netbsd pkgsrc
Hello everybody! Probably I am going to ask a stupid question but it is very interesting for me. Because I would like to help BSD projects. Why FreeBSD does not use pkgsrc of NetBSD project as default ports? I guess work can be faster in case port system is shared between BSD projects including OpenBSD. NetBSD ports are ported to many Oses so I would prefer these port system. -- /BR, Alexander ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: netbsd pkgsrc
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 12:06:08PM +0400, Alexander Bubnov wrote: Why FreeBSD does not use pkgsrc of NetBSD project as default ports? You're able to do so if you like -- FreeBSD is a supported pkgsrc platform IIUC. OTOH, there are some things FreeBSD ports are able to do that pkgsrc can't (e.g. follow port renames/recategorizations by MOVED during port upgrades). The converse is true, as well. There are also the following data which might be of interest. Note: for FreeBSD and pkgsrc, I'm using the number of things that are buildable from source; but for OpenBSD, I'm using the number of binary packages that are available for the i386 platform (but only because I don't have a quick way to figure out the equivalent ports count, which is higher. Hopefully, someone will inform me.) Therefore, this is a _slightly_ apples vs. oranges comparision, but it still may be informative. FreeBSD 20730* pkgsrc 8458** OpenBSD5379*** mcl * per FreshPorts.org ** per pkgsrc.org *** from an OpenBSD web page; again, this is undercounting ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: attention CHOI Junho
You're blocking mail from FreeBSD.org, among others: c...@kr.freebsd.org: host mail.kr.freebsd.org[210.118.94.73] said: 554 Service unavailable; Client host [69.147.83.53] blocked using krrbl.or.kr (in reply to RCPT TO command) mcl FYI 69.147.83.5 is in one of yahoo's IP blocks David ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: netbsd pkgsrc
Thank a lot you for clarification! 2009/10/6 Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 12:06:08PM +0400, Alexander Bubnov wrote: Why FreeBSD does not use pkgsrc of NetBSD project as default ports? You're able to do so if you like -- FreeBSD is a supported pkgsrc platform IIUC. OTOH, there are some things FreeBSD ports are able to do that pkgsrc can't (e.g. follow port renames/recategorizations by MOVED during port upgrades). The converse is true, as well. There are also the following data which might be of interest. Note: for FreeBSD and pkgsrc, I'm using the number of things that are buildable from source; but for OpenBSD, I'm using the number of binary packages that are available for the i386 platform (but only because I don't have a quick way to figure out the equivalent ports count, which is higher. Hopefully, someone will inform me.) Therefore, this is a _slightly_ apples vs. oranges comparision, but it still may be informative. FreeBSD 20730* pkgsrc 8458** OpenBSD5379*** mcl * per FreshPorts.org ** per pkgsrc.org *** from an OpenBSD web page; again, this is undercounting -- /BR, Alexander ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: possible security problem? FreeBSD Port: www/adzap
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 09:38:51PM -0400, B. Cook wrote: Hello all, Strange thing going on w/ adzap.. possible problem on the server? Seems as if md5/sha256 doesn't match.. but the size is right. I'm using adzap extensively at home and at work, so I'm quite interested in solving this problem. I checked the archieves(I have an old one handy in a server's distifles dir too). It looks like the archieve contents are identical(diffing old and new archieve content gives no diff). It looks like the distfile was rerolled in some way. Maybe some automatic procedure on sourceforge? I could contact the author and ask. If it's just a new ditifle we can simply update the port to reflect the situation. I'll let you know! -- Guido Falsi m...@madpilot.net ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ion windows manager on FreeBSD
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Dmitry Marakasov amd...@amdmi3.ru wrote: * Mark Linimon (lini...@lonesome.com) wrote: The author orginally contacted us with a legal threat because we were not in compliance with the 28-day clause. A long, acrimonious disucssion ensued. In that discussion, the author was asked if we agree to meet that condition going forward, would you guarantee that this would remove any further legal threat? and he said yes ... for now. But that he reserved the right to change his mind later. *depending* on what we did or did not do in the future -- not just in adhering to the *existing clauses* like the significant clause or renamed clause -- both of which he mentioned would be part of any lawsuit. Legally indefensible? Of course. Would that prevent a lawsuit being filed? No. Anyone can sue anyone for anything. Well, if you insist I of course won't commit it. But the whole thing disappoints me greately, cause I was pretty sure at least FreeBSD developers won't be affected by a mere FUD. Do you honestly think the probability of Tuomo suing us is higher of, say, me suing, well, us? And that anything will change by us not providing a port we have absolutely totally utterly 100% right to provide? That is just silly. The port from now on is available here (removed from people.freebsd.org): http://mirror.amdmi3.ru/ports/ion3-20090110.port.tar You can start a fork of it, change its name, its license, and keep it as a separate project... people will use the same software with another name. Everybody will be happy and we won't have a Tuomo's software inside ports collection again. -- Renato Botelho ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
[CFT] KDE 4.3.2 / Qt 4.5.3 Ready for Testing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 We're happy to announce that KDE-4.3.2 is ready for testing. KDE-4.3.2 is only a Bugfix release. If you want to play with KDE 4.3.2 please checkout all ports from area51. A note about area51, we have changed the repo layout, Qt and KDE is now split between area51/QT and area51/KDE. If you have an old check out please delete all and run a new checkout: svn co http://area51.pcbsd.org/trunk/area51 You'll then find 3 dirs: QT, KDE, Tools, in Tools/scripts you'll find 2 scripts to merge QT and KDE to /usr/ports. If you see any issues please let use know. Happy Testing! - -- +---+---+ | PGP: 0xB1E6FCE9 | Jabber : miwi(at)BSDCrew.de | | Skype : splash_111 | Mail : miwi(at)FreeBSD.org | +---+---+ | Mess with the Best, Die like the Rest! | +---+---+ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkrLiKYACgkQdLJIhLHm/On75gCdEANw7t+9ZCwH1PMk7luYuWhh uroAoJcly6BgWrvp1SDegtiZsK9HK/0+ =gwD1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Port: ocaml-3.11
Hello, I discovered a strange problem with the FreeBSD port of OCaml. Frama-C/Jessie is a formal verification framework for C code, written in OCaml. The Beryllium distribution [1] compiles on OpenBSD, NetBSD, and Linux, but not on FreeBSD. On FreeBSD 7.2, I tried OCaml 3.11.0 as well as OCaml 3.11.1 [2]. However, I was able to compile [1] with OCaml 3.11.1 on Debian testing. On both platforms, I used ./configure make (gmake on FreeBSD). Any ideas? Cheers, Boris [1] http://frama-c.cea.fr/download/frama-c-Beryllium-20090901.tar.gz [2] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/frama-c-discuss/2009-September/001445.html I just tried to compile frama-c-Beryllium-20090901 on FreeBSD 7.2 with OCaml 3.11.0. Compiling stops with File src/jessie/interp.mli, line 26, characters 0-7: Error: Unbound module Jc gmake: *** [src/jessie/interp.cmi] Error 2 http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/frama-c-discuss/2009-October/001448.html Hi Richard, no success with Ocaml 3.11.1 either: Ocamlc src/jessie/interp.cmi File src/jessie/interp.mli, line 26, characters 0-7: Error: Unbound module Jc gmake: *** [src/jessie/interp.cmi] Error 2 Maybe it's a problem with the makefile. Does it compile on Debian testing? On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 10:07:58 +0200, Richard Bonichon richard.bonichon at gmail.com wrote: Hi Boris, OCaml 3.11.0. Compiling stops with File src/jessie/interp.mli, line 26, characters 0-7: Error: Unbound module Jc gmake: *** [src/jessie/interp.cmi] Error 2 AFAIK, the problem you describe is not related to FreeBSD (the version you use compiles and runs on both Open- and NetBSD, so there is no reason this should not be the case on FreeBSD). Have you tried something along the lines of: % gmake clean % gmake depend % gmake (I assume your compilation process has been properly configured) Aside from that (and not related to it), why not use the latest OCaml version (ie. 3.11.1) ported to FreeBSD? Cheers, ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Portmaster funding proposal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 I am launching an initiative to give the community the opportunity to fund further development on portmaster. As much as I love doing this work I need to be able to support myself and my family and the kinds of features that users have requested (such as package support) will take a lot of time to implement correctly. The URL is here: http://dougbarton.us/portmaster-proposal.html If you have any interest in funding this project take a look at that web page. Of course additional ideas for features are also welcome. Finally, if you find this message unwelcome or inappropriate please accept my apologies. Regards, Doug - -- This .signature sanitized for your protection -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEAREDAAYFAkrLvLwACgkQyIakK9Wy8PsADwCfSHs6zYxPNpz5jvZm3kweo6W9 cFEAoLXYm4P+uouW5TLOIXnZ1mw/tXTg =IIY0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
