Re: www / p5-HTML-Embperl

2009-03-17 Thread hideo
Jim Pazarena (Sun 03/15/09 23:22):
 presently p5-HTML-Embperl in the ports is at 1.3.6_2 however it is marked as
 will not compile.
 
 The main website for Embperl shows a much newer stable version (2.2.0)
 
 Is there any way someone (more clever than myself) could get this newer 
 version
 to compile in the ports system?
 
 I would very much appreciate it. Thanks!

I'd be willing to take a look at it if no one else has started.  Looks
like it's really a new port since it's now Embperl (not HTML::Embperl.)
Might be a bit before I can get it submitted though.

Zach
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: www / p5-HTML-Embperl

2009-03-17 Thread Cezary Morga
hideo wrote:
 Jim Pazarena (Sun 03/15/09 23:22):
  presently p5-HTML-Embperl in the ports is at 1.3.6_2 however it is
  marked as will not compile.
 
  The main website for Embperl shows a much newer stable version
  (2.2.0)
 
  Is there any way someone (more clever than myself) could get this
  newer version to compile in the ports system?
 
  I would very much appreciate it. Thanks!

 I'd be willing to take a look at it if no one else has started. 
 Looks like it's really a new port since it's now Embperl (not
 HTML::Embperl.) Might be a bit before I can get it submitted though.

I was just going to write the same thing :)

I've started working on it, but if you'd really want to do this I can 
send you what I've got so far.

-- 
Cezary Morga
I have left orders to be awakened at any time in case of national 
emergency, even if I'm in a cabinet meeting. (Ronald Reagan)
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: www / p5-HTML-Embperl

2009-03-17 Thread Jim Pazarena

Cezary Morga wrote:

hideo wrote:

Jim Pazarena (Sun 03/15/09 23:22):

presently p5-HTML-Embperl in the ports is at 1.3.6_2 however it is
marked as will not compile.

The main website for Embperl shows a much newer stable version
(2.2.0)

Is there any way someone (more clever than myself) could get this
newer version to compile in the ports system?

I would very much appreciate it. Thanks!

I'd be willing to take a look at it if no one else has started.
Looks like it's really a new port since it's now Embperl (not
HTML::Embperl.) Might be a bit before I can get it submitted though.


I was just going to write the same thing :)

I've started working on it, but if you'd really want to do this I can
send you what I've got so far.


you guys are awesome, and I really appreciate it!

Jim
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: www / p5-HTML-Embperl

2009-03-17 Thread hideo
Cezary Morga (Tue 03/17/09 16:38):
 hideo wrote:
  Jim Pazarena (Sun 03/15/09 23:22):
   presently p5-HTML-Embperl in the ports is at 1.3.6_2 however it is
   marked as will not compile.
  
   The main website for Embperl shows a much newer stable version
   (2.2.0)
  
   Is there any way someone (more clever than myself) could get this
   newer version to compile in the ports system?
  
   I would very much appreciate it. Thanks!
 
  I'd be willing to take a look at it if no one else has started. 
  Looks like it's really a new port since it's now Embperl (not
  HTML::Embperl.) Might be a bit before I can get it submitted though.
 
 I was just going to write the same thing :)
 
 I've started working on it, but if you'd really want to do this I can 
 send you what I've got so far.
 

Go for it, Cezary.  I haven't even started.

Zach
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


FreeBSD Port: etoile-0.4.0, port request

2009-03-17 Thread Nikolay Tychina
Hi,

i installed 0.4.0 from ports but i couldn't run it. Do you use Etoile?
I would be appreciate if you give me some advices how to setup it on fbsd
(i'm trying to build
Etoile from svn now)
btw, could you port 0.4.1? :) It was released today.

Thanks,

Nik
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


FreeBSD Port: syslinux-3.72

2009-03-17 Thread Cynthia Flynn
I would like to draw your attention to this posting in regards to the 
syslinux FreeBSD port:


  http://syslinux.zytor.com/archives/2009-March/011749.html

FWIW, that posting belongs to this thread:

  http://syslinux.zytor.com/archives/2009-February/011548.html

Of more importance is H. Peter Anvin's private response to me in which 
he said this:


  Okay, that sounds like the FreeBSD port stuff pull in way too
   many things that aren't obligatory.  Python is only used by one
   small contrib script that isn't relevant to 99% of all users
   (pretty much only used by large-site system administrators); the
   X libraries I have no clue where they even come into the picture!

   Sounds like the FreeBSD ports people either need to factor the
   package differently, or suppress some of their dependencies.

syslinux is a powerful tool, but its FreeBSD port is just too bloated. 
And given GRUB's inability to boot logical partitions, this means that a 
 Linux-free FreeBSD production environment isn't possible for us. Not 
the end of the world, I know, but it would be great if a future version 
of the syslinux port were cleaned up to require only the truly necessary 
dependencies and preferably without the horrible mtools package.


