PDF viewer for editable PDFs

2013-03-02 Thread Wojciech Puchar
anyone knows a program that can do this. I use xpdf for normal PDFs, but 
people are using PDF as forms, and acrobat do support it.


Yes i know there is acroread9 in ports, but i would like to have something 
opensource and NOT taking 100% CPU just because i started it.


thanks :)


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


[RFC] lang/pypy

2013-03-02 Thread David Naylor
Hi All.

After many months of (sporadic) work I would like to introduce pypy-2.0.b1.  

Could you please have a look at, and test, my proposed changes (attached) and 
the wiki page at http://wiki.FreeBSD.org/PyPy.  

I would like to commit these changes (after incorporating feedback) sometime 
next week.  Feel free to update the wiki yourselves ;-).  

Regards

David

P.S. Please keep my mentors CCed in any discussions :-)
Index: pypy/Makefile
===
--- pypy/Makefile	(revision 312473)
+++ pypy/Makefile	(working copy)
@@ -2,8 +2,7 @@
 # $FreeBSD$
 
 PORTNAME=	pypy
-DISTVERSION=	1.9
-PORTREVISION=	2
+DISTVERSION=	2.0-beta1
 CATEGORIES=	lang python java
 MASTER_SITES=	https://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/get/
 DISTNAME=	release-${DISTVERSION}
@@ -18,18 +17,30 @@
 LIB_DEPENDS=	expat:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/expat2 \
 		ffi:${PORTSDIR}/devel/libffi
 
-OPTIONS_DEFINE=	SANDBOX
+CLI_DESC=	(BROKEN) Translate a CLI (.NET) based pypy
+JVM_DESC=	(BROKEN) Translate a JVM (Java) based pypy
+PYPY_DESC=	Use pypy to translate (faster but uses more memory)
 SANDBOX_DESC=	Translate a sandboxed pypy
+.if !defined(PYPY_INST)
+OPTIONS_DEFINE+=	CLI JVM SANDBOX
+.endif
+LOCALBASE?=	/usr/local
+.if exists(${LOCALBASE}/bin/pypy)
+OPTIONS_DEFINE+=	PYPY
+.endif
 
+ALL_TARGET=	${PYPY_NAMES}
 BUILD_WRKSRC=	${WRKDIR}
 USE_BZIP2=	yes
 USE_ICONV=	yes
 USE_GETTEXT=	yes
+MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=	yes
+MAKEFILE=	${FILESDIR}/Makefile
 PKGINSTALL=	${WRKDIR}/pkg-install
 PKGDEINSTALL=	${WRKDIR}/pkg-deinstall
-WRKSRC=		${WRKDIR}/pypy-pypy-341e1e3821ff
+WRKSRC=		${WRKDIR}/pypy-pypy-fcb6b056f00e
 
-PYPY_VER=	${DISTVERSION}
+PYPY_VER=	${DISTVERSION:C|([0-9])\.([0-9]).*|\1.\2|}
 PYTHON_IMPL_VER=	2.7
 PYPY_LIBDIR=	lib/pypy${PYPY_VER}
 PYPY_INCLUDEDIR=	include/pypy${PYPY_VER}
@@ -38,20 +49,26 @@
 PLIST_SUB+=	PYPY_LIBDIR=${PYPY_LIBDIR} \
 		PYPY_INCLUDEDIR=${PYPY_INCLUDEDIR}
 
-MAKE_ENV+=	PYPY_LOCALBASE=${LOCALBASE}
-.if exists(/usr/bin/clang)
-MAKE_ARGS+=	CC=clang
-MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=	yes
-.endif
+MAKE_ENV+=	DISTVERSION=${DISTVERSION} PYTHON_CMD=${PYTHON_CMD} \
+		WRKSRC=${WRKSRC} PYPY_LOCALBASE=${LOCALBASE}
 
