Fwd: Install ctorrent-3.2_1 error, Makefile error?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sunry Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sep 7, 2007 3:07 PM
Subject: Re: Install ctorrent-3.2_1 error, Makefile error?
To: Nikola Lecic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/7/07, Nikola Lecic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(1) The identically arranged .for loop for PORTDOCS works correctly
in e.g. devel/p5-Proc-ProcessTable;
(2) There is no global isspace(3) problem with something weird, e.g.
with your locale or something else.
The last two things you can try are:
(a) download
http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/ports/net-p2p/ctorrent/ctorrent.tar.gz?tarball=1
Replace net-p2p/ctorrent dir with it and try again;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp]# tar xzvf /usr/ports/net-p2p/ctorrent.tar.gz\?tarball\=1
x ctorrent/
x ctorrent/Makefile
x ctorrent/distinfo
x ctorrent/pkg-descr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp]# cd -
/usr/ports/net-p2p/ctorrent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net-p2p/ctorrent]# diff Makefile
/tmp/ctorrent/Makefile
5c5
# $FreeBSD: ports/net-p2p/ctorrent/Makefile,v 1.16 2007/08/24
09:40:35 flz Exp $
---
# $FreeBSD: ports/net-p2p/ctorrent/Makefile,v 1.17 2007/08/25 11:49:56 flz
Exp $
30c29,31
${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKSRC}/${PORTDOCS} ${DOCSDIR}/
---
.for i in ${PORTDOCS}
${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKSRC}/$i ${DOCSDIR}/
.endfor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/net-p2p/ctorrent]#
I see, the Makefiles a little diff from mine. :-)
(b) try to reproduce the error using the minimal BSDmakefile I
attached, which literally repeats the problematic line. If your
output differs from
# make
test 1...
README-DNH.TXT
UserGuide
test 2...
README-DNH.TXT
UserGuide
then you maybe can book a hunted bug somewhere in
src/usr.bin/make/for.c or related to isspace(3), triggered by
something strange in your environment, maybe by your locale. But
that's material for a new thread, perhaps on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp]# make
test 1...
README-DNH.TXT
UserGuide
test 2...
README-DNH.TXT
UserGuide
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to get a static binary from ports
Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
Hi all,
to keep it short:
is there any ports knob to statically link binaries?
If not, what steps should I take to modify a port?
longer version:
I'm trying to get a static binary out of the port. I thought it should
be straight and easy, but I'm lost right now.
The port in question is databases/rrdtool, uses libtool:15, gnu
configure, gmake, etc.
Normally, this port builds rrdtool binary which is dynamically linked
(full path removed for brevity):
# ldd (...)/work/rrdtool-1.2.23/src/.libs/rrdtool
(...)/work/rrdtool-1.2.23/src/.libs/rrdtool:
librrd.so.2 = not found (0x0)
libfreetype.so.9 = /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9 (0x28085000)
libpng.so.5 = /usr/local/lib/libpng.so.5 (0x280ef000)
libz.so.4 = /lib/libz.so.4 (0x28115000)
libart_lgpl_2.so.5 = /usr/local/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.5 (0x28127000)
libm.so.5 = /lib/libm.so.5 (0x2813c000)
libc.so.7 = /lib/libc.so.7 (0x28151000)
With 'make CFLAGS+=-static' I get:
# ldd (...)/work/rrdtool-1.2.23/src/rrdtool
(...)/work/rrdtool-1.2.23/src/rrdtool:
libfreetype.so.9 = /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9 (0x280cb000)
libpng.so.5 = /usr/local/lib/libpng.so.5 (0x28135000)
libz.so.4 = /lib/libz.so.4 (0x2815b000)
libart_lgpl_2.so.5 = /usr/local/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.5 (0x2816d000)
libm.so.5 = /lib/libm.so.5 (0x28182000)
libc.so.7 = /lib/libc.so.7 (0x28197000)
librrd.so.2 is now included statically, but the rest is not. I tried
various configure options like --enable-static, --disable-shared, also
added '-static' to CFLAGS and/or LDFLAGS in Makefile plus various
combinations of the above but that doesn't make a difference.
How can I include the rest of the libraries in the binary?
OK, it seems it's a problem with rrdtool's build suite, and not only
I've got problems with it[1].
For the archives, in case of rrdtool's port, a simple workaround is to
patch src/Makefile (exists after 'configure' part, so those patches are
host's dependent):
# cat src_Makefile.patch
--- src/Makefile.orig 2007-09-06 14:01:07.0 +0200
+++ src/Makefile2007-09-06 15:13:15.0 +0200
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@
INSTALL_PROGRAM = install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555
INSTALL_SCRIPT = install -o root -g wheel -m 555
INSTALL_STRIP_PROGRAM = ${SHELL} $(install_sh) -c -s
-LDFLAGS = -L/usr/local/lib
+LDFLAGS = -all-static -L/usr/local/lib
LIBOBJS =
LIBS =
LIBTOOL = $(SHELL) /usr/local/bin/libtool
And while we're here it might be worth changing path to default font so
the binary can work as a 'standalone' (here to 'current'):
@@ -301,7 +301,7 @@
#
#ACLOCAL_M4 = $(top_srcdir)/config/aclocal.m4
#AUTOHEADER = ${SHELL}
/mnt/big/FreeBSD/work/usr/ports/databases/rrdtool/work/rrdtool-1.2.23/missing
--run autoheader --localdir=$(top_srcdir)/config
-fontsdir = $(datadir)/rrdtool/fonts
+fontsdir = .
fonts_DATA = DejaVuSansMono-Roman.ttf
AM_CPPFLAGS = -DRRD_DEFAULT_FONT=\$(RRD_DEFAULT_FONT)\ -DNUMVERS=1.2023
UPD_C_FILES = \
Cheers and thanks for the pointers.
