Possibly unbuildable ports reminder

2009-02-14 Thread Bill Fenner
Dear porters,

  This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of
unbuildable ports at http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ .
A list by MAINTAINER is

http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/

so you can easily check the status of ports that you maintain.  In
addition, the list of ports with no MAINTAINER with build problems is

http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/po...@freebsd.org.html

Since no one is responsible for these ports, the problem won't get
fixed unless someone on this list takes the initiative.

Thanks for your help!

Bill annoying port email Fenner
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Call for potential ports maintainers

2009-02-14 Thread Wesley Shields
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:51:03PM +0200, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
 Thomas Abthorpe wrote:
  The gauntlet has been thrown down, who among you is prepared to pick it up?
 
 audio/aureal-kmod please.

Done.

-- WXS
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Call for potential ports maintainers

2009-02-14 Thread chifeng
Hi Boss,

I'll take these ports. Because my job is about mail system development and
maintenance. :)

mail/fdm
mail/p5-IMAP-Admin
mail/p5-MIME-Lite
mail/p5-MIME-Lite-HTML
mail/p5-Mail-Alias
mail/p5-Mail-Folder
mail/p5-Mail-MailStats
mail/p5-Mail-SRS
mail/p5-Mail-Spool
mail/p5-Mail-Verify
mail/popcheck
mail/rss2email
mail/sqlgrey

Otherwise, I want to take these ports, as I am using that port.
benchmarks/iozone
benchmarks/iozone21


Chifeng


On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Thomas Abthorpe tabtho...@freebsd.orgwrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 On February 13, 2009 12:33:12 am Sergey N. Voronkov wrote:
  Most of them are dead, but still working for me quite well. ;-)
  I'll try to keep it building until I can do that.

 They are now your, Sergey!

 - --
 Thomas Abthorpe | FreeBSD Committer
 tabtho...@freebsd.org   | 
 http://people.freebsd.org/~tabthorpehttp://people.freebsd.org/%7Etabthorpe
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD)

 iEYEARECAAYFAkmVknUACgkQ5Gm/jNBp8qAdqQCfSePRcELYlvR2xtho4m6oEkm/
 nqIAmwSW8eOcWsls7lhAyPiPWSdAubFJ
 =V+AZ
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 ___
 freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org




-- 
regards.
chifeng
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Sox in 7.1 broken or corrupt?

2009-02-14 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Lars Eighner portsu...@larseighner.com wrote:

 It appears to me the audio/sox port is broken.  During configure the screen
 breaks up with a bunch of ANSI garbage.  This happens again with the compile
 which seems to halt in sox.c with the message EOF in backtick operator.

Giving this a quick try on -CURRENT and with all dependencies
disabled, I don't see it.  sox configures and builds fine.

If you build sox in a script(1) session and inspect the typescript
with less(1) afterwards, you should be able to see where configure
starts going wrong.

-- 
Christian naddy Weisgerber  na...@mips.inka.de

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Sox in 7.1 broken or corrupt?

2009-02-14 Thread Lars Eighner

On Sat, 14 Feb 2009, Christian Weisgerber wrote:


Lars Eighner portsu...@larseighner.com wrote:


It appears to me the audio/sox port is broken.  During configure the
screen breaks up with a bunch of ANSI garbage.  This happens again with
the compile which seems to halt in sox.c with the message EOF in backtick
operator.


Giving this a quick try on -CURRENT and with all dependencies
disabled, I don't see it.  sox configures and builds fine.

If you build sox in a script(1) session and inspect the typescript
with less(1) afterwards, you should be able to see where configure
starts going wrong.


Oh, I see.  The config script looks for something it calls distro name in
/etc/issue .  I don't think this is the right way to get this information;
my understanding was that /etc/issue could be used for any pre-login message
(as motd is the post-login message).  Surely uname is the right way to get
what the configure script wants.  At any rate, /etc/issue contained, amoung
other things an ANSI portrait of Beastie, which does have a few odd
backticks in it.  I just did not recognise it as the script rendered it all
squashed.

Well, I can fix this up to build sox (the fix is as simple as renaming the
existing /etc/issue -- sox will build if the file does not exist), but I
think the config script is sloppy and I haven't seen this on any other
ports.

--
Lars Eighner
http://www.larseighner.com/index.html
8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Follow up to Ports Maintainer Roundup 2009

2009-02-14 Thread Cezary Morga
Thomas Abthorpe wrote:
 Do us all proud, and show us what you are made of!

