Question about fields in INDEX files
Hello all,
As part of my Google SoC project I'm taking a look at INDEX-{ver} and
revising it to fit Berkeley DB objects combined with pkg_*, much like
pkgdb does.
I have a few questions about the meanings of the fields though and
their use. I'm using net/DarwinStreamingServer as an example, because
it's short, and contains all of the fields I could find present in all
of the INDEX entries, and this comes from INDEX-7, not INDEX-5 or INDEX-6.
===
Entry:
===
DarwinStreamingServer-5.5.4_1|/usr/ports/net/DarwinStreamingServer|/usr/local|Darwin
Streaming Server, a MP3, MPEG4 and QuickTime streaming
server|/usr/ports/net/DarwinStreamingServer/pkg-descr|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|net||p5-Net-SSLeay-1.30_1
perl-5.8.8|http://developer.apple.com/darwin/projects/streaming/|||
===
The fields are as following (separated by pipes):
1. [Port name (without category)]-[version][{:_revision}]
2. Full path to port.
3. Installation prefix (?)
4. Comment
5. Full path to pkg-descr file
6. Maintainer
7. Category
8. [unknown] -- blank field
9. Direct dependencies
10. Developer's / Project's Webpage
11., 12. [unknown] (x2) -- blank fields
===
If someone can correct me on the meanings of these fields, that would be
fantastic. Also, if someone can help me discover the secret identities
of some of the unknown fields (in particular the last 2 blank fields),
that would be helpful as well. I understand that the majority of these
lines do come from the Makefiles, but I'm not sure what additional
fields could be involved in this.
Also, I was wondering if fields 3. and 5. are really necessary in the
INDEX file. 3. can be user specified, or default to a particular value.
Also, 5. can be automatically assumed to {2.}/pkg-descr in all cases
that I've seen. So, given this observation is there any real case that
this assumption would be false?
Thanks for any and all help!
-Garrett
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question about fields in INDEX files
The output from each port's make describe is documented at the describe target in: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk This is changed to a different format (a historical bug, too late to fix now because of POLA) via make index from ports/Makefile by the following script (see the foreach block at the end): http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/Tools/make_index I will send you portsmon's portsIndexUtils.py file that you can work from to figure out this mess. (I don't see any reason to post it to the list). mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question about fields in INDEX files
Mark Linimon wrote: The output from each port's make describe is documented at the describe target in: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk This is changed to a different format (a historical bug, too late to fix now because of POLA) via make index from ports/Makefile by the following script (see the foreach block at the end): http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/Tools/make_index I will send you portsmon's portsIndexUtils.py file that you can work from to figure out this mess. (I don't see any reason to post it to the list). mcl Mark, Thanks for the speedy reply. Would you happen to know what the Perl module / class is that's used for storing the pkg objects with? I just want to look at the structure a bit closer. Thanks, -Garrett ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question about fields in INDEX files
Mark Linimon wrote: The output from each port's make describe is documented at the describe target in: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk This is changed to a different format (a historical bug, too late to fix now because of POLA) via make index from ports/Makefile by the following script (see the foreach block at the end): http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/Tools/make_index I will send you portsmon's portsIndexUtils.py file that you can work from to figure out this mess. (I don't see any reason to post it to the list). mcl Mark, Thanks for the speedy reply. Would you happen to know what the Perl module / class is that's used for storing the pkg objects with? I just want to look at the structure a bit closer. Thanks, -Garrett ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question about fields in INDEX files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hello all,
As part of my Google SoC project I'm taking a look at INDEX-{ver}
and revising it to fit Berkeley DB objects combined with pkg_*, much
like pkgdb does.
I have a few questions about the meanings of the fields though and
their use. I'm using net/DarwinStreamingServer as an example, because
it's short, and contains all of the fields I could find present in all
of the INDEX entries, and this comes from INDEX-7, not INDEX-5 or INDEX-6.
