Re: Jumbled dependencies
Thomas Mueller mueller6722 at twc.com wrote on Fri Jun 19 01:31:47 UTC 2020 : > > > I do package builds on one machine on my (small) network, using > > > portmaster [...] > [...] > > > And how do I bandage up the foot I shot myself in? > > > I understand it might be unpopular, but the preferred way to get > > to stable updates in the ports tree is using poudriere to > > build the ports and the pkg repo. > > > pi at opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? > > What is the current status of synth? I see little or no updating activity, > and no update to gcc6.aux while gcc is updated to 10.1. https://github.com/jrmarino/synth/ seems to have been touched the last 2 mostly recent times on: A) 2020-Feb-24 (v2.09) B) 2019-Jan-30 (v2.08) So it appears that it is in a fairly stable state for whatever contexts use it. I've not checked what eversion of ada is in use wherever synth is in use. (I've not researched where either. It did not run on the full range of architectures I wanted back when I experimented with it.) > Does poudriere install build dependencies by default or when requested? The question is really where and when build-dependencies are built, installed, and removed for poudriere. Poudriere normally has uses own work area instead of touching the system/environment that it is invoked from. In this area each port is built into a package via the steps (quick summary for the point at hand): A) install build-dependencies to a local/internal context (such dependencies were built earlier if needed). B) build the package in that context and file away the package for later use (including in building more ports). C) clean out that local/internal context. So, at build time, during a poudriere bulk operation for a port, the build dependencies needed are available for the port build to use. Yes, this does mean that across building many ports in a poudriere bulk build, various build-dependencies are repeatedly installed (once per port that depends on the it), instead of being installed just once and re-used for each port that happens to have the dependency. It also means that, during a port build, the only ports installed locally/internally are the ports that are explicit build dependencies, no extras (part of being a clean build environment for the port). After poudriere is done, pkg update; package install can later be used to install into the system/environment any or all of the ports that were built into packages, including those there were built just because they were dependecies of something else that was directly requested. (Worded for local builds locally installed to the same machine.) > I looked through the FreeBSD Handbook and Porters' Handbook online, and > couldn't find the answer. > > With synth, I had a difficult time getting everything that was built to > install, some packages like bison are needed in building other software. > > How is poudriere in that regard? > > Gentoo Linux with portage has "--with-bdeps=y" which installs build > dependencies when desired. > > I found that poudriere uses dialog4ports; I much prefer to save options in a > file such as Gentoo Linux does with make.conf and (NetBSD) pkgsrc does with > mk.conf . The files with the information are text and are stored in the file system and can be created and edited manually. For example: # find /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/ -name options -type f -print /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/options/lang_gcc8/options /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/options/ports-mgmt_poudriere-devel/options /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/options/lang_gcc9/options /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/options/devel_llvm80/options /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/options/devel_llvm90/options /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/options/devel_llvm10/options /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/options/lang_gcc10/options /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/FBSDFSSDjail-options/lang_gcc8/options /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/FBSDFSSDjail-options/ports-mgmt_poudriere-devel/options /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/FBSDFSSDjail-options/lang_gcc9/options /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/FBSDFSSDjail-options/devel_llvm80/options /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/FBSDFSSDjail-options/devel_llvm90/options /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/FBSDFSSDjail-options/devel_llvm10/options /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/FBSDFSSDjail-options/lang_gcc10/options The area is separate from FreeBSD's /var/db/ports/*_*/options files. > I once got a royal mess of circular/jumbled dependencies with dialog4ports; > cleaning was a major nuisance, nothing simple like editing /etc/mk.conf or > /etc/make.conf . > > I never used pkgsrc with any OS other than NetBSD but have thought about it > for FreeBSD and possibly Linux. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Jumbled dependencies
