Re: FreeBSD Port: boinc-einsteinathome-4.18_4,2
Hello, I don't know. David Whytcross píše v so 24. 03. 2012 v 14:52 +1100: Hi guys, am hoping you may be able to assist with an enquiry my FreeBSD 9.0 machine is fitted with an NVIDIA GEForce 210 card is it possible to utilize its CUDA GPU operability into boinc_setiathome_enhanced 6.12_1 regards, Dave Whytcross -- -- Pav Lucistnik p...@oook.cz p...@freebsd.org A)bort, R)etry, H)it with big hammer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: How useful is %%DATADIR%%, anyway?
On 23/03/2012 23:49, Mel Flynn wrote: I think even more space can be saved if a PORTWWW is introduced, though PORTWWW=* should be used more carefully as WWWDIR can be dynamic. I've been maintaining databases/phpmyadmin and several others essentially like this for years. It works nicely, but there is a gotcha you tend to run into with web applications: they usually have config files within the web tree which the admin will modify, and you have to avoid gratuitously blowing their changes away. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
FreeBSD Port: boinc-setiathome-enhanced-6.12_2
Hi guys, am hoping you may be able to assist with an enquiry my FreeBSD 9.0 machine is fitted with an NVIDIA GEForce 210 card is it possible to utilize its CUDA GPU operability into boinc_setiathome_enhanced 6.12_1 also, would you please pass on my appologies to p...@freesd.org for bothering them, as I inadvertently sent this request to that address initially regards, Dave Whytcross ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
FFMpeg port video4linux
I'm at a loss here; I could be tired, but I cant find if video4linux has been enabled in ffmpeg (or disabled). There's nothing in the makefile either. For the life of me I cannot get it use a webcamd device - all I get is unknown input format. I'm using ffplay (not that should make a difference here), and this is the cmd: $ffplay -f video4linux2 /dev/video0 Just video4linux fails similarly. I was trying to get something to work, and I think I just figured out the why. Can anyone point me to how to get this to work? Or why it doesn't? What do I need to do to make this happen? Cheers ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: luakit port
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 01:30:50 -0300 Luiz Gustavo luizgust...@luizgustavo.pro.br wrote: Hi List ! This is my first port, then please do not mind if you find any errors, I'm still learning how to create ports ;) This port is of Luakit (www.luakit.org). Is a light browser (see pkg-desc): Luakit is a highly configurable, micro-browser framework based on the WebKit web content engine and the GTK+ toolkit. It is very fast, extensible by Lua and licensed under the GNU GPLv3 license. It is primarily targeted at power users, developers and any people with too much time on their hands who want to have fine-grained control over their web browsers behaviour and interface. WWW: http://luakit.org Please, test this port and if someone wants to adopt and commit to do, I'll be happy! Source: http://mundounix.com.br/~gugabsd/luakit-ports.tar.gz PS: Very thanks garga, is a nice tool !!! Thanks --- Luiz Gustavo Costa (Powered by BSD) *+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+ mundoUnix - Consultoria em Software Livre http://www.mundounix.com.br ICQ: 2890831 / MSN: cont...@mundounix.com.br Tel: 55 (21) 4063-7110 / 8194-1905 / (11) 4063-0407 Blog: http://www.luizgustavo.pro.br For a better development, i make a new repository for this ports: https://bitbucket.org/gugabsd/freebsd_ports/downloads Thanks ! --- Luiz Gustavo Costa (Powered by BSD) *+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+ mundoUnix - Consultoria em Software Livre http://www.mundounix.com.br ICQ: 2890831 / MSN: cont...@mundounix.com.br Tel: 55 (21) 4063-7110 / 8194-1905 / (11) 4063-0407 Blog: http://www.luizgustavo.pro.br ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
security/gnutls update when...
Apparently this port has fell two versions behind. Is there anything that is going to happen to update it to the current stable version ? These advisories have been out for a week now. And the current version is 2.12.18. Database created: Sat Mar 24 13:15:03 EDT 2012 Affected package: gnutls-2.12.16 Type of problem: libtasn1 -- ASN.1 length decoding vulnerability. Reference: http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/2e7e9072-73a0-11e1-a883-001cc0a36e12.html Affected package: gnutls-2.12.16 Type of problem: gnutls -- possible overflow/Denial of service vulnerabilities. Reference: http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/aecee357-739e-11e1-a883-001cc0a36e12.html 2 problem(s) in your installed packages found. -- ;s =; pgp7BKEh337D3.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: security/gnutls update when...