===
Entry:
===
DarwinStreamingServer-5.5.4_1|/usr/ports/net/DarwinStreamingServer|/usr/local|Darwin
Streaming Server, a MP3, MPEG4 and QuickTime streaming
server|/usr/ports/net/DarwinStreamingServer/pkg-descr|[EMAIL
PROTECTED]|net||p5-Net-SSLeay-1.30_1
perl-5.8.8|http://developer.apple.com/darwin/projects/streaming/|||
===
The fields are as following (separated by pipes):
1. [Port name (without category)]-[version][{:_revision}]
2. Full path to port.
3. Installation prefix (?)
4. Comment
5. Full path to pkg-descr file
6. Maintainer
7. Category
8. [unknown] -- blank field
9. Direct dependencies
10. Developer's / Project's Webpage
11., 12. [unknown] (x2) -- blank fields
===
If someone can correct me on the meanings of these fields, that would be
fantastic. Also, if someone can help me discover the secret identities
of some of the unknown fields (in particular the last 2 blank fields),
that would be helpful as well. I understand that the majority of these
lines do come from the Makefiles, but I'm not sure what additional
fields could be involved in this.
Also, I was wondering if fields 3. and 5. are really necessary in the
INDEX file. 3. can be user specified, or default to a particular value.
Also, 5. can be automatically assumed to {2.}/pkg-descr in all cases
that I've seen. So, given this observation is there any real case that
this assumption would be false?
Thanks for any and all help!
-Garrett
Been there, done that. Take a look at the code in Port.pm from my
FreeBSD::Portindex stuff. Particularly the print() method:
#
# Print out one line of the INDEX file
#
sub print ($*;$)
{
my $self = shift;
my $fh = shift;
my $allports = shift;
my $counter = shift;
print $fh $self-PKGNAME(), '|';
print $fh $self-ORIGIN(), '|';
print $fh $self-STUFF(), '|';
print $fh $self-_chase_deps( $allports, 'BUILD_DEPENDS' ), '|';
print $fh $self-_chase_deps( $allports, 'RUN_DEPENDS' ), '|';
print $fh $self-WWW(), '|';
print $fh $self-_chase_deps( $allports, 'EXTRACT_DEPENDS' ), '|';
print $fh $self-_chase_deps( $allports, 'PATCH_DEPENDS' ), '|';
print $fh $self-_chase_deps( $allports, 'FETCH_DEPENDS' ), \n;
counter( \%::Config, $counter );
return $self;
}
STUFF is the amalgamation of fields 3,4,5,6,7 which you've already
identified. The PREFIX (field 3) is usually /usr/local although for
a limited time there are still a number of X11 related entries using
/usr/X11R6. Similarly the pkg-desc (field 5) is almost always
/usr/ports/category/portname/pkg-descr -- but there are a
significant number of exceptions, which are slave ports. Eg. compare
these two INDEX entries:
% grep ^mod_jk INDEX-6
mod_jk-1.2.21,1|/usr/ports/www/mod_jk|/usr/local|Apache JK module for
connecting to Tomcat using AJP1X|/usr/ports/www/mod_jk/pkg-descr|[EMAIL
PROTECTED]|www|apache-1.3.37_3 expat-2.0.0_1 gettext-0.16.1_1 gmake-3.81_1
libiconv-1.9.2_2 perl-5.8.8|apache-1.3.37_3 expat-2.0.0_1
perl-5.8.8|http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/|||
mod_jk-ap2-1.2.21|/usr/ports/www/mod_jk-apache2|/usr/local|Apache2 JK module
for connecting to Tomcat using
AJP1X|/usr/ports/www/mod_jk-apache2/../mod_jk/pkg-descr|[EMAIL
PROTECTED]|www|apache-2.0.59 expat-2.0.0_1 gettext-0.16.1_1 gmake-3.81_1
libiconv-1.9.2_2 perl-5.8.8|apache-2.0.59 expat-2.0.0_1 libiconv-1.9.2_2
perl-5.8.8|http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/|||
Note that either of these fields can vary with local customization as
well -- nothing says that you've always got to keep the ports tree rooted
at /usr/ports or install everything with a prefix of /usr/local, although
if you change any of that, you're going to be building your own INDEX
anyhow.
