Re: FreeBSD in Google Code-In 2012? You can help too!
2012/10/25 Pedro Giffuni p...@freebsd.org (cc'ing -ports and cutting most of the rest) From: Eitan Adler . On 24 October 2012 13:24, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: Also related to that, what about writing a section about redports[1] in the porter's handbook[2]? This is a good documentation task... but we need more *coding* tasks as well. We do need to port and test patch (1) from NetBSD or DragonFly to replace GNU patch, and this shouldn't be difficult. I would guess there are other interesting possibilities in the ports tree and new ports count as coding: http://wiki.freebsd.org/WantedPorts Interesting, there is mentioned LWJGL, while I have patch for native build for about a year. I poked upstream about it again, I hope they will apply it in next version. So i guess we need porting mentors. Pedro. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Regards, Alexander Yerenkow ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
INDEX build failed for 7.x
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done. Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: pgtcl-2.0.0 Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: pgtcl-2.0.0 Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: pgtcl-2.0.0 Committers on the hook: crees jkim Most recent SVN update was: Updating '.': UMk/bsd.database.mk Ujava/bootstrap-openjdk/distinfo.i386 Ujava/bootstrap-openjdk/distinfo.amd64 Ujava/bootstrap-openjdk/pkg-plist Ujava/bootstrap-openjdk/Makefile Ujava/bootstrap-openjdk/Makefile.update Adatabases/postgresql91-pgtcl Adatabases/postgresql91-pgtcl/Makefile Adatabases/postgresql92-pgtcl Adatabases/postgresql92-pgtcl/Makefile Udatabases/Makefile Adatabases/postgresql90-pgtcl Adatabases/postgresql90-pgtcl/Makefile Updated to revision 306354. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Index not being built again
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:21:45AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: After two days of having no ports to update on any systems I built the index myself and: ldns-1.6.13_1 needs updating (port has 1.6.14) libevent2-2.0.19 needs updating (port has 2.0.20) libvdpau-0.5 needs updating (port has 0.5_1) lighttpd-1.4.31_4 needs updating (port has 1.4.31_5) mosh-1.2.3needs updating (port has 1.2.3_1) openjdk6-b26_1needs updating (port has b26_2) portmaster-3.14_5 needs updating (port has 3.14_6) wireshark-1.8.2_1 needs updating (port has 1.8.3) xterm-284 needs updating (port has 284_1) Looks like the index build is broken again or I have some problem that is common to all of my systems. Since the recent issue, I suspect that it is the former. Yes, INDEX is broken by the following commit: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/2012-October/006294.html There are duplicate pgtcl ports. As Mark said earlier, there has been both a lot of work on the physical machines and we moved the backend from cvs (via the svn-to-cvs exporter) to use svn directly, which is why mails of the breakage were turned off for debugging. Those mails are turned on again. Erwin -- Erwin Lansinghttp://droso.dk er...@freebsd.orghttp:// www.FreeBSD.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Index not being built again
On 25 Oct 2012 08:15, Erwin Lansing er...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:21:45AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: After two days of having no ports to update on any systems I built the index myself and: ldns-1.6.13_1 needs updating (port has 1.6.14) libevent2-2.0.19 needs updating (port has 2.0.20) libvdpau-0.5 needs updating (port has 0.5_1) lighttpd-1.4.31_4 needs updating (port has 1.4.31_5) mosh-1.2.3needs updating (port has 1.2.3_1) openjdk6-b26_1needs updating (port has b26_2) portmaster-3.14_5 needs updating (port has 3.14_6) wireshark-1.8.2_1 needs updating (port has 1.8.3) xterm-284 needs updating (port has 284_1) Looks like the index build is broken again or I have some problem that is common to all of my systems. Since the recent issue, I suspect that it is the former. Yes, INDEX is broken by the following commit: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/2012-October/006294.html There are duplicate pgtcl ports. Oh no, I'm really sorry- my first broken INDEX :( Please feel free to disconnect them for now- I'm not home for a while yet. Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Another snag: devel/doxygen and audio/jack seem to have themselves as dependencies