On (03/24/12 13:29), Jason Hellenthal wrote: Apparently this port has fell two versions behind. Is there anything that is going to happen to update it to the current stable version ? These advisories have been out for a week now. And the current version is 2.12.18. Database created: Sat Mar 24 13:15:03 EDT 2012 Affected package: gnutls-2.12.16 Type of problem: libtasn1 -- ASN.1 length decoding vulnerability. Reference: http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/2e7e9072-73a0-11e1-a883-001cc0a36e12.html Affected package: gnutls-2.12.16 Type of problem: gnutls -- possible overflow/Denial of service vulnerabilities. Reference: http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/aecee357-739e-11e1-a883-001cc0a36e12.html 2 problem(s) in your installed packages found. -- ;s =; Jason, There is an update in progress (ports/166307). There is a shared library version bump that is part of the gnutls update and this requires a little extra scrutiny. This, combined with the upcoming 8.3 RELEASE is what is contributing to the delay. Hope this helps, -r -- Ryan Steinmetz PGP: EF36 D45A 5CA9 28B1 A550 18CD A43C D111 7AD7 FAF2 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: security/gnutls update when...
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Jason Hellenthal jhellent...@dataix.net wrote: Apparently this port has fell two versions behind. Is there anything that is going to happen to update it to the current stable version ? These advisories have been out for a week now. And the current version is 2.12.18. Database created: Sat Mar 24 13:15:03 EDT 2012 Affected package: gnutls-2.12.16 Type of problem: libtasn1 -- ASN.1 length decoding vulnerability. Reference: http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/2e7e9072-73a0-11e1-a883-001cc0a36e12.html Affected package: gnutls-2.12.16 Type of problem: gnutls -- possible overflow/Denial of service vulnerabilities. Reference: http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/aecee357-739e-11e1-a883-001cc0a36e12.html 2 problem(s) in your installed packages found. -- ;s =; Note that one of these problems is with libtasn1 and is not a gnutls problems at all. So updating libtasn1actually fixes this one, although the other does require an update to a version of gnutls that has yet to be ported. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: security/gnutls update when...
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 01:52:45PM -0400, Ryan Steinmetz wrote: On (03/24/12 13:29), Jason Hellenthal wrote: Apparently this port has fell two versions behind. Is there anything that is going to happen to update it to the current stable version ? These advisories have been out for a week now. And the current version is 2.12.18. Database created: Sat Mar 24 13:15:03 EDT 2012 Affected package: gnutls-2.12.16 Type of problem: libtasn1 -- ASN.1 length decoding vulnerability. Reference: http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/2e7e9072-73a0-11e1-a883-001cc0a36e12.html Affected package: gnutls-2.12.16 Type of problem: gnutls -- possible overflow/Denial of service vulnerabilities. Reference: http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/aecee357-739e-11e1-a883-001cc0a36e12.html 2 problem(s) in your installed packages found. -- ;s =; Jason, There is an update in progress (ports/166307). There is a shared library version bump that is part of the gnutls update and this requires a little extra scrutiny. This, combined with the upcoming 8.3 RELEASE is what is contributing to the delay. Thanks Ryan. Not to sound hasty I realize the release is coming and thought that to be most of the reason as well the shared bump, but I have already had to deal with a few ramifications from rand(lusers); I appreciate the feedback, it gives me at least something to work with. Thanks again. -- ;s =; ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: security/gnutls update when...
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 10:54:32AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Jason Hellenthal
jhellent...@dataix.net wrote:
Apparently this port has fell two versions behind. Is there anything
that is going to happen to update it to the current stable version ?
These advisories have been out for a week now. And the current version
is 2.12.18.
Database created: Sat Mar 24 13:15:03 EDT 2012
Affected package: gnutls-2.12.16
Type of problem: libtasn1 -- ASN.1 length decoding vulnerability.
Reference:
http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/2e7e9072-73a0-11e1-a883-001cc0a36e12.html
Affected package: gnutls-2.12.16
Type of problem: gnutls -- possible overflow/Denial of service
vulnerabilities.
Reference:
http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/aecee357-739e-11e1-a883-001cc0a36e12.html
2 problem(s) in your installed packages found.
--
;s =;
Note that one of these problems is with libtasn1 and is not a gnutls
problems at all. So updating libtasn1actually fixes this one, although
the other does require an update to a version of gnutls that has yet
to be ported.
Only if it was installed or implied...
.if (defined(WITH_LIBTASN1) || exists(${LOCALBASE}/lib/libtasn1.so.4))
!defined(WITHOUT_LIBTASN1)
LIB_DEPENDS+= tasn1.4:${PORTSDIR}/security/libtasn1
.else
CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--with-included-libtasn1
.endif
--
;s =;
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: security/gnutls update when...