The 5 'DEPENDS' entries in the last 6 fields consist of the output of
various FOO_DEPENDS variables from the port's Makefile processed to turn
the port origins 'editors/emacs21' into the package names 'emacs-21.3_9'
These values are then combined in various ways, ie. RUN_DEPENDS in the
Index file is the combination of the values from the $RUN_DEPENDS and
$LIB_DEPENDS variables from the Makefile, plus the accumulated sum of
the RUN_DEPENDS for each of the dependencies, and each of their
dependencies, recursively.
eg. If '$EXTRACT_DEPENDS' in the port Makefile is set to:
EXTRACT_DEPENDS= rpm2cpio.pl:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/rpm2cpio
then the EXTRACT_DEPENDS field in the
apache20 and mod_python3 problem
hello, I'm having problems with mod_python-3.3.1 and apache-2.0.59. By I know and tested the problem is caused by mod_python3 port. The configuration of apache is the proposed at the /usr/local/share/examples/apache2/http-std.conf file, I only modified it with the following lines: LoadModule python_module libexec/apache2/mod_python.so LoadModule php4_module libexec/apache2/libphp4.so AddType application/x-httpd-php .php AddType application/x-httpd-php-source .phps LoadModule security_module libexec/apache2/mod_security.so LoadModule dav_module libexec/apache2/mod_dav.so LoadModule dav_fs_module libexec/apache2/mod_dav_fs.so LoadModule dav_svn_module libexec/apache2/mod_dav_svn.so LoadModule authz_svn_module libexec/apache2/mod_authz_svn.so When i disable python_module i can restart, stop and reload the server but when i don't disable it i get several errors: # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache2.sh stop Stopping apache2. Waiting for PIDS: 20827, 20827, 20827, 20827, 20827, # kill -9 20827 If I try to restart or reload apache with python_module loaded I get the following error: # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache2.sh restart Performing sanity check on apache2 configuration: Syntax OK Segmentation fault (core dumped) I'm a newbie user of FreeBSD 6.1 and i'm suffering this error from several months. I would be pleased if you could help me. Thanks, -- Christian Pinedo Zamalloa [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key at: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x6E261AAB Fingerprint: B96C BEC0 B037 AFAC 43C1 952A 6D87 962E 6E26 1AAB signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: FreeBSD Port: wildfire-3.2.4
On Thursday, 3 May 2007 at 16:01:27 -0400, Brandon McCorkle wrote: Hi Quetzal, I was curious if you were working on a openfire 3.3.0 port in FreeBSD? It's my understanding that it needs Java 1.6 now and I didn't see a Java port for this version in BSD so I was curious if 3.3.0 was going to happen. Thanks for all your hard work, the 3.2.4 port has been working beautifully for us. Brandon Hi Brandon. I currently working on this :) -- == - Best regards, Nikolay Pavlov. --- == ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: net/rrdtool fails to build when ruby is installed?
Hi, On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 04:25:41PM -0700, Kian Mohageri wrote: I'm running into an error (seen below) when attempting to build the latest net/rrdtool when Ruby is installed. Others (including me) have encountered the exact same issue - see the ports/112412 PR. Regards, Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp3yR4KwTmAm.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: cups permission problems
AN [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, 3 May 2007, Lowell Gilbert wrote: AN [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I just installed cups 1.2.10 on FBSD 6.2 stable from ports. The install completed successfully, however when I try to do anything nothing works. After starting the cups daemon, I go to localhost:631 and I can see the main page but when I try to add a printer the page is blank. The following are excerpts from /var/log/cups/error_log: I [02/May/2007:22:44:46 +0300] Full reload complete. I [02/May/2007:22:44:46 +0300] Listening to ::1:631 on fd 2... I [02/May/2007:22:44:46 +0300] Listening to 127.0.0.1:631 on fd 3... I [02/May/2007:22:44:46 +0300] Listening to /var/run/cups.sock on fd 4... I [02/May/2007:22:45:04 +0300] commptr=?OP=add-printer I [02/May/2007:22:45:04 +0300] Started /usr/local/libexec/cups/cgi-bin/admin.cgi (pid=89759) E [02/May/2007:22:45:04 +0300] [CGI] Unable to open template file /usr/local/share/cups/templates/header.tmpl - Permission denied E [02/May/2007:22:45:04 +0300] [CGI] Unable to open template file /usr/local/share/cups/templates/add-printer.tmpl - Permission denied E [02/May/2007:22:45:04 +0300] [CGI] Unable to open template file /usr/local/share/cups/templates/trailer.tmpl - Permission denied I [02/May/2007:22:48:13 +0300] Full reload complete. I [02/May/2007:22:48:13 +0300] Listening to ::1:631 on fd 1... I [02/May/2007:22:48:13 +0300] Listening to 127.0.0.1:631 on fd 3... I [02/May/2007:22:48:13 +0300] Listening to /var/run/cups.sock on fd 4... I [02/May/2007:22:53:32 +0300] commptr=?OP=add-printer I [02/May/2007:22:53:32 +0300] Started /usr/local/libexec/cups/cgi-bin/admin.cgi (pid=89770) E [02/May/2007:22:53:32 +0300] [CGI] Unable to open template file /usr/local/share/cups/templates/header.tmpl - Permission denied E [02/May/2007:22:53:32 +0300] [CGI] Unable to open template file /usr/local/share/cups/templates/add-printer.tmpl - Permission denied E [02/May/2007:22:53:32 +0300] [CGI] Unable to open template file /usr/local/share/cups/templates/trailer.tmpl - Permission denied I [02/May/2007:22:55:10 +0300] Saving remote.cache... I [02/May/2007:22:56:18 +0300] Full reload complete. E [02/May/2007:22:56:19 +0300] Unable to bind socket for address ::1:631 - Address already in use. E [02/May/2007:22:56:19 +0300] Unable to bind socket for address 127.0.0.1:631 - Address already in use. I [02/May/2007:22:56:19 +0300] Listening to /var/run/cups.sock on fd 2... E [02/May/2007:22:56:19 +0300] cupsdStartBrowsing: Unable to bind broadcast socket - Address already in use. I [02/May/2007:22:58:22 +0300] Listening to ::1:631 (IPv6) I [02/May/2007:22:58:22 +0300] Listening to 127.0.0.1:631 (IPv4) I [02/May/2007:22:58:22 +0300] Listening to /var/run/cups.sock (Domain) I [02/May/2007:22:58:22 +0300] Loaded configuration file /usr/local/etc/cups/cupsd.conf I [02/May/2007:22:58:22 +0300] Using default TempDir of /var/spool/cups/tmp... I [02/May/2007:22:58:22 +0300] Cleaning out old temporary files in /var/spool/cups/tmp... I [02/May/2007:22:58:22 +0300] Configured for up to 100 clients. I [02/May/2007:22:58:22 +0300] Allowing up to 100 client connections per host. I [02/May/2007:22:58:22 +0300] Using policy default as the default! I [02/May/2007:22:58:22 +0300] Full reload is required. I [02/May/2007:22:58:22 +0300] Loaded MIME database from /usr/local/etc/cups': 34 types, 38 filters... I [02/May/2007:22:58:22 +0300] Loading job cache file /var/cache/cups/job.cache... I [02/May/2007:22:58:22 +0300] Full reload complete. E [02/May/2007:22:58:22 +0300] Unable to bind socket for address ::1:631 - Address already in use. E [02/May/2007:22:58:22 +0300] Unable to bind socket for address 127.0.0.1:631 - Address already in use. I [02/May/2007:22:58:22 +0300] Listening to /var/run/cups.sock on fd 2... E [02/May/2007:22:58:22 +0300] cupsdStartBrowsing: Unable to bind broadcast socket - Address already in use. I [02/May/2007:22:58:48 +0300] commptr=list+1+0+requested-attributes=all I [02/May/2007:22:58:48 +0300] Started /usr/local/libexec/cups/daemon/cups-driverd (pid=89822) E [02/May/2007:22:58:48 +0300] [cups-driverd] Unable to open PPD directory /usr/local/share/cups/model: Permission denied I [02/May/2007:22:59:38 +0300] commptr=list+1+0+requested-attributes=all I [02/May/2007:22:59:38 +0300] Started /usr/local/libexec/cups/daemon/cups-driverd (pid=89823) E [02/May/2007:22:59:38 +0300] [cups-driverd] Unable to open PPD directory /usr/local/share/cups/model: Permission denied I [02/May/2007:22:59:52 +0300] commptr=list+1+0+requested-attributes=all I [02/May/2007:22:59:52 +0300] Started /usr/local/libexec/cups/daemon/cups-driverd (pid=89824) E [02/May/2007:22:59:52 +0300] [cups-driverd] Unable to open PPD directory /usr/local/share/cups/model: Permission denied I tried commenting out all security and authorization settings in the conf file, but it did not help. I compared the settings on the files and folders
Re: question about fields in INDEX files