-# XXX !.include bsd.port.pre.mk as USE_* need to be set prior
 .include bsd.port.options.mk
-.include ${.CURDIR}/files/bsd.pypy.inst.mk
+.include ${MASTERDIR}/files/bsd.pypy.inst.mk
 
-.if defined(PACKAGE_BUILDING)
-MANUAL_PACKAGE_BUILD=	fails to finish compilation on pointyhat, reason unknown
+.if ${OSVERSION}  124 || ( ${ARCH} != i386  ${ARCH} != amd64 )
+.if ${CC:T} == cc  ( exists(/usr/bin/clang) || exists(${LOCALBASE}/clang) )
+CC=		clang
+.else
+USE_GCC=	yes
 .endif
+.endif
 
+.if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MPYPY} || defined(PYTHON_CMD)
+PYTHON_CMD?=	${LOCALBASE}/bin/pypy
+.else
+USE_PYTHON_BUILD=	2.5+
+.endif
+
 # List of PyPy instances
 .if !defined(PYPY_INST)
 PYPY_INST=	DEFAULT
@@ -60,13 +77,26 @@
 PYPY_INST+=	SANDBOX
 .endif
 
+.if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MCLI}
+PYPY_INST+=	CLI
+.endif
+
+.if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MJVM}
+PYPY_INST+=	JVM
+.endif
+
 .endif # !defined(PYPY_INST)
 
-PYPY_NAMES=
+MAKE_ENV+=	PYPY_INST=${PYPY_INST}
+
 .for inst in ${PYPY_INST}
 
 PYPY_NAMES+=	${PYPY_${inst}_NAME}
 PYPY_PRIMARY?=	${PYPY_${inst}_NAME}
+MAKE_ENV+=	PYPY_${inst}_NAME=${PYPY_${inst}_NAME} \
+		PYPY_${inst}_OBJSPACE_ARGS=${PYPY_${inst}_OBJSPACE_ARGS} \
+		PYPY_${inst}_OPT=${PYPY_${inst}_OPT} \
+		PYPY_${inst}_TRANSLATE_ARGS=${PYPY_${inst}_TRANSLATE_ARGS}
 
 # Check if the boehm GC will be used
 .if ${PYPY_${inst}_OPT} == 0 || ${PYPY_${inst}_OPT} == 1 || ${PYPY_${inst}_OPT} == size
@@ -85,24 +115,6 @@
 
 .endfor # inst in ${PYPY_INST}
 
-# Use pypy if it is installed, else use python (to translate)
-.if !defined(PY)
-.if !defined(PYPY)
-.if ${PYPY_PRIMARY} == pypy
-PYPY!=		${WHICH} ${PYPY_PRIMARY} 2 /dev/null || true
-.else
-PYPY!=		${WHICH} ${PYPY_PRIMARY} 2 /dev/null || ${WHICH} pypy 2 /dev/null || true
-.endif
-.endif # !defined(PYPY)
-
-.if exists(${PYPY})
-PY=		${PYPY}
-.else
-USE_PYTHON_BUILD=	2.5+
-PY=		${PYTHON_CMD}
-.endif
-.endif # !defined(PY)
-
 .if defined(WITH_BOEHM_GC)
 LIB_DEPENDS+=	gc.1:${PORTSDIR}/devel/boehm-gc
 .endif
@@ -117,7 +129,7 @@
 
 .if defined(WITH_JVM)
 USE_JAVA=	yes
-JAVA_VERSION=	1.6+
+JAVA_VERSION=	1.5+
 ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=	i386 powerpc
 ONLY_FOR_ARCHS_REASON=	only translates on 32bit systems
 BROKEN=		JVM backend broken, partially supported upstream
@@ -149,19 +161,59 @@
 .endfor # inst in ${PYPY_INST}
 .endif # !defined(PYPY_JITTABLE)
 
