Re: Boost 1.37 released!

2008-11-05 Thread Flex
I also agree with you Jeremy. devel/boost-devel makes no sense as it is a
stable and not a development version.When there are so much ports that
depend on devel/boost (as version 1.34) then I see two approaches to solve
this.

1.) Try to find out if boost 1.37 is binary compatible with boost 1.34. If
so, then we could update it to the actual version without breaking the ports
depending on it, IMHO. I made this a question to the boost irc channel and
got only the answer that this is doubtable so far.

2.) We should think of one or two alternative boost port(s) like
devel/boost137 and devel/boost138. All depending ports must be made
dependant to devel/boost137 then. Other ports also keep two ports with their
(often major) release numbers and switch dependent ports back and forth to
the right port release number.

I'd prefer the second because there are less side effects and problems
possible.
Also please note that http://home.leo.org isn't accessible anymore.
Hopefully someone, preferrably Alexander, has the 1.35 patch from Simon to
check whether it's easy to bump the port to 1.37 easily. I also agree to
send a PR.


/Flex
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Wacom driver

2008-11-05 Thread Gábor Kövesdán

Dominic Fandrey escribió:

I have created a port of Bartosz Fabianowski's Wacom driver.
Since nobody has stepped forward to commit it, I thought I'd
inform this list, so that people can test it.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=128547
  
I suggest that you should consult with [EMAIL PROTECTED] He was going to port this 
driver himself but he hasn't got time so far. I've CC'd him because I 
don't think he is on the ports@ list because he is a doc committer.


Cheers,

--
Gabor Kovesdan

EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:   http://www.kovesdan.org

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: ports/125745: Update to www/rt3* available - 3.8.0

2008-11-05 Thread Albert Shih
 Le 27/08/2008 à 23:51:31-0400, Philip M. Gollucci a écrit
 Albert Shih wrote:
   Le 19/08/2008 à 19:32:52-0400, Philip M. Gollucci a écrit
  Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
  [PLEASE DROP GNATS from your replys]
  http://tinderbox-amd64.rws/index.php?action=list_buildportsbuild=8-CURRENT-RT38
   
  should be
  http://tinderbox-amd64.riderway.com:8080/index.php?action=list_buildportsbuild=8-CURRENT-RT38
   
  
  I saw everything is «success».
  
  When you think this ports is push into the ports-tree ? (for 7-Release).
  
  Lots of thanks for your work.
 1)
 I need to figure a multi-instance patch first which I'm going to have to 
 code from almost scratch for 3.8.
 
 2) I need to test NOPORTDOCS, NPORTEXAMPLES, NOPORTDATA vars
 
 3) I'm planing to install a field test of the port tonight/tomorrow at 
 $work and make public through friday ish.
 
 4) I need to deal with the post install make steps in a way different
 from previous rt ports so it stays package able.
 
 http://people.freebsd.org/~pgollucci/rt38.txt is a better link at this 
 point to start with

I'm come back for rt.

Now I'm need to make a seconde install of rt before end of the mounth.

I would like to known if you think before this date rt38 ports can be
release ? 

I don't want push anyone because I can use rt36. All I would like to known
is if it's good idea to wait. I prefer to not have to make a upgrade on rt.
So if the www/rt38 going to be release soon I prefer to wait. 

Thanks for you work.

Regards.


-- 
Albert SHIH
SIO batiment 15
Observatoire de Paris Meudon
5 Place Jules Janssen
92195 Meudon Cedex
Téléphone : 01 45 07 76 26
Heure local/Local time:
Mer 5 nov 2008 14:47:12 CET
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Wacom driver

2008-11-05 Thread Dominic Fandrey
I have created a port of Bartosz Fabianowski's Wacom driver.
Since nobody has stepped forward to commit it, I thought I'd
inform this list, so that people can test it.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=128547

Feedback is, of course, welcome.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Wacom driver

2008-11-05 Thread Gabor PALI
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
 Gábor Kövesdán wrote:
 Dominic Fandrey escribió:
 I have created a port of Bartosz Fabianowski's Wacom driver.
 Since nobody has stepped forward to commit it, I thought I'd
 inform this list, so that people can test it.

 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=128547
   
 I suggest that you should consult with [EMAIL PROTECTED] He was going to 
 port this 
 driver himself but he hasn't got time so far. I've CC'd him because I 
 don't think he is on the ports@ list because he is a doc committer.
 
