Re: php 5.2.2

2007-05-10 Thread Spil Oss

On 10/05/07, Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 10:48:30AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The latest release of PHP is out (as at May 3) and I'm just wondering if
 there's a schedule for updating the port - this release corrects some not
 insignificant security vulnerabilities.

We are in an unusual ports freeze to do the preliminary work to import
the xorg7.2 release, so at the moment we are holding off on this.  We
are, however, aware of the issue.

mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



As much as I (and I hope all of us) appreciate the effort to include
xorg7.2, this leaves many productive systems vulnerable. I have not
yet found an update on the progress of the xorg7.2 work but I'm
anxious to find out when we can expect the ports tree to be unfrozen.

Can anyone supply us with a timeline for php 5.2.2?

Kind regards,

Spil.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: php 5.2.2

2007-05-10 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 10:25:56AM +0200, Spil Oss wrote:
 On 10/05/07, Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 10:48:30AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The latest release of PHP is out (as at May 3) and I'm just wondering if
  there's a schedule for updating the port - this release corrects some not
  insignificant security vulnerabilities.
 
 We are in an unusual ports freeze to do the preliminary work to import
 the xorg7.2 release, so at the moment we are holding off on this.  We
 are, however, aware of the issue.
 
 mcl
 ___
 freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 As much as I (and I hope all of us) appreciate the effort to include
 xorg7.2, this leaves many productive systems vulnerable. I have not
 yet found an update on the progress of the xorg7.2 work but I'm
 anxious to find out when we can expect the ports tree to be unfrozen.
 
 Can anyone supply us with a timeline for php 5.2.2?

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/112527

Just apply it, relax, and stop bugging us.  Thanks :)

Kris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


FreeBSD Port: php5-session-5.2.1_3

2007-05-10 Thread jumpyboy
Do you know that PHP 5.2.1 has a Security Enhancements 
and Fixes in PHP 5.2.2 and PHP 4.4.7 as reported on 
www.php.net? When will be available the PHP 5.2.2 in the 
ports? I have got a webserver with a vulnerable PHP 
version on it (5.2.1) and I'm scared.


Giovanni
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD Port: php5-session-5.2.1_3

2007-05-10 Thread Mark Linimon
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 10:00:06AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Do you know that PHP 5.2.1 has a Security Enhancements and Fixes in
 PHP 5.2.2 and PHP 4.4.7 as reported on www.php.net? When will be
 available the PHP 5.2.2 in the ports?

Please go read the archives of this mailing list over the past 24
hours.  Thanks.

mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Startup script's race condition with zabbix over MySQL

2007-05-10 Thread l . cligny

Hello,

I've set up a FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE Box to act as a zabbix server.

The relevant packages I use are:

zabbix-1.1.7,1
mysql-server-5.0.37

Fisrt of all, both software works properly, my setup run well if I run them
manually via /usr/local/etc/rc.d. No error messages.

But I had a problem when I put the MySQL and zabbix_server services to run in
/etc/rc.conf, in order to start them at startup.

In fact the MySQL start first, and then the zabbix-server follows immediately,
which makes sense, (I made it sure by adding # REQUIRE mysql, without quotes,
to the head of /usr/local/etc/rc.d/zabbix-server script). So the logic startup
order is respected.

But, at every boot, my zabbix-server daemon won't start, the zabbix's log file
saying could not connect to socket /tmp/mysql.sock. So I put a dirty sleep
10 in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/zabbix_server script, just after variables
declarations, and now it works well at each startup.

Does some of you guys have a better method to fix this race-condition behavior
(maybe a file exists condition over the /tmp/mysql.sock file or so), in the
zabbix_server FreeBSD startup script ?

Another issue I found is when zabbix exits after claiming /tmp/mysql.sock
doesn't exists, it leave its PID file on /var/tmp/zabbix_server.pid, which avoid
also starting zabbix_server, even manually by rc.d script, if we don't remove it
 before.

P.S: sorry for my English

Cheers,

Laurent CLIGNY




___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD Port: wildfire-3.2.4

2007-05-10 Thread Nikolay Pavlov
On Sunday,  6 May 2007 at 14:12:34 +0300, Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
 On Thursday,  3 May 2007 at 16:01:27 -0400, Brandon McCorkle wrote:
 Hi Quetzal,
  
  
  
 I was curious if you were working on a  openfire 3.3.0
 port in FreeBSD?  It's my understanding that it needs Java 1.6 now and I
 didn't see a Java port for this version in BSD so I was curious if 3.3.0
 was going to happen.  Thanks for all your hard work, the 3.2.4 port has
 been working beautifully for us.
  
