sword compile errors

2017-09-13 Thread bruce 

Hi,

updating sword with portmaster caused  the following errors:


../src/keys/treekeyidx.cpp:64:12: error: ordered comparison between 
pointer and

  zero ('sword::FileDesc *' and 'int')
if (datfd <= 0) {
~ ^  ~
../src/keys/treekeyidx.cpp:334:12: error: ordered comparison between 
pointer and

  zero ('sword::FileDesc *' and 'int')
if (datfd > 0) {
~ ^ ~
../src/keys/treekeyidx.cpp:388:12: error: ordered comparison between 
pointer and

  zero ('sword::FileDesc *' and 'int')
if (idxfd > 0) {
~ ^ ~
../src/keys/treekeyidx.cpp:425:12: error: ordered comparison between 
pointer and

  zero ('sword::FileDesc *' and 'int')
if (idxfd > 0) {
~ ^ ~
../src/keys/treekeyidx.cpp:491:12: error: ordered comparison between 
pointer and

  zero ('sword::FileDesc *' and 'int')
if (idxfd > 0) {
~ ^ ~
5 errors generated.


thanks for any help.

Bruce
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Issues between openmp and llvm

2017-09-13 Thread Shane Ambler 

On 13/09/2017 20:51, Jan Beich wrote:

Shane Ambler  writes:


... libomp.so - found (/usr/local/llvm-devel/lib/libomp.so)


The issue is that the build then fails because cc/ld is looking for
openmp files in /usr/local where they should be installed.


Try using SOVERSION to ignore devel/llvm* copy e.g.,

   LIB_DEPENDS += libomp.so.0:devel/openmp



Yes that works, now. As other libs from llvm are versioned what are the
chances that it will always to work?

--
FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing

Shane Ambler

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: PRs commit request

2017-09-13 Thread Łukasz Wąsikowski 
W dniu 2017-09-13 o 16:46, Kurt Jaeger pisze:

>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220902
> 
> Done. If you describe the topic of the PR, it makes it easier
> to decide if I can work on it.

Thank you, I'll describe it next time.

-- 
best regards,
Lukasz Wasikowski
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: PRs commit request

2017-09-13 Thread Kurt Jaeger 
Hi!

> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220902

Done. If you describe the topic of the PR, it makes it easier
to decide if I can work on it.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: PRs commit request

2017-09-13 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen 
AS usual, you should mention which ports they refer to, it increases
the chance that they will get looked at more quickly.

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Łukasz Wąsikowski
 wrote:
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220112

sysutils/n98-magerun: Update to 1.97.30 and take maintainership

> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220902

mail/opendmarc: Update to 1.3.2

HTH
-- 
Regards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Issues between openmp and llvm

2017-09-13 Thread Jan Beich 
Shane Ambler  writes:

>> ... libomp.so - found (/usr/local/llvm-devel/lib/libomp.so)
>
> The issue is that the build then fails because cc/ld is looking for
> openmp files in /usr/local where they should be installed.

Try using SOVERSION to ignore devel/llvm* copy e.g.,

  LIB_DEPENDS += libomp.so.0:devel/openmp
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Issues between openmp and llvm

2017-09-13 Thread Shane Ambler 


I am testing an update to graphics/blender and seeing if I can use
devel/openmp as a dependency to prevent forcing the choice of compiler.

This works fine when openmp is pre-installed but fails if llvm[40|devel]
is installed before checking if libomp exists.

As the copy of libomp.so installed by llvm is found, devel/openmp does
not get installed.

> ... libomp.so - found (/usr/local/llvm-devel/lib/libomp.so)

The issue is that the build then fails because cc/ld is looking for
openmp files in /usr/local where they should be installed.

This can fail on the host system as well as in poudriere. In poudriere
it only fails if blenders CYCLESOSL option is enabled which now installs
llvm40 before checking for libomp.so.

--
FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing

Shane Ambler

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Kibana53 - Not suitable node version available?

2017-09-13 Thread Eugene Grosbein 
On 13.09.2017 16:29, Mark Clarke wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I posted a comment on a bug report regarding kibana53 failure to start 
> by default on 11.0 and 11.1. I installed Kibana53 with pkg. From the bug 
> report it looks like node 8.2 or higher is required. The maintainer 
> asked me to post here instead to follow up. Miroslav pointed out in his 
> comment that  it will work with node-8.3.0 but  I cannot find this in 
> port nor in pkg. I have upgaded my ports tree via svn and all I have is 
> node, and node010. Node is version 8.1 which is not compatible. How do I 
> get more recent node versions in my ports tree or in pkg?

www/node was upgraded from 8.3.0 to 8.4.0 almost a month ago.
You could remove your ports tree and fetch it again from official mirror
as your source is obviously stale.


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Kibana53 - Not suitable node version available?

2017-09-13 Thread Mark Clarke 

Hi all,

I posted a comment on a bug report regarding kibana53 failure to start 
by default on 11.0 and 11.1. I installed Kibana53 with pkg. From the bug 
report it looks like node 8.2 or higher is required. The maintainer 
asked me to post here instead to follow up. Miroslav pointed out in his 
comment that  it will work with node-8.3.0 but  I cannot find this in 
port nor in pkg. I have upgaded my ports tree via svn and all I have is 
node, and node010. Node is version 8.1 which is not compatible. How do I 
get more recent node versions in my ports tree or in pkg?


thanks



--
Mark Clarke
📱  +2711-781 8014
🌍  www.JumpingBean.co.za
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Qupzilla 2.x

2017-09-13 Thread Martin Waschbüsch 

> Am 12.09.2017 um 21:47 schrieb Martin Waschbüsch :
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Now that we have qt5-webengine (as of 
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=448132), I wondered 
> if anyone is working on porting qupzilla 2.x?

Hoping I am not duplicating anyone else's efforts, I am working on porting this 
myself. A patch for an initial port will shortly be available here:

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79 


Should anyone else be working on this, too, please let me know so we can 
coordinate.

Martin


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

PRs commit request

2017-09-13 Thread Łukasz Wąsikowski 
Hi,

I'm looking for a good soul with a commit bit to push those PRs:

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220112
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220902


Thank you in advance.
-- 
best regards,
Lukasz Wasikowski
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2017-09-13 Thread portscout 
Dear port maintainer,

The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can
safely ignore the entry.

You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations
below.

Full details can be found at the following URL:
http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html


Port| Current version | New version
+-+
devel/libisofs  | 1.4.6   | 1.4.8
+-+


If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page
for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of
distfiles on a per-port basis:

http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt

Thanks.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"