www/horde-base
The latest patch broke my horde, I get the following error when opening horde
in the browser:
Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_STRING in
/usr/local/www/horde/lib/Horde/NLS.php on line 122
This is the file that was patched.
Here is the patch file's contents:
--- lib/Horde/NLS.php.orig 2007-09-29 07:22:46.0 -0800
+++ lib/Horde/NLS.php 2007-12-18 11:16:03.0 -0900
@@ -119,6 +119,10 @@
setlocale(LC_ALL, $lang_charset);
}
}
+ A0 A0 A0 A0/* avoid FreeBSD issapce(3) bug */
+ A0 A0 A0 A0if(NLS::getCharset() == UTF-8){
+ A0 A0 A0 A0 A0 A0setlocale(LC_CTYPE,C);
+ A0 A0 A0 A0}
@putenv('LANG=' . $lang_charset);
@putenv('LANGUAGE=' . $lang_charset);
}
Here is what the file looks like now, obviously there were some funny
characters:
setlocale(LC_ALL, $lang_charset);
}
}
\xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0/* avoid FreeBSD issapce(3) bug */
\xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0if(NLS::getCharset() == UTF-8){
\xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0setlocale(LC_CTYPE,C);
\xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0}
@putenv('LANG=' . $lang_charset);
@putenv('LANGUAGE=' . $lang_charset);
}
This is what the patch should look like;
--- usr/local/www/horde/lib/Horde/NLS.php Sat Sep 29 17:22:46 2007
+++ /usr/local/www/horde/lib/Horde/NLS.php Thu Dec 20 10:38:46 2007
@@ -119,6 +119,10 @@
setlocale(LC_ALL, $lang_charset);
}
}
+/* avoid FreeBSD issapce(3) bug */
+if(NLS::getCharset() == UTF-8){
+ setlocale(LC_CTYPE,C);
+}
@putenv('LANG=' . $lang_charset);
@putenv('LANGUAGE=' . $lang_charset);
}
Regards,
Nicki
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: www/horde-base
On Wednesday 19 December 2007, Nicki de Wet said:
The latest patch broke my horde, I get the following error when
opening horde in the browser:
Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_STRING in
/usr/local/www/horde/lib/Horde/NLS.php on line 122
This is the file that was patched.
Here is the patch file's contents:
--- lib/Horde/NLS.php.orig 2007-09-29 07:22:46.0 -0800
+++ lib/Horde/NLS.php 2007-12-18 11:16:03.0 -0900
@@ -119,6 +119,10 @@
setlocale(LC_ALL, $lang_charset);
}
}
+ A0 A0 A0 A0/* avoid FreeBSD issapce(3) bug */
+ A0 A0 A0 A0if(NLS::getCharset() == UTF-8){
+ A0 A0 A0 A0 A0 A0setlocale(LC_CTYPE,C);
+ A0 A0 A0 A0}
@putenv('LANG=' . $lang_charset);
@putenv('LANGUAGE=' . $lang_charset);
}
Here is what the file looks like now, obviously there were some
funny characters: setlocale(LC_ALL, $lang_charset);
}
}
\xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0/* avoid FreeBSD issapce(3) bug */
\xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0if(NLS::getCharset() == UTF-8){
\xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0setlocale(LC_CTYPE,C);
\xa0 \xa0 \xa0 \xa0}
@putenv('LANG=' . $lang_charset);
@putenv('LANGUAGE=' . $lang_charset);
}
This is what the patch should look like;
--- usr/local/www/horde/lib/Horde/NLS.php Sat Sep 29 17:22:46
2007 +++ /usr/local/www/horde/lib/Horde/NLS.php Thu Dec 20
10:38:46 2007 @@ -119,6 +119,10 @@
setlocale(LC_ALL, $lang_charset);
}
}
+/* avoid FreeBSD issapce(3) bug */
+if(NLS::getCharset() == UTF-8){
+ setlocale(LC_CTYPE,C);
+}
@putenv('LANG=' . $lang_charset);
@putenv('LANGUAGE=' . $lang_charset);
}
Regards,
Nicki
The problem has been fixed, update your ports tree and rebuild.
Beech
--
---
Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org
X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release:
/ \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html
---
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: www/horde-base
- Original Message - From: Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Nicki de Wet [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 11:04 AM Subject: Re: www/horde-base http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2007-December/045813.html My apologies, I also saw the thread after posting. I've fixed it locally for now. Regards, Nicki ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: www/horde-base
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 10:40:02AM +0200, Nicki de Wet wrote: The latest patch broke my horde, I get the following error when opening horde in the browser: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2007-December/045813.html -- | Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FreeBSD Port: horde-base-3.1.5_1
Okay, so it's probably a Unicode vs. UTF-8 parser thing. My comment about the code needing to remain in ASCII stands, though (this isn't your fault, of course). The patch should really be fixed to use literal whitespace (ASCII 0x20) or tabs (ASCII 0x09). I have commit access to fix this, but I want to clear it + discuss with those involved with the PR first. I have re-rolled the patch, please let me know if you still have problems. It may take a while to get into the tree. Beech Looks fine now - ran portupgrade this morning and all is well. Thanks, Barry ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD Ports Search webpage is not usable
`cd /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2/` works properly but `pkg_add -r openoffice.org` doesn't work. And why don't you include these two lines of shell commands to official site interface? 2007/12/20, Pav Lucistnik [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Кутейников Дмитрий píše v čt 20. 12. 2007 v 00:04 +0300: Web interface for ports collection is very inconvenient. I want to find package to install it by `pkg_add -r` command (because I don't have much time to build it from ports tree) but it's name on the site and in the package server differ. I've spent a lot of time trying to guess, what command I should enter to install openoffice.org-2.3.20071115 : `pkg_add -r openoffice.org`, `pkg_add -r openofficeorg-23`, `pkg_add -r openofficeorg23`, `pkg_add -r openoffice.org-2.3.20071115` or `pkg_add -r openoffice-org_23`. It's unbearable! Look at http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=openoffice.orgsearchon=namessuite=testingsection=all It's simple. It gave me all information I need to know and I can type `apt-get install openoffice.org` or download precompiled package straight from the site. FIX: Show real package names in the search results and give a link to precompiled package. Maybe this would work for you? It even got the pkg_add command line: http://www.freshports.org/editors/openoffice.org-2 -- Pav Lucistnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 25 And the Lord spoke unto the Angel that guarded the eastern gate, saying, Where is the flaming sword which was given unto thee? 26 And the Angel said, I had here only a moment ago, I must have put it down some where, forget my own head next. 27 And the Lord did not ask him again. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD Ports Search webpage is not usable
Note that some packages might not be available for certain architectures and FreeBSD versions, because the packages are always lagging few days or a week behind the ports tree. Or the package can't be compiled. We can't add it to the official website easily, because we don't have that information available inside the website. Кутейников Дмитрий píše v čt 20. 12. 2007 v 17:59 +0300: `cd /usr/ports/editors/openoffice.org-2/` works properly but `pkg_add -r openoffice.org` doesn't work. And why don't you include these two lines of shell commands to official site interface? 2007/12/20, Pav Lucistnik [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Кутейников Дмитрий píše v čt 20. 12. 2007 v 00:04 +0300: Web interface for ports collection is very inconvenient. I want to find package to install it by `pkg_add -r` command (because I don't have much time to build it from ports tree) but it's name on the site and in the package server differ. I've spent a lot of time trying to guess, what command I should enter to install openoffice.org-2.3.20071115 : `pkg_add -r openoffice.org`, `pkg_add -r openofficeorg-23`, `pkg_add -r openofficeorg23`, `pkg_add -r openoffice.org-2.3.20071115` or `pkg_add -r openoffice-org_23`. It's unbearable! Look at http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=openoffice.orgsearchon=namessuite=testingsection=all It's simple. It gave me all information I need to know and I can type `apt-get install openoffice.org` or download precompiled package straight from the site. FIX: Show real package names in the search results and give a link to precompiled package. Maybe this would work for you? It even got the pkg_add command line: http://www.freshports.org/editors/openoffice.org-2 -- Pav Lucistnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 25 And the Lord spoke unto the Angel that guarded the eastern gate, saying, Where is the flaming sword which was given unto thee? 26 And the Angel said, I had here only a moment ago, I must have put it down some where, forget my own head next. 27 And the Lord did not ask him again. -- Pav Lucistnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 25 And the Lord spoke unto the Angel that guarded the eastern gate, saying, Where is the flaming sword which was given unto thee? 26 And the Angel said, I had here only a moment ago, I must have put it down some where, forget my own head next. 27 And the Lord did not ask him again. signature.asc Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