  
  
  
  
 Brandon
  
  
  
  
 
 Hi Brandon. I currently working on this :)

Hi Brandon. Could you please look at this post:
http://www.igniterealtime.org/forum/thread.jspa?threadID=26442

-- 
==  
- Best regards, Nikolay Pavlov. ---
==  

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


FreeBSD Port: xqf-1.0.5

2007-05-10 Thread Stefan Peters

FYI, XQF 1.0.5 does *require* qstat 2.11 (current qstat port is 2.10).

Just confirmed this on a FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE setup. XQF would not query 
any master or game servers until I upgraded my qstat port to 2.11.


Changes made to qstat-2.10 port:

'Makefile':

- PORTVERSION=2.10
+ PORTVERSION=2.11

'distinfo':

- MD5 (qstat-2.10.tar.gz) = ac3ce3dbed5248bd5738a4968460880e
- SHA256 (qstat-2.10.tar.gz) = 
c86c12465dac1efbab7e0d2f84a5fc5388f7057e9cf09a2253cc88730ca1476c

- SIZE (qstat-2.10.tar.gz) = 228886
+ MD5 (qstat-2.11.tar.gz) = 26c09831660ef9049fe74b786b80d091
+ SHA256 (qstat-2.11.tar.gz) = 
16f0c0f55567597d7f2db5136a0858c56effb4481a2c821a48cd0432ea572150

+ SIZE (qstat-2.11.tar.gz) = 258335


No other changes were needed. XQF worked fine after that.

--

Stefan T. Peters


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Startup script's race condition with zabbix over MySQL

2007-05-10 Thread RW
On Thu, 10 May 2007 11:16:28 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 Hello,
 
 I've set up a FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE Box to act as a zabbix server.
 
 The relevant packages I use are:
 
 zabbix-1.1.7,1
 mysql-server-5.0.37
 
 Fisrt of all, both software works properly, my setup run well if I
 run them manually via /usr/local/etc/rc.d. No error messages.
 
 But I had a problem when I put the MySQL and zabbix_server services
 to run in /etc/rc.conf, in order to start them at startup.

They belong in /usr/local/etc/rc.d

 In fact the MySQL start first, and then the zabbix-server follows
 immediately, which makes sense, (I made it sure by adding # REQUIRE
 mysql, without quotes, to the head
 of /usr/local/etc/rc.d/zabbix-server script). So the logic startup
 order is respected.
 
 But, at every boot, my zabbix-server daemon won't start, the zabbix's
 log file saying could not connect to socket /tmp/mysql.sock. So I
 put a dirty sleep 10 in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/zabbix_server script,
 just after variables declarations, and now it works well at each
 startup.
 
 Does some of you guys have a better method to fix this race-condition
 behavior (maybe a file exists condition over the /tmp/mysql.sock
 file or so), in the zabbix_server FreeBSD startup script ?

I would suggest you you write a new script that's ordered between the
two, and waits for the socket. That avoids having to maintain any
modifications to port installed scripts.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD Port: delegate-9.5.6 problem

2007-05-10 Thread Nils Vogels
Hello!

Сергей Святкин wrote on 10-5-2007 5:39:
 Hello!

 The problem when start under freebsd 6.2

 # uname -a
 FreeBSD mail.svgc.ru 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Wed Apr  4 10:02:02 
 SAMST 2007
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/MAILKERNEL  i386

 install delegated from ports:

 # cd /usr/ports/net/delegate
 # make install

 then try to start:

 # delegated
 DeleGate/9.5.6 (April 5, 2007) 
 AIST-Product-ID: 2000-ETL-198715-01, H14PRO-049, H15PRO-165, H18PRO-443 
 Copyright (c) 1994-2000 Yutaka Sato and ETL,AIST,MITI 
 Copyright (c) 2001-2006 National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and 
 Technology (AIST) 
   
Thank you for the report.

Stripping the binary seems to invalidate the internal checksum check. I
will send in an update for the port to not strip the binary for the time
being.

You can do this yourself by adding to the Makefile:

'STRIP=   '
after the PLIST_FILES line.

Greets,

Nils
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

2007-05-10 Thread Danny Pansters
On Thursday 10 May 2007 23:28:17 Kris Kennaway wrote:
 Dear porters,

 We are now ready for xorg 7.2 testing!  Over the past week we have
 done extensive tests of various upgrade scenarios, fixed many
 remaining bugs, and now the upgrade is looking good.  Of course, we
 can't possibly test everything, so that's where you come in.  What we
 need now is for everyone to download this tarball:

   http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/ports-xorg-7.2.tbz

 Extract it into a clean directory (i.e. not over the top of your
 existing ports tree), then follow the directions in UPDATING to begin

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't this require that the tarball is 
extracted over existing /usr/ports? Using portupgrade etc.

Dan
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

2007-05-10 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 00:11 +0200, Danny Pansters wrote:
 On Thursday 10 May 2007 23:28:17 Kris Kennaway wrote:
  Dear porters,
 
  We are now ready for xorg 7.2 testing!  Over the past week we have
  done extensive tests of various upgrade scenarios, fixed many
  remaining bugs, and now the upgrade is looking good.  Of course, we
  can't possibly test everything, so that's where you come in.  What we
  need now is for everyone to download this tarball:
 
http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/ports-xorg-7.2.tbz
 
  Extract it into a clean directory (i.e. not over the top of your
  existing ports tree), then follow the directions in UPDATING to begin
 
 Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't this require that the tarball is 
 extracted over existing /usr/ports? Using portupgrade etc.

No.  DO NOT EXTRACT OVER EXISTING /usr/ports as this will cause patch
problems.  Instead, set the PORTSDIR environment variable to the
fully-qualified path to this new location.  For example:

# cd /space/xorg/ports
# tar -xjf ports-xorg-7.2.tbz
# setenv PORTSDIR `realpath .`

The realpath is important so as to resolve symlinks.

Joe

-- 
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

2007-05-10 Thread Danny Pansters
On Friday 11 May 2007 00:26:31 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
 On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 00:11 +0200, Danny Pansters wrote:
  On Thursday 10 May 2007 23:28:17 Kris Kennaway wrote:
   Dear porters,
  
   We are now ready for xorg 7.2 testing!  Over the past week we have
   done extensive tests of various upgrade scenarios, fixed many
   remaining bugs, and now the upgrade is looking good.  Of course, we
   can't possibly test everything, so that's where you come in.  What we
   need now is for everyone to download this tarball:
  
 http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/ports-xorg-7.2.tbz
  
   Extract it into a clean directory (i.e. not over the top of your
   existing ports tree), then follow the directions in UPDATING to begin
 
  Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't this require that the tarball is
  extracted over existing /usr/ports? Using portupgrade etc.

 No.  DO NOT EXTRACT OVER EXISTING /usr/ports as this will cause patch
 problems.  Instead, set the PORTSDIR environment variable to the
 fully-qualified path to this new location.  For example:

 # cd /space/xorg/ports
 # tar -xjf ports-xorg-7.2.tbz
 # setenv PORTSDIR `realpath .`

 The realpath is important so as to resolve symlinks.


OK, thanks. This wasn't very clear.

Dan

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

2007-05-10 Thread Edwin Groothuis
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
 Dear porters,
 
 We are now ready for xorg 7.2 testing!  Over the past week we have
 done extensive tests of various upgrade scenarios, fixed many
 remaining bugs, and now the upgrade is looking good.  Of course, we
 can't possibly test everything, so that's where you come in.  What we
 need now is for everyone to download this tarball:
 
   http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/ports-xorg-7.2.tbz

http://people.FreeBSD.org/~ade/ports-xorg-7.2-nogit.tar.bz2 is only 28Mb

Edwin

-- 
Edwin Groothuis  |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|  Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

2007-05-10 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin

On 5/11/07, Edwin Groothuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
 Dear porters,

 We are now ready for xorg 7.2 testing!  Over the past week we have
 done extensive tests of various upgrade scenarios, fixed many
 remaining bugs, and now the upgrade is looking good.  Of course, we
 can't possibly test everything, so that's where you come in.  What we
 need now is for everyone to download this tarball:

   http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/ports-xorg-7.2.tbz

http://people.FreeBSD.org/~ade/ports-xorg-7.2-nogit.tar.bz2 is only 28Mb


http://people.freebsd.org/~sat/diffs/ports.xorg72.diff.bz2 is only 461 Kb

In fact, that's what we've been promised - a diff :-)
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

2007-05-10 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 04:03:16AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
 On 5/11/07, Edwin Groothuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
  Dear porters,
 
  We are now ready for xorg 7.2 testing!  Over the past week we have
  done extensive tests of various upgrade scenarios, fixed many
  remaining bugs, and now the upgrade is looking good.  Of course, we
  can't possibly test everything, so that's where you come in.  What we
  need now is for everyone to download this tarball:
 
http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/ports-xorg-7.2.tbz
 
 http://people.FreeBSD.org/~ade/ports-xorg-7.2-nogit.tar.bz2 is only 28Mb
 
 http://people.freebsd.org/~sat/diffs/ports.xorg72.diff.bz2 is only 461 Kb
 
 In fact, that's what we've been promised - a diff :-)

Dunno who promised this to you, but it was never the plan.

Kris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

2007-05-10 Thread Florent Thoumie
Kris Kennaway wrote:
 On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 04:03:16AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
 On 5/11/07, Edwin Groothuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
 Dear porters,

 We are now ready for xorg 7.2 testing!  Over the past week we have
 done extensive tests of various upgrade scenarios, fixed many
 remaining bugs, and now the upgrade is looking good.  Of course, we
 can't possibly test everything, so that's where you come in.  What we
 need now is for everyone to download this tarball:

   http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/ports-xorg-7.2.tbz
 http://people.FreeBSD.org/~ade/ports-xorg-7.2-nogit.tar.bz2 is only 28Mb
 http://people.freebsd.org/~sat/diffs/ports.xorg72.diff.bz2 is only 461 Kb

 In fact, that's what we've been promised - a diff :-)
 
 Dunno who promised this to you, but it was never the plan.

Was about to say the same.

-- 
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

2007-05-10 Thread Edwin Groothuis
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:28:57PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
  http://people.FreeBSD.org/~ade/ports-xorg-7.2-nogit.tar.bz2 is only 28Mb
  
  http://people.freebsd.org/~sat/diffs/ports.xorg72.diff.bz2 is only 461 Kb
  
  In fact, that's what we've been promised - a diff :-)
 
 Dunno who promised this to you, but it was never the plan.

And it's not clear what the diff is against.

Edwin

-- 
Edwin Groothuis  |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|  Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

2007-05-10 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
 Dear porters,
 
 We are now ready for xorg 7.2 testing!  Over the past week we have
 done extensive tests of various upgrade scenarios, fixed many
 remaining bugs, and now the upgrade is looking good.  Of course, we
 can't possibly test everything, so that's where you come in.  What we
 need now is for everyone to download this tarball:
 
   http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/ports-xorg-7.2.tbz
 
 Extract it into a clean directory (i.e. not over the top of your
 existing ports tree), then follow the directions in UPDATING to begin
 the upgrade process.

Amendment to the instructions: XORG_UPGRADE must be set before the
portupgrade -Rf libXft.

Kris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing

2007-05-10 Thread Garrett Cooper

Kris Kennaway wrote:

On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:

Dear porters,

We are now ready for xorg 7.2 testing!  Over the past week we have
done extensive tests of various upgrade scenarios, fixed many
remaining bugs, and now the upgrade is looking good.  Of course, we
can't possibly test everything, so that's where you come in.  What we
need now is for everyone to download this tarball:

  http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/ports-xorg-7.2.tbz

Extract it into a clean directory (i.e. not over the top of your
existing ports tree), then follow the directions in UPDATING to begin
the upgrade process.


Amendment to the instructions: XORG_UPGRADE must be set before the
portupgrade -Rf libXft.

Kris


Well, bottoms up to the upgrade. Lessee how the experience is..

Many thanks to all of the maintainers for finally getting this out. It's 
been a while since FreeBSD's been up to date in terms of its X11 
distribution :).


-Garrett
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


FreeBSD Port: php5-5.2.1_3

2007-05-10 Thread Paul Laudanski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Greetings, I'd like to offer my services to upgrade this port to 5.2.2.
 Please let me know where I can help.

- --
Paul Laudanski, CastleCops®, www.castlecops.com
Submit Phish: www.castlecops.com/pirt
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/1/49a/17b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGQ+4rHP6ZmSxUymURAkoqAJ96r3Lxeb9a/p1aHXQ2qroS49Zy3gCfW1td
mNMfGOKx+PjuOqmrE4d/5uo=
=fLy4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD Port: php5-5.2.1_3

2007-05-10 Thread Scot Hetzel

On 5/10/07, Paul Laudanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Greetings, I'd like to offer my services to upgrade this port to 5.2.2.
 Please let me know where I can help.


A PR has already been submitted:

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/112527

We are in a ports freeze due to the xorg 7.2 import.  When the freeze
is over, the pending PRs will be commited.

Scot
--
DISCLAIMER:
No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD Port: php5-5.2.1_3

2007-05-10 Thread LI Xin
Hi,

Paul Laudanski wrote:
 Greetings, I'd like to offer my services to upgrade this port to 5.2.2.
  Please let me know where I can help.

Thanks for your offer.  Currently we are in a ports freeze (which means
that only a selected subset of port committers and the security team can
commit during the period) in preparision for the upcoming Xorg 7.2
import, which will take some time to be finished.  The FreeBSD Security
Team is already aware of the issue, and the upgrade is already being
working on.

For those who concern about the upgrade urgently please consult
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/112527 for patch.

Cheers,
-- 
Xin LI [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.delphij.net/
FreeBSD - The Power to Serve!



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature