FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html Port| Current version | New version +-+ net-im/mastodon | 2.3.3 | v2.4.3 +-+ x11-wm/wmconfig | 1.5.0 | 1.5.1 +-+ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hadoop-ecosystem ports
Hi ports@ I will be working on making Hadoop a first class citizen on FreeBSD. This will include bumping the existing ports for Hadoop, HBase, Oozie, Spark (probably some others as well), and creating ports for HUE, Sqoop, Zeppelin, Flume, Ambari and a variety of other projects maintained by the ASF. Think Hortonworks HDP/Cloudera CDH/MapR, just on FreeBSD. This can't be done on just one laptop and I'm looking for people interested in testing and reviewing them. Preferably also someone with hardware to stand up a large enough cluster as reference architecture, to show that Hadoop on FreeBSD trumps Hadoop on Linux. What's a good mailing list to coordinate this effort on? Given that they're mostly Apache projects, would apache@ be a good fit? -- Best regards, Johannes Meixner Perceivon OÜ Pikk 7-17 10123 Tallinn web: http://www.perceivon.net signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Hadoop-ecosystem ports
Hi! > I will be working on making Hadoop a first class citizen on FreeBSD. Thanks, that sounds helpful, as that is a large group of applications. > This will include bumping the existing ports for Hadoop, HBase, Oozie, > Spark (probably some others as well), and creating ports for HUE, Sqoop, > Zeppelin, Flume, Ambari and a variety of other projects maintained by > the ASF. Think Hortonworks HDP/Cloudera CDH/MapR, just on FreeBSD. > > This can't be done on just one laptop and I'm looking for people > interested in testing and reviewing them. > Preferably also someone with hardware to stand up a large enough cluster > as reference architecture, to show that Hadoop on FreeBSD trumps Hadoop > on Linux. I can provide a 32 GB / 4c+4t box as a testing environment, if it helps. > What's a good mailing list to coordinate this effort on? Given that > they're mostly Apache projects, would apache@ be a good fit? apache@ looks very limited to the webserver (if you review the last few month of posts). For a start, use ports@. If ports@ gets too much hadoop-related posts, you can always ask postmaster@ to add a list, like freebsd-hadoop@ or something similar. https://wiki.freebsd.org/Teams/postmaster#How_to_create_a_new_list.3F says: What we need Terse (one-line) description of list. More verbose description of list. Any deviations from these defaults: Max message body size: 200KB Not moderated Open (subscription not required for) posting Public archives "Official" name of list "foo" is "freebsd-foo" List is a technical list (vs. freebsd-chat@) List is for discussions (vs. freebsd-announce@) No designated non-postmaster "moderator" or "list administrator" -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Is there an index of all central poudriere builds?
For example, this server http://package21.nyi.freebsd.org/ builds for 110amd64 and 111amd64. Some other builds can be found if to change 21 to 20 or 22, but I couldn't find 112amd64, for example. Is there an index of build servers by version/architecture? Yuri ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Is there an index of all central poudriere builds?
Yuri writes: > For example, this server http://package21.nyi.freebsd.org/ builds for > 110amd64 and 111amd64. > > Some other builds can be found if to change 21 to 20 or 22, but I > couldn't find 112amd64, for example. > > Is there an index of build servers by version/architecture? Do you mean https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/ or something else? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Hadoop-ecosystem ports
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 22:21:59 +0200 "Kurt Jaeger" said Hi! > I will be working on making Hadoop a first class citizen on FreeBSD. Thanks, that sounds helpful, as that is a large group of applications. > This will include bumping the existing ports for Hadoop, HBase, Oozie, > Spark (probably some others as well), and creating ports for HUE, Sqoop, > Zeppelin, Flume, Ambari and a variety of other projects maintained by > the ASF. Think Hortonworks HDP/Cloudera CDH/MapR, just on FreeBSD. > > This can't be done on just one laptop and I'm looking for people > interested in testing and reviewing them. > Preferably also someone with hardware to stand up a large enough cluster > as reference architecture, to show that Hadoop on FreeBSD trumps Hadoop > on Linux. I can provide a 32 GB / 4c+4t box as a testing environment, if it helps. > What's a good mailing list to coordinate this effort on? Given that > they're mostly Apache projects, would apache@ be a good fit? apache@ looks very limited to the webserver (if you review the last few month of posts). For a start, use ports@. If ports@ gets too much hadoop-related posts, you can always ask postmaster@ to add a list, like freebsd-hadoop@ or something similar. https://wiki.freebsd.org/Teams/postmaster#How_to_create_a_new_list.3F says: What we need Terse (one-line) description of list. More verbose description of list. Any deviations from these defaults: Max message body size: 200KB Not moderated Open (subscription not required for) posting Public archives "Official" name of list "foo" is "freebsd-foo" List is a technical list (vs. freebsd-chat@) List is for discussions (vs. freebsd-announce@) No designated non-postmaster "moderator" or "list administrator" The link you cite above, only returns the following: You are not allowed to view this page. Is this the intended output? Thanks. --Chris -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Is there an index of all central poudriere builds?