Re: [RFC] Automated generation of /etc/resolv.conf from the rc.d script
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 10:42:07AM +, Roy Marples wrote: Hi Eygene. You might get some ideas from this implementation then: http://packages.debian.org/sid/resolvconf At least it contains those ugly sed expression to edit forwarders in a named.conf. You may also want to look at openresolv, which is a resolvconf implementation that works on FreeBSD as well as Linux. http://roy.marples.name/node/343 I keep meaning to make a request to put that into ports :) Thanks Roy [ Moving off current@ and onto ports@ ] I've took a stab at it[1]. If you have a FreeBSD box handy and can test it out I'll be glad to receive feedback. I've never used openresolv nor do I have a use for it at the moment. I'm not sure if my removal of the symlink was the right thing to do or not since I'm not familiar with how the software works. Can you test out the port and let me know if it works normally? Also, if you want to be the maintainer I can change it to your address if I send a PR for it. -- WXS [1]: http://www.atarininja.org/~wxs/patches/openresolv.shar - Just cd /usr/ports/dns sh /path/to/openresolv.shar ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RFC] Automated generation of /etc/resolv.conf from the rc.d script
I've took a stab at it[1]. If you have a FreeBSD box handy and can test it out I'll be glad to receive feedback. I've never used openresolv nor do I have a use for it at the moment. I'm not sure if my removal of the symlink was the right thing to do or not since I'm not familiar with how the software works. Can you test out the port and let me know if it works normally? Which symlink did you remove? /etc/resolv.conf should be a symlink to $PREFIX/etc/resolvconf/run/resolv.conf otherwise it won't actually work as resolvconf never updates the real /etc/resolv.conf $PREFIX/etc/resolvconf/run should be a symlink to /var/run/resolvconf so that all prior information collected is cleaned when the system boots. Also, if you want to be the maintainer I can change it to your address if I send a PR for it. No, not really. I spent enough time maintaining my software :) On another note, what is the preferred means of getting something into ports? I also have dhcpcd [1] and a ports Makefile for it (dhcpcd is a DHCP client) Thanks Roy PS - not currently subscribed to ports@ - should I be for this discussion? [1] http://dhcpcd.berlios.de/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RFC] Automated generation of /etc/resolv.conf from the rc.d script
--On Thursday, December 20, 2007 16:44:59 + Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On another note, what is the preferred means of getting something into ports? I also have dhcpcd [1] and a ports Makefile for it (dhcpcd is a DHCP client) 1) Create the port [1] 2) Submit it to the ports group [2] Thanks Roy PS - not currently subscribed to ports@ - should I be for this discussion? You should if you're going to be a port maintainer. [1] http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/ [2] http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html or man (1) send-pr -- Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD Ports Search webpage is not usable
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 12:04:07AM +0300, Кутейников Дмитрий wrote: Web interface for ports collection is very inconvenient. I want to find package to install it by `pkg_add -r` command (because I don't have much time to build it from ports tree) but it's name on the site and in the package server differ. I've spent a lot of time trying to guess, what command I should enter to install openoffice.org-2.3.20071115 : `pkg_add -r openoffice.org`, `pkg_add -r openofficeorg-23`, `pkg_add -r openofficeorg23`, `pkg_add -r openoffice.org-2.3.20071115` or `pkg_add -r openoffice-org_23`. It's unbearable! Look at http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=openoffice.orgsearchon=namessuite=testingsection=all It's simple. It gave me all information I need to know and I can type `apt-get install openoffice.org` or download precompiled package straight from the site. FIX: Show real package names in the search results and give a link to precompiled package. Well, you can always use make package-name to get the proper package name, another side is, the specified name can be not available of ftp server if the package wasn't uploaded from pointyhat. -Kirill ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RFC] Automated generation of /etc/resolv.conf from the rc.d script