So, how about me picking up
devel/p5-Config-IniFiles
devel/p5-Config-Record
devel/p5-Config-Simple
devel/p5-Config-Std
devel/p5-ConfigReader
net/wakeonlan
net/wol
net/gspoof
?

-- 
Cezary Morga
Not a shred of evidence exists in favor of the idea that life is 
serious. (Brendan Gill)
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Sox in 7.1 broken or corrupt?

2009-02-14 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Lars Eighner:

  It appears to me the audio/sox port is broken.  During configure the
  screen breaks up with a bunch of ANSI garbage.
 
 Oh, I see.  The config script looks for something it calls distro name in
 /etc/issue .  I don't think this is the right way to get this information;

Oh my.  This appears to be a desperate attempt to figure out on
which flavor of Linux sox is being built, since Linux distributions
are all different but you can't distinguish them by uname.

We should just disable the whole test.  I'll commit this patch if
the maintainer approves.

Index: files/patch-configure
===
RCS file: files/patch-configure
diff -N files/patch-configure
--- /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -
+++ files/patch-configure   14 Feb 2009 18:17:51 -
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+--- configure.orig 2009-02-14 19:08:53.0 +0100
 configure  2009-02-14 19:09:06.0 +0100
+@@ -20805,7 +20805,7 @@
+ 
+ 
+ 
+-if test -r /etc/issue; then
++if false  test -r /etc/issue; then
+   { $as_echo $as_me:$LINENO: checking distro name 5
+ $as_echo_n checking distro name...  6; }
+   DISTRO=`sed -e s/.0-90-9;*mJH//g  /etc/issue|tr \n   | sed -e 
s/(?.*// -e s/  */ /g -e s/^ // -e s/ $//`
-- 
Christian naddy Weisgerber  na...@mips.inka.de
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Sox in 7.1 broken or corrupt?

2009-02-14 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Christian Weisgerber:

 We should just disable the whole test.  I'll commit this patch if
 the maintainer approves.

PS: The test has also been removed in the sox CVS.

-- 
Christian naddy Weisgerber  na...@mips.inka.de
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD Port: ktorrent-3.1.6_1

2009-02-14 Thread Chuck Robey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Max Brazhnikov wrote:
 On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:21:32 +0300, Nikolay Tychina wrote:
 Hello,

 i installed ktorrent3 and it seems to be very slow while checking pieces.
 (~2mb per second)
 (Deluge do it much more faster, i didn't try any other clients though)
 Do you have the same problem?
 
 Do you mean 'Check data' for downloaded files? It gives me about 20Mb/s

I finally found an odd fix, not sure why it worked this way, but I thought to
pass it along on the hope that maybe it will work for you as well as it did for
me.  My max upload is  about 38KBPS, my max download is about 160KBPS.  I'd set
for to -1, so that the u/d rates would be set to infinite, so that the torrent
client would intelligently choose the best rate.  But my experience showed that
my max ACTUAL gross download was only about 25KBPS (remember, I was expecting,
from the torrent protocol, to get better than 6 times that.)

Well, finally losing all hope, I decided to set the upload rate down to about
20K, so I could use the reserved rate for other entertainments.  IMMEDIATELY
upon limiting the UPLOAD rate to 20K, the download rate shot up to nearly my
160K maximum.  I can't understand this, but I tried to move the upload/download
rates around a little bit, to verify the finding: that I just should NEVER set
the rates to infinite, and that (at least in ktorrent) the max download rate
really was attainable.

I haven't any idea why this worked for me, only that it did do this, reliably.
I may go back to trying previous torrent clients now.  What a fine way to spend
the afternoon!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkmXKZgACgkQz62J6PPcoOn0jACfe1wnh+JFmhQYi2UgjYRIc/y2
SFQAn2y5qjyzL3rEfmT8YOtq2MMuoKTx
=xcN8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


gecko firefox marked forbidden

2009-02-14 Thread t-u-t

just a note,
firefox2 has been marked forbidden, and it stopped me twice while 
building gnome2-lite today when pulled for gecko depends by www/epiphany 
and x11/yelp.


on my own system i fixed the Makefiles of these two to use xulrunner, 
(which was there anyway - just removed firefox), but i don't know what 
other effects there are on other ports etc.


n.b. i don't need ff2, just noting
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Sox in 7.1 broken or corrupt?