-pre-fetch:
-	@${ECHO} PyPy requires a large amount of free RAM and time to translate and compile.
-	@${ECHO}
-	@${ECHO} To translate, PyPy requires on 32bit 3G (min 2G) free RAM and on 64bit
-	@${ECHO} 6G (min 4G) free RAM.  Also, to compile, PyPy on amd64 gcc requires an
-	@${ECHO} extra 4G however clang only requires 400M (CC=clang) but clang is slower
-	@${ECHO} in compiling PyPy.
-	@${ECHO}
-	@${ECHO} If memory is in short supply consider using a lower optimisation level
-	@${ECHO} (e.g. PYPY_DEFAULT_OPT=2) however that makes PyPy much slower.  Also,
-	@${ECHO} 

Re: PDF viewer for editable PDFs

2013-03-02 Thread Chris Rees
Hi Wojciech,

On 2 March 2013 11:44, Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
 anyone knows a program that can do this. I use xpdf for normal PDFs, but
 people are using PDF as forms, and acrobat do support it.

 Yes i know there is acroread9 in ports, but i would like to have something
 opensource and NOT taking 100% CPU just because i started it.


I believe evince supports form filling of PDFs, but I don't know if
it's a little heavyweight for you.

It's definitely an improvement on Adobe Reader.

Chris

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_PDF_software#Viewers
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD port for redirecting printer

2013-03-02 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Saturday, March 02, 2013 a las 04:49:05PM +0100, Bernt Hansson escribió:

  $ lpr -Pfoo myfile.txt
 
  And now? Big silence? Nobody wants to step-up with a proposal? :-)
 
  You have already proposed the correct answer.
 
 
  /usr/bin/lpr -Pbar file instead of your cups /usr/local/bin/lpr
 
  Well, and which tool/filter (and fonts) to the painting of UTF-8 files
  to Postscript exactly?
 
 The ones in the printer.

What modell of printer? I only know very high end printers (with
harddisks) able to understand UTF-8 directly. But maybe you have a
better idea...

matthias

-- 
Matthias Apitz   |  /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribbon.org
E-mail: g...@unixarea.de |  \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail
WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ |   X  - No proprietary attachments
phone: +49-170-4527211   |  / \ - Respect for open standards
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: PDF viewer for editable PDFs

2013-03-02 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl writes:

 anyone knows a program that can do this. I use xpdf for normal PDFs,
 but people are using PDF as forms, and acrobat do support it.

 Yes i know there is acroread9 in ports, but i would like to have
 something opensource and NOT taking 100% CPU just because i started
 it.

Personally, I prefer letting my computer work harder instead of me, but
even the Acrobat reader doesn't handle all files; it's good to have
multiple options. I would recommend trying several. pdfedit is the main
one for filling out forms.

The annoying situation is when the PDF file isn't really designed for
editing. In that case, the only option I've found is to go in with a
graphical editor and layer my changes on top. 
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: java/openjdk6 fails to build..

2013-03-02 Thread njrizzo
Hi all,


i`m have the same problem, and I try to use
MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=1 in /etc/make.conf  and it`s not work

I put -DMAKES_JOBS_UNSAFE in make command line too

make config-recursive fetch-recursive install clean -DMAKES_JOBS_UNSAFE

and it`s not work too  

my box:

Athlon 64 X2
4GB of RAM
valvenda# uname -a
FreeBSD valvenda 9.1-STABLE FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #0 r247209: Sat Mar  2
12:56:12 BRT 2013 rizzo@valvenda:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/VALVENDA 
amd64




--
View this message in context: 
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/java-openjdk6-fails-to-build-tp5771110p5792045.html
Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Firefox 19 vs large images

2013-03-02 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Viewing large images has become cumbersome with the switch from
Firefox 18 to 19.  Am I the only one to notice this?

Wikipedia's high-resolution pictures of the day are great for this:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e9/Bison_skull_pile_edit.jpg

What happens is that Firefox loads the image and then does some
sort of operation that causes the X11 server to be busy for a
noticeable amount of time.  During this time the whole X11 session
hangs.  If you have a network login, you can see the Xorg process
eat all the CPU it can get.  The duration of this delay varies and
depends on the size of the image; with the one above it just took
30 seconds.

