Re: FOCAL
On 2016-12-02 22:02, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Saturday, 3 December 2016 at 11:40:36 +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote: > Be there an implementation of FOCAL? I have a hankering to get back to my > early programming days :-) Heh. I have a paper tape from my first year at uni somewhere in the mess on my desk. It's been there for at least 10 years, and it's short enough for it to be practical to read it in by eye, but I haven't got more than a third of the way through. It's in FOCAL-69, and does some world-shattering calculations like mean and standard deviation. It would be fun to run it again--once. Greg Wow! Have not thought of FOCAL in years. Used to write a bit both when in college and, using FOCAL-11, in my early years at LLNL. Unlike FOCAL on a PDP-8, FOCAL-11 ran on top of DOS-11. (No relation to Microsoft DOS.) The PDP-8L was the only solid state computer in the lab. All of the others still had vacuum tubes and drum memory, though the Univac Athena had both drum and core. In college I wrote a simple craps game and, it it caught you trying to cheat, it zeroed your account and gave you the finger on the ASR-33. My computer logic prof (and department head) saw that trivial ASCII art and chewed me a new one for putting code to generate that gesture on a school computer. That was about 45 years ago. Memories! Brings back memories for me as well from high school. Back in 1972. PDP-8/L in the Levittown (NY) School District. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail: 17716 Limpia Crk, Round Rock, TX 78664-7281 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FOCAL
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Saturday, 3 December 2016 at 11:40:36 +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote: > > Be there an implementation of FOCAL? I have a hankering to get back to > my > > early programming days :-) > > Heh. I have a paper tape from my first year at uni somewhere in the > mess on my desk. It's been there for at least 10 years, and it's > short enough for it to be practical to read it in by eye, but I > haven't got more than a third of the way through. It's in FOCAL-69, > and does some world-shattering calculations like mean and standard > deviation. It would be fun to run it again--once. > > Greg > Wow! Have not thought of FOCAL in years. Used to write a bit both when in college and, using FOCAL-11, in my early years at LLNL. Unlike FOCAL on a PDP-8, FOCAL-11 ran on top of DOS-11. (No relation to Microsoft DOS.) The PDP-8L was the only solid state computer in the lab. All of the others still had vacuum tubes and drum memory, though the Univac Athena had both drum and core. In college I wrote a simple craps game and, it it caught you trying to cheat, it zeroed your account and gave you the finger on the ASR-33. My computer logic prof (and department head) saw that trivial ASCII art and chewed me a new one for putting code to generate that gesture on a school computer. That was about 45 years ago. Memories! -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FOCAL
On Saturday, 3 December 2016 at 11:40:36 +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote: > Be there an implementation of FOCAL? I have a hankering to get back to my > early programming days :-) Heh. I have a paper tape from my first year at uni somewhere in the mess on my desk. It's been there for at least 10 years, and it's short enough for it to be practical to read it in by eye, but I haven't got more than a third of the way through. It's in FOCAL-69, and does some world-shattering calculations like mean and standard deviation. It would be fun to run it again--once. Greg -- Sent from my desktop computer. Finger g...@freebsd.org for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. This message is digitally signed. If your Microsoft mail program reports problems, please read http://lemis.com/broken-MUA signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: FOCAL
On 12/02/16 19:40, Dave Horsfall wrote: > Be there an implementation of FOCAL? I have a hankering to get back to my > early programming days :-) > The Wikipedia page has a few links: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FOCAL_%28programming_language%29 -- George ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
FOCAL
Be there an implementation of FOCAL? I have a hankering to get back to my early programming days :-) -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer." ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Please commit devel/oniguruma6
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715 Thanks! Yuri ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Hash changes in the freebsd-ports GitHub mirror
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 04:08:23PM +, Steven Hartland wrote:
> On 02/12/2016 15:12, Shawn Webb wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 10:40:29AM +0100, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I tried running `git pull` a few minutes ago and had a ton of conflicts.
> >>
> >> It turns out all hashes after c96fb0418e545a569b5975b4d878a30a948c29d5
> >> ("fix issues related with USES=fonts" from 2015-07-18, aka r392404) are
> >> now different in all GitHub branches.
> >>
> >> Is anyone else experiencing this? Was this change intentional?
> > We at HardenedBSD are affected as well. Well, time to spend my weekend
> > resolving merge conflicts.
> >
> > Seems like any downstream project that relies on the GitHub mirror of
> > the ports tree will have issues. Major ouch.
> >
> Did someone do a force push?
Looks like the svn2git conversion script iis having issues:
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-git/2016-December/74.html
--
Shawn Webb
Cofounder and Security Engineer
HardenedBSD
GPG Key ID: 0x6A84658F52456EEE
GPG Key Fingerprint: 2ABA B6BD EF6A F486 BE89 3D9E 6A84 658F 5245 6EEE
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: Hash changes in the freebsd-ports GitHub mirror
On 02/12/2016 15:12, Shawn Webb wrote:
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 10:40:29AM +0100, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
Hi all,
I tried running `git pull` a few minutes ago and had a ton of conflicts.
It turns out all hashes after c96fb0418e545a569b5975b4d878a30a948c29d5
("fix issues related with USES=fonts" from 2015-07-18, aka r392404) are
now different in all GitHub branches.
Is anyone else experiencing this? Was this change intentional?
We at HardenedBSD are affected as well. Well, time to spend my weekend
resolving merge conflicts.
Seems like any downstream project that relies on the GitHub mirror of
the ports tree will have issues. Major ouch.
Did someone do a force push?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Hash changes in the freebsd-ports GitHub mirror
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 10:40:29AM +0100, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I tried running `git pull` a few minutes ago and had a ton of conflicts.