On 07/12/18 16:26, Jan Beich wrote: Do you meanhttps://pkg-status.freebsd.org/ or something else? I don't find 112amd64 among Package Builds there. Which server do packages come from when people install 11.2 amd64? Yuri ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Is there an index of all central poudriere builds?
On 07/12/18 18:19, Kyle Evans wrote: Packages are built on the earliest supported release of a branch, so 11.1. They'll switch to 11.2 when 11.1 goes EOL. One user on 11.2 amd64 is trying to install the package cinelerra-gg, and pkg can't find it. I have 11.1 amd64, and this package installs fine. Where it is supposed to come on 11.2 and why is it not found? Yuri ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Is there an index of all central poudriere builds?
Yuri writes: > On 07/12/18 18:19, Kyle Evans wrote: > >> Packages are built on the earliest supported release of a branch, so >> 11.1. They'll switch to 11.2 when 11.1 goes EOL. > > > One user on 11.2 amd64 is trying to install the package cinelerra-gg, > and pkg can't find it. pkg(8) defaults to /quarterly set on -RELEASE since FreeBSD 10.2. https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/333474 cinelerra-gg is missing on 2018Q3, so the package is only built for /latest until 2018Q4 branches sometime after 2018-10-01. http://beefy3.nyi.freebsd.org/data/latest-per-pkg/cinelerra-gg/ # 111amd64-quarterly http://beefy9.nyi.freebsd.org/data/latest-per-pkg/cinelerra-gg/ # 111amd64-default ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Is there an index of all central poudriere builds?
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Yuri wrote: > On 07/12/18 18:19, Kyle Evans wrote: > >> Packages are built on the earliest supported release of a branch, so >> 11.1. They'll switch to 11.2 when 11.1 goes EOL. >> > > > One user on 11.2 amd64 is trying to install the package cinelerra-gg, and > pkg can't find it. > > I have 11.1 amd64, and this package installs fine. > > Where it is supposed to come on 11.2 and why is it not found? > > > > Yuri > There are no 11.2 builds. Builds are done for the oldest supported release of each major version. This is because the commitment of a stable API/ABI assures that anyu port ythab is built for an older release will run on a newer one but not the reverse. ATM, this means that builds are done on HEAD, 11.1 and 10.4. 11.2 will start being used in October when 11.1 goes EOL. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Is there an index of all central poudriere builds?
On 07/12/18 19:12, Jan Beich wrote: pkg(8) defaults to /quarterly set on -RELEASE since FreeBSD 10.2. https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/333474 cinelerra-gg is missing on 2018Q3, so the package is only built for /latest until 2018Q4 branches sometime after 2018-10-01. http://beefy3.nyi.freebsd.org/data/latest-per-pkg/cinelerra-gg/ # 111amd64-quarterly http://beefy9.nyi.freebsd.org/data/latest-per-pkg/cinelerra-gg/ # 111amd64-default So 11.2 is the latest release, but is doesn't get any latest package updates? Quarterly is mostly for security patches, otherwise it is outdated. What should people do who install the latest FreeBSD release (11.2) and want some recently added packages? Yuri ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Is there an index of all central poudriere builds?
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 9:06 PM Yuri wrote: > > On 07/12/18 19:12, Jan Beich wrote: > > pkg(8) defaults to /quarterly set on -RELEASE since FreeBSD 10.2. > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/333474 > > > > cinelerra-gg is missing on 2018Q3, so the package is only built for > > /latest until 2018Q4 branches sometime after 2018-10-01. > > http://beefy3.nyi.freebsd.org/data/latest-per-pkg/cinelerra-gg/ # > > 111amd64-quarterly > > http://beefy9.nyi.freebsd.org/data/latest-per-pkg/cinelerra-gg/ # > > 111amd64-default > > > So 11.2 is the latest release, but is doesn't get any latest package > updates? Quarterly is mostly for security patches, otherwise it is outdated. > > What should people do who install the latest FreeBSD release (11.2) and > want some recently added packages? Every 11.x gets the same packages. They're built on the lowest supported version (11.1 here), but 11.2 and 11.1 pkg users get the same packages. Quarterly is NOT outdated. It is specifically and intentionally not latest-and-greatest. Whatever new pkg you're talking about, the whole point is that it is tested for ~3 mo in head before it arrives in quarterly. If you don't like it, you switch to head. That's what it's there for. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger ad...@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Hadoop-ecosystem ports
Hi! > > For a start, use ports@. If ports@ gets too much hadoop-related > > posts, you can always ask postmaster@ to add a list, like > > freebsd-hadoop@ or something similar. > > > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/Teams/postmaster#How_to_create_a_new_list.3F [...] > The link you cite above, only returns the following: > > You are not allowed to view this page. > > Is this the intended output? It's complicated. I'll try to work on that. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 31013722 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
