Unfetchable distfiles reminder
Dear porters, This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of unfetchable distfiles at http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/ . In particular, the list of ports with no MAINTAINER with distfile problems, which currently has 212 bad ports, is http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Since no one is responsible for these ports, the problem won't get fixed unless someone on this list takes the initiative. In addition, the list of all ports with any unfetchable distfile is http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/bad.html if you don't mind coordinating your fixes with the port MAINTAINER. Thanks for your help! Bill distfiles Fenner ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remove outdated StarOffice ports
I have decided (and started) to make a minor contribution to FreeBSD by looking at broken ports - in particular those with [EMAIL PROTECTED] as maintainer - and fixing them. (I guess I do it just because I like FreeBSD and I want stuff to be tidy.) Enough said. I started looking at the broken staroffice ports (listed at http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) but gave up because the patches no longer are distributed - which makes sense since this is very old software. I suggest removing editors/staroffice52/ editors/staroffice60/ editors/staroffice70/ If there aren't any objections, I hope someone with commit permission can remove them. Regards, Hans PS! There is probably a procedure for stuff like this - should I have submitted a PR? (I didn't find any info about this when browsing quickly through the porter's handbook.) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports/102058: arping has INconsistent versioning
Synopsis: arping has INconsistent versioning State-Changed-From-To: feedback-open State-Changed-By: lawrance State-Changed-When: Wed Feb 21 11:13:03 UTC 2007 State-Changed-Why: Feedback timeout for the second time, it's a free for all. Responsible-Changed-From-To: lawrance-ports Responsible-Changed-By: lawrance Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Feb 21 11:13:03 UTC 2007 Responsible-Changed-Why: But not for me :-) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=102058 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports/80944: [NEW PORT] www/mnogosearch-php: Mnogosearch PHP frontend
Synopsis: [NEW PORT] www/mnogosearch-php: Mnogosearch PHP frontend Responsible-Changed-From-To: lawrance-ports Responsible-Changed-By: lawrance Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Feb 21 11:13:52 UTC 2007 Responsible-Changed-Why: Release it; I was never sure about this one. Maybe a mnogosearch/php user could recommend whether the additional port is useful. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80944 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports/93216: [PATCH] finance/gnucash-devel: Add development release 1.9.0
Synopsis: [PATCH] finance/gnucash-devel: Add development release 1.9.0 Responsible-Changed-From-To: lawrance-ports Responsible-Changed-By: lawrance Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Feb 21 11:17:37 UTC 2007 Responsible-Changed-Why: Back to pool. A lot of people are interested in an updated version of gnucash. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=93216 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Policy on new ports
Hello! I'd be interested in the policy about new ports in the following situation: The program has the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. The program is not in the FreeBSD ports system but can be compiled on FreeBSD without problems with approx. 5 commands. And because of that the author may not want his program in the ports collection. So will the program be added even if the author may disagree with that? Regards, atz ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nntpcache ( news/nntpcache ) on AMD 64 (6.2-RELEASE)
Greetings, Has anyone been able to get nntpcache working on AMD64 (6.2-RELEASE) The same ports tree compiles on 6.2-RELEASE i386 and work 100% Compiling on AMD64 results in : connected to NNTP server vasbyt.local.net as DEFAULT = [vasbyt.local.net] list overview.fmt refused list overview.fmt on vasbyt.local.net: '430 Dont have it' checking server vasbyt.local.net for 'active' = [vasbyt.isdsl.net] list refused list active on vasbyt.local.net: '500 Syntax error or bad command' checking server vasbyt.local.net for 'active.times' = [vasbyt.isdsl.net] list active.times parsing 'active.times' from vasbyt.local.net page error please advise Please note: This email and its content are subject to the disclaimer as displayed at the following link http://www.is.co.za/legal/E-mail+Confidentiality+Notice+and+Disclaimer.htm. Should you not have Web access, send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and a copy will be emailed to you. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Policy on new ports
Atz-Soft wrote: Hello! I'd be interested in the policy about new ports in the following situation: The program has the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. The program is not in the FreeBSD ports system but can be compiled on FreeBSD without problems with approx. 5 commands. And because of that the author may not want his program in the ports collection. So will the program be added even if the author may disagree with that? My understanding is that the build skeleton (we call it ports) is not a derived work of the original application and therefore you own the port itself, and it's up to you to decide whether it can be included in the ports collection. Cheers, -- Xin LI [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Policy on new ports
Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is that an assumption or do you really know someone who first uses a free license and then objects to people distributing his program in compliance with that license? Just an assumption. I didn't want to spend time and effort creating a port and then not be able to add it. Thanks, atz ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Policy on new ports
Atz-Soft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd be interested in the policy about new ports in the following situation: The program has the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. The program is not in the FreeBSD ports system but can be compiled on FreeBSD without problems with approx. 5 commands. And because of that the author may not want his program in the ports collection. Is that an assumption or do you really know someone who first uses a free license and then objects to people distributing his program in compliance with that license? I would assume that most authors are either glad that someone considers their program worthy enough to create a port for it, or just don't care. So will the program be added even if the author may disagree with that? Usually the author isn't asked for his opinion, if the license allows distribution, it's assumed that the author is ok with it. I don't know if there ever was a situation where the author of a GPL'ed program asked to remove it from the ports collection again, but in my opinion such requests should be ignored. If the author doesn't want distribution he shouldn't use a license that allows it. Fabian signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Policy on new ports
