Re: FreeBSD Port: samba43-4.3.11_1 and 44 and 45

[Julian Elischer]

On 23/12/2016 3:10 AM, Jane wrote:'
what this requires is someone to track it..

how about *you* :-)
tracking a port and sending in Makefile updates is not too hard if you 
keep on top of it..




Hi,

  


Is it me or is it lately impossible to keep samba ports updated to their
latest security releases?

I hope you can find time to update the samba ports more regular.

  


Also when do we see samba 45 in ports?

Samba 4.5 = current stable release! I believe we are not updated proper yet.

This worries me a lot.

  



series

   git branch

status

started

maintenance

security

discontinued (EOL)


4.6 ( 
details)

   master

  
new upcoming release series



4.5 ( 
details)

  
v4-5-test

  
 current stable release series

2016-09-07



4.4 ( 
details)

  
v4-4-test

  
maintenance mode

2016-03-22

2016-09-07



4.3 ( 
details)

  
v4-3-test

  
 security fixes only

2015-09-08

2016-03-22

2016-09-07



  

  


I really do hope samba can get some more attention to keep our servers more
secured and patched.

  


Thanks for you hard work and hope for a reply of this message.

  


Signed by

Kater

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"



___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: libwraster

[Hiroki Sato]

jbe...@freebsd.org (Jan Beich) wrote
  in <20170101195127.6c0cb3...@freefall.freebsd.org>:

jb> Hiroki Sato  writes:
jb>
jb> >  I did not able to reproduce it even if ImageMagick was built with the
jb> >  OpenMP option.  I guess your environment has another issue which
jb> >  pulls -lomp into the build process.
jb>
jb> Clang >= 3.7 no longer ignores -fopenmp which now requires libomp.so
jb> from devel/openmp (for base compiler) or devel/llvm* built with OPENMP=on.
jb>
jb> For example:
jb>   1. Use FreeBSD >= 11.0
jb>   2. Install graphics/ImageMagick with OPENMP=on
jb>   3. Deinstall devel/openmp (just in case)
jb>   4. Build the port with default compiler
jb>
jb> The obvious fix is teach ImageMagick to not pollute namespace as nothing
jb> in its public API uses #pragma omp or omp_ symbols.

 So is the attached patch safe to avoid this?

-- Hiroki
Index: graphics/ImageMagick/files/patch-configure
===
--- graphics/ImageMagick/files/patch-configure	(nonexistent)
+++ graphics/ImageMagick/files/patch-configure	(working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+--- configure.orig	2017-01-03 02:07:28.432298000 +0900
 configure	2017-01-03 02:09:38.248392000 +0900
+@@ -11691,7 +11691,6 @@
+
+
+ CFLAGS="$OPENMP_CFLAGS $CFLAGS"
+-MAGICK_PCFLAGS="$MAGICK_PCFLAGS $OPENMP_CFLAGS"
+
+ if test "$enable_openmp" != no; then
+   if test "$ac_cv_prog_c_openmp" != 'unsupported'; then

Property changes on: graphics/ImageMagick/files/patch-configure
___
Added: fbsd:nokeywords
## -0,0 +1 ##
+yes
\ No newline at end of property
Added: svn:eol-style
## -0,0 +1 ##
+native
\ No newline at end of property
Added: svn:mime-type
## -0,0 +1 ##
+text/plain
\ No newline at end of property


pgpJ_4clr0RzA.pgp
Description: PGP signature

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

[portscout]

Dear port maintainer,

The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can
safely ignore the entry.

You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations
below.

Full details can be found at the following URL:
http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html


Port| Current version | New version
+-+
games/robocode  | 1.9.2.5 | 1.9.2.6
+-+
textproc/supercat   | 0.5.5   | 0.5.6
+-+


If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page
for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of
distfiles on a per-port basis:

http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt

Thanks.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: What's happened to flashplugin?

[Mike Clarke]

On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 11:16:38 +0100
Dimitry Andric  wrote:

> It's been renamed to www/linux-flashplayer.

Thanks. It's working fine now after installing the new renamed version.
 
-- 
Mike Clarke
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: What's happened to flashplugin?

[Dimitry Andric]

On 02 Jan 2017, at 11:05, Mike Clarke  wrote:
> 
> Both www/linux-c7-flashplugin24 and www/linux-c6-flashplugin24 appear
> to have been deleted from ports but I can't find information relating
> to why they've gone.

$ grep flashplugin /usr/ports/MOVED
www/linux-f8-flashplugin10||2011-04-04|Has expired: End of Life since Jan 7, 
2009
www/flashplugin-mozilla||2011-09-30|gplflash is no longer supported, please use 
graphics/gnash
www/asterisk-fop||2011-09-30|Depends on www/flashplugin-mozilla which is 
DEPRECATED
www/linux-flashplugin7||2011-10-14|Vulnerable since at least 2008-05-30
www/linux-f10-flashplugin10|www/linux-f10-flashplugin11|2012-08-26|Has expired: 
has vulnerabilities and is EOL
www/linux-flashplugin9||2013-04-16|Has expired: Vulnerable, Broken for more 
than 6 months
www/linux-f10-flashplugin11|www/linux-flashplayer|2016-12-13|Removed upstream
www/linux-c6-flashplugin11|www/linux-flashplayer|2016-12-13|Removed upstream
www/linux-c7-flashplugin11|www/linux-flashplayer|2016-12-13|Removed upstream
www/linux-c6-flashplugin24|www/linux-flashplayer|2016-12-18|Renamed to match 
upstream
www/linux-c7-flashplugin24|www/linux-flashplayer|2016-12-18|Renamed to match 
upstream


> Is this deletion permanent or can we expect a flash plugin to reappear?

It's been renamed to www/linux-flashplayer.

-Dimitry



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

What's happened to flashplugin?

[Mike Clarke]

Both www/linux-c7-flashplugin24 and www/linux-c6-flashplugin24 appear
to have been deleted from ports but I can't find information relating
to why they've gone.

Is this deletion permanent or can we expect a flash plugin to reappear?

-- 
Mike Clarke
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"