Kevin Oberman wrote: On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Jason Hellenthal jhellent...@dataix.net wrote: Apparently this port has fell two versions behind. Is there anything that is going to happen to update it to the current stable version ? These advisories have been out for a week now. And the current version is 2.12.18. Database created: Sat Mar 24 13:15:03 EDT 2012 Affected package: gnutls-2.12.16 Type of problem: libtasn1 -- ASN.1 length decoding vulnerability. Reference: http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/2e7e9072-73a0-11e1-a883-001cc0a36e12.html Affected package: gnutls-2.12.16 Type of problem: gnutls -- possible overflow/Denial of service vulnerabilities. Reference: http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/aecee357-739e-11e1-a883-001cc0a36e12.html 2 problem(s) in your installed packages found. -- ;s =; Note that one of these problems is with libtasn1 and is not a gnutls problems at all. So updating libtasn1actually fixes this one, although the other does require an update to a version of gnutls that has yet to be ported. There's a vulnerability in gnutls also: http://www.gnu.org/software/gnutls/security.html Mu Dynamics released an advisory for both libtasn1 and gnutls: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/5959 gnutls one is tagged MU-201202-01 and libtasn1 on is MU-201202-02. Roman Bogorodskiy pgpjf0nHsK5UG.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: named/bind98... rather ports usage and base interaction.
On 3/23/2012 8:41 AM, Jason Hellenthal wrote: Hey Doug, Do you know of anything we could do to stop the following from happening ? Yes, see below. If you set world to build without BIND and it is your intention to use bind from ports... upon running (make delete-old) I don't like the delete-old stuff, and make no efforts to support it. That said, the solution to your problem is to not use WITHOUT_BIND, but to use the various other WITHOUT_BIND_* knobs, except for WITHOUT_BIND_ETC. Yes, this is clunky; no, I have no plans to change it. hth, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: luakit port
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 11:55:05AM -0300, Luiz Gustavo thus spake: On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 01:30:50 -0300 Luiz Gustavo luizgust...@luizgustavo.pro.br wrote: Hi List ! This is my first port, then please do not mind if you find any errors, I'm still learning how to create ports ;) This port is of Luakit (www.luakit.org). Is a light browser (see pkg-desc): Luakit is a highly configurable, micro-browser framework based on the WebKit web content engine and the GTK+ toolkit. It is very fast, extensible by Lua and licensed under the GNU GPLv3 license. It is primarily targeted at power users, developers and any people with too much time on their hands who want to have fine-grained control over their web browsers behaviour and interface. WWW: http://luakit.org Please, test this port and if someone wants to adopt and commit to do, I'll be happy! Source: http://mundounix.com.br/~gugabsd/luakit-ports.tar.gz PS: Very thanks garga, is a nice tool !!! Thanks --- Luiz Gustavo Costa (Powered by BSD) *+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+ mundoUnix - Consultoria em Software Livre http://www.mundounix.com.br ICQ: 2890831 / MSN: cont...@mundounix.com.br Tel: 55 (21) 4063-7110 / 8194-1905 / (11) 4063-0407 Blog: http://www.luizgustavo.pro.br For a better development, i make a new repository for this ports: https://bitbucket.org/gugabsd/freebsd_ports/downloads Thanks ! --- Luiz Gustavo Costa (Powered by BSD) This may be committed more speedily if you follow the recommended path for submitting new ports. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-submitting.html Nonetheless, thank you for all the work on this! -jgh -- Jason Helfman System Administrator experts-exchange.com http://www.experts-exchange.com/M_4830110.html E4AD 7CF1 1396 27F6 79DD 4342 5E92 AD66 8C8C FBA5 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: named/bind98... rather ports usage and base interaction.
On 24 Mar 2012 21:47, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote: On 3/23/2012 8:41 AM, Jason Hellenthal wrote: Hey Doug, Do you know of anything we could do to stop the following from happening ? Yes, see below. If you set world to build without BIND and it is your intention to use bind from ports... upon running (make delete-old) I don't like the delete-old stuff, and make no efforts to support it. That said, the solution to your problem is to not use WITHOUT_BIND, but to use the various other WITHOUT_BIND_* knobs, except for WITHOUT_BIND_ETC. Yes, this is clunky; no, I have no plans to change it. I would agree in the sense that delete-old should not be deleting stuff just because it's set WITHOUT. We should really use two targets, one for old stuff, and one for irrelevant stuff. Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: named/bind98... rather ports usage and base interaction.
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 02:46:36PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: On 3/23/2012 8:41 AM, Jason Hellenthal wrote: Hey Doug, Do you know of anything we could do to stop the following from happening ? Yes, see below. If you set world to build without BIND and it is your intention to use bind from ports... upon running (make delete-old) I don't like the delete-old stuff, and make no efforts to support it. That said, the solution to your problem is to not use WITHOUT_BIND, but to use the various other WITHOUT_BIND_* knobs, except for WITHOUT_BIND_ETC. Yes, this is clunky; no, I have no plans to change it. Jeeze that was simpler than I thought it was going to be... Thanks! Doug hth, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection -- ;s =; ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: FFMpeg port video4linux
On 03/24/12 23:31, David Wolfskill wrote: On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 11:12:50PM +1000, R Skinner wrote: I'm at a loss here; I could be tired, but I cant find if video4linux has been enabled in ffmpeg (or disabled). There's nothing in the makefile either. For the life of me I cannot get it use a webcamd device - all I get is unknown input format. I'm using ffplay (not that should make a difference here), and this is the cmd: $ffplay -f video4linux2 /dev/video0 Just video4linux fails similarly. ... Can anyone point me to how to get this to work? Or why it doesn't? What do I need to do to make this happen? This may be a usefule clue: g1-227(9.0-S)[1] cd /usr/ports/multimedia/ g1-227(9.0-S)[2] make search key=video4linux Port: libv4l-0.8.4_1 Path: /usr/ports/multimedia/libv4l Info: Video4Linux library Maint: hsela...@freebsd.org B-deps: gettext-0.18.1.1 gmake-3.82 jpeg-8_3 libiconv-1.13.1_2 v4l_compat-1.0.20110720 R-deps: jpeg-8_3 WWW:http://freshmeat.net/projects/libv4l Port: linux-f10-libv4l-0.6.2 Path: /usr/ports/multimedia/linux-f10-libv4l Info: Collection of video4linux support libraries (Fedora 10) Maint: emulat...@freebsd.org B-deps: R-deps: linux_base-f10-10_4 WWW:http://hansdegoede.livejournal.com/3636.html Port: pwcview-1.4.1_4 Path: /usr/ports/multimedia/pwcview Info: The Video4Linux PWC webcam viewer Maint: hsela...@freebsd.org B-deps: aalib-1.4.r5_6 damageproto-1.2.1 dri2proto-2.3 expat-2.0.1_2 fixesproto-5.0 jpeg-8_3 kbproto-1.0.5 libGL-7.4.4 libGLU-7.4.4 libX11-1.4.4,1 libXau-1.0.6 libXdamage-1.1.3 libXdmcp-1.1.0 libXext-1.3.0_1,1 libXfixes-5.0 libXrandr-1.3.2 libXrender-0.9.6 libXxf86vm-1.1.1 libdrm-2.4.12_1 libiconv-1.13.1_2 libpthread-stubs-0.3_3 libv4l-0.8.4_1 libxcb-1.7 pkg-config-0.25_1 randrproto-1.3.2 renderproto-0.11.1 sdl-1.2.15,2 v4l_compat-1.0.20110720 xextproto-7.2.0 xf86vidmodeproto-2.3.1 xproto-7.0.22 R-deps: aalib-1.4.r5_6 damageproto-1.2.1 dri2proto-2.3 expat-2.0.1_2 fixesproto-5.0 jpeg-8_3 kbproto-1.0.5 libGL-7.4.4 libGLU-7.4.4 libX11-1.4.4,1 libXau-1.0.6 libXdamage-1.1.3 libXdmcp-1.1.0 libXext-1.3.0_1,1 libXfixes-5.0 libXrandr-1.3.2 libXrender-0.9.6 libXxf86vm-1.1.1 libdrm-2.4.12_1 libiconv-1.13.1_2 libpthread-stubs-0.3_3 libv4l-0.8.4_1 libxcb-1.7 pkg-config-0.25_1 randrproto-1.3.2 renderproto-0.11.1 sdl-1.2.15,2 xextproto-7.2.0 xf86vidmodeproto-2.3.1 xproto-7.0.22 WWW:http://raaf.atspace.org/ Port: v4l-utils-0.8.4 Path: /usr/ports/multimedia/v4l-utils Info: Video4Linux utilities Maint: n...@freebsd.org B-deps: argp-standalone-1.3_2 gettext-0.18.1.1 gmake-3.82 jpeg-8_3 libiconv-1.13.1_2 libv4l-0.8.4_1 v4l_compat-1.0.20110720 R-deps: argp-standalone-1.3_2 jpeg-8_3 libv4l-0.8.4_1 WWW:http://freshmeat.net/projects/libv4l Port: v4l_compat-1.0.20110720 Path: /usr/ports/multimedia/v4l_compat Info: Video4Linux IOCTL header files Maint: multime...@freebsd.org B-deps: R-deps: WWW: g1-227(9.0-S)[3] I appreciate that, but if it was that simple I would not have asked. I have both libv4l and v4l_compat installed already, but if not then ffmpeg should have installed them anyway. This lies in the ffmpeg build somewhere; it should be automatically enabled but somehow it is missed... There is no --enable-indev in the configure script, just disable. So where else should I be looking? Why would it be disabled (not in the Makefile BTW)? Cheers ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: luakit port