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 12:25:06PM +0100, Atz-Soft wrote: The program has the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. The program is not in the FreeBSD ports system but can be compiled on FreeBSD without problems with approx. 5 commands. And because of that the author may not want his program in the ports collection. If that's the author's reason for not wanting a FreeBSD point, I suspect he can be safely ignored. If you want to engage him in further conversation about this, points to remember (or perhaps to make) are: 1) The port is not the software, it's effectively a database entry implemented in a Makefile, and the license on the port is completely independent of the license of the software. (That said, USING the port could potentially violate a license if the software wasn't GPL'd.) In the absense of a blanket policy that ports in the FreeBSD ports tree are covered by the same license as FreeBSD, I believe that YOU as the author of the port determine the license. (Note: IANAL. I don't even play one on TV.) 2) The five commands required to compile the software comprise only ONE requirement addressed by a port. Others include upgrade management, security vulnerability tracking and dependencies. We use the ports system to address ALL these requirements, not just the compile process. So will the program be added even if the author may disagree with that? The port is not the software. If the author wants to limit the availability of the software, he needs to use a license that allows this. GPL is not that license. And the effect of such a license will be to limit the ACTIVITY of the port, not the existence of it, since the port is not a derived work. -- Paul Chvostek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Operations / Abuse / Whatever it.canada, hosting and development http://www.it.ca/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports/80944: [NEW PORT] www/mnogosearch-php: Mnogosearch PHP frontend
Synopsis: [NEW PORT] www/mnogosearch-php: Mnogosearch PHP frontend Responsible-Changed-From-To: ports-freebsd-ports-bugs Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Feb 21 13:53:01 UTC 2007 Responsible-Changed-Why: Canonicalize assignment. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80944 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question About Python Ports
Hi; I'm rebuilding a server because of a hardware failure that has corrupted various s/w, including the OS. The server I'm rebuilding was built by someone else. That person spent a lot of time developing a certain s/w package that I haven't had time to study enough to claim any expertise. So, I need to rebuild similar to how he built. However, he didn't understand FBSD's port system. He built everything from source...including python. He has some links in his s/w to the python dirs he built. I can easily put symlinks where his links are and build from ports...obviously my preference. However, I can't figure out *where* the ports build! That is, in a standard built-from-source python, one enters the dir, issues an ls and sees dirs like lib, etc, etc. Where are these dirs in a built-from-port python? TIA, Drew Bored stiff? Loosen up... Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games. http://games.yahoo.com/games/front ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question About Python Ports
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 07:48 am, Drew Jenkins wrote: I'm rebuilding a server because of a hardware failure that has corrupted various s/w, including the OS. The server I'm rebuilding was built by someone else. That person spent a lot of time developing a certain s/w package that I haven't had time to study enough to claim any expertise. So, I need to rebuild similar to how he built. However, he didn't understand FBSD's port system. He built everything from source...including python. He has some links in his s/w to the python dirs he built. I can easily put symlinks where his links are and build from ports...obviously my preference. However, I can't figure out *where* the ports build! That is, in a standard built-from-source python, one enters the dir, issues an ls and sees dirs like lib, etc, etc. Where are these dirs in a built-from-port python? TIA, Ports install under /usr/local/. If you do an ls under there, you'll find lib/ bin/ libexec/ share/ man/ and so on. Read through the hier(7) man page for more information on the directory layout used. -- Freddie Cash [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question About Python Ports
Drew Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi; [...] links are and build from ports...obviously my preference. However, I can't figure out *where* the ports build! That is, in a standard built-from-source python, one enters the dir, issues an ls and sees dirs like lib, etc, etc. Where are these dirs in a built-from-port python? They are relative paths to the PREFIX set by the make system. This is by default /usr/local. For more details take a look at the great handbook (section ports using) and the porter's handbook. It also might help to take a look at man ports(1) :-) Regards Marcus ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Bsd-sharp-list] [ports/lang/mono] crosstalk compiling problem between installed mono and port's mono
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 01:48:44PM -0300, Phillip Neumann wrote: El mi??, 21-02-2007 a las 17:28 +0200, Kostik Belousov escribi??: Could you, please, give me the full patch (against CVS Makefile) ? Sure. sorry for not doing it .. thanks Patch helped, thanks. I successfully did portupgrade -f mono-1.2.2.1_2. pgpKILhv11238.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Bsd-sharp-list] [ports/lang/mono] crosstalk compiling problem between installed mono and port's mono
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 01:48:44PM -0300, Phillip Neumann wrote: El mi??, 21-02-2007 a las 17:28 +0200, Kostik Belousov escribi??: Could you, please, give me the full patch (against CVS Makefile) ? Sure. sorry for not doing it .. thanks Patch helped, thanks. I successfully did portupgrade -f mono-1.2.2.1_2. Gah, I didn't realize in my earlier patch that MAKE_ENV was redefined a little further below in the port's Makefile. I'm still curious to know what the exact change was that fixed things. (It may be that while one change fixed your problem we should be using all the changes so we don't get bitten again later.) I'll commit Philip's patch later when I have access. tom ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xorg-server is broken due to objformat in -current
X server can't load any module (undefined symbols) because modules are not linked properly (due to objformat check). Does somebody work on this? -- http://ache.pp.ru/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xorg-server is broken due to objformat in -current
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 19:01, Andrey Chernov wrote: X server can't load any module (undefined symbols) because modules are not linked properly (due to objformat check). Does somebody work on this? ports/109091 (imake.c patch) shoul fix that. I'll hopefully have time to test and commit today/tomorrow. Dejan ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wireshark build problem....
