Re: Odd dependency issue with pkg 1.6
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Matthew D. Fuller < fulle...@over-yonder.net> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 12:25:32PM -0700 I heard the voice of > Kevin Oberman, and lo! it spake thus: > > > > Since the update to pkg-1.6 I have gotten errors when running "pkg > > check -d". > > FWIW, I get similar. No bare unversioned .so's, but they're all for > filenames that are symlinks to the actual libs. > > > -- > Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fulle...@over-yonder.net > Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ >On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. > Thanks! I just opened a pair of bug reports, one for the symlink issue and one for the mangled error message. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203882 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203883 -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: distfiles cleaner
On 10/19/2015 16:41, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Bryan Drewery wrote > >> I could go on, but really I think both are pretty bad compared to using >> Poudriere, which also has a 'distclean' sub-command. > OK, Thanks for all detail. I would have run a poudriere to compare > with the previous 3, but I've just removed my last copy of my 58 > Gig. But I note: one more reason to learn poudriere :-) > > Cheers, > Julian Just to add to the portmaster V portupgrade ... I recall fondly the MOVED portmanager. (binary code). It had an initial check-dependency run one could cntl-c out of and have onscreen to update just a few ports... and fixed ports often where the others failed for some reason. [I tried coding some local variances to portmaster here, but got lost in the code...] I read about poudriere daily almost on the ports list, and wish [1] that before I use it someone (if ever, not likely to use it as of now, not enough machines) puts together a flowchart of its use cases, edge cases, etc large enough to preclude reading forum threads or mailing lists... [1] not for my benefit, but something I could write about in emails... ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Seafile/Seahub stack update with a dependence update.
www/seahubhttps://reviews.freebsd.org/D3943 www/py-seafdav https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3944 www/py-seafobj https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3945 www/py-django-statici18nhttps://reviews.freebsd.org/D3946 net-mgmt/seafile https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3947 net-mgmt/ccnethttps://reviews.freebsd.org/D3948 net-mgmt/seafile-guihttps://reviews.freebsd.org/D3949 devel/libsearpc https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3950 Also made a new port which I no longer need py-django-statici18n. I figured someone may want it down the line. Ultima ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: distfiles cleaner
Bryan Drewery wrote > I could go on, but really I think both are pretty bad compared to using > Poudriere, which also has a 'distclean' sub-command. OK, Thanks for all detail. I would have run a poudriere to compare with the previous 3, but I've just removed my last copy of my 58 Gig. But I note: one more reason to learn poudriere :-) Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys. Eng. Consultant Munich http://berklix.com Reply After previous text to preserve context, as in a play script. Indent previous text with >Insert new lines before 80 chars. Use plain text, Not quoted-printable, Not HTML, Not base64, Not MS.doc. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: distfiles cleaner
On 10/19/15 3:57 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Hi, Reference: >> From:RW via freebsd-ports >> Date:Mon, 19 Oct 2015 14:56:11 +0100 > > RW via freebsd-ports wrote: >> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 14:16:37 +0200 >> Julian H. Stacey wrote: >> >>> Hi ports@ >>> What is the modern equivalent of this obsolete stuff please ? >>> >>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=portsclean&sektion=1&apropos=0&manpath=FreeBSD+9.0-RELEASE+and+Ports >>> portsclean --distclean >>> Clean out all the distfiles that are not referenced by any >>> port in the ports tree. >>> >>> https://wiki.freebsd.org/portupgrade >>> Portupgrade (aka pkgtools) >>> last edited 2012-08-01 >> >> Why are you looking at the wiki? > > I didnt know what tool to look for so a search engine took me to the wiki. > >> The code was updated only a few months >> ago? The wiki seems generally fine to me but I didn't read details. > > Err ? moved from wiki to which ports/ ? > Wiki has "It is currently maintained by BryanDrewery " > So I added to CC. If the wiki is obsolete I suggest it be deleted > or reduced to point to URL with new code. > >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/ports-mgmt/portupgrade/ > > Thanks. > > [with current] > cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade ; make install ; man portupgrade > "To clean unreferenced distfiles, working directories and old shared > libraries, use portsclean(1)" > which portsclean # /usr/local/sbin/portsclean > pkg which /usr/local/sbin/portsclean # portupgrade-2.4.14,2 > pkg info portupgrade-2.4.14,2 | grep Origin # ports-mgmt/portupgrade > > >> I think the case for portupgrade and portsclean is now much stronger >> than it was before they were fully converted to