This isn't entirely new.  With previous versions of Firefox it
happened when I accidentally dragged an image.  But now with
Firefox 19, just viewing the image is enough.  Needless to say,
this is painful if you are going through a number of large images
and are forced to pause for half a minute each.

I don't know if this happens for all video drivers.  I'm running
Xorg 1.7.7 with radeon(4x) on an ATI RV370 (Radeon X300SE) card,
7.4-STABLE/amd64.

-- 
Christian naddy Weisgerber  na...@mips.inka.de

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Firefox 19 vs large images

2013-03-02 Thread Rainer Hurling
On 02.03.2013 18:53 (UTC+2), Christian Weisgerber wrote:
 Viewing large images has become cumbersome with the switch from
 Firefox 18 to 19.  Am I the only one to notice this?

Today there started a thread about this on the german bsdforen with
several 'me toos':

  http://www.bsdforen.de/showthread.php?p=248950#post248950

Posting #11 could be a useful first hint.

 Wikipedia's high-resolution pictures of the day are great for this:
 https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e9/Bison_skull_pile_edit.jpg
 
 What happens is that Firefox loads the image and then does some
 sort of operation that causes the X11 server to be busy for a
 noticeable amount of time.  During this time the whole X11 session
 hangs.  If you have a network login, you can see the Xorg process
 eat all the CPU it can get.  The duration of this delay varies and
 depends on the size of the image; with the one above it just took
 30 seconds.
 
 This isn't entirely new.  With previous versions of Firefox it
 happened when I accidentally dragged an image.  But now with
 Firefox 19, just viewing the image is enough.  Needless to say,
 this is painful if you are going through a number of large images
 and are forced to pause for half a minute each.
 
 I don't know if this happens for all video drivers.  I'm running
 Xorg 1.7.7 with radeon(4x) on an ATI RV370 (Radeon X300SE) card,
 7.4-STABLE/amd64.

For me it happens on 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 with xorg-7.5.2,
xorg-server-1.10.6_2,1, nvidia-driver 313.18 (from patched port) and
firefox-19.0,1.

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Firefox 19 vs large images

2013-03-02 Thread Florian Smeets
On 02.03.13 19:15, Rainer Hurling wrote:
 On 02.03.2013 18:53 (UTC+2), Christian Weisgerber wrote:
 Viewing large images has become cumbersome with the switch from
 Firefox 18 to 19.  Am I the only one to notice this?
 

Can anybody try with firefox 20.0b2?

You might need to replace bsd.gecko.mk with the version from the gecko
repo to build it, I'm not 100% certain right now.

You can check everything out from:

https://trillian.chruetertee.ch/svn/freebsd-gecko/trunk

There is even a firefox-nightly if you are more adventurous.

Thanks,
Florian



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


dependency firefox-py-sqlite3 is broken

2013-03-02 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Hi,

www/firefox (19.0;1) Makefile shows dependency:

 ${PYTHON_SITELIBDIR}/_sqlite3.so:${PORTSDIR}/databases/py-sqlite3

so it searches for /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/_sqlite3.so;

OTOH built package (py27-sqlite3-2.7.3_3) contains:

/usr/local/lib/python2.7/lib-dynload/_sqlite3.so

so it remakes the py-sqlite3 package and fails on attempt to install
it.

py-sqlite3 port Makefile contains explicit request for library
placement:

PYDISTUTILS_INSTALLARGS+=   --install-lib ${PYTHON_LIBDIR}/lib-dynload

Ports are fresh a few minutes ago, system is 9.1.

Which directory assignment is correct?


-netch-
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: java/openjdk6 fails to build..

2013-03-02 Thread Lowell Gilbert
njrizzo ri...@i805.com.br writes:

 i`m have the same problem, and I try to use
 MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=1 in /etc/make.conf  and it`s not work

That's not a good idea; it will apply to everything, not just this one port.