2009-02-14 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Feb 14), Christian Weisgerber said:
 Lars Eighner:
   It appears to me the audio/sox port is broken.  During configure the
   screen breaks up with a bunch of ANSI garbage.
  
  Oh, I see.  The config script looks for something it calls distro name
  /in etc/issue .  I don't think this is the right way to get this
  /information;
 
 Oh my.  This appears to be a desperate attempt to figure out on which
 flavor of Linux sox is being built, since Linux distributions are all
 different but you can't distinguish them by uname.
 
 We should just disable the whole test.  I'll commit this patch if the
 maintainer approves.

Eww.  Yes, by all means, commit :)

-- 
Dan Nelson
dnel...@allantgroup.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: gecko firefox marked forbidden

2009-02-14 Thread Naram Qashat

t-u-t wrote:

just a note,
firefox2 has been marked forbidden, and it stopped me twice while 
building gnome2-lite today when pulled for gecko depends by www/epiphany 
and x11/yelp.


on my own system i fixed the Makefiles of these two to use xulrunner, 
(which was there anyway - just removed firefox), but i don't know what 
other effects there are on other ports etc.


n.b. i don't need ff2, just noting


I'll point out that the same issue occured for me with multimedia/vlc.  It was 
updated to have xulrunner after firefox in USE_GECKO, but even defining 
WITH_GECKO=xulrunner it still tried to install firefox2.  I don't know what the 
bug is, but there is one.


Naram Qashat
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: xclip port update

2009-02-14 Thread Eitan Adler
This works; tested with make install, make deinstall, and portlint.

# ex:ts=8
# New ports collection makefile for:xclip
# Date created: Dec 18, 2001
# Whom: ijliao
#
# $FreeBSD: ports/x11/xclip/Makefile,v 1.7 2009/02/13 02:02:49 tabthorpe
Exp $
#

PORTNAME=   xclip
PORTVERSION=0.11
CATEGORIES= x11
MASTER_SITES=SF

MAINTAINER= eitanadlerl...@gmail.com
COMMENT=An interface to X selections (the clipboard) from the command
line

WRKSRC= ${WRKDIR}/${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}
#USE_IMAKE= yes
GNU_CONFIGURE=yes
USE_GMAKE=  yes
USE_XORG=   x11 xproto xmu

MAN1=   xclip.1
PLIST_FILES=bin/xclip bin/xclip-copyfile bin/xclip-cutfile
bin/xclip-pastefile

.include bsd.port.mk

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: gecko firefox marked forbidden

2009-02-14 Thread Martin Wilke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 04:33:16PM -0500, Naram Qashat wrote:
 t-u-t wrote:
  just a note,
  firefox2 has been marked forbidden, and it stopped me twice while 
  building gnome2-lite today when pulled for gecko depends by www/epiphany 
  and x11/yelp.
  
  on my own system i fixed the Makefiles of these two to use xulrunner, 
  (which was there anyway - just removed firefox), but i don't know what 
  other effects there are on other ports etc.
  
  n.b. i don't need ff2, just noting
 
 I'll point out that the same issue occured for me with multimedia/vlc.  It 
 was 
 updated to have xulrunner after firefox in USE_GECKO, but even defining 
 WITH_GECKO=xulrunner it still tried to install firefox2.  I don't know what 
 the 
 bug is, but there is one.

Hi,

Firefox2 is no longer supported by the Mozilla Foundation.
We marked this port BROKEN as part of the last Security update
for Firefox3 [1]. Firefox2 is also affected with the same
Isusses as in Firefox3. That's the reason.

[1] See also:
http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2009/mfsa2009-01.html Impact: Critical
http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2009/mfsa2009-03.html Impact: High
http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2009/mfsa2009-04.html Impact: Moderate
http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2009/mfsa2009-05.html Impact: Low
http://www.vuxml.org/freebsd/8b491182-f842-11dd-94d9-0030843d3802.html

Maybe should someone take a look to get some backport patches?

- - Martin

 
 Naram Qashat
 ___
 freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
 

- -- 

+---+---+
|  PGP: 0xB1E6FCE9  |  Jabber : miwi(at)BSDCrew.de  |
|  ICQ: 169139903   |  Mail   : miwi(at)FreeBSD.org |
+---+---+
|   Mess with the Best, Die like the Rest!  |
+---+---+
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkmXW5cACgkQdLJIhLHm/Ole1wCeNweWD8OrrM68bGbtLg1nTO7q
c2AAoNXbjePEqaTlwZholUKhfHGCA3Ze
=RiPY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org