would make committers lives easier. But email and even Internet access are not completely reliable; people go away on vacations sometimes, for a timely example. (Merry Christmas/holidays all. :-) For a maintainer timeout to be useful, there needs to be a pending PR and/or someone else willing to be more accessible. Update the current PR with the bounce and set responsible to Nivo, committing the change or not as you feel best; or file a new PR listing another maintainer if one is available and wait for the standard timeout period pending resolution by the hat-wearing demigods known as [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to construct this port?
Bill Moran píše v čt 28. 12. 2006 v 14:02 -0500: In response to Ion-Mihai \IOnut\ Tetcu [EMAIL PROTECTED]: However banning a hole country isn't a tradeoff in my book, it's just plain [inset_the_word_here]. And sine it's giving a 5XX code there's really no way to reach the person in question. Besides, it's _his_ mailserver. He has the right to accept to deny mail as he sees fit. Trying to tell him otherwise is like trying to tell me that I have to eat a certain type of food. The problem is that, IMHO, this kind of rejecting affects us all as I think that being a port maintainer implies receiving and replying to users' email. No, it doesn't. Port maintainer is a volunteer position. If you start dictating too many things about what they must and must not do, you're going to run short of willing volunteers. Ugh, actually, http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributing-ports/maintain-port.html reads in a section Maintainer _responsibilities_, quote: 5.2.4 Providing support Part of being a maintainer is providing support -- not for the software in general -- but for the port and any FreeBSD-specific quirks and problems. Users may contact you with questions, suggestions, problems and patches. Most of the time their correspondence will be specific to FreeBSD. So that reads as exact opposite of what you wrote. You may want to adjust your attitude here :) -- Pav Lucistnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alignment: Neutral Greedy signature.asc Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
freebsd usage data
Hey guys, is there a freebsd port that tracks cpu usage? I’m looking for something similar to the performance tab in Windows Task Manager. I know the “top” command tells me the current CPU load, but an average for the day, week, whatever would be awesome. Thanks! Freebsd 6.1 Jason Gretz Network Admin Angstman Law PLLC Office 208.284.8588 Cell 208.850.9284 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.28/605 - Release Date: 12/27/2006 12:21 PM ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
squirrelmail vuln not published on vuxml ?
hello, if i'm not wrong, it seems like the security issue with squirrelmail 1.4.8 published on squirrelmail.org is not reported on vuxml. shouldn't it be ? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phpBB
hi, i have phpbb-2.0.21 installed, and see version 2.0.22 is ready to be upgraded to by portupgrade. i've never been through an upgrade of phpBB and was wondering what exactly portupgrade does? i see i can add the code changes from 2.0.21 to 2.0.22 for the webpages from phpbb.com, which i will do since my board is fairly heavily modded (and then you run an update_to_latest.php which updates the database). i assume portupgrade just updates the webpages, so that i can restore my own pages after it thinks it's done (and leaves things like update_to_latest.php to the user)? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Proftpd-user] proftpd build error
On Thursday 28 December 2006 11:15, Beech Rintoul wrote: I'm attempting to update the FreeBSD port of proftpd. While building the new mod_wrap2 I get the following error: gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/contrib/mod_wrap2' cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFREEBSD7_0 -DFREEBSD7 -I. -I../.. -I../../include -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wall -c mod_wrap2.c In file included from mod_wrap2.h:35, from mod_wrap2.c:25: ../../include/conf.h:57:21: libintl.h: No such file or directory gmake[2]: *** [mod_wrap2.o] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/contrib/mod_wrap2' cp: ../contrib/mod_wrap2/mod_wrap2.o: No such file or directory gmake[1]: *** [static] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/ftp/proftpd/work/proftpd-1.3.1rc1/modules' gmake: *** [modules] Error 2 *** Error code 2 I tried adding #include libintl.h to config.h, but it didn't help. That header is in the the path, what do I need to do to get mod_wrap2 to see it? I fixed the build with the following patches: --- contrib/mod_wrap2/Makefile.in.orig Wed Sep 6 15:11:47 2006 +++ contrib/mod_wrap2/Makefile.in Thu Dec 28 11:41:24 2006 @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ MODULE_NAME=mod_wrap2 # Necessary redefinitions -INCLUDES=-I. -I../.. -I../../include +INCLUDES=-I. -I../.. -I../../include -I/usr/local/include CPPFLAGS= -DHAVE_CONFIG_H $(DEFAULT_PATHS) $(PLATFORM) $(INCLUDES) LDFLAGS=-L../../lib --- lib/getopt.c.orig Thu Feb 28 10:30:01 2002 +++ lib/getopt.cTue Dec 26 13:39:53 2006 @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ # endif #endif -#ifndef _ +#if defined(PR_USE_NLS) !defined(_) /* This is for other GNU distributions with internationalized messages. When compiling libc, the _ macro is predefined. */ # ifdef HAVE_LIBINTL_H @@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ # else # define _(msgid) (msgid) # endif +#else +# define _(msgid) (msgid) #endif /* This version of `getopt' appears to the caller like standard Unix `getopt' That fixed earlier problems, but now I'm getting: cc -L./lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -o ftptop utils/ftptop.o utils/scoreboard.o -lncurses -lsupp ./lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.text+0x5c5): In function `_getopt_internal': : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' ./lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.text+0x687): In function `_getopt_internal': : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' ./lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.text+0x8b1): In function `_getopt_internal': : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' ./lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.text+0xa3a): In function `_getopt_internal': : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' ./lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.text+0xa99): In function `_getopt_internal': : undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' ./lib/libsupp.a(getopt.o)(.text+0xb04): more undefined references to `libintl_gettext' follow gmake: *** [ftptop] Error 1 *** Error code 2 I could use some help here. TIA, Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Alaska Paradise Travel \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310 X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501 / \ - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com --- pgpr2N7EtH7o5.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: phpBB
gareth wrote: hi, i have phpbb-2.0.21 installed, and see version 2.0.22 is ready to be upgraded to by portupgrade. i've never been through an upgrade of phpBB and was wondering what exactly portupgrade does? i see i can add the code changes from 2.0.21 to 2.0.22 for the webpages from phpbb.com, which i will do since my board is fairly heavily modded (and then you run an update_to_latest.php which updates the database). i assume portupgrade just updates the webpages, so that i can restore my own pages after it thinks it's done (and leaves things like update_to_latest.php to the user)? portupgrade would do pkg_delete and then make install. So yes, it just updates the php files, and yes, you will need to do update_to_latest.php your own. Cheers, -- Xin LI [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: phpBB
On Fri 2006-12-29 (05:29), LI Xin wrote: gareth wrote: hi, i have phpbb-2.0.21 installed, and see version 2.0.22 is ready to be upgraded to by portupgrade. i've never been through an upgrade of phpBB and was wondering what exactly portupgrade does? i see i can add the code changes from 2.0.21 to 2.0.22 for the webpages from phpbb.com, which i will do since my board is fairly heavily modded (and then you run an update_to_latest.php which updates the database). i assume portupgrade just updates the webpages, so that i can restore my own pages after it thinks it's done (and leaves things like update_to_latest.php to the user)? portupgrade would do pkg_delete and then make install. So yes, it just updates the php files, and yes, you will need to do update_to_latest.php your own. ok, thanx. as long as it doesn't touch the database i'm happy. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD Port: net/knemo
On Monday 25 December 2006 09:30, Abdullah Al-Marrie wrote: Could you please update knemo to 0.4.6? Not yet, as it will not work out of the box. The author has changed knemo to support multiple backends and the FreeBSD code, that lived as patches within the port, hasn't been transformed to a FreeBSD backend, yet. I'll update it as soon as I have the time. Cheers, Markus -- Markus Brueffer | GPG-Key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~markus/markus.asc [EMAIL PROTECTED] | FP: 3F9B EBE8 F290 E5CC 1447 8760 D48D 1072 78F8 A8D4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! pgpj2comUp7cq.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: How to construct this port?
I'll echo pav here. For people that don't want to answer questions or deal with reminder-email from portmgr, the best thing to do is turn the port over to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and just submit PRs for updates. That's the difference, in my view, between being a 'submitter' and being a 'maintainer'. We need both, of course. mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