 I put -DMAKES_JOBS_UNSAFE in make command line too

You have an extra 'S' in there; the variable should be MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE.

 make config-recursive fetch-recursive install clean -DMAKES_JOBS_UNSAFE

With default options and an up-to-date RELENG_9 and ports tree, that
works fine for me (I tried it without the variable definition, but since
the variable isn't used in any makefile, that shouldn't make any
difference.

Sorry, but since the problem seems to be on your end, we can't help you
unless you show us enough detail to see what actually went wrong. Saying
it doesn't work is not enough to figure out *how* it went wrong. 

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Firefox 19 vs large images

2013-03-02 Thread Rainer Hurling
Florian,

thanks for the hint.

On 02.03.2013 19:58 (UTC+2), Florian Smeets wrote:
 On 02.03.13 19:15, Rainer Hurling wrote:
 On 02.03.2013 18:53 (UTC+2), Christian Weisgerber wrote:
 Viewing large images has become cumbersome with the switch from
 Firefox 18 to 19.  Am I the only one to notice this?

 
 Can anybody try with firefox 20.0b2?

I tried 20.0b2 and it seems to have the same problems with bigger images
as 19.0 :(

Interesting is, that the freezing time depends on the size of the image
and that the freeze does not happen again for the same image, as long as
it is loaded.

 You might need to replace bsd.gecko.mk with the version from the gecko
 repo to build it, I'm not 100% certain right now.

There is no need for this, since the repo has r310207 and in the ports
tree is r312869.

 You can check everything out from:
 
 https://trillian.chruetertee.ch/svn/freebsd-gecko/trunk
 
 There is even a firefox-nightly if you are more adventurous.
 
 Thanks,
 Florian

On BSDforen.de they talk about some progress, made by the ubuntu folks:

  http://www.bsdforen.de/showpost.php?p=248952postcount=13

and from there

  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1134409

Regards,
Rainer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Firefox 19 vs large images

2013-03-02 Thread Stefan Ehmann
On Saturday, March 02, 2013 10:23:14 PM Rainer Hurling wrote:
 Florian,
 
 thanks for the hint.
 
 On 02.03.2013 19:58 (UTC+2), Florian Smeets wrote:
  On 02.03.13 19:15, Rainer Hurling wrote:
  On 02.03.2013 18:53 (UTC+2), Christian Weisgerber wrote:
  Viewing large images has become cumbersome with the switch from
  Firefox 18 to 19.  Am I the only one to notice this?
...

 On BSDforen.de they talk about some progress, made by the ubuntu folks:
 
   http://www.bsdforen.de/showpost.php?p=248952postcount=13
 
 and from there
 
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1134409

The referenced bug is specific to ubuntu. The affected code is not present in 
ports.

The diff is available here:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/19.0+build1-0ubuntu0.12.10.2
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Firefox 19 vs large images

2013-03-02 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Rainer Hurling:

 Interesting is, that the freezing time depends on the size of the image
 and that the freeze does not happen again for the same image, as long as
 it is loaded.

If you have images in two tabs and you switch back and forth, you
get a freeze each time you switch tabs.

 On BSDforen.de they talk about some progress, made by the ubuntu folks:

Time waster.  The linked issues have no relation to the problem
under discussion.

   http://www.bsdforen.de/showpost.php?p=248952postcount=13
 
 and from there
 
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1134409

That concerns a problem with the globalmenu extension, which Debian
includes by default (but we don't).  And USN-1729-1 references a
bunch of problems that all affect Mozilla Firefox before 19.0,
and the recommended fix is to update to Firefox 19.

http://www.ubuntuupdates.org/package/core/quantal/main/security/firefox
http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-1729-1/

-- 
Christian naddy Weisgerber  na...@mips.inka.de
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Python libraries moved

2013-03-02 Thread Robert Simmons
It looks like a port revision made a few hours ago has broken firefox
(and most likely a bunch of other ports).  In the makefile for
firefox, it has the following checks for dependencies:

BUILD_DEPENDS=  nspr=4.9.4:${PORTSDIR}/devel/nspr \
nss=3.14.1:${PORTSDIR}/security/nss \
sqlite3=3.7.14.1:${PORTSDIR}/databases/sqlite3 \

${PYTHON_SITELIBDIR}/_sqlite3.so:${PORTSDIR}/databases/py-sqlite3 \

As you can see, it looks for _sqlite3.so in ${PYTHON_SITELIBDIR} which
points to the old location for this library.  The revision to python
and its libraries has moved the location of these libraries to
lib-dynload

This is the revision in question:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revisionrevision=313167

This has broken firefox and most likely all other ports that look for
libraries in ${PYTHON_SITELIBDIR}
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Python libraries moved

2013-03-02 Thread Martin Wilke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 12:08:41AM -0500, Robert Simmons wrote:
 It looks like a port revision made a few hours ago has broken firefox
 (and most likely a bunch of other ports).  In the makefile for
 firefox, it has the following checks for dependencies:
 
 BUILD_DEPENDS=  nspr=4.9.4:${PORTSDIR}/devel/nspr \
 nss=3.14.1:${PORTSDIR}/security/nss \
 sqlite3=3.7.14.1:${PORTSDIR}/databases/sqlite3 \
 
 ${PYTHON_SITELIBDIR}/_sqlite3.so:${PORTSDIR}/databases/py-sqlite3 \
 
 As you can see, it looks for _sqlite3.so in ${PYTHON_SITELIBDIR} which
 points to the old location for this library.  The revision to python
 and its libraries has moved the location of these libraries to
 lib-dynload
 
 This is the revision in question:
 http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revisionrevision=313167
 
 This has broken firefox and most likely all other ports that look for
 libraries in ${PYTHON_SITELIBDIR}

This is fixed please update your portstree.

- - Martin

 ___
 freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
 

- -- 
+-oOO--(_)--OOo-+
With best Regards,
Martin Wilke (miwi_(at)_FreeBSD.org)


  Mess with the Best, Die like the Rest


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAlEy6WEACgkQdLJIhLHm/OlXlwCfRXWOPSk2cJ725IjYx9jeEy1+
Pb8AoL34Lr6ffYhsMeQgU8SreN8U6P4+
=3TVO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Python libraries moved

2013-03-02 Thread Robert Simmons
Sorry, what was the change you made?

On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 1:10 AM, Martin Wilke m...@freebsd.org wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 12:08:41AM -0500, Robert Simmons wrote:
 It looks like a port revision made a few hours ago has broken firefox
 (and most likely a bunch of other ports).  In the makefile for
 firefox, it has the following checks for dependencies:

 BUILD_DEPENDS=  nspr=4.9.4:${PORTSDIR}/devel/nspr \
 nss=3.14.1:${PORTSDIR}/security/nss \
 sqlite3=3.7.14.1:${PORTSDIR}/databases/sqlite3 \

 ${PYTHON_SITELIBDIR}/_sqlite3.so:${PORTSDIR}/databases/py-sqlite3 \

 As you can see, it looks for _sqlite3.so in ${PYTHON_SITELIBDIR} which
 points to the old location for this library.  The revision to python
 and its libraries has moved the location of these libraries to
 lib-dynload

 This is the revision in question:
 http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revisionrevision=313167

 This has broken firefox and most likely all other ports that look for
 libraries in ${PYTHON_SITELIBDIR}

 This is fixed please update your portstree.

 - - Martin

 ___
 freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


 - --
 +-oOO--(_)--OOo-+
 With best Regards,
 Martin Wilke (miwi_(at)_FreeBSD.org)


   Mess with the Best, Die like the Rest


 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

 iEYEARECAAYFAlEy6WEACgkQdLJIhLHm/OlXlwCfRXWOPSk2cJ725IjYx9jeEy1+
 Pb8AoL34Lr6ffYhsMeQgU8SreN8U6P4+
 =3TVO
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org