I have hit another snag in updating ports that depend on png. Portmaster seems to go into an infinite loop or keep looking for a long time, producing monstrous log files: -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 72138 Oct 2 03:18 /BETA1/usr/ports/build-png.log -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 8060 Oct 19 02:36 /BETA1/usr/ports/build2.cmd -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 351911 Oct 19 02:37 /BETA1/usr/ports/build2.log -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 8052 Oct 19 02:41 /BETA1/usr/ports/build2b.cmd -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 8063 Oct 20 03:47 /BETA1/usr/ports/build3.cmd -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 377896 Oct 19 02:50 /BETA1/usr/ports/build3.log -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 7913 Oct 20 04:42 /BETA1/usr/ports/build4.cmd -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel2573873 Oct 20 04:15 /BETA1/usr/ports/build4.log -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 7186 Oct 21 04:45 /BETA1/usr/ports/build5.cmd -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 13451651 Oct 20 07:37 /BETA1/usr/ports/build5.log -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 7150 Oct 25 07:07 /BETA1/usr/ports/build6.cmd -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 757204321 Oct 25 03:04 /BETA1/usr/ports/build6.log -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 129655234 Oct 25 07:18 /BETA1/usr/ports/build7.log That last one, build7.log, only took ten minutes to get that large! Logs, too big to post here, suggest a dependency loop, and I ran make all-depends-list | more in both devel/doxygen and audio/jack directories, and the result for devel/doxygen showed devel/doxygen, the result for audio/jack showed audio/jack . I also tried make all-depends-list | more in print/hplip directory, and print/hplip did not show. I remember a circular dependency bug in the recent past with devel/doxygen and audio/jack, so that's where I looked, especially after finding these ports repeatedly in my monster-sized logs. Portmaster, when it fails, ends the log with a note to resume by running portmaster flags list of ports separated by spaces, all on one line. So I separate out that part and edit as necessary with vi: that's how I got my build?.cmd files. Tom ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Index not being built again
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 09:09:07AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: On 25 Oct 2012 08:15, Erwin Lansing er...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:21:45AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: After two days of having no ports to update on any systems I built the index myself and: ldns-1.6.13_1 needs updating (port has 1.6.14) libevent2-2.0.19 needs updating (port has 2.0.20) libvdpau-0.5 needs updating (port has 0.5_1) lighttpd-1.4.31_4 needs updating (port has 1.4.31_5) mosh-1.2.3needs updating (port has 1.2.3_1) openjdk6-b26_1needs updating (port has b26_2) portmaster-3.14_5 needs updating (port has 3.14_6) wireshark-1.8.2_1 needs updating (port has 1.8.3) xterm-284 needs updating (port has 284_1) Looks like the index build is broken again or I have some problem that is common to all of my systems. Since the recent issue, I suspect that it is the former. Yes, INDEX is broken by the following commit: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/2012-October/006294.html There are duplicate pgtcl ports. Oh no, I'm really sorry- my first broken INDEX :( Welcome to the club :-) Please feel free to disconnect them for now- I'm not home for a while yet. I've reverted part of you commit to databases/Makefile and Mk/bsd.databases.mk, but left the new ports in the tree. That should fix the INDEX build for now, and leave it easy for you to readd. Cheers, Erwin -- Erwin Lansing (o_ _o)http://droso.dk \\\_\ /_/// er...@lansing.dk ) ( ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
INDEX build failed for 7.x
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done. Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: pgtcl-2.0.0 Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: pgtcl-2.0.0 Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: pgtcl-2.0.0 Committers on the hook: crees cy gjb jhale jkim rakuco wen wxs Most recent SVN update was: Updating '.': UU lang/gprolog/distinfo UU lang/gprolog/Makefile Unet/tcpillust/Makefile Umultimedia/Makefile Amultimedia/py-enzyme Amultimedia/py-enzyme/distinfo Amultimedia/py-enzyme/pkg-descr Amultimedia/py-enzyme/Makefile Updated to revision 306373. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Another snag: devel/doxygen and audio/jack seem to have themselves as dependencies