Karol
[1] http://ramblingfoo.blogspot.com/2007/08/softfloat-rrdtool-sequel.html
--
Karol Kwiatkowski karol.kwiat at gmail dot com
OpenPGP 0x06E09309
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Upgrading to squid-2.6.15 is not recommended.
The squid site is recommending that people skip 2.6.15 and go straight to 2.6.16 http://squidproxy.wordpress.com/2007/09/03/dont-upgrade-to-squid-26stable15-skip-straight-to-squid-26stable16/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: why an Hamachi port? yet another VPN?
Lapo Luchini wrote: Moreover, this works has already been done, and yours truly also prepared a port to automate it. The only thing lacking is someone interested in it enough to give me feedback on the PR ports/112982. Update: the port has been committed, thanks edwin ;-) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gramps fails to run
On Friday 07 September 2007 01:13:50 am Lars Eighner wrote: On Thu, 6 Sep 2007, David J Brooks wrote: After upgrading all my python stuff to 2.5, gramps will no longer start. I have tried rebuilding gramps, but its apparently still looking for python 2.4, at least some of the time. Two things I'd try if I were you: 1) is there a link python-python2.5 in /usr/local/bin? If not, I'd install one. 2) I'd try adding PYTHON_DEFAULT_WERSION=python2.5 to /etc/make.conf and rebuilding gramps. Thanks for the suggestions Lars. I tried both, (amending the spelling of WERSION to VERSION ;) but gramps still produces the same set of warnings and errors at runtime. David -- Hey, what do you expect from a culture that *drives* on *parkways* and *parks* on *driveways*? -- Gallagher ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Port: exim-4.67
Hi. Why Exim is stil 4.67 in FreeBSD ports tree? I use it and see that it already has to be 4.68. With respect, Maxim. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FreeBSD Port: exim-4.67
resync your ports tree. 4.68 is in there, and I'm running it from ports. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Maxim Sirenko Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 2:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FreeBSD Port: exim-4.67 Hi. Why Exim is stil 4.67 in FreeBSD ports tree? I use it and see that it already has to be 4.68. With respect, Maxim. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD Port: exim-4.67
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 10:16:44PM +0300, Maxim Sirenko wrote: Hi. Why Exim is stil 4.67 in FreeBSD ports tree? I use it and see that it already has to be 4.68. Please, update your ports. -Kirill ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[HEADSUP] bsd.perl.mk import coming soon
The refactoring that gabor has done to recreate bsd.perl.mk will be imported soon, along with the many ports that it simplifies. Due to the size of the patch, I expect there to be collisions that I will have to adjust as I go, so expect the tree to be broken briefly while I work through the checkin. The main feature of the change will be to allow USE_PERL5= 5.8.0+ (and similarly for USE_PERL5_RUN, USE_PERL5_BUILD, PERL_CONFIGURE and PERL_MODBUILD). As a side-effect, the remaining few stragglers that attempt to keep perl5.003 going will be dropped. (Other committers have also been removing that code). mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Updating X.org FreeBSD ports to 7.3
As some of you may know already, X.org released X11R7.3 yesterday. Since we already made the move to modular ports for 7.2, the work to update ports to 7.3 was much faster. It's not likely to cause any major breakage but I'd like to get some feedback (from users and pointyhat) before I commit the update, so it probably won't reach the CVS repository before wednesday. Here's a diff against current ports tree: http://dump.xbsd.org/freebsd/xorg73.diff.gz PS: I'll be away (and unreachable) getting some sunburns this week-end, so leave a message on x11@ and I'll answer when I'm back. flz 4 x11@ -- Florent Thoumie [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD Committer ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Totem and Ghostscript-gpl build failure
Hi all. I've done quite a bit of searching and head scratching for 2 days now, and I can't find an answer for this. I'm trying to build rhythmbox and gnome2-lite and both fail to build in ports. I've tried building gnome instead and it stops in totem. The error returned for totem is gnome-libtool: link: libtotem_player_la-totem-statusbar.lo is not a valid libtool object. The error for ghostscript is undefined reference errors in function opvp_to_utf8 to libiconv_close, resulting in an error code 1 for gmake and an error code 2 for the port build. Is there a fix or workaround for this? Or am I missing something? Thanks guys. _ Telstra’s Next GTM Network - now on Pre-Paid. Find out more. www.spreadthegoodstuff.com.au http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fclk%2Eatdmt%2Ecom%2FOAT%2Fgo%2Fnnmsnnxg008046oat%2Fdirect%2F01%2F_t=765565283_r=Telstra_FFF_Prepaid_Hotmail_Email_Taglines_JuySep07_Aug_m=EXT___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