> > I do package builds on one machine on my (small) network, using > > portmaster [...] [...] > > And how do I bandage up the foot I shot myself in? > I understand it might be unpopular, but the preferred way to get > to stable updates in the ports tree is using poudriere to > build the ports and the pkg repo. > p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? What is the current status of synth? I see little or no updating activity, and no update to gcc6.aux while gcc is updated to 10.1. Does poudriere install build dependencies by default or when requested? I looked through the FreeBSD Handbook and Porters' Handbook online, and couldn't find the answer. With synth, I had a difficult time getting everything that was built to install, some packages like bison are needed in building other software. How is poudriere in that regard? Gentoo Linux with portage has "--with-bdeps=y" which installs build dependencies when desired. I found that poudriere uses dialog4ports; I much prefer to save options in a file such as Gentoo Linux does with make.conf and (NetBSD) pkgsrc does with mk.conf . I once got a royal mess of circular/jumbled dependencies with dialog4ports; cleaning was a major nuisance, nothing simple like editing /etc/mk.conf or /etc/make.conf . I never used pkgsrc with any OS other than NetBSD but have thought about it for FreeBSD and possibly Linux. Tom ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: accel-ppp
19.06.2020 0:34, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote: > Wonder if my mpd5.conf is configured properly? It depends on your goals as mpd5 is versatile. It has extensive logging and documentaion. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: accel-ppp
19.06.2020 0:35, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Which project is better maintained ? > > mpd5 had it's latest release in 2016, but commits until recently. > accel-ppp had it's latest release in August 2019 and also commits > until recently. mav@ and myself commit to upstream repo as needed, and there is another one person. I maintain the port also. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: accel-ppp
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 07:35:42PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > > Would anyone like to help me port this application? > > > > Very Linux based but coould be BSD convertible. > > > > It would make a good addition to the net ports. > > > > We already have net/mpd5 in ports for this task. > > So are there features in accel-ppp which are missing in mpd5 > or vice versa ? I saw a mention of TR-101 extension for PPPoE > in accel-ppp. > > Which project is better maintained ? > > mpd5 had it's latest release in 2016, but commits until recently. > accel-ppp had it's latest release in August 2019 and also commits > until recently. > And available as follows: https://accel-ppp.org/ https://sourceforge.net/projects/accel-ppp/ > -- > p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! nk.ca started 1 June 1995 . https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Better shun the bait, than struggle in the snare. -John Dryden ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: accel-ppp
Hi! > > Would anyone like to help me port this application? > > Very Linux based but coould be BSD convertible. > > It would make a good addition to the net ports. > > We already have net/mpd5 in ports for this task. So are there features in accel-ppp which are missing in mpd5 or vice versa ? I saw a mention of TR-101 extension for PPPoE in accel-ppp. Which project is better maintained ? mpd5 had it's latest release in 2016, but commits until recently. accel-ppp had it's latest release in August 2019 and also commits until recently. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: accel-ppp
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:23:58AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 19.06.2020 0:09, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote: > > > Would anyone like to help me port this application? > > > > Very Linux based but coould be BSD convertible. > > > > > > It would make a good addition to the net ports. > > We already have net/mpd5 in ports for this task. > Wonder if my mpd5.conf is configured properly? # # # MPD configuration file # # This file defines the configuration for mpd: what the # bundles are, what the links are in those bundles, how # the interface should be configured, various PPP parameters, # etc. It contains commands just as you would type them # in at the console. Lines without padding are labels. Lines # starting with a "#" are comments. # # $Id: mpd.conf.sample,v 