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:46:25 -0700 Jason Helfman jhelf...@e-e.com wrote: On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 11:55:05AM -0300, Luiz Gustavo thus spake: On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 01:30:50 -0300 Luiz Gustavo luizgust...@luizgustavo.pro.br wrote: Hi List ! This is my first port, then please do not mind if you find any errors, I'm still learning how to create ports ;) This port is of Luakit (www.luakit.org). Is a light browser (see pkg-desc): Luakit is a highly configurable, micro-browser framework based on the WebKit web content engine and the GTK+ toolkit. It is very fast, extensible by Lua and licensed under the GNU GPLv3 license. It is primarily targeted at power users, developers and any people with too much time on their hands who want to have fine-grained control over their web browsers behaviour and interface. WWW: http://luakit.org Please, test this port and if someone wants to adopt and commit to do, I'll be happy! Source: http://mundounix.com.br/~gugabsd/luakit-ports.tar.gz PS: Very thanks garga, is a nice tool !!! Thanks --- Luiz Gustavo Costa (Powered by BSD) *+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+ mundoUnix - Consultoria em Software Livre http://www.mundounix.com.br ICQ: 2890831 / MSN: cont...@mundounix.com.br Tel: 55 (21) 4063-7110 / 8194-1905 / (11) 4063-0407 Blog: http://www.luizgustavo.pro.br For a better development, i make a new repository for this ports: https://bitbucket.org/gugabsd/freebsd_ports/downloads Thanks ! --- Luiz Gustavo Costa (Powered by BSD) This may be committed more speedily if you follow the recommended path for submitting new ports. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-submitting.html Nonetheless, thank you for all the work on this! -jgh -- Jason Helfman System Administrator experts-exchange.com http://www.experts-exchange.com/M_4830110.html E4AD 7CF1 1396 27F6 79DD 4342 5E92 AD66 8C8C FBA5 Hi Jason, Thanks for you attention. I already sent a new a new PR for this. I'm learning ;) --- Luiz Gustavo Costa (Powered by BSD) *+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+ mundoUnix - Consultoria em Software Livre http://www.mundounix.com.br ICQ: 2890831 / MSN: cont...@mundounix.com.br Tel: 55 (21) 4063-7110 / 8194-1905 / (11) 4063-0407 Blog: http://www.luizgustavo.pro.br ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: What about Firefox 11?
On Mar 25, 2012, at 1:43 AM, Chris wrote: On 3/22/12, Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote: On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:00:15 +0100 Florian Smeets articulated: Yes, after the ports freeze. We decided to stay with firefox 10.0.x for now and update www/firefox to 11 after the FreeBSD 8.3 release is out. Considering that Firefox is in a race to get to version 20 before the Mayan Doomsday December 21, I think you should revise that to at least Firefox 12 or better. Is there any chance of the 10-ESR release being turned into its own port? Yes, there is: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/165790 HTH, Beat ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: named/bind98... rather ports usage and base interaction.
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 02:46:36PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: On 3/23/2012 8:41 AM, Jason Hellenthal wrote: Hey Doug, Do you know of anything we could do to stop the following from happening ? Yes, see below. If you set world to build without BIND and it is your intention to use bind from ports... upon running (make delete-old) I don't like the delete-old stuff, and make no efforts to support it. That said, the solution to your problem is to not use WITHOUT_BIND, but to use the various other WITHOUT_BIND_* knobs, except for WITHOUT_BIND_ETC. Yes, this is clunky; no, I have no plans to change it. Just to followup and say thanks again... This is what I was looking for. I ended up with just these to accomplish what I wanted on stable/8 machines: /etc/src.conf WITHOUT_BIND_DNSSEC=YES WITHOUT_BIND_LIBS_LWRES=YES WITHOUT_BIND_NAMED=YES WITHOUT_BIND_UTILS=YES And did not use: WITHOUT_BIND_ETC WITHOUT_BIND_MTREE Works as expected. Thanks again Doug. -- ;s =; ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