pkg. That removed all >> the problems associated with maintaining a secondary database. The >> conversion to pkg replaced portmaster's best code and portupgrade's >> worst. > > I'm lost. I presume portupgrade had some bad code, > replaced by good code from portmaster. Portupgrade is objectively better. Having maintained both for quite a while, I have given up trying to fix the problems in portmaster. Portupgrade has proper dependency handling, which portmaster does not (https://github.com/freebsd/portmaster/issues/44 not easily fixable in portmaster compared to easy to fix in portupgrade). Portupgrade handles libraries during upgrade so your system is not totally trashed during upgrade AND it does it in a sane order which portmaster does not as it removes things on the way down the chain which can result in basically removing everything while it works back up (https://github.com/freebsd/portmaster/issues/40) Portupgrade supports installing from packages, which portmaster does not (https://github.com/freebsd/portmaster/pull/34 incomplete). [Likely referenced by OP] Portupgrade keeps logs. Portupgrade keeps a db of the INDEX so it can be fast, compared to portmaster reparsing it. Portupgrade used to be frowned on for having a 2nd db for tracking installing ports, but it no longer does. It just queries the pkg db with 'pkg query' now [as referenced by OP]. Portupgrade's biggest problem is still with ruby upgrades. I could go on, but really I think both are pretty bad compared to using Poudriere, which also has a 'distclean' sub-command. -- Regards, Bryan Drewery ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: distfiles cleaner
Hi, Reference: > From: RW via freebsd-ports > Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 14:56:11 +0100 RW via freebsd-ports wrote: > On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 14:16:37 +0200 > Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > Hi ports@ > > What is the modern equivalent of this obsolete stuff please ? > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=portsclean&sektion=1&apropos=0&manpath=FreeBSD+9.0-RELEASE+and+Ports > > portsclean --distclean > > Clean out all the distfiles that are not referenced by any > > port in the ports tree. > > > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/portupgrade > > Portupgrade (aka pkgtools) > > last edited 2012-08-01 > > Why are you looking at the wiki? I didnt know what tool to look for so a search engine took me to the wiki. > The code was updated only a few months > ago? Err ? moved from wiki to which ports/ ? Wiki has "It is currently maintained by BryanDrewery " So I added to CC. If the wiki is obsolete I suggest it be deleted or reduced to point to URL with new code. > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/ports-mgmt/portupgrade/ Thanks. [with current] cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade ; make install ; man portupgrade "To clean unreferenced distfiles, working directories and old shared libraries, use portsclean(1)" which portsclean# /usr/local/sbin/portsclean pkg which /usr/local/sbin/portsclean# portupgrade-2.4.14,2 pkg info portupgrade-2.4.14,2 | grep Origin # ports-mgmt/portupgrade > I think the case for portupgrade and portsclean is now much stronger > than it was before they were fully converted to pkg. That removed all > the problems associated with maintaining a secondary database. The > conversion to pkg replaced portmaster's best code and portupgrade's > worst. I'm lost. I presume portupgrade had some bad code, replaced by good code from portmaster. > BTW I recently switched from distviper to portsclean. I used to prefer > distviper because of its speed, but that speed comes from assuming that > all distinfo files are called distinfo, which isn't true. I found > it was unconditionally removing the files for linux ports. Yes, confirmed below, distviper removed a great swathe of rpm/i386/fedora/10/ rpm/i686/centos/6.6/ > It's also > never been converted to pkg which breaks its fast mode. Cloning my 58G current distfiles to test each method I found: PORTS/ EXECUTABLE DISTFILES GIG sysutils/bsdadminscripts distviper # 4.185918 ports-mgmt/portmaster portmaster -t -y --clean-distfiles # 4.231094 ports-mgmt/portupgrade portsclean --distclean # 4.078680 portsclean removed 50 files that portmaster did not, so I guess portmaster may be best/ most conservative. A sample of 1 deletion by portsclean: ./subversion18/subversion-1.8.14.tar.bz2 from devel/subversion18 (not something Ive just built or fetched BTW) I ran find on all 3 stripped distfiles/ + diff current.portsclean current.portmaster > cleanmaster.diff wc -l * 100 cleanmaster.diff 751 current.distviper 837 current.portmaster 783 current.portsclean All here for next few days in case of interest: http://berklix.com/~jhs/tmp/distfile_lists/ Thanks Lars, Kubilay, RW. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys. Eng. Consultant Munich http://berklix.com Reply After previous text to preserve context, as in a play script. Indent previous text with >Insert new lines before 80 chars. Use plain text, Not quoted-printable, Not HTML, Not base64, Not MS.doc. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Odd dependency issue with pkg 1.6