1.49 2015/06/02 08:30:35 dmitryluhtionov Exp $ # # startup: # configure mpd users set user admin Secret admin #set user foo1 bar1 # configure the console set console self 127.0.0.1 5005 set console open # configure the web server set web self 0.0.0.0 5006 set web open default: load radius load l2tp_server load pptp_server pptp_server: # # Mpd as a PPTP server compatible with Microsoft Dial-Up Networking clients. # # Suppose you have a private Office LAN numbered 192.168.1.0/24 and the # machine running mpd is at 192.168.1.1, and also has an externally visible # IP address of 1.2.3.4. # # We want to allow a client to connect to 1.2.3.4 from out on the Internet # via PPTP. We will assign that client the address 192.168.1.50 and proxy-ARP # for that address, so the virtual PPP link will be numbered 192.168.1.1 local # and 192.168.1.50 remote. From the client machine's perspective, it will # appear as if it is actually on the 192.168.1.0/24 network, even though in # reality it is somewhere far away out on the Internet. # # Our DNS server is at 192.168.1.3 and our NBNS (WINS server) is at 192.168.1.4. # If you don't have an NBNS server, leave that line out. # # Define dynamic IP address pool. set ippool add pool1 10.10.0.0 10.255.255.254 # Create clonable bundle template named B create bundle template B set iface enable proxy-arp set iface idle 1800 set iface enable tcpmssfix set ipcp yes vjcomp # Specify IP address pool for dynamic assigment. set ipcp ranges 10.10.0.1/32 ippool pool1 set ipcp dns 192.168.81.1 #set ipcp nbns 192.168.81.3 # The five lines below enable Microsoft Point-to-Point encryption # (MPPE) using the ng_mppc(8) netgraph node type. set bundle enable compression set ccp yes mppc set mppc yes e40 set mppc yes e128 set mppc yes stateless # Create clonable link template named L create link template L pptp # Set bundle template to use set link action bundle B # Multilink adds some overhead, but gives full 1500 MTU. set link enable multilink set link yes acfcomp protocomp set link no pap chap eap set link enable pap set link enable chap # We can use use RADIUS authentication/accounting by including # another config section with label 'radius'. load radius set link keep-alive 10 60 # Enable utmp/wtmp logging #set auth enable system-acct # We reducing link mtu to avoid GRE packet fragmentation. set link mtu 1460 # Configure PPTP set pptp self 0.0.0.0 # Allow to accept calls set link enable incoming l2tp_server: # Define dynamic IP address pool. set ippool add pool1 10.12.0.0 10.12.255.254 # Create clonable bundle template named B create bundle template B_l2tp set bundle enable compression set iface enable proxy-arp set iface enable tcpmssfix set ifce mtu 1280 set ipcp yes vjcomp # Specify IP address pool for dynamic assigment. set ipcp ranges 10.12.0.1/32 ippool pool_l2tp set ipcp dns 192.168.81.1 # Create clonable link template named L create link template L_l2tp l2tp set link action bundle B_l2tp set link keep-alive 0 0 set link yes acfcomp protocomp set link no pap chap eap set link enable pap set link enable chap # Configure L2TP set l2tp self 0.0.0.0 set l2tp disable dataseq # Allow to accept calls set link enable incoming pptp_vpn: # # Mpd using PPTP for LAN to LAN VPN, always connected. # # Suppose you have a private Office LAN numbered 192.168.1.0/24 and another # remote private Office LAN numbered 192.168.2.0/24, and you wanted to route # between these two private networks using a PPTP VPN over the Internet. # # You run mpd on dual-homed machines on either end. Say the local machine # has internal address 192.168.1.1 an
Re: accel-ppp
19.06.2020 0:09, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote: > Would anyone like to help me port this application? > > Very Linux based but coould be BSD convertible. > > > It would make a good addition to the net ports. We already have net/mpd5 in ports for this task. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
accel-ppp
Would anyone like to help me port this application? Very Linux based but coould be BSD convertible. It would make a good addition to the net ports. -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! nk.ca started 1 June 1995 . https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Better shun the bait, than struggle in the snare. -John Dryden ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: cups-pdf crash status -139
On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 08:16:19 +0200 Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > On 2020-06-17 23:30, Tatsuki Makino wrote: > > Hello. > > > > If you want a quick solution, create the following symlink. > > ln -s /usr/local/etc/cups /etc/cups > > > > There are two bug reports about it. > > Bug 244530, 246955. > > 244530 also describes how to fix it. > > > > If the queue gets corrupted, use the following command to delete > > them all. /usr/local/bin/cancel -a -x > > