Re: HEADS UP: Ports tree frozen in preparation for X.Org 7.2 merge
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 23:47 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > I will be freezing the ports tree in 15 minutes in preparation for the > X.Org 7.2 merge. The merge will not happen right away. Instead, we > will enter a period of testing as per Kris' email. During this freeze > only portmgr, and those working on the X.Org merge will be allowed to > commit. Ports tree is now frozen. Joe -- Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
HEADS UP: Ports freeze coming in 15 minutes
I will be freezing the ports tree in 15 minutes in preparation for the X.Org 7.2 merge. The merge will not happen right away. Instead, we will enter a period of testing as per Kris' email. During this freeze only portmgr, and those working on the X.Org merge will be allowed to commit. Joe -- Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
FreeBSD Port: sdl_gui-0.10.3_5
Hello, SDL_gui has moved from: http://www.newimage.com/~rhk/SDL_gui to: http://rhk.dataslab.com/SDL_gui Thanks! -Ray ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD Port: portmanager-0.4.1_9 - broken?
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 03:32 +0530, Avinash Duduskar wrote: > Hi, > > > I’m getting the following error when using portmanager: > > barge# /usr/local/bin/portmanager -ui > rParseCommandLine 0.4.1_9 error: /usr/ports/-ui is not a valid port > directory > rParseCommandLine 0.4.1_9 info:either you have used an invalid command line > switch as the first option or you are trying to update a non existent port > path, see man portmanager(1) > MGPMrCommandLine 0.4.1_9 error: rParseCommandLine returned errorCode 1 > Ok, so I have reviewed the code and the command line parsing is a bit odd... It separates options to commands and flags. -ui is a flag, which is not entirely obvious. Options which seem to be interpreted as commands are -sl, -slid, -s, -u, -v or category/port. Other options are treated as flags -l, -ui, --resume, etc... So, "portmanager -u -ui" seems to do what you want. I might break down and rework the parsing code eventually, as I have had other complaints about the way options are handled... robert. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD Port: portmanager-0.4.1_9 - broken?
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 00:10 +0100, RW wrote: > On Wed, 02 May 2007 18:53:22 -0400 > Robert Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 03:32 +0530, Avinash Duduskar wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > I’m getting the following error when using portmanager: > > > > > > barge# /usr/local/bin/portmanager -ui > > > > The options must be seperate flags. i.e. portmanager -u -i > > -ui is short for --upgrade-interactive according to the man page, and > the latter doesn't work either. > > Have you changed something in this area recently? I could quite believe > this has gone unnoticed for a long time though, since this degree of > user micromanagement largely defeats the purpose of portmanager. No, I have not made any real changes since I took over the port. Most all of my efforts have just been to keep it current and address bugs that show up. robert. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Status of (teTeX &) Tex Live port(s)
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote Rong-en Fan thusly... > > On 5/3/07, Parv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Apparently teTeX development/support ended on May 2006 > > (according to http://www.tug.org/tetex/) ... > > Will there be any Tex Live port in our future? I did not find > > anything suitable via search for "tex live" or "texlive" on > > http://www.freebsd.org/ports/. To do my part, I volunteer to be > > a tester of Tex Live port(s). > > I asked hrs@ (current teTeX maintainer) yesterday, I am feeling some shame as that was what I was thinking of doing but instead opted to ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] > he told me that he is working on porting TeX Live and should be > available soon. Ah, nice! Thanks for the update. - Parv -- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: make -D recent problem?
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:43:06PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday 03 May 2007 17:34:04 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:24:41PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
> > > On Thursday 03 May 2007 15:27:44 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > > > > that is the reason we I am saying that the is something wrong in
> > > > > > > some port configurations
> > > > > >
> > > > > > OK, I was willing to help you figure this out, but you've ignored
> > > > > > my instructions 3 times now, so I'm giving up and will let you deal
> > > > > > with it on your own.
> > > > >
> > > > > whatt?
> > > > >
> > > > > you're very funny, sure I did
> > > > > seems you do not read with attention
> > > >
> > > > Probably it is because English is not your first language, but you
> > > > really did not follow my instructions.
> > > >
> > > > If you had followed them, your email would contain the results of your
> > > > grep -r command. This command would show which ports refer to the
> > > > incorrect /usr/X11R6 location, and I would have helped you to figure
> > > > out which ports they belong to. Rebuilding those ports is all that is
> > > > necessary to fix your problem, but first you have to identify which
> > > > ports they are.
> > > >
> > > > > but no problem since the problem *is* solved thanks to your help
> > > >
> > > > By doing the ln -s you worked around the problem but didn't solve it.
> > > > There might be other problems later on.
> > >
> > > there is nothing wrong with my english, I guess you are just used to
> > > handle slower people :) ... I just spared you and the list from getting
> > > hundreds of lines in there email's, but here the shortform:
> > >
> > > pkg_info -L `pkg_info -r dia-\* | awk '{print $2}'` | grep libgdk-x11
> >
> > No, that's some random command you made up that has nothing to do with
> > what I asked you to do.
> >
>
> that's randomly right :) mine is the shortcut to Rome and your's the other
> way
> around the globe ...
No, you're doing something completely irrelevant and wrong. Anyway,
I'm tired of arguing with you: you obviously are convinced you know
what you're doing, so who am I to tell you otherwise.
Good luck fixing your own problems in future :-)
Kris
pgpEfvQPka6mF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: make -D recent problem?
On Thursday 03 May 2007 17:34:04 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:24:41PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 May 2007 15:27:44 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > > > that is the reason we I am saying that the is something wrong in
> > > > > > some port configurations
> > > > >
> > > > > OK, I was willing to help you figure this out, but you've ignored
> > > > > my instructions 3 times now, so I'm giving up and will let you deal
> > > > > with it on your own.
> > > >
> > > > whatt?
> > > >
> > > > you're very funny, sure I did
> > > > seems you do not read with attention
> > >
> > > Probably it is because English is not your first language, but you
> > > really did not follow my instructions.
> > >
> > > If you had followed them, your email would contain the results of your
> > > grep -r command. This command would show which ports refer to the
> > > incorrect /usr/X11R6 location, and I would have helped you to figure
> > > out which ports they belong to. Rebuilding those ports is all that is
> > > necessary to fix your problem, but first you have to identify which
> > > ports they are.
> > >
> > > > but no problem since the problem *is* solved thanks to your help
> > >
> > > By doing the ln -s you worked around the problem but didn't solve it.
> > > There might be other problems later on.
> >
> > there is nothing wrong with my english, I guess you are just used to
> > handle slower people :) ... I just spared you and the list from getting
> > hundreds of lines in there email's, but here the shortform:
> >
> > pkg_info -L `pkg_info -r dia-\* | awk '{print $2}'` | grep libgdk-x11
>
> No, that's some random command you made up that has nothing to do with
> what I asked you to do.
>
that's randomly right :) mine is the shortcut to Rome and your's the other way
around the globe ...
anyway it shows clearly that no port installs the required files into the
place where dia looks them up
means or gtk-2 installes them into the wrong path or dia looks in the wrong
place
--
João
A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: make -D recent problem?
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:24:41PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday 03 May 2007 15:27:44 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > that is the reason we I am saying that the is something wrong in some
> > > > > port configurations
> > > >
> > > > OK, I was willing to help you figure this out, but you've ignored my
> > > > instructions 3 times now, so I'm giving up and will let you deal with
> > > > it on your own.
> > >
> > > whatt?
> > >
> > > you're very funny, sure I did
> > > seems you do not read with attention
> >
> > Probably it is because English is not your first language, but you
> > really did not follow my instructions.
> >
> > If you had followed them, your email would contain the results of your
> > grep -r command. This command would show which ports refer to the
> > incorrect /usr/X11R6 location, and I would have helped you to figure
> > out which ports they belong to. Rebuilding those ports is all that is
> > necessary to fix your problem, but first you have to identify which
> > ports they are.
> >
> > > but no problem since the problem *is* solved thanks to your help
> >
> > By doing the ln -s you worked around the problem but didn't solve it.
> > There might be other problems later on.
> >
>
> there is nothing wrong with my english, I guess you are just used to handle
> slower people :) ... I just spared you and the list from getting hundreds of
> lines in there email's, but here the shortform:
>
> pkg_info -L `pkg_info -r dia-\* | awk '{print $2}'` | grep libgdk-x11
No, that's some random command you made up that has nothing to do with
what I asked you to do.
Kris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: HEADS UP: xorg upgrade plans
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 15:37 -0400, Robert Huff wrote: > Danny Pansters writes: > > > /usr/X11R6 was a long standing bug about to be fixed once and for > > all. IIRC it originated from fixed paths in the old XFree. It > > won't be missed or mourned :) > > While I understand why this is going to happen, I've been of > the opinion it ought to be retained with contents limited to the > installed X Windows distribution. > > > Robert Huff This move was also already done on a number of Linux distros... -- Coleman ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: make -D recent problem?
On Thursday 03 May 2007 15:27:44 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > >
> > > > that is the reason we I am saying that the is something wrong in some
> > > > port configurations
> > >
> > > OK, I was willing to help you figure this out, but you've ignored my
> > > instructions 3 times now, so I'm giving up and will let you deal with
> > > it on your own.
> >
> > whatt?
> >
> > you're very funny, sure I did
> > seems you do not read with attention
>
> Probably it is because English is not your first language, but you
> really did not follow my instructions.
>
> If you had followed them, your email would contain the results of your
> grep -r command. This command would show which ports refer to the
> incorrect /usr/X11R6 location, and I would have helped you to figure
> out which ports they belong to. Rebuilding those ports is all that is
> necessary to fix your problem, but first you have to identify which
> ports they are.
>
> > but no problem since the problem *is* solved thanks to your help
>
> By doing the ln -s you worked around the problem but didn't solve it.
> There might be other problems later on.
>
there is nothing wrong with my english, I guess you are just used to handle
slower people :) ... I just spared you and the list from getting hundreds of
lines in there email's, but here the shortform:
pkg_info -L `pkg_info -r dia-\* | awk '{print $2}'` | grep libgdk-x11
/usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.a
/usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.la
/usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so
/usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
so there is no reason at all that dia looks and depends
on /usr/X11R6/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.la
or is this still my computer who tweaks it?
ah, almost forgot it, all dependencies were and are rebuild
--
João
A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: HEADS UP: xorg upgrade plans
Danny Pansters writes: > /usr/X11R6 was a long standing bug about to be fixed once and for > all. IIRC it originated from fixed paths in the old XFree. It > won't be missed or mourned :) While I understand why this is going to happen, I've been of the opinion it ought to be retained with contents limited to the installed X Windows distribution. Robert Huff ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: HEADS UP: xorg upgrade plans
On Thursday 03 May 2007 19:12:45 [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > mal content wrote: > >> /usr/local > > > > Hello. > > > > Why is FreeBSD using /usr/local instead of /usr/X11R7? > > > > thanks, > > MC > > A version dependant directory structure hasn't been a good idea in the > first place. No one was really able to tell weather to put a port into > /usr/X11R6 or /usr/local anyway. And it's virtually impossible to make a clean pkg-plist if a port/pkg needs to put stuff in *both* LOCALBASE and X11BASE. Let alone make it PREFIX safe (you have to choose either as default and cwd to the other halfway the plist). /usr/X11R6 was a long standing bug about to be fixed once and for all. IIRC it originated from fixed paths in the old XFree. It won't be missed or mourned :) Dan ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: make -D recent problem?