Michel Talon wrote: Take a look at: http://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/~talon/freebsdports.html all fields are explained. Thanks to Michel (many kudos and much thanks!), I now have a list of all of the fields: 1. pkgname 2. path 3. prefix 4. comment 5. descr 6. maintainer 7. categories 8. build_deps 9. run_deps 10. website 11. extract_deps 12. patch_deps 13. fetch_deps I looked through the INDEX file pretty quickly, and I can't see any instances of 12. or 13. Also, I'm still wondering if 3. is necessary because the user can specify the install directory, and/or we could set the default to /usr/local. The only case where I see this as incorrect is with already installed packages, but that should be specified in the /var/db/pkg/* files, right? Thanks again all! -Garrett ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: question about fields in INDEX files
Garrett Cooper wrote: Michel Talon wrote: Take a look at: http://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/~talon/freebsdports.html all fields are explained. Thanks to Michel (many kudos and much thanks!), I now have a list of all of the fields: 1. pkgname 2. path 3. prefix 4. comment 5. descr 6. maintainer 7. categories 8. build_deps 9. run_deps 10. website 11. extract_deps 12. patch_deps 13. fetch_deps I looked through the INDEX file pretty quickly, and I can't see any instances of 12. or 13. Also, I'm still wondering if 3. is necessary because the user can specify the install directory, and/or we could set the default to /usr/local. The only case where I see this as incorrect is with already installed packages, but that should be specified in the /var/db/pkg/* files, right? Thanks again all! -Garrett Ok, question about 3. was answered, and so was the questions for 12. and 13. I assume. I'll reread the email Matthew Seaman, and see if I can find any spots where I'm confused. Thanks! -Garrett ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Fwd: Re: Ports forbids me to install compat3x-i386]
---BeginMessage--- Garrett Cooper wrote: Theorem wrote: Stevan Tiefert wrote: I need to install the port misc/compat3x-i386 as a dependency for the port audio/mbrola. The port misc/compat3x-i386 is marked as IGNORE and it returns an error after portinstall compat3x-i386: vagabund# portinstall compat3x-i386 ** Port marked as IGNORE: misc/compat3x: is forbidden: FreeBSD-SA-03:05.xdr, FreeBSD-SA-03:08.realpath - not fixed / no lib available How can I install the port compat3x-i386? 'make install' ? The port you're trying to install ( mbrola ) is binary only and requires libraries that are no longer either 1. in the expected locations or 2. replaced by something better. I suspect since the maintainer for compat3x listed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] then there's not much you can do other than mail that list. If you decide to hack up your own BSD dist, drag in the binary from ports, and keep adding libraries to your system. The errors from the binary should point out what's wrong and what to add next. Not much help, good luck. Theorem Nothing there that can be installed for compat3x, so you need to see if a) the app can be ported to a later version of FreeBSD, and b) see if the maintainer can swing the upgrade in the Makefile. FreeBSD 3.x was abandoned a long time ago due to possible security concerns and support issues :). -Garrett Yes, thanks for the tip, did this make it to the list ? I don't see it up there. -Theorem ---End Message--- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Fwd: Re: Ports forbids me to install compat3x-i386]
Garrett Cooper wrote: Subject: Re: Ports forbids me to install compat3x-i386 From: Theorem [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 16:13:22 -0400 To: Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user youshi10) for youshi10+mail/non-UW; Sun, 6 May 2007 13:13:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mxe9.u.washington.edu (mxe9.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.150]) by bp13.u.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l46KDcYR020249 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 6 May 2007 13:13:38 -0700 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.239]) by mxe9.u.