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 12:25:32PM -0700 I heard the voice of Kevin Oberman, and lo! it spake thus: > > Since the update to pkg-1.6 I have gotten errors when running "pkg > check -d". FWIW, I get similar. No bare unversioned .so's, but they're all for filenames that are symlinks to the actual libs. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fulle...@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Odd dependency issue with pkg 1.6
Since the update to pkg-1.6 I have gotten errors when running "pkg check -d". Three of the ports I have installed show one or more missing libraries. gnome-vfs has require a missing libraries: libcom_err.so gnome-vfs has require a missing libraries: libgssapi_krb5.so gnome-vfs has require a missing libraries: libkrb5.so mediatomb has require a missing libraries: libjs.so wireshark has require a missing libraries: libcom_err.so wireshark has require a missing libraries: libkrb5.so wireshark has require a missing libraries: libk5crypto.so I have confirmed that all of the libraries ARE present in /usr/local/lib and several are also in /usr/ib. I have tried reinstalling all of the ports and all of the libraries. Makes no difference. All of the ports are working as far as I can tell. The one thing I notice is that all show no version. ldd also shows no version: libjs.so => /usr/local/lib/libjs.so (0x2d197000) I do see at least one other entry that is missing a version, libkrb5support.so, but it seems that lack of a version is at least a part of the problem. FreeBSD 10-Stable (r288387) amd64. All ports are up to date. Ports are built with portmaster. BTW, could the text of these messages be fixed to read: PORTNAME requires a missing library: LIBNAME While the meaning is obvious, "wireshark has require a missing libraries:" really makes no sense. It's been annoying for a while, but not enough so to get me to submit a bug report. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
OpenCASCADE 6.9.1
Hello Thierry. Sorry to bother you. 6.9.1 was released recently, but we are stuck at 6.8.0. Are you working on this? Any plan about it? If you don't, I might give it a try. In that case, did you look at it already? Any showstopper? bye & Thanks av. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FreeBSD Port: pgadmin3-1.20.0_1
On 10/19/15 02:16, Martin Waschbüsch wrote: > >> Am 19.10.2015 um 08:04 schrieb Christoph Moench-Tegeder >> : >> >> ## Daniel Malaby (d...@malaby.com): >> >>> Is there a way to get this to use postgres9.4 instead of 9.3? >> >> Add "postgresql=9.4" to DEFAULT_VERSIONS, e.g. in make.conf. > > Actually, the way I read '/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk' > it should be pgsql and not postgresql. > > So, add 'pgsql=9.4' to your make.conf DEFAULT_VERSIONS variable. Thanks, postgresql did not work, but pgsql did work, and now I know where to go look for this in the future. Thanks again. > > Best, > > Martin > -- Daniel Malaby d...@malaby.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: distfiles cleaner
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 14:16:37 +0200 Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Hi ports@ > What is the modern equivalent of this obsolete stuff please ? > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=portsclean&sektion=1&apropos=0&manpath=FreeBSD+9.0-RELEASE+and+Ports > portsclean --distclean > Clean out all the distfiles that are not referenced by any > port in the ports tree. > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/portupgrade > Portupgrade (aka pkgtools) > last edited 2012-08-01 Why are you looking at the wiki? The code was updated only a few months ago? https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/ports-mgmt/portupgrade/ I think the case for portupgrade and portsclean is now much stronger than it was before they were fully converted to pkg. That removed all the problems associated with maintaining a secondary database. The conversion to pkg replaced portmaster's best code and portupgrade's worst. BTW I recently switched from distviper to portsclean. I used to prefer distviper because of its speed, but that speed comes from assuming that all distinfo files are called distinfo, which isn't true. I found it was unconditionally removing the files for linux ports. It's also never been converted to pkg which breaks its fast mode. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: distfiles cleaner
Hi, Reference: > From: Kubilay Kocak Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 19/10/2015 11:16 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Hi ports@ > > What is the modern equivalent of this obsolete stuff please ? > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=portsclean&sektion=1&apropos=0&manpath=FreeBSD+9.0-RELEASE+and+Ports > > portsclean --distclean > > Clean out all the distfiles that are not referenced by any > > port in the ports tree. > > > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/portupgrade > > Portupgrade (aka pkgtools) > > last edited 2012-08-01 > > > > Cheers, > > Julian > > > > Also, portmaster(8) has --clean-distfiles, and --clean-packages for > stale packages Thanks, just installed ports-mgmt/portmaster , so now I have a choice :-) Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys. Eng. Consultant Munich http://berklix.com Reply After previous text to preserve context, as in a play script. Indent previous text with >Insert new lines before 80 chars. Use plain text, Not quoted-printable, Not HTML, Not base64, Not MS.doc. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: any chance of squid4 port soon?