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 03:14:58PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote: > > > On Thursday 03 May 2007 15:00:24 Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 02:43:43PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote: > > > On Thursday 03 May 2007 14:23:13 Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > > > I guess this is a port configuration problem because certainly > > > > > > > others need them too but did not have this problem, only > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it's because something is stale on your system and needs to be > > > > > > rebuilt. > > > > > > > > > > I dont know, look > > > > > > > > > > # pkg_info -L gtk-2\* | grep libgdk-x11 > > > > > /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.a > > > > > /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.la > > > > > /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so > > > > > /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 > > > > > > > > > > this files are not beeing installed in /usr/X11R6/lib > > > > > > > > > > but some ports are looking there and not in /usr/local/lib > > > > > > > > Right, my suggestion quoted at the top of this email was an > > > > instruction for figuring out which these "some ports" are. > > > > > > well > > > as you can see gtk2 is installing them into /usr/local/lib > > > > > > but some ports are looking in /usr/X11R6/lib > > > > > > that is the reason we I am saying that the is something wrong in some > > > port configurations > > > > OK, I was willing to help you figure this out, but you've ignored my > > instructions 3 times now, so I'm giving up and will let you deal with > > it on your own. > > > > whatt? > > you're very funny, sure I did > seems you do not read with attention Probably it is because English is not your first language, but you really did not follow my instructions. If you had followed them, your email would contain the results of your grep -r command. This command would show which ports refer to the incorrect /usr/X11R6 location, and I would have helped you to figure out which ports they belong to. Rebuilding those ports is all that is necessary to fix your problem, but first you have to identify which ports they are. > but no problem since the problem *is* solved thanks to your help By doing the ln -s you worked around the problem but didn't solve it. There might be other problems later on. Kris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: make -D recent problem?
On Thursday 03 May 2007 15:00:24 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 02:43:43PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote: > > On Thursday 03 May 2007 14:23:13 Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > > I guess this is a port configuration problem because certainly > > > > > > others need them too but did not have this problem, only > > > > > > > > > > No, it's because something is stale on your system and needs to be > > > > > rebuilt. > > > > > > > > I dont know, look > > > > > > > > # pkg_info -L gtk-2\* | grep libgdk-x11 > > > > /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.a > > > > /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.la > > > > /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so > > > > /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 > > > > > > > > this files are not beeing installed in /usr/X11R6/lib > > > > > > > > but some ports are looking there and not in /usr/local/lib > > > > > > Right, my suggestion quoted at the top of this email was an > > > instruction for figuring out which these "some ports" are. > > > > well > > as you can see gtk2 is installing them into /usr/local/lib > > > > but some ports are looking in /usr/X11R6/lib > > > > that is the reason we I am saying that the is something wrong in some > > port configurations > > OK, I was willing to help you figure this out, but you've ignored my > instructions 3 times now, so I'm giving up and will let you deal with > it on your own. > whatt? you're very funny, sure I did seems you do not read with attention but no problem since the problem *is* solved thanks to your help -- João A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: make -D recent problem?
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 02:43:43PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote: > > > On Thursday 03 May 2007 14:23:13 Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > I guess this is a port configuration problem because certainly others > > > > > need them too but did not have this problem, only > > > > > > > > No, it's because something is stale on your system and needs to be > > > > rebuilt. > > > > > > I dont know, look > > > > > > # pkg_info -L gtk-2\* | grep libgdk-x11 > > > /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.a > > > /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.la > > > /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so > > > /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 > > > > > > this files are not beeing installed in /usr/X11R6/lib > > > > > > but some ports are looking there and not in /usr/local/lib > > > > Right, my suggestion quoted at the top of this email was an > > instruction for figuring out which these "some ports" are. > > well > as you can see gtk2 is installing them into /usr/local/lib > > but some ports are looking in /usr/X11R6/lib > > that is the reason we I am saying that the is something wrong in some port > configurations OK, I was willing to help you figure this out, but you've ignored my instructions 3 times now, so I'm giving up and will let you deal with it on your own. Best of luck, Kris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: make -D recent problem?
On Thursday 03 May 2007 14:23:13 Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > I guess this is a port configuration problem because certainly others > > > > need them too but did not have this problem, only > > > > > > No, it's because something is stale on your system and needs to be > > > rebuilt. > > > > I dont know, look > > > > # pkg_info -L gtk-2\* | grep libgdk-x11 > > /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.a > > /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.la > > /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so > > /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 > > > > this files are not beeing installed in /usr/X11R6/lib > > > > but some ports are looking there and not in /usr/local/lib > > Right, my suggestion quoted at the top of this email was an > instruction for figuring out which these "some ports" are. well as you can see gtk2 is installing them into /usr/local/lib but some ports are looking in /usr/X11R6/lib that is the reason we I am saying that the is something wrong in some port configurations -- João A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: HEADS UP: xorg upgrade plans
On 03/05/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:43:47PM +0100, mal content wrote: > >/usr/local > > Hello. > > Why is FreeBSD using /usr/local instead of /usr/X11R7? /usr/local is the new de facto standard, AFAIK no-one is using /usr/X11R7. Kris Oh, OK. thanks, MC ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: make -D recent problem?
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 07:32:28AM -0300, JoaoBR wrote: > On Wednesday 02 May 2007 23:59:19 Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > I guess one of those libraries needs to be rebuilt. > > > > > > grep -r /usr/X11R6/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.la /usr/local/lib /usr/X11R6/lib > > > > > > should show you the files that need to be rebuilt. ?pkg_which will > > > help you to figure out which port they belong to. > > > > it didn't help so much > > > What does this statement mean? > > means rebuilding them didn't solved the problem Rebuilding what? I can't help you if you keep not telling me anything :) > > > even Garrett's suggestion not, the only way I could > > > solve this was linking them to /usr/local/lib where the files are on my > > > system > > > > > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.la > > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.la > > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.la > > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.la > > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.la > > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libpango-1.0.la > > > > > > I guess this is a port configuration problem because certainly others > > > need them too but did not have this problem, only > > > > No, it's because something is stale on your system and needs to be > > rebuilt. > > > > I dont know, look > > # pkg_info -L gtk-2\* | grep libgdk-x11 > /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.a > /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.la > /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so > /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 > > this files are not beeing installed in /usr/X11R6/lib > > but some ports are looking there and not in /usr/local/lib Right, my suggestion quoted at the top of this email was an instruction for figuring out which these "some ports" are. Kris pgpiiX0fLkeic.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: HEADS UP: xorg upgrade plans
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:43:47PM +0100, mal content wrote: > >/usr/local > > Hello. > > Why is FreeBSD using /usr/local instead of /usr/X11R7? /usr/local is the new de facto standard, AFAIK no-one is using /usr/X11R7. Kris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: HEADS UP: xorg upgrade plans
mal content wrote: >> /usr/local > > Hello. > > Why is FreeBSD using /usr/local instead of /usr/X11R7? > > thanks, > MC A version dependant directory structure hasn't been a good idea in the first place. No one was really able to tell weather to put a port into /usr/X11R6 or /usr/local anyway. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: HEADS UP: xorg upgrade plans
/usr/local Hello. Why is FreeBSD using /usr/local instead of /usr/X11R7? thanks, MC ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Can't update vlc (new compiler error)
Garrett Cooper wrote: [snipped] It's missing a dependency. Look at the original source's website because it may offer some clues as to what package(s) is/are required to compile vlc against. Thanks for the hint, but I couldn't find any information on required libraries as the vlc-folks havn't updated this list when I took a look... I did got it to compile though. Apparently it required a newer version of ffmpeg-devel. I fixed that and now it works :-) Thanks anyway. Philipp -- www.familie-ost.info/~pj ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
INDEX now builds successfully on 5.x
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
INDEX build failed for 5.x
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..gaim-hotkeys-0.2.2: "/local0/tmp/erwin/tindex/ports/net-im/gaim-devel" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete ===> net-im/gaim-hotkeys failed *** Error code 1 *** Error code 1 Stop in /local0/tmp/erwin/tindex/ports. *** Error code 1 Stop in /local0/tmp/erwin/tindex/ports. 1 error Committers on the hook: ahze benjsc demon flz jkoshy lth lwhsu maho marcus miwi sat stas vanilla Most recent CVS update was: U astro/tclgeomap/Makefile U astro/tclgeomap/distinfo U astro/tkgeomap/Makefile U astro/tkgeomap/distinfo U astro/xearth/files/freebsd.committers.markers U games/klavaro/Makefile U games/klavaro/distinfo U games/klavaro/pkg-plist U lang/gnat-gcc42/Makefile U lang/gnat-gcc42/distinfo U lang/gnat-gcc42/pkg-descr U lang/gnat-gcc42/files/patch-gcc-ada-Makefile.in U multimedia/vlc/Makefile.inc ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: [HEADS UP] ntfs-3g: better performance with libublio