Cynthia
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Looking for new maintainer for my ports.

2009-03-17 Thread Edward Tomasz Napierala
For the past few months, I didn't have enough time to maintain my ports
properly.  I'm afraid I'll have even less time in the future.  So, I'm
looking for new maintainers for the ports below.  If you're interested
in maintaining one or more of them, please let me know.

audio/amb-plugins
audio/aubio
audio/caps-plugins
audio/celt
audio/dino
audio/dssi
audio/fluidsynth-dssi
audio/fmit
audio/ghostess
audio/gigedit
audio/gmidimonitor
audio/hexter
audio/jack-keyboard
audio/jack-smf-utils
audio/jamin
audio/lash
audio/libconvolve
audio/libgig
audio/liblo
audio/liblscp
audio/nekobee
audio/patchage
audio/qjackctl
audio/raul
audio/sineshaper
audio/specimen
audio/timemachine
audio/whysynth
audio/xsynth-dssi
audio/zynaddsubfx
benchmarks/fhourstones
benchmarks/imb
comms/tcpser
devel/acovea
devel/acovea-gtk
devel/cppi
devel/libcoyotl
devel/libevocosm
devel/rlog
emulators/basiliskII
emulators/dtcyber
emulators/lisaem
emulators/nonpareil
emulators/simh
emulators/tme
emulators/xhomer
games/mudmagic
graphics/openjpeg
misc/findutils
net/wire
net/wired
net/wired-tracker
net-im/gloox
science/g3data
security/fl0p
sysutils/mpiexec
sysutils/torque
textproc/iksemel
x11-clocks/glclock
x11-toolkits/flowcanvas
x11-toolkits/phat

-- 
If you cut off my head, what would I say?  Me and my head, or me and my body?

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


FreeBSD Port: groupoffice-2.18.s.21

2009-03-17 Thread Jeferson Tadeu R. da Silva
As,
When the port is available from 3:00 and 3:01 versions of
Group-Office? 
Now thanks.
 
Jeferson Tadeu R. da Silva
Gerente Executivo
Fone:+55 (71) 3616-8401
Celular: +55 (71) 9242-9929
 blocked::blocked::blocked::mailto:jeferson.si...@tecnoasp.com.br
jeferson.si...@tecnoasp.com.br

TECNOASP – Tecnologia e Serviços de Comunicação LTDA 
Av. Antonio Carlos Magalhães, 4362 - Pituba
CEP 41800-700 - Salvador-BA
Fone: +55 (71) 3616-8400
Fax  : +55 (71) 3616-8439
 blocked::blocked::blocked::blocked::http://www.tecnoasp.com.br/
http://www.tecnoasp.com.br

 
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


upgrading phonon-xine

2009-03-17 Thread Chuck Robey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I can't figure out why (because the Makefile sure seems fine) but whenever I try
to install the phonon-xine port, it comes back and tells me it doesn't:

make: don't know how to make install. Stop

I can't see anything about the port that would do this ... the include of
bsd.port.mk seems totally ordinary ... it's the latest cvsup of the phonon-xine
port.  Both phonon-4.3.1 and phonon-gstreamer-4.3.1 are installed fine.  I tried
to see if maybe removing the pnonon-gstreamer port would affect things, but it
didn't, so I put it back in, but I need the phonon-xine port to complete the
upgrade of kde4.

Need a hint here, does the phonon-xine port work for everyone else?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAknAOJ4ACgkQz62J6PPcoOmq8ACcDhhWoTLMTXFCNj9g0f8mI1FW
U1AAn0ABSORMUBY4n/02eXjxO1LmYqFY
=oPwQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD Port: syslinux-3.72

2009-03-17 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 01:25:41PM -0700, Cynthia Flynn wrote:
 I would like to draw your attention to this posting in regards to the 
 syslinux FreeBSD port:
 
   http://syslinux.zytor.com/archives/2009-March/011749.html
 
 FWIW, that posting belongs to this thread:
 
   http://syslinux.zytor.com/archives/2009-February/011548.html
 
 Of more importance is H. Peter Anvin's private response to me in which 
 he said this:
 
   Okay, that sounds like the FreeBSD port stuff pull in way too
many things that aren't obligatory.  Python is only used by one
small contrib script that isn't relevant to 99% of all users
(pretty much only used by large-site system administrators); the
X libraries I have no clue where they even come into the picture!
 
Sounds like the FreeBSD ports people either need to factor the
package differently, or suppress some of their dependencies.
 
 syslinux is a powerful tool, but its FreeBSD port is just too bloated. 
 And given GRUB's inability to boot logical partitions, this means that a 
  Linux-free FreeBSD production environment isn't possible for us. Not 
 the end of the world, I know, but it would be great if a future version 
 of the syslinux port were cleaned up to require only the truly necessary 
 dependencies and preferably without the horrible mtools package.

