graphics/php*-gd requires X11 by default

2018-09-15 Thread Greg Kennedy
I sent an email to the maintainer of these ports (t...@freebsd.org) a few
days ago, but didn't hear back - so I thought I'd raise the same question
to the mailing list instead.

---

Hey there!  I was wondering something about the php-gd ports
(specifically 7.2 but earlier as well).  Looking at the config options
I see this:

 X11=on: Enable XPM support

With this option enabled php-gd can read XPixMap images, but in turn
this pulls in a host of additional X11 dependencies.  That's an awful
lot for (usually) headless servers, especially for an image format
that is (relatively) unused.  I don't mind the option being there but
because it is defaulted to "on", that means official FreeBSD packages
are built with this support and all the dependencies.  On my system I
have to manually build this one port just to turn off the option.

Would it be possible to modify the defaults for this port so that
X11=off by default?  Or, why is the default to "on"?  (I have a guess,
that this respects WITHOUT_X11 in /etc/make.conf, but that's useless
for pre-built binary packages)

-Greg
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: how to enforce one version of python

2018-09-15 Thread Robert Huff


tech-lists writes:

>  > _This_  is really annoying.  I try to keep my systems with exactly
>  > what they need installed, to reduce both bloat and possibly security
>  > issues.
>  
>  YES. This for me is *exactly* why it is so infuriating. And
>  doubleplus regarding security. Followed closely by something
>  installing the py-27 version when I wanted the 36-version.
>  
>  I'd like to have the latest stable python for everything that
>  requires it. Like I have with perl. I think that means py-36. I
>  don't want py-27.  I'd like to enforce that, but seemingly I can't,
>  because the invocation in make.conf for default version does not
>  enforce it in all situations.
>  
>  If something wants another version of python, I want it to fail,
>  ideally spitting out a usable reason why. Is my position
>  unreasonable? I hope it isn't. Maybe it is? I dunno.

Let's see if the folks on python@ have better information.



Respectfully,


Robert Huff

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: how to enforce one version of python

2018-09-15 Thread tech-lists

On 13/09/2018 17:39, Robert Huff wrote:

_This_  is really annoying.  I try to keep my systems with exactly
what they need installed, to reduce both bloat and possibly security
issues.


YES. This for me is *exactly* why it is so infuriating. And doubleplus 
regarding security. Followed closely by something installing the py-27 
version when I wanted the 36-version.


I'd like to have the latest stable python for everything that requires 
it. Like I have with perl. I think that means py-36. I don't want py-27. 
I'd like to enforce that, but seemingly I can't, because the invocation 
in make.conf for default version does not enforce it in all situations.


If something wants another version of python, I want it to fail, ideally 
spitting out a usable reason why. Is my position unreasonable? I hope it 
isn't. Maybe it is? I dunno.


thanks,

--
J.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: emulators/i386-wine-devel

2018-09-15 Thread David Naylor
On Saturday, 01 September 2018 22:45:58 SAST Rozhuk Ivan wrote:
> Hi!

Hi

> What happen with emulators/i386-wine-devel ?

Honestly, I've lost interest in compiling the port.  I'm working on a means to 
avoid manual compilation [1][2].  I've attached the scripts I use to build and 
update the ports - if anyone is interested.  

> I use it on FreeBSD 11.2 x64 to run old win32 apps.

The above mentioned work will also make running win64 apps concurrently with 
win32 apps.  

Regards

[1] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D14721
[2] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D16830

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.