 Well, I'm always willing to talk. However, I don't see much to be done
 here. The port is done, I keep close contact to Bartosz and I'm
 willing to maintain it. It's one of the few that actually installs a 
 module into /boot/modules, something that should be enforced more
 thoroughly, in my opinion.
 
 Thanks to the ports Xorg magic I even don't have to take care of
 dependencies.
 

Hello there,

Thanks to Ping Cheng (maintainer of the original Linux driver), I
already found and contacted Bartosz (at about middle of August), and I
have tested some versions of his ported driver with my USB Wacom Bamboo.
 I asked him about an official FreeBSD port, but he replied he will do
that himself (when it is time) :)

I would be happy to see this driver in the Ports Collection, however I
had serious problems with the latest version I tested (X crashed after a
few minutes with Firefox and Gimp).

It is a sorry, but I had to leave that configuration (6.3-STABLE on a
desktop machine) behind (I had to move) and I switched to FreeBSD
7-PRERELEASE on a notebook meanwhile.  I have not had time to test it
again, though my Bamboo is next to my notebook :)  (Therefore no
physical limitations...)

But if you need a committer for this port, I can offer you to look after
your PRs, test and commit them (with some help from an experienced ports
committer, of course).

Cheers,
:g
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Boost 1.37 released!

2008-11-05 Thread Jeremy Messenger

On Wed, 05 Nov 2008 03:13:33 -0600, Flex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I also agree with you Jeremy. devel/boost-devel makes no sense as it is a
stable and not a development version.When there are so much ports that
depend on devel/boost (as version 1.34) then I see two approaches to  
solve

this.

1.) Try to find out if boost 1.37 is binary compatible with boost 1.34.  
If
so, then we could update it to the actual version without breaking the  
ports
depending on it, IMHO. I made this a question to the boost irc channel  
and

got only the answer that this is doubtable so far.


The binary compatible does not matter as it only forces us to wait until  
complete unfreeze. We can bump all of other ports to get rebuild. What  
about the API (source) compatible? It's more important than ABI (binary)  
compatible as we need to make sure others can build with newer boost.



2.) We should think of one or two alternative boost port(s) like
devel/boost137 and devel/boost138. All depending ports must be made
dependant to devel/boost137 then. Other ports also keep two ports with  
their
(often major) release numbers and switch dependent ports back and forth  
to

the right port release number.


We don't need devel/boost137 either if all other ports can build with  
newer boost or easy to get others fix with newer boost. We should avoid  
two same exactly libraries in ports tree if they don't do the parallel  
installation (non-conflict) as possible unless no choice to do two or more.



I'd prefer the second because there are less side effects and problems
possible.
Also please note that http://home.leo.org isn't accessible anymore.
Hopefully someone, preferrably Alexander, has the 1.35 patch from Simon  
to

check whether it's easy to bump the port to 1.37 easily. I also agree to
send a PR.


Yeah, two people have told me about that URL is dead. Too bad, I don't  
have this file anymore.


Cheers,
Mezz


/Flex



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Boost 1.37 released!

2008-11-05 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2008-Nov-05 09:52:12 -0600, Jeremy Messenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 05 Nov 2008 03:13:33 -0600, Flex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Also please note that http://home.leo.org isn't accessible anymore.

Yeah, two people have told me about that URL is dead. Too bad, I don't  
have this file anymore.

Depending on how long it was up, it might have been grabbed by the
Internet Archive Wayback Machine.  It's not there right now but the
FAQ says it generally takes 6 months or more for pages to appear.

That URL looks like the member's area of an ISP - it's also possible
that LEO just renamed (rather than removed) the site.

-- 
Peter Jeremy
Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement
an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour.


pgpQ0zEF1sgAm.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Problems building ports - Error code 2 when attempting to cd

2008-11-05 Thread Scott Ullrich
All,

I have a strange port problem that I am trying to figure out.
Hopefully someone can shed a light on what is happening here:

===   rrdtool-1.2.26_1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/libtool - found
   (but building it anyway)
===Verifying install for /usr/local/bin/libtool in
/usr/ports/devel/libtool15
===   Returning to build of rrdtool-1.2.26_1
===   rrdtool-1.2.26_1 depends on shared library: freetype.9 - found
   (but building it anyway)
===Verifying install for freetype.9 in /usr/ports/print/freetype2
cd: can't cd to /usr/ports/print/freetype2/work/freetype-2.3.7
*** Error code 2
1 error
*** Error code 2
1 error

But as you can see here, it does exist:

freebsd-nexus-computers# ls /usr/ports/print/freetype2/work/freetype-2.3.7
ChangeLog   ChangeLog.22Makefileautogen.sh  devel   
modules.cfg version.sed
ChangeLog.20Jamfile README  builds  docs
objsvms_make.com
ChangeLog.21JamrulesREADME.CVS  configure   include 
src

Does anyone have any idea what is happening here?  This is happening
randomly to a number of port builds and I am stumped.