Hello, Anyone seeing the following while building the latest wireshark? Previously had it installed, this was just a portupgrade from: wireshark-0.99.4_1needs updating (port has 0.99.5) -Wl,/usr/local/lib -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/X11R6/lib epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC831' epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC834' epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC830' epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC832' epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC835' epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC833' epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC829' gmake[2]: *** [wireshark] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/wireshark/work/wireshark-0.99.5' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/wireshark/work/wireshark-0.99.5' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 2 If so... any workarounds? -- Regards, Eric ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
exim WITH_SRS problem
Hi, I have compiled exim with WITH_SRS however I am not able to use any srs commands. 2007-02-21 13:57:47 Exim configuration error in line 18 of /usr/local/etc/exim/configure: main option srs_alwaysrewrite unknown I wanted to be sure that it was compiled in by uninstalling libsrs2 and when I uninstall it exim complains that it cant find the libsrs2...so file. Is this a problem with FreeBSD ports or am I doing something wrong? I got spf working the same way and I have been using exim from ports for years. This is the first time something like this is happening. #exim -bV Exim version 4.66 #0 (FreeBSD 6.2) built 21-Feb-2007 13:42:28 Copyright (c) University of Cambridge 2006 Probably Berkeley DB version 1.8x (native mode) Support for: crypteq iconv() use_setclassresources Perl OpenSSL Content_Scanning Experimental_SPF Lookups: dbm dbmnz mysql Authenticators: plaintext Routers: accept dnslookup ipliteral manualroute queryprogram redirect Transports: appendfile autoreply pipe smtp Fixed never_users: 0 Size of off_t: 8 2007-02-21 13:57:47 Exim configuration error in line 18 of /usr/local/etc/exim/configure: main option srs_alwaysrewrite unknown Here are the options I used at compile time. 'mail/exim*' = [ 'WITH_CONTENT_SCAN=yes', 'WITHOUT_OLD_DEMIME=yes', 'WITH_MYSQL=yes', 'WITHOUT_IPV6=yes', 'WITHOUT_PAM=yes', 'WITHOUT_AUTH_CRAM_MD5=yes', 'WITHOUT_AUTH_SPA=yes', 'WITHOUT_MAILDIR=yes', 'WITHOUT_MAILSTORE=yes', 'WITHOUT_MBX=yes', 'WITHOUT_CDB=yes', 'WITHOUT_DNSDB=yes', 'WITHOUT_DSEARCH=yes', 'WITHOUT_LSEARCH=yes', 'WITHOUT_NIS=yes', 'WITHOUT_PASSWD=yes', 'WITHOUT_LMTP=yes', 'WITHOUT_ALT_CONFIG_PREFIX=yes', 'WITH_SPF=yes', 'WITH_SRS=yes', ], Thanks, Evren ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: xorg-server is broken due to objformat in -current
Andrey Chernov wrote: X server can't load any module (undefined symbols) because modules are not linked properly (due to objformat check). Does somebody work on this? I just created a shell script named /usr/bin/objformat that spits out elf when invoked. A step backwards but it works here until things are fixed. -- Skip ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mod_auth_kerb
Hi, does anyone maintain that port? Or is there something adequate for Apache 2.0? Thanks, Helmut ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question About Python Ports
- Original Message From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ...and Freddie Cash Thanks. This has led me to a few other questions: * There are apparently a number of s/w packages the previous sysadmin built out in this box. However, the version of Zope upon which we are dependent requires python 2.3, and these packages build automatically with python 2.4. How do I change that? Here are the packages: codeville epydoc py-xml * I also need to download/check out a cvs, and I've forgotten how to do that :-) I thought the line of code was this: cvs co http://cvs.zope.org/Packages/tadaa but it didn't work. After a frustrating search on Yahoo, I'm hoping someone can clue me in ;) Thanks, Drew Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NTFS-3G install errors
Hey guys, I got a prob here, I am trying to install the new NTFS-3G driver, which just went 1.0, and This is what the output of “make install make clean” got me: === Installing for fusefs-ntfs-0.20070207RC1 === fusefs-ntfs-0.20070207RC1 depends on file: /usr/local/modules/fuse.ko - not found ===Verifying reinstall for /usr/local/modules/fuse.ko in /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod === fusefs-kmod-0.3.0_4 requires the Kernel source to be installed. Set SRC_BASE if it is not in /usr/src. I’m new to UNIX/FreeBSD and I dunno how to check the kernel source, but it is a stock FreeBSD kernel. FreeBSD 6.1 Thanks! Jason -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.3/696 - Release Date: 2/21/2007 3:19 PM ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_auth_kerb
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 10:31:04PM +0100, Helmut Schneider wrote: does anyone maintain that port? Or is there something adequate for Apache 2.0? $ cd ports/www/mod_auth_kerb $ make maintainer [EMAIL PROTECTED] So, you should post this question to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NTFS-3G install errors