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Thomas Mueller mueller6...@bellsouth.net wrote: I have hit another snag in updating ports that depend on png. Portmaster seems to go into an infinite loop or keep looking for a long time, producing monstrous log files: -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 72138 Oct 2 03:18 /BETA1/usr/ports/build-png.log -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 8060 Oct 19 02:36 /BETA1/usr/ports/build2.cmd -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 351911 Oct 19 02:37 /BETA1/usr/ports/build2.log -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 8052 Oct 19 02:41 /BETA1/usr/ports/build2b.cmd -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 8063 Oct 20 03:47 /BETA1/usr/ports/build3.cmd -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 377896 Oct 19 02:50 /BETA1/usr/ports/build3.log -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 7913 Oct 20 04:42 /BETA1/usr/ports/build4.cmd -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel2573873 Oct 20 04:15 /BETA1/usr/ports/build4.log -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 7186 Oct 21 04:45 /BETA1/usr/ports/build5.cmd -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 13451651 Oct 20 07:37 /BETA1/usr/ports/build5.log -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 7150 Oct 25 07:07 /BETA1/usr/ports/build6.cmd -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 757204321 Oct 25 03:04 /BETA1/usr/ports/build6.log -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 129655234 Oct 25 07:18 /BETA1/usr/ports/build7.log That last one, build7.log, only took ten minutes to get that large! Logs, too big to post here, suggest a dependency loop, and I ran make all-depends-list | more in both devel/doxygen and audio/jack directories, and the result for devel/doxygen showed devel/doxygen, the result for audio/jack showed audio/jack . I also tried make all-depends-list | more in print/hplip directory, and print/hplip did not show. I remember a circular dependency bug in the recent past with devel/doxygen and audio/jack, so that's where I looked, especially after finding these ports repeatedly in my monster-sized logs. In the past I had seen this dependency loop: audio/pulseaudio - audio/jack -- devel/doxygen --- graphics/graphviz graphics/devil - devel/sdl12 -- audio/pulseaudio And the solution to this loop was to do one of the following: 1. Turn the DOC option OFF for audio/jack. 2. define NOPORTDOCS when installing devel/doxygen (breaks dependancy on graphics/graphviz) 3. Turn the DEVIL option OFF for graphics/graphviz 4. Turn the PULSEAUDIO option OFF for devel/sdl12 If you don't need the documentaion for audio/jack, try disabling the DOC option for audio/jack. Scot ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [HEADSUP] IPV6 on by default
Bapt wrote: We decided to activate the IPV6 option by default for the whole ports tree to make sure that we ship ipv6 aware packages. If a port is broken with the IPV6 options activated please report it and/or fix it. That's very nice and about time to do so by default (even though a sizable set of ports already had it turned on). Thanks! ... now if only the PORTSNAP(8) would be able to fetch port updates on an IPv6-only machine !!! (portsnap.FreeBSD.org has no IPv6 address) Mark ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Index not being built again
On 25 Oct 2012 10:47, Erwin Lansing er...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 09:09:07AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: On 25 Oct 2012 08:15, Erwin Lansing er...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:21:45AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: After two days of having no ports to update on any systems I built the index myself and: ldns-1.6.13_1 needs updating (port has 1.6.14) libevent2-2.0.19 needs updating (port has 2.0.20) libvdpau-0.5 needs updating (port has 0.5_1) lighttpd-1.4.31_4 needs updating (port has 1.4.31_5) mosh-1.2.3needs updating (port has 1.2.3_1) openjdk6-b26_1needs updating (port has b26_2) portmaster-3.14_5 needs updating (port has 3.14_6) wireshark-1.8.2_1 needs updating (port has 1.8.3) xterm-284 needs updating (port has 284_1) Looks like the index build is broken again or I have some problem that is common to all of my systems. Since the recent issue, I suspect that it is the former. Yes, INDEX is broken by the following commit: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/2012-October/006294.html There are duplicate pgtcl ports. Oh no, I'm really sorry- my first broken INDEX :( Welcome to the club :-) Please feel free to disconnect them for now- I'm not home for a while yet. I've reverted part of you commit to databases/Makefile and Mk/bsd.databases.mk, but left the new ports in the tree. That should fix the INDEX build for now, and leave it easy for you to readd. Fantastic, thank you. Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