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW07.03) with ESMTP id l46KDbNH030402 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 6 May 2007 13:13:37 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so1470724wxd for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 06 May 2007 13:13:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UUe3tL+66KooAkeihPR2Psft42BV/4SKbKKjnT47feqDAq254OvyUt7Xz+49GWGBlXYr0WlqByifGE5DH3kqoHojpjN7hZYYEu11Eyj8gf3dWhFNtMAywx2/J4G5prHDdaNHIQ4kjRUOFoP69j+lzEB9t2ebUDlhCsvZqQHTIek= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Ig2mQznLbrwdvb+9jk0bwz2nw6o8eEg5IyupXqe18C8yY2c6V+svqEoXBVvDzqC33R7EZkxW8MH2eQWDT74ocd3DDIDJXTQh3/sf03OgwgTIi47DavarVoP4klCICg/YHxp0HYK5tSV6llwxKYqnIZDztXB9A0PZfwtd5VEUjTg= Received: by 10.90.113.20 with SMTP id l20mr4504399agc.1178482416514; Sun, 06 May 2007 13:13:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.10.0.6? ( [71.251.196.244]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 7sm5952998aga.2007.05.06.13.13.35; Sun, 06 May 2007 13:13:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 5.3.1.294258, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.5.6.125434 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=III, Probability=7%, Report='SPF_PASS 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FROM_GMAIL 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HELO_GMAIL 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __RDNS_GMAIL 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Garrett Cooper wrote: Theorem wrote: Stevan Tiefert wrote: I need to install the port misc/compat3x-i386 as a dependency for the port audio/mbrola. The port misc/compat3x-i386 is marked as IGNORE and it returns an error after portinstall compat3x-i386: vagabund# portinstall compat3x-i386 ** Port marked as IGNORE: misc/compat3x: is forbidden: FreeBSD-SA-03:05.xdr, FreeBSD-SA-03:08.realpath - not fixed / no lib available How can I install the port compat3x-i386? 'make install' ? The port you're trying to install ( mbrola ) is binary only and requires libraries that are no longer either 1. in the expected locations or 2. replaced by something better. I suspect since the maintainer for compat3x listed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] then there's not much you can do other than mail that list. If you decide to hack up your own BSD dist, drag in the binary from ports, and keep adding libraries to your system. The errors from the binary should point out what's wrong and what to add next. Not much help, good luck. Theorem Nothing there that can be installed for compat3x, so you need to see if a) the app can be ported to a later version of FreeBSD, and b) see if the maintainer can swing the upgrade in the Makefile. FreeBSD 3.x was abandoned a long time ago due to possible security concerns and support issues :). -Garrett Yes, thanks for the tip, did this make it to the list ? I don't see it up there. -Theorem Hmmm.. wrong list yet again. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XFree86-4 maintainer needed
Dear community, With the xorg 7.2 upgrade changing a lot of the ground rules for X support in ports, and the deprecation of FreeBSD 4.x support (the last FreeBSD release to use it), XFree86 4.x has effectively been desupported. In fact the port-xorg 7.2 ports tree has not been tested at all with XFree86 4.x, so it may or may not work once the update hits the tree this week. If anyone out there still needs to use XFree86 4.x and wants to take over support for it, please let me know. Otherwise we will begin formal deprecation and removal from the ports tree. Kris pgpQ5oPEpwIlx.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: XFree86-4 maintainer needed
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 05:48:06PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: Dear community, With the xorg 7.2 upgrade changing a lot of the ground rules for X support in ports, and the deprecation of FreeBSD 4.x support (the last FreeBSD release to use it), XFree86 4.x has effectively been desupported. In fact the port-xorg 7.2 ports tree has not been tested post at all with XFree86 4.x, so it may or may not work once the update hits the tree this week. If anyone out there still needs to use XFree86 4.x and wants to take over support for it, please let me know. Otherwise we will begin formal deprecation and removal from the ports tree. Kris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problem in compiling by gfortran
It was my failure. distinfo file has no checksum, and distfile stored on my host was too old. I cannot build biology/platon on my hosts. Precise report has been sent to PR: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=108105 , but no one reproduce the same trouble. --- Tsurutani Naoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