On 2/21/07, Jason Gretz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey guys, I got a prob here, I am trying to install the new NTFS-3G driver, which just went 1.0, and This is what the output of make install make clean got me: === Installing for fusefs-ntfs-0.20070207RC1 === fusefs-ntfs-0.20070207RC1 depends on file: /usr/local/modules/fuse.ko - not found ===Verifying reinstall for /usr/local/modules/fuse.ko in /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod === fusefs-kmod-0.3.0_4 requires the Kernel source to be installed. Set SRC_BASE if it is not in /usr/src. I'm new to UNIX/FreeBSD and I dunno how to check the kernel source, but it is a stock FreeBSD kernel. Hi Jason, First, I would suggest sending posts like this to the freebsd-questions@ list rather than [EMAIL PROTECTED] Second, try installing sysutils/fusefs-kmod and sysutils/fusefs-libs from the ports tree, and then try installing the NTFS-3G source again: # cd /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-libs # make install clean # cd /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod # make install clean Good luck! -David -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# fortune Happiness is just an illusion, filled with sadness and confusion. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: wireshark build problem....
Hello Eric, On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Eric Schuele wrote: Hello, Anyone seeing the following while building the latest wireshark? Yep. See: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=108892 Can't say much for the responses though :-/ Regards, Stacey Previously had it installed, this was just a portupgrade from: wireshark-0.99.4_1needs updating (port has 0.99.5) -Wl,/usr/local/lib -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/X11R6/lib epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC831' epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC834' epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC830' epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC832' epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC835' epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC833' epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC829' gmake[2]: *** [wireshark] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/wireshark/work/wireshark-0.99.5' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/wireshark/work/wireshark-0.99.5' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 2 If so... any workarounds? -- Regards, Eric ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp9f44rbta4Q.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: wireshark build problem...
Eric: I too saw the same problem on both 6.2 and current. If one searches the PR's one can find a reference to this problem. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/108776 Unfortunately, the PR is closed because it is not reproducible. At the bottom of the PR I found the following information: I rebuild net-snmp with -O2 optimization and then build wireshark with -O2 or -O, and both succeeded. I did this with -O2 and both net-snmp and wireshare 0.99.5 built without errors and wireshark seems to work. I hope this helps. G. Dinolt. Hello Eric, On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Eric Schuele wrote: Hello, =20 Anyone seeing the following while building the latest wireshark?=20 Yep. See: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D108892 Can't say much for the responses though :-/ Regards, Stacey Previously had it installed, this was just a portupgrade from: =20 wireshark-0.99.4_1needs updating (port has 0.99.5) =20 -Wl,/usr/local/lib -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/X11R6/lib epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC831' epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC834' epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC830' epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC832' epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC835' epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC833' epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined reference to `.LC829' gmake[2]: *** [wireshark] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/wireshark/work/wireshark-0.99= .5' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/wireshark/work/wireshark-0.99= .5' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 2 =20 If so... any workarounds? =20 --=20 Regards, Eric ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports/93216: [PATCH] finance/gnucash-devel: Add development release 1.9.0
Synopsis: [PATCH] finance/gnucash-devel: Add development release 1.9.0 Responsible-Changed-From-To: ports-freebsd-ports-bugs Responsible-Changed-By: lawrance Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Feb 22 06:16:36 UTC 2007 Responsible-Changed-Why: Reassign to the correct group http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=93216 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