Thanks,

Scott
PS: please CC me on any replies, I am not subscribed to this particular list
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Wacom driver

2008-11-05 Thread bomberboy
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Dominic Fandrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hello,

 I have created a port of Bartosz Fabianowski's Wacom driver.
 Since nobody has stepped forward to commit it, I thought I'd
 inform this list, so that people can test it.

 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=128547

I tried compiling it my system but building the port fails for me.
Two diffs are attached, one for the Makefile of the port itself and
one for uwacom.c in the code of Bartosz Fabianowski.

My system is running a recent current btw:
# uname -a
FreeBSD Tablet.lan 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #2: Tue Nov  4
15:27:47 CET 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TABLET
amd64

makefile.diff :
The Makefile of the port tries to create a link to the linuxwacom
archive in the work-dir of the port.
However, this archive is located in /usr/ports/distfiles/xorg/driver/
in stead of just /usr/ports/distfiles/ (or is this something specific
to current?)

uwacom.diff:
uwacom.c is missing the include sys/clist.h
Maybe this was indirectly included in a different header file in 6.x or 7.0?

After these changes the compile of uwacom.c still fails with:
=
cc -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE
-std=c99 -nostdinc   -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -finline-limit=8000
--param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000
-fno-common  -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mcmodel=kernel -mno-red-zone
-mfpmath=387 -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-sse3 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow
-msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding
-fstack-protector -fstack-protector -Wall -Wredundant-decls
-Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes  -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual  -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign
-fformat-extensions -c uwacom.c
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
uwacom.c: In function 'uwacom_init':
uwacom.c:1072: warning: left shift count = width of type
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/x11-drivers/xf86-input-wacom/work/uwacom.
*** Error code 1
=

Removing -Werror from the compile step silently ignores this warning,
but I guess that's not the right way to deal with this :)
I'm not familiar with the code at all and don't really know how to
solve this, but maybe you do.

Can't verify if it works though, I'm using it on a Tablet PC (Fujitsu
T4220) for which the wacom device should show up as a serial device.
(However, I'm still having some problems with that though)

As a sidenote. The tablets which use a serial port (e.g. most
tabletPCs according to the linuxwacom documentation) don't need the
the usb-part if I'm correct. So maybe it would be a good idea to split
the port into two parts? One just for the linuxwacom codebase, and one
for the kernel module? (which then depends on the linuxwacom port)


Kind regards,
Bruno


makefile.diff
Description: Binary data


uwacom.diff
Description: Binary data
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Wacom driver

2008-11-05 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
Hello,

On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:34 PM, bomberboy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 My system is running a recent current btw:
 # uname -a
 FreeBSD Tablet.lan 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #2: Tue Nov  4
 15:27:47 CET 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TABLET
 amd64

Under 7.0-stable / i386:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] uname -a
FreeBSD kg-work2.kg4.no 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #2: Sun Oct 19
19:29:06 CEST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SX270
 i386

 makefile.diff :

The port compiles fine here with this diff. No need for the other diff.

My Wacom CTF-420 is detected:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] usbdevs -v
Controller /dev/usb0:
addr 1: full speed, self powered, config 1, UHCI root hub(0x),
Intel(0x), rev 1.00
 port 1 powered
 port 2 addr 2: low speed, power 40 mA, config 1, CTF-420
V2.0-0(0x0062), WACOM(0x056a), rev 2.00
from /var/log/messages:
Nov  5 22:43:13 kg-work2 root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x056a
product 0x0062 bus uhub0
Nov  5 22:43:13 kg-work2 kernel: uwacom0: WACOM CTF-420 V2.0-0, class
0/0, rev 1.10/2.00, addr 2 on uhub0

It works too (after I restated X), at least as a mouse (I don't know
how to test the other functions).

 uwacom.diff:
 uwacom.c is missing the include sys/clist.h
 Maybe this was indirectly included in a different header file in 6.x or 7.0?