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 04:44:59PM +, Roy Marples wrote: I've took a stab at it[1]. If you have a FreeBSD box handy and can test it out I'll be glad to receive feedback. I've never used openresolv nor do I have a use for it at the moment. I'm not sure if my removal of the symlink was the right thing to do or not since I'm not familiar with how the software works. Can you test out the port and let me know if it works normally? Which symlink did you remove? ln -snf /var/run/resolvconf $(ETCDIR)/run, which appears to be the only symlink installed by openresolv. /etc/resolv.conf should be a symlink to $PREFIX/etc/resolvconf/run/resolv.conf otherwise it won't actually work as resolvconf never updates the real /etc/resolv.conf This is not something the Makefile does automatically, correct? I can add a message saying that the user must make the symlink manually to enable openresolv? $PREFIX/etc/resolvconf/run should be a symlink to /var/run/resolvconf so that all prior information collected is cleaned when the system boots. OK, I'll put this back in - I'm not really sure about the policies on installing things in /var/run though. I know one of my other ports touches /var so I guess it should be OK. I've made the changes and updated the shar at the original location. If you can test it out and let me know if it works for you I would appreciate it. I've also added a message to be displayed during install stating that the symlink of /etc/rc.conf needs to be applied manually, and a message on deinstall stating that /var/run/resolvconf can be removed if the port is no longer in use. Also, if you want to be the maintainer I can change it to your address if I send a PR for it. No, not really. I spent enough time maintaining my software :) Fair enough. If you would like to see it in ports I can send in the PR and maintain it, despite not using it. I'll at least be more responsive to problem reports than nobody. :) On another note, what is the preferred means of getting something into ports? I also have dhcpcd [1] and a ports Makefile for it (dhcpcd is a DHCP client) Documentation on submission is at: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-submitting.html Thanks Roy PS - not currently subscribed to ports@ - should I be for this discussion? You don't have to be. [1] http://dhcpcd.berlios.de/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: www/horde-base
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 12:21:35AM -0900, Beech Rintoul wrote:
--- usr/local/www/horde/lib/Horde/NLS.php Sat Sep 29 17:22:46
2007 +++ /usr/local/www/horde/lib/Horde/NLS.php Thu Dec 20
10:38:46 2007 @@ -119,6 +119,10 @@
setlocale(LC_ALL, $lang_charset);
}
}
+/* avoid FreeBSD issapce(3) bug */
+if(NLS::getCharset() == UTF-8){
+ setlocale(LC_CTYPE,C);
+}
@putenv('LANG=' . $lang_charset);
@putenv('LANGUAGE=' . $lang_charset);
}
Regards,
Nicki
The problem has been fixed, update your ports tree and rebuild.
You need to use __FreeBSD_version check in your patch, since the bug
itself is fixed in 7x and up.
--
http://ache.pp.ru/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TeTeX and TeXLive
Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: On Sun, 16.12.2007 at 22:59:55 +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: This is a progress report from the current teTeX maintainer who is trying to update TeX in the ports tree to TeXLive. As I explained, if we go with the finer-grained package model, over 1000 ports have to be added at a time, so testing them should be done in a separate tree at least. I hope I will be able to set up a public tree for testing and collaborative work this month... Any comments are welcome. Thanks. As I'm not doing any work, my vote doesn't count, but please: Creating 2-3 *big* TeXLive ports is certainly wrong, but creating 1000 tiny ports is equally wrong. Think about the repo bloat and churn introduced by a single software like a LaTeX system. It will slow down everything from cvs checkout, to index building and pkg_info(1). Can't you split the TeXLive Distribution up into say 12 ports? Something minimal that can be used by other ports to typeset documentation (how common is this, anyway?) and 3-4 big TeXLive ports for the typical TeX user. Cheers, Ulrich Spoerlein I am also only a user of TeX and friends. May I suggest some categories for triage? 1) Simple packages like envlab and lettrine are easy to locate and install afterwards. So, maybe these packages (and others like additional fonts) don't need to be in the typical TeXLive port for FreeBSD. 2) Binaries for features like xetex and ConTeXt may be difficult to install outside the assistance of a port. I wish recent, stable versions of these could be included in a port, maybe the main port. 3) For now, the FreeBSD port for musixtex is incompatible with tetex. I wish that the various TeXLive components could be designed to be compatible with each other so that a user could still choose to add additional features after the initial installation. These are only suggestions. Thanks for your work maintaining TeX and friends for FreeBSD. --- Rick Voland [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