>
> It turns out all hashes after c96fb0418e545a569b5975b4d878a30a948c29d5
> ("fix issues related with USES=fonts" from 2015-07-18, aka r392404) are
> now different in all GitHub branches.
>
> Is anyone else experiencing this? Was this change intentional?
We at HardenedBSD are affected as well. Well, time to spend my weekend
resolving merge conflicts.
Seems like any downstream project that relies on the GitHub mirror of
the ports tree will have issues. Major ouch.
Thanks,
--
Shawn Webb
Cofounder and Security Engineer
HardenedBSD
GPG Key ID: 0x6A84658F52456EEE
GPG Key Fingerprint: 2ABA B6BD EF6A F486 BE89 3D9E 6A84 658F 5245 6EEE
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: WIP: lang/php71
Aloha, yesterday PHP 7.1 was released. I upgraded my dev-repo for interested users. You can get a full ports-tree with all new ports from GitHub: $ git clone https://github.com/t-zuehlsdorff/freebsd-ports $ git checkout php71 Also i created a diff for an review: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8693 If no errors were found, i'm going to bring it in next week! :) Greetings, Torsten ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
FreeBSD Port: xapian-bindings-1.2.24
Hi There I have been waiting for SWIG to gain php7 support so that xapian-bindings can too. Looks like SWIG is now there, and the xapian guys have included a php7 compiliation option on xapian master branch: https://lists.xapian.org/pipermail/xapian-discuss/2016-November/009444.html I tried to do some test compiling & testing, but immediately fell foul of the fact that the new stuff is based off master and the FreeBSD ports are still on 1.2.24, rather than the more recent 1.4.1 branch. Would it be possible to update the port to 1.4.1, I will then try with master and give some feedback to xapian with the hope they can then tag a new release (presumable in 1.4 series) which will include php7 support. Many Thanks -- Oliver Schönrock Mobile : +44 7880 617 446 email: oli...@schonrocks.com signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Hash changes in the freebsd-ports GitHub mirror
Le 02/12/2016 à 10:40, Raphael Kubo da Costa a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I tried running `git pull` a few minutes ago and had a ton of conflicts.
>
> It turns out all hashes after c96fb0418e545a569b5975b4d878a30a948c29d5
> ("fix issues related with USES=fonts" from 2015-07-18, aka r392404) are
> now different in all GitHub branches.
>
> Is anyone else experiencing this? Was this change intentional?
>
It may be related to the fact that the git repository is made from the
public http repository, which is a mirror of the official repository
made with svnmirror (I think?) and that that mirroring thing was
dropping commit that had no files in them. (Aka forced commits.)
Things may have been fixed.
(It's the reason my fork[1] is not really a fork, it was redone using
repo.freebsd.org as its source)
Or maybe it is not related and I don't know what I'm talking about.
1: https://github.com/mat813/freebsd-ports/
--
Mathieu Arnold
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hash changes in the freebsd-ports GitHub mirror
Hi all,
I tried running `git pull` a few minutes ago and had a ton of conflicts.
It turns out all hashes after c96fb0418e545a569b5975b4d878a30a948c29d5
("fix issues related with USES=fonts" from 2015-07-18, aka r392404) are
now different in all GitHub branches.
Is anyone else experiencing this? Was this change intentional?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Thunar is slow when browsing automounted NFS shares
I'm including xfce mailing list as well. On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 21:22:37 +0100 Olivier Duchateau wrote: > There's a mailing list for Xfce related questions :) I have just subscribed. I guess it was about time after using it for more than 5 years as primary DE :) > Before I want to know, if Thunar is running in daemon mode (for > faster startup). I don't think so. > Can you display result of ps x | grep thunar? pacija@efreet:~ % ps x | grep Thunar 1241 v4 S0:01,07 /usr/local/bin/Thunar (thunar) 1454 1 R+ 0:00,00 grep Thunar > NFS bug is well known, fixes since 1.5.x (according to Xfce's bug > tracker). In fact problem often comes from gvfs (in your case > gvfsd-network). I'm at Thunar-1.6.10_2, gvfs-1.26.3_2. I don't see gvfsd-network in ps: pacija@efreet:~ % ps x | grep gvfs 1163 - I0:00,03 /usr/local/libexec/gvfsd 1171 - S0:00,08 /usr/local/libexec/gvfs-hal-volume-monitor 1173 - I0:00,03 /usr/local/libexec/gvfs-gphoto2-volume-monitor 1243 - I0:00,02 /usr/local/libexec/gvfsd-metadata 1245 - S0:00,10 /usr/local/libexec/gvfsd-trash --spawner :1.8 /org/gtk/gvfs/exec_spaw/0 1465 1 S+ 0:00,00 grep gvfs > If you change value of AutoMount (true -> false) > in /usr/local/share/gvfs/mounts/network.mount is there notable > changes? Did the change but no improvements. On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 22:42:54 + Ben Woods wrote: > I noticed this exact same behaviour last night, when I set up > autofs(5) for the first time. I thought that from '...automounted NFS shares' in subject it will be clear that I am using autofs, but I see now I should explain it in more detail. My auto_master: pacija@efreet:~ % sudo cat /etc/auto_master /net-hosts -nobrowse,nosuid,intr How client sees exports on server: pacija@efreet:~ % showmount -E mephala /usr/home/pacija/Music > Olivier: My understanding was that the autofs(5) behaviour should be > transparent to thunar, and therefore it should not be related to gvfs > at all? This was my understanding as well. Perhaps some fight between the two? Regards, -- Before enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. After enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. Marko Cupać https://www.mimar.rs/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