Alejandro Pulver wrote: The reason AFAIK is the lack of cache for block devices, which was (re)added in FreeBSD-CURRENT (7.x). I don't think something like that cache has been added in -CURRENT. AFAIK things are still the same as in 6.x. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Apache 2.2 + mod_auth_pam + PAM
On 5/3/07, Jonathan Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm struggeling with setting up Apache 2.2 and mod_auth_pam to authenticate an BasicAuth directory against my local unix users. I'm using pam authentication with apache 2.2. We mostly use radius for authentication but here is my config: $ cat /etc/pam.d/httpd # # PAM configuration for the "httpd" service # # auth authrequiredpam_nologin.so no_warn authsufficient pam_radius.so no_warn try_first_pass authrequiredpam_unix.so no_warn try_first_pass # account account requiredpam_login_access.so account requiredpam_unix.so # session session requiredpam_permit.so # password passwordrequiredpam_unix.so no_warn try_first_pass # relevant httpd.conf: LoadModule auth_pam_modulelibexec/apache2/mod_auth_pam.so LoadModule auth_sys_group_module libexec/apache2/mod_auth_sys_group.so Alias /wordpress "/usr/local/www/data/wordpress" AuthType Basic AuthName "Secure Area" AuthGroupFile /usr/local/etc/apache2/groups Require group group1 DirectoryIndex index.php $ cat /usr/local/etc/apache2/groups group1: corsmith BTW: I don't believe you need to mess around with changing permissions on any of the password files: $ ls -l /etc/passwd /etc/master.passwd /etc/spwd.db -rw--- 1 root wheel 1248 Apr 1 11:35 /etc/master.passwd -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1022 Apr 1 11:35 /etc/passwd -rw--- 1 root wheel 20960 Apr 1 11:35 /etc/spwd.db -Corey Smith ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
INDEX build failed for 5.x
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..gaim-hotkeys-0.2.2: "/local0/tmp/erwin/tindex/ports/net-im/gaim-devel" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete ===> net-im/gaim-hotkeys failed *** Error code 1 *** Error code 1 Stop in /local0/tmp/erwin/tindex/ports. *** Error code 1 Stop in /local0/tmp/erwin/tindex/ports. 1 error Committers on the hook: demon flz jkoshy lth maho marcus miwi sat stas vanilla Most recent CVS update was: U MOVED U databases/p5-DBIx-SearchBuilder/Makefile U databases/p5-DBIx-SearchBuilder/distinfo U devel/gaa/Makefile U devel/gaa/distinfo U devel/gaa/pkg-plist U devel/gaa/files/patch-configure U devel/p5-ExtUtils-ParseXS/Makefile U devel/p5-ExtUtils-ParseXS/distinfo U editors/openoffice.org-1.1-devel/files/moz-patch U editors/openoffice.org-1.1-devel/files/patch-objformat U emulators/gxemul/pkg-descr U net/p5-Net-Z3950-ZOOM/Makefile U net/p5-Net-Z3950-ZOOM/distinfo U net/pear-Net_MAC/Makefile U net/pear-Net_MAC/distinfo U net/quagga/Makefile U net/quagga/distinfo U net/rrdtool/Makefile U net/rrdtool/distinfo U net/rrdtool/files/patch-bindings-Makefile.in U net/rrdtool/files/patch-doc-Makefile.in U net/rrdtool/files/patch-examples-Makefile.in U net-im/Makefile U net-im/finch/Makefile U net-im/finch/pkg-descr U net-im/finch/pkg-plist U net-im/libpurple/Makefile U net-im/libpurple/distinfo U net-im/libpurple/pkg-descr U net-im/libpurple/pkg-plist U net-im/pidgin/Makefile U net-im/pidgin/pkg-descr U net-im/pidgin/pkg-plist U net-im/telepathy-gabble/Makefile U net-im/telepathy-gabble/distinfo U net-im/telepathy-glib/Makefile U net-im/telepathy-glib/distinfo U net-im/telepathy-glib/pkg-plist U net-im/telepathy-idle/Makefile U net-im/telepathy-idle/distinfo U net-im/telepathy-python/Makefile U net-im/telepathy-python/distinfo U net-im/telepathy-python/pkg-plist U sysutils/devcpu/Makefile U sysutils/devcpu/distinfo U sysutils/devcpu/pkg-plist U textproc/Makefile U textproc/dblatex/Makefile U textproc/dblatex/distinfo U textproc/dblatex/pkg-plist U textproc/p5-MARC-Record/Makefile U textproc/p5-MARC-Record/distinfo U textproc/p5-MARC-Record/pkg-plist U textproc/p5-UML-Class-Simple/Makefile U textproc/p5-UML-Class-Simple/distinfo U textproc/p5-UML-Class-Simple/pkg-descr U textproc/p5-UML-Class-Simple/pkg-plist U www/p5-Catalyst-View-Jemplate/Makefile U www/p5-Catalyst-View-Jemplate/distinfo U www/p5-POE-Component-Server-SOAP/Makefile U www/p5-POE-Component-Server-SOAP/distinfo U www/pear-HTTP_Download/Makefile U www/pear-HTTP_Download/distinfo U www/www6to4/Makefile U www/www6to4/pkg-plist U www/www6to4/files/www6to4.in U www/xpi-sessionmanager/Makefile U www/xpi-sessionmanager/distinfo ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: make -D recent problem?