who is the portsmgr? Re Linux hier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Back last time I was last active,Satoshi Asami was the Portsmeister. I dunno if that term is used anymore, but I need to find out if one person is in charge of ports, or if it's a group of folks, and whichever it is, what their name(s) are? In case you're curious (nosy, aren't you?) I need to ask questions about the official attitude with regards to the install hierarchy to be followed for Linux applications. I need more than just opinions, else I'd just ask here, but I need to know, officially, what it is. IF I can get it nailed down, and if it ends up the way I would like it, I will go ahead and invest all the time it takes, to fix every port I see that I think is broken, but I won't start doing this until I get official word on RIGHT WAY. Oh, BTW, I don't intend sneaking anything in, but I am not going to do the work unless I find out if the work (if it does like I ask) would be accepted. Darn, I can see 6 different ways to misinterpret that. Ah, heck, it'll be easier to reply to all the accusations, than try to explain it all up front. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHaxigz62J6PPcoOkRAltuAJ0c14uXXocEzIX3zwXY6VUc+EI9fACfWMcT QHXnAixnorYljynmcdO4AAk= =Icxf -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: who is the portsmgr? Re Linux hier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Darn, I can see 6 different ways to misinterpret that. Ah, heck, it'll be easier to reply to all the accusations, than try to explain it all up front. Welecome to my delima with ports2 - -- Aryeh M. Friedman FloSoft Systems http://www.flosoft-systems.com Developer, not business, friendly -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHaxn4zIOMjAek4JIRAhbYAKCIoH0A3wGVVen6/fDsfF3XMitcbwCfdiTJ FshCEByNlU24WJXllV2vWWM= =OBOk -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: who is the portsmgr? Re Linux hier
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 08:36:32PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote: Back last time I was last active,Satoshi Asami was the Portsmeister. I dunno if that term is used anymore, but I need to find out if one person is in charge of ports, or if it's a group of folks, and whichever it is, what their name(s) are? [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the right email address. Or try #bsdports of the Efnet IRC network, three of them are hanging out there during various times of the day. Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]| Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: who is the portsmgr? Re Linux hier
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:36:32 -0600, Chuck Robey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Back last time I was last active,Satoshi Asami was the Portsmeister. I dunno if that term is used anymore, but I need to find out if one person is in charge of ports, or if it's a group of folks, and whichever it is, what their name(s) are? s/portsmgr/portmgr/g (without 's') http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors/staff-listing.html (3.2) Cheers, Mezz In case you're curious (nosy, aren't you?) I need to ask questions about the official attitude with regards to the install hierarchy to be followed for Linux applications. I need more than just opinions, else I'd just ask here, but I need to know, officially, what it is. IF I can get it nailed down, and if it ends up the way I would like it, I will go ahead and invest all the time it takes, to fix every port I see that I think is broken, but I won't start doing this until I get official word on RIGHT WAY. Oh, BTW, I don't intend sneaking anything in, but I am not going to do the work unless I find out if the work (if it does like I ask) would be accepted. Darn, I can see 6 different ways to misinterpret that. Ah, heck, it'll be easier to reply to all the accusations, than try to explain it all up front. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHaxigz62J6PPcoOkRAltuAJ0c14uXXocEzIX3zwXY6VUc+EI9fACfWMcT QHXnAixnorYljynmcdO4AAk= =Icxf -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD GNOME Team - FreeBSD Multimedia Hat (ports, not src) http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wiki.freebsd.org/multimedia - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: make config-conditional recursive ?
I wrote a simple script some months ago. You could try it by yourself. If you find any bug in the script, please let me know. Thanks! On 12/14/07, Andriy Gapon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is make config-conditional recursive ? If not, shouldn't there be something like config-conditional-recursive ? My idea is to run something like the following to configure ports before upgrading a significant number of them: portupgrade -n -B 'make config-conditional' pkg1 pkg2 ... -- Andriy Gapon ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Regards, Wang Yi ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: who is the portsmgr? Re Linux hier
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 08:36:32PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote: Back last time I was last active,Satoshi Asami was the Portsmeister. I dunno if that term is used anymore, but I need to find out if one person is in charge of ports, or if it's a group of folks, and whichever it is, what their name(s) are? Most of your questions are probably answered on http://www.freebsd.org/portmgr/. With the addition of another 10,000 or so ports, things have gotten more formalized over time :-) mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