The only direct dependencies that syslinux brings in are perl
(not python) and mtools.

Probably perl can be removed, though I did not bother because probably
95% of the systems have it installed already.
Patches welcome, of course, and if you want to install syslinux on
a reduced system you can just grab the two binaries you need:

 ldd `which syslinux`
/usr/local/bin/syslinux:
libc.so.7 = /lib/libc.so.7 (0x2807f000)

 ldd `which mtools`
/usr/local/bin/mtools:
libcam.so.4 = /lib/libcam.so.4 (0x2809e000)
libc.so.7 = /lib/libc.so.7 (0x280ae000)
libsbuf.so.4 = /lib/libsbuf.so.4 (0x281b)

I don't know why you think mtools is horrible, but it has a big reason
to be there, as explained in sysutils/syslinux/pkg-descr:

This FreeBSD port can additionally operate on plain files containing
a FAT image, thus requiring no special privilege. The program relies
on mtools to perform the manipulation of the FAT filesystem.

I think the extra dependencies that you find listed for syslinux:

 grep pkgdep /var/db/pkg/syslinux-3.72/+CONTENTS
@pkgdep kbproto-1.0.3
@pkgdep perl-5.8.8_1
@pkgdep pkg-config-0.23_1
@pkgdep xtrans-1.0.4
@pkgdep xproto-7.0.10_1
@pkgdep libXdmcp-1.0.2_1
@pkgdep libXau-1.0.3_2
@pkgdep libX11-1.1.3_1,1
@pkgdep libICE-1.0.4,1
@pkgdep libSM-1.0.3,1
@pkgdep mtools-3.9.10_4

come directly from mtools, which seems to have a similar list of
dependencies. Once the mtools dependency list is fixed, we should
be ok.

cheers
luigi
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Call for testers: MythTV 0.21 port upgrade

2009-03-17 Thread David La Croix
Following up to myself, because I think I figured it out ...

I had EIT scans enabled ...   I think that the information stream
coming from the TV station was shifting the schedule ...That's the
only process I could find that updates the schedule outside of running
mythfilldatabase.



On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 9:07 PM, David La Croix dlacr...@gmail.com wrote:
 I'm running the mythtv port from the original patch... at the
 beginning of this thread and I've seen something extremely frustrating
 ever since the Daylight savings time started...

 (Using an HDhomerun for the tuner).

 I can run the command to reload my schedule, and it looks correct in
 the grid view ...   At some unknown interval, sometimes as much as 30
 minutes later, one or more of the channels will shift their schedule
 as if it's applying a correction to the timezone after-the fact.
 Re-running mythfilldatabase --refresh-today sets the schedule back to
 what it's supposed to be ... and then some other channel shifts.

 My /etc/localtime corresponds to EST5EDT ... and my OS is 7.1pl3 ...

 mythbackend --version
 Please include all output in bug reports.
 MythTV Version   : Unknown
 MythTV Branch    : tags/release-0-21
 Library API      : 0.21.20080304-1
 Network Protocol : 40
 Options compiled in:
  freebsd release using_oss using_arts using_backend using_dbox2
 using_frontend using_hdhomerun using_iptv using_v4l using_x11
 using_xrandr using_xv using_bindings_perl using_bindings_python
 using_ffmpeg_threads using_live


 I've tried setting the timezone in mythtv-config from auto to -4 --
 which is EDT ... but it doesn't seem to make any difference ... the
 overcorrection seems to happen at random intervals ...

 Anybody have any ideas?    Any possibility anybody's working on the
 fixes release?



 2009/3/16 Greg Larkin glar...@freebsd.org:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
 [...]

 Great work and thanks to all of you! I've just seen the pkg-descr file and
 the middle paragraph is now outdated i think ...

 The current distributed version of MythTV
 (http://www.mythtv.org/modules.php?name=Downloadsd_op=viewdownloadcid=1)
 is out of date for just about all platforms.  It is also protocol
 incompatible with the bug fix version, which is maintained under
 subversion, rather like the FreeBSD -STABLE branch.  This port is a
 snapshot of svn version 13053, dated 15 March 2007.  Later versions of
 this tree are no longer compatible with this port.



 Hi Bernhard,

 Thanks for the report, and I have updated the pkg-descr file.  I'll
 commit the change soon, after I research some reports that I've received
 from other users.

 Regards,
 Greg
 - --
 Greg Larkin

 http://www.FreeBSD.org/       - The Power To Serve
 http://www.sourcehosting.net/ - Ready. Set. Code.
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

 iD8DBQFJvm/e0sRouByUApARAjZEAKCljX9tWepuswAOme7ovxwsvurgSQCgp4Aj
 jByeTADrl460q0nmNe2LoA8=
 =3x01
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

 ___
 freebsd-multime...@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-multimedia
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-multimedia-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org