I do not know, I ony know that I didn't need this on my machine.

HTH
-- 
Regards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


On pkg_trans

2008-11-05 Thread Ivan Voras
Hi,

I'll probably have some time in the next few days to work on pkg_trans
again, but first I'd like to get some input on the whole thing. The last
time I talked about it I've made code available but I've received no
feedback.

More information on pkg_trans can be found in the list archives or on
these pages:

http://wiki.freebsd.org/IvanVoras/PkgTransProposal
http://ivoras.sharanet.org/blog/tree/2008-10-13.addition-to-freebsds-package-infrastructure--pkg_trans.html

Those pages also carry links to the code.

I'm not a ports committer and I don't want to tell people who are how to
work on their project but I think pkg_trans is important enough that it
should require a policy decision - if it's accepted, pkg_trans should go
into the base system. I know that there are utilities than can do some
or all of what I've planned for pkg_trans but one important point of
pkg_trans is that it should be integrated into the regular base package
infrastructure, not requiring external utilities, runtimes or libraries.

Some implementation notes:

* I've avoided changes to the base utilities. A separate utility,
pkg_trans, is called by the transaction-aware utilities
* Client-side utilities are added to the pkg_install library (lib.h, etc.)
* Transaction records are kept as text files. I think it would have been
significantly better if sqlite was used but there was great opposition
to importing sqlite into the base system the last time I brought it up
so this is the last mention of it (in context of pkg_trans :) )
* If it's accepted, I'll maintain this addition to the utilities (of
course, everyone's invited to contribute). I'll also be a regular user
of these features - I created pkg_trans because I want the functionality
on my systems.
* For the pkg_trans to be effective, it requires slight modifications to
the ports Makefile infrastructure (basically, the install and
deinstall targets should be aware of transactions) and external ports
utilities (like portupgrade), which I can't do myself.

If there's interest in finishing pkg_trans, now's the time to discuss it :)



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Problems building ports - Error code 2 when attempting to cd

2008-11-05 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 03:49:29PM -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
 All,
 
 I have a strange port problem that I am trying to figure out.
 Hopefully someone can shed a light on what is happening here:
 
 ===   rrdtool-1.2.26_1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/libtool - found
(but building it anyway)
 ===Verifying install for /usr/local/bin/libtool in
 /usr/ports/devel/libtool15
 ===   Returning to build of rrdtool-1.2.26_1
 ===   rrdtool-1.2.26_1 depends on shared library: freetype.9 - found
(but building it anyway)
 ===Verifying install for freetype.9 in /usr/ports/print/freetype2
 cd: can't cd to /usr/ports/print/freetype2/work/freetype-2.3.7
 *** Error code 2
 1 error
 *** Error code 2
 1 error
 
 But as you can see here, it does exist:
 
 freebsd-nexus-computers# ls /usr/ports/print/freetype2/work/freetype-2.3.7
 ChangeLog ChangeLog.22Makefileautogen.sh  devel   
 modules.cfg version.sed
 ChangeLog.20  Jamfile README  builds  docs
 objsvms_make.com
 ChangeLog.21  JamrulesREADME.CVS  configure   include 
 src
 
 Does anyone have any idea what is happening here?  This is happening
 randomly to a number of port builds and I am stumped.

Please provide the output from the following commands:

mount
ls -ld / /usr /usr/ports /usr/ports/print /usr/ports/print/freetype2

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking   http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator  Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.  PGP: 4BD6C0CB |

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Problems building ports - Error code 2 when attempting to cd

2008-11-05 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 09:04:18PM -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
 On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Please provide the output from the following commands:
 
  mount
  ls -ld / /usr /usr/ports /usr/ports/print /usr/ports/print/freetype2
 
 Here is mount: /dev/da0s1a on / (ufs, local)
 devfs on /dev (devfs, local)
 /dev/da0s1d on /usr (ufs, local, soft-updates)
 devfs on /usr/jails/sullrich/dev (devfs, local)
 fdescfs on /usr/jails/sullrich/dev/fd (fdescfs)
 procfs on /usr/jails/sullrich/proc (procfs, local)
 devfs on /usr/jails/ermal/dev (devfs, local)
 fdescfs on /usr/jails/ermal/dev/fd (fdescfs)
 procfs on /usr/jails/ermal/proc (procfs, local)
 devfs on /usr/jails/billm/dev (devfs, local)
 fdescfs on /usr/jails/billm/dev/fd (fdescfs)
 procfs on /usr/jails/billm/proc (procfs, local)
 devfs on /usr/jails/ondemand/dev (devfs, local)
 fdescfs on /usr/jails/ondemand/dev/fd (fdescfs)
 procfs on /usr/jails/ondemand/proc (procfs, local)
 devfs on /usr/local/pfsense-fs/dev (devfs, local)
 
 (Note that it is a jail host and this build was running within a jail)
 
 freebsd-nexus-computers# ls -ld / /usr /usr/ports /usr/ports/print
 /usr/ports/print/freetype2
 drwxr-xr-x   20 root  wheel   512 Nov  2 18:47 /
 drwxr-xr-x   18 root  wheel   512 Nov  5 14:20 /usr
 drwxr-xr-x   70 root  wheel  1536 Nov  5 15:15 /usr/ports
 drwxr-xr-x  331 root  wheel  7168 Nov  5 15:16 /usr/ports/print
 drwxr-xr-x3 root  wheel   512 Nov  5 15:16 /usr/ports/print/freetype2
 
 They all exist.  The error message is really strange.
 
 Anything else you can think to check?

Does the problem happen outside of the jail?

Other than that, I have no ideas.

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking   http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator  Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.  PGP: 4BD6C0CB |

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Problems building ports - Error code 2 when attempting to cd

2008-11-05 Thread Scott Ullrich
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Does the problem happen outside of the jail?

Unfortunately it does from time to time even with -j1

 Other than that, I have no ideas.

Thanks for trying.   This is one of those situations where I am out of
ideas as well.

Scott
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Problems building ports - Error code 2 when attempting to cd

2008-11-05 Thread Scott Ullrich
Sorry, forgot reply-all.

On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Diane Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Look for this variable set somewhere. ALWAYS_BUILD_DEPENDS

I enabled this in a last ditch effort to get around the problem.  It
instructs dependencies to rebuild even if the ports tree thinks it is
not necessary.  From what I gather it only adds additional time when
rebuilding the port.

 This message but building it anyway is odd. looking in /usr/ports/Mk ,
 I'd like to know why ALWAYS_BUILD_DEPENDS is set.
 That can't be right. What are you typing to do the make?

The problem occurs regardless of if this is defined or not.   The
script being used is:

http://cvs.pfsense.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/tools/pfPorts/Makefile.RELENG_1?rev=1.66;content-type=text%2Fplain

Don't let the filename fool you, its a simple shell script that was
originally a sub-port make file quite a while back and we have not
repo moved the file to reflect its new purpose.

I did notice something else odd, even after the cd command fails, the
port starts back over and somehow it finishes building which seems a
bit strange (regardless if ALWAYS_BUILD_DEPENDS is defined).

Scott
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Problems building ports - Error code 2 when attempting to cd

2008-11-05 Thread Diane Bruce
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 09:04:18PM -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
...
 Anything else you can think to check?

Look for this variable set somewhere. ALWAYS_BUILD_DEPENDS

 ===   rrdtool-1.2.26_1 depends on shared library: freetype.9 - found
(but building it anyway)

This message but building it anyway is odd. looking in /usr/ports/Mk ,
I'd like to know why ALWAYS_BUILD_DEPENDS is set.
That can't be right. What are you typing to do the make?

--
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.db.net/~db
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


port request - listadmin (mailman admin utility)

2008-11-05 Thread Christer Edwards
I don't know if this is exactly the right place to ask, but I'd like to
request a port.  Previously, on debian, I administered a number of
mailman lists using a CLI tool listadmin.  After migrating my servers
to FreeBSD 7 I'm unable to find that port.

http://freshmeat.net/projects/listadmin/

Thank You,
Christer


pgpLsE1ICwsbK.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Problems building ports - Error code 2 when attempting to cd

2008-11-05 Thread Boris Samorodov
Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Does the problem happen outside of the jail?
 Unfortunately it does from time to time even with -j1

According to make(1) -j1 is not the same as if -j is not defined.
I'd try either remove -j1 or add -B option:
-
 −B  Try to be backwards compatible by executing a single shell per
 command and by executing the commands to make the sources of a
 dependency line in sequence.  This is turned on by default unless
 −j is used.
 −j max_jobs
 Specify the maximum number of jobs that make may have running at
 any one time.  Turns compatibility mode off, unless the −B flag
 is also specified.
-


HTH  WBR
-- 
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone  Internet SP
FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]