INDEX now builds successfully on 7.x
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
[HEADS UP]: CVE-2012-4929 (CRIME)
I think there is nothing FreeBSD can do about this besides making sure our users are aware of it. The situation in which this is a problem is specific but one you should consider if you are using TLS with compression. TLS 1.2 and earlier are vulnerable to an attack commonly known as CRIME. The attack involves TLS sessions using compression where an attacker is able to inject known plaintext into the stream. Through a series of guesses and measuring the length of the encrypted text an attacker is able to determine the plaintext. The recommended workaround for now is to disable compression on servers where this may have an impact. As this is a flaw in a protocol and no one specific implementation please consult the documentation for any affected services to determine how to turn off TLS compression. More information is available at: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-4929 -- WXS ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT] fusefs-ntfs and fusefs-libs updates
On 24/10/2012 15:33, Florian Smeets wrote: On 10/22/2012 10:05, Dominic Fandrey wrote: On my RELENG_9 system apart from ntfs non of the fusefs systems works any more: fusefs-smbnetfs-0.5.3a fusefs-sshfs-2.4 fusefs-wdfs-1.4.2_4 And concerning ntfs, ports/170695 is still present. All in all, I was much better off before the updates. Yes, I'm aware of the problems. We are working on making the fuse import from head work on older releases and update the fusefs-kmod with that. Also we are currently looking into the problem why certain fusefs filesystems don't work with the current versions in ports. Oh, thanks! If you need me to test anything ... -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: 'pkg check -d' showing missing dependencies after upgrading lang/perl
On Wed 2012-10-24 14:48:59 UTC-0500, Mark Felder (f...@feld.me) wrote: I noticed at some point after installing and switching to pkgng, then upgrading Perl from 5.12 to 5.14 with 'portmaster -o lang/perl5.14 lang/perl5.12', the 'pkg check -d' command would still list some ports with perl5.12 as a missing dependency: What I failed to mention was that at this point if I ran 'portmaster irssi-scripts' to reinstall that port, the dependency on perl5.12 would remain after irssi-scripts had been reinstalled. Initially I thought this was because irssi-scripts depends on irssi, which also at the time had dependencies on both perl5.12 perl5.14. So then I ran 'portmaster irssi' to reinstall irssi, but the perl5.12 dependency still remained. At that point I got frustrated and just ran 'pkg del' on all of them, then began reinstalling them again. I think this is a bug with portmaster. Portmaster should have run this command on your behalf: # pkg set -o lang/perl5.14:lang/perl5.12 Ah! Thanks for that. I've since read the man page for 'pkg set' which has: # pkg set -o lang/perl5.12:lang/perl5.14 which I think is the correct order. So I'll make a note of that. But hopefully I won't have to do that again. This runs a query in the pkg sqlite database and update dependencies. This clearly didn't happen for you yet, so thats where your errors come from. Well I think it worked correctly for most ports, just those few that I listed earlier remained problematic and I couldn't figure out why. I've since tried to replicate it in a VM and got nowhere. Everything worked OK, so I'm a bit baffled. Thanks again, Regards Andrew ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT] fusefs-ntfs and fusefs-libs updates
On Thu 2012-10-25 16:44:08 UTC+0200, Dominic Fandrey (kamik...@bsdforen.de) wrote: Yes, I'm aware of the problems. We are working on making the fuse import from head work on older releases and update the fusefs-kmod with that. Also we are currently looking into the problem why certain fusefs filesystems don't work with the current versions in ports. Oh, thanks! If you need me to test anything ... Likewise. Am particularly keen on getting fusefs-encfs to work without segfaulting. Currently as a workaround I'm still using the older fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1.20080208_10, instead of _11. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Use custom scripts for pkg-deinstall
In the port I'm working on I have a script in pkg-deinstall but FreeBSD is still trying to remove the files in pkg-plist even though my script takes care of this. Is there a way to tell FreeBSD to only run what I have in pkg-deinstall? Thank you, Kristopher Clark ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Use custom scripts for pkg-deinstall