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 23:59:19 Kris Kennaway wrote: > > I guess one of those libraries needs to be rebuilt. > > > > grep -r /usr/X11R6/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.la /usr/local/lib /usr/X11R6/lib > > > > should show you the files that need to be rebuilt. pkg_which will > > help you to figure out which port they belong to. > > it didn't help so much > What does this statement mean? means rebuilding them didn't solved the problem > > > even Garrett's suggestion not, the only way I could > > solve this was linking them to /usr/local/lib where the files are on my > > system > > > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.la > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.la > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.la > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.la > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.la > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libpango-1.0.la > > > > I guess this is a port configuration problem because certainly others > > need them too but did not have this problem, only > > No, it's because something is stale on your system and needs to be > rebuilt. > I dont know, look # pkg_info -L gtk-2\* | grep libgdk-x11 /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.a /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.la /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 this files are not beeing installed in /usr/X11R6/lib but some ports are looking there and not in /usr/local/lib -- João A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: install fails because / is not writeable
> Once in a while a port fails to upgrade, because it wants to write > something in /etc. E.g. perl into /etc/make.conf or other ports into > /etc/group. > > On my systems / is normally a read only mount. These ports build fine > during a portupgrade and fail during install, leaving most of the port > installed, but unregistered (i.e. the package database is broken). > > [...] Mount / writable before upgrading or installing software. Regards Björn ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
multiple versions of docbook et al.
While doing some pruning on my ports I noticed these: docbook-1.3: ok docbook-241_2: ok docbook-3.0_2: ok docbook-3.1_2: ok docbook-4.0_2: ok docbook-4.1_2: ok docbook-4.2: ok docbook-xml-4.2_1: ok docbook-xml-4.3: ok docbook-xml-4.4: ok Do I _really_ need all those versions of docbook(-xml) ? Is there any compelling reason not to remove all but the latest versions and use pkgdf -f to point everything else to those? David -- A mother takes twenty years to make a man of her boy, and another woman makes a fool of him in twenty minutes. -- Frost ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Apache 2.2 + mod_auth_pam + PAM
Cheers, I'm struggeling with setting up Apache 2.2 and mod_auth_pam to authenticate an BasicAuth directory against my local unix users. Apache is using PAM in so far as when I have his /etc/pam.d/httpd config: auth required pam_permit.so debug accountrequired pam_permit.so debug It works fine, so the user gets an Auth login window and the login works (because of pam_permit.so). With the real thing (pam_unix.so instead of pam_permit.so) I get: PAM: user 'jweiss' - not authenticated: authentication error The www user has read rights to /etc/master.passwd and /etc/spwd.db # ll /etc/spwd.db 40 -rw-r- 1 root www40K May 2 20:40 /etc/spwd.db # ll /etc/master.passwd 4 -rw-r- 1 root www 2.1K May 2 20:40 /etc/master.passwd Is this not enough for PAM to check a login/password? Also it seems that the 'debug' statement in /etc/pam.d/httpd is ignored as I do not get more output in /var/log/messages with it present. Does anybody have a hint? Thanks, Jonathan -- Jonathan Weiss http://blog.innerewut.de ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