Hi! There is a bug report related to it https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203860 2015-10-19 15:44 GMT+03:00 Marko Cupać : > Hi, > > squid 4 has entered RC state: > http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Squid-4 > > It features some cool new options, of which the most important for me > is automatic detection of unsupported ssl protocols not to be bumped. > > Any chance to get this in ports as squid4, squid-devel or something? > > Thank you in advance, > -- > Before enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. > After enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. > > Marko Cupać > https://www.mimar.rs/ > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: distfiles cleaner
Lars Engels wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 02:16:37PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Hi ports@ > > What is the modern equivalent of this obsolete stuff please ? > >=20 > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=3Dportsclean&sektion=3D1&apropos= > =3D0&manpath=3DFreeBSD+9.0-RELEASE+and+Ports > > portsclean --distclean > > Clean out all the distfiles that are not referenced by any > > port in the ports tree. > >=20 > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/portupgrade > > Portupgrade (aka pkgtools) > > last edited 2012-08-01 > > Try distviper from sysutils/bsdadminscripts. Thanks Lars, Just installed, Now copying my 58 G of current distfiles before trying. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys. Eng. Consultant Munich http://berklix.com Reply After previous text to preserve context, as in a play script. Indent previous text with >Insert new lines before 80 chars. Use plain text, Not quoted-printable, Not HTML, Not base64, Not MS.doc. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
any chance of squid4 port soon?
Hi, squid 4 has entered RC state: http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Squid-4 It features some cool new options, of which the most important for me is automatic detection of unsupported ssl protocols not to be bumped. Any chance to get this in ports as squid4, squid-devel or something? Thank you in advance, -- Before enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. After enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. Marko Cupać https://www.mimar.rs/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: distfiles cleaner
On 19/10/2015 11:16 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Hi ports@ > What is the modern equivalent of this obsolete stuff please ? > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=portsclean&sektion=1&apropos=0&manpath=FreeBSD+9.0-RELEASE+and+Ports > portsclean --distclean > Clean out all the distfiles that are not referenced by any > port in the ports tree. > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/portupgrade > Portupgrade (aka pkgtools) > last edited 2012-08-01 > > Cheers, > Julian > Also, portmaster(8) has --clean-distfiles, and --clean-packages for stale packages ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: distfiles cleaner
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 02:16:37PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Hi ports@ > What is the modern equivalent of this obsolete stuff please ? > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=portsclean&sektion=1&apropos=0&manpath=FreeBSD+9.0-RELEASE+and+Ports > portsclean --distclean > Clean out all the distfiles that are not referenced by any > port in the ports tree. > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/portupgrade > Portupgrade (aka pkgtools) > last edited 2012-08-01 Try distviper from sysutils/bsdadminscripts. pgpK3VsjPGPwL.pgp Description: PGP signature
distfiles cleaner
Hi ports@ What is the modern equivalent of this obsolete stuff please ? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=portsclean&sektion=1&apropos=0&manpath=FreeBSD+9.0-RELEASE+and+Ports portsclean --distclean Clean out all the distfiles that are not referenced by any port in the ports tree. https://wiki.freebsd.org/portupgrade Portupgrade (aka pkgtools) last edited 2012-08-01 Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys. Eng. Consultant Munich http://berklix.com Reply After previous text to preserve context, as in a play script. Indent previous text with >Insert new lines before 80 chars. Use plain text, Not quoted-printable, Not HTML, Not base64, Not MS.doc. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html Port| Current version | New version +-+ print/lilypond-devel| 2.19.11 | 2.19.29 +-+ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 199897] Mk/bsd.gcc.mk: GCC runtime should be optional
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199897 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|bsd.gcc.mk: GCC runtime |Mk/bsd.gcc.mk: GCC runtime |should be optional |should be optional Keywords||needs-qa Assignee|freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org |p...@freebsd.org --- Comment #3 from Kubilay Kocak --- @Pedro Given you created the report, and that it has been through portmgr@ -> gerald@, who needs to now be assigned, or what changes need to be made to progress the issue? Does the summary need clarification? Is this a pkg feature request @ upstream? Feel free to re-assign/re-triage or resolve/close as necessary -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FreeBSD Port: pgadmin3-1.20.0_1
> Am 19.10.2015 um 08:04 schrieb Christoph Moench-Tegeder : > > ## Daniel Malaby (d...@malaby.com): > >> Is there a way to get this to use postgres9.4 instead of 9.3? > > Add "postgresql=9.4" to DEFAULT_VERSIONS, e.g. in make.conf. Actually, the way I read '/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk' it should be pgsql and not postgresql. So, add 'pgsql=9.4' to your make.conf DEFAULT_VERSIONS variable. Best, Martin signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
How to debug a Mk-Script?
Hello, after defining a USES pgsql:9.3+ in an port-update i stumbled over this error message: the port wants postgresql-client version 9.3 9.4 and you have version 9.4 installed. This seems to be an error in Mk/Uses/pgsql.mk which i found to track down (in order to gather some more experience). While i have already an idea what the case can be, i just want to add some output into the script. How is this possible? Can someone guide me please? Thanks, Torsten ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