On 25 Oct 2012 15:54, Kristopher Clark kcl...@actuate.com wrote: In the port I'm working on I have a script in pkg-deinstall but FreeBSD is still trying to remove the files in pkg-plist even though my script takes care of this. Is there a way to tell FreeBSD to only run what I have in pkg-deinstall? In short, no. Deinstalling is done by removing all files from pkg-plist and running pkg-deinstall scripts. No other way. Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Use custom scripts for pkg-deinstall
On 25 October 2012 10:39, Kristopher Clark kcl...@actuate.com wrote: In the port I'm working on I have a script in pkg-deinstall but FreeBSD is still trying to remove the files in pkg-plist even though my script takes care of this. Is there a way to tell FreeBSD to only run what I have in pkg-deinstall? No. Your script should not be removing the files. -- Eitan Adler ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Cvsup svn (ports,src) question and...
When using csup/cvsup sometimes I tee the result to a new logfile so that I do not have to run pkg_version for what-to-upgrade information [1]. How could that be attained using subversion (svn)? A not-trivial inconvenience if it is not possible. [1] my $PAGER (/lookat/) has an easy search function, distinfo, for example, and at least here is easier to read than 'less' and its analogues... ... Anyone have any ideas about a ports-mgmt/legacy_pkg port of some sort that could layer a legacy /var/db/pkg set of files on top of the workings of /pkg/? I thought about it a while, but came up with nothing to really expound upon, other than it being a good idea. ... Thanks. J. Bouquet ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Cvsup svn (ports,src) question and...
On 25 October 2012 16:15, Jeffrey Bouquet jeffreybouq...@yahoo.com wrote: When using csup/cvsup sometimes I tee the result to a new logfile so that I do not have to run pkg_version for what-to-upgrade information [1]. How could that be attained using subversion (svn)? A not-trivial inconvenience if it is not possible. [1] my $PAGER (/lookat/) has an easy search function, distinfo, for example, and at least here is easier to read than 'less' and its analogues... You can not tell by what files were changed what you must update. pkg_version (or pkg version) is the only correct way to determine this. If you wish to see what files were updated I believe svn update prints this information out. -- Eitan Adler ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Having problems downloading source from Sourceforge
I decided to work on a new port - phpwhois. But I can't seem to get this thing to download no matter what I try. It's located at Sourceforge. http://sourceforge.net/projects/phpwhois/files/phpwhois/ When I run make makesum, I get tons of Moved temporarily errors. I've tried SF as the master site, I've tried master_site_subdir. I've tried pointing to the url directly. Nothing works. What am I missing? I can download the file directly with no problem, but that won't help build a port for it. -- Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. *** It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer medication to the dead. Thomas Jefferson There are some ideas so wrong that only a very intelligent person could believe in them. George Orwell ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Having problems downloading source from Sourceforge
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.comwrote: I decided to work on a new port - phpwhois. But I can't seem to get this thing to download no matter what I try. It's located at Sourceforge. http://sourceforge.net/** projects/phpwhois/files/**phpwhois/http://sourceforge.net/projects/phpwhois/files/phpwhois/ When I run make makesum, I get tons of Moved temporarily errors. I've tried SF as the master site, I've tried master_site_subdir. I've tried pointing to the url directly. Nothing works. What am I missing? I can download the file directly with no problem, but that won't help build a port for it. I have found with SF it is best to refer to the direct link for specifying of the MASTER_SITE directive. In a quick glance, it appears that is the case here, as well. -jgh ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Another snag: devel/doxygen and audio/jack seem to have themselves as dependencies
In the past I had seen this dependency loop:
audio/pulseaudio
- audio/jack
-- devel/doxygen
--- graphics/graphviz
graphics/devil
- devel/sdl12
-- audio/pulseaudio
And the solution to this loop was to do one of the following:
1. Turn the DOC option OFF for audio/jack.
2. define NOPORTDOCS when installing devel/doxygen (breaks dependancy
on graphics/graphviz)
3. Turn the DEVIL option OFF for graphics/graphviz
4. Turn the PULSEAUDIO option OFF for devel/sdl12
If you don't need the documentaion for audio/jack, try disabling the
DOC option for audio/jack.
Scot
I remember this or similar dependency loop in the past, thought it was fixed,
then apparently the dependency loop came back.
Maybe wait until this bug is (temporarily?) fixed again? I look through the
Makefiles for audio/jack and devel/doxygen and can't find what the default
options are supposed to be.
I have other things I could do in the interim, like cross-compiling NetBSD and
Linux, so I don't have to resume this portupgrade/portmaster immediately.
I was waiting on FreeBSD update from source until I could finish upgrading all
ports depending on png, but that won't happen any time soon with portmaster.
I still don't have my HP LaserJet working.
Portmaster finds one port that won't update, and stops the whole process.
Portupgrade, in my experience, upgraded most other ports, and then I could fish
through the log file, make fixes, and portupgrade those failed ports one at a
time.
I have a NetBSD 5.1_STABLE installation on old computer with many packages
built from pkgsrc, from summer 2011. I just checked, and there was no jack or
doxygen.
Now I am more than ever tempted to update FreeBSD from source, install to
another partition on my 3 TB Western Digital Caviar Green hard drive, and build
packages from NetBSD pkgsrc, which has been ported to and can be bootstrapped
on FreeBSD and other (quasi-)Unixes and even Haiku OS. No more config dialogs
messing up when I create a log file.
Tom
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Port: vtwm-5.4.7_3
Why is rplay being packaged with VTWM? VTWM is supposed to be a minimal no-frills window manager (I have used it for 15 years) and I very much dislike the added dependencies for things I don't care to use and violate the spirit of VTWM. I wrote the programmer that did this hack several years ago when he first did it, and he promised he would undo it. And now, I see it back again (still using 4.11, was thinking of upgrading to 9.1). Please keep VTWM *minimal*. If someone wants fancy things like network sound, I am sure one of the more fancy window managers will do. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Index not being built again
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote: On 25 Oct 2012 10:47, Erwin Lansing er...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 09:09:07AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: On 25 Oct 2012 08:15, Erwin Lansing er...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:21:45AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: After two days of having no ports to update on any systems I built the index myself and: ldns-1.6.13_1 needs updating (port has 1.6.14) libevent2-2.0.19 needs updating (port has 2.0.20) libvdpau-0.5 needs updating (port has 0.5_1) lighttpd-1.4.31_4 needs updating (port has 1.4.31_5) mosh-1.2.3needs updating (port has 1.2.3_1) openjdk6-b26_1needs updating (port has b26_2) portmaster-3.14_5 needs updating (port has 3.14_6) wireshark-1.8.2_1 needs updating (port has 1.8.3) xterm-284 needs updating (port has 284_1) Looks like the index build is broken again or I have some problem that is common to all of my systems. Since the recent issue, I suspect that it is the former. Yes, INDEX is broken by the following commit: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/2012-October/006294.html There are duplicate pgtcl ports. Oh no, I'm really sorry- my first broken INDEX :( Welcome to the club :-) Please feel free to disconnect them for now- I'm not home for a while yet. I've reverted part of you commit to databases/Makefile and Mk/bsd.databases.mk, but left the new ports in the tree. That should fix the INDEX build for now, and leave it easy for you to readd. Fantastic, thank you. Chris And thanks to Edwin and all for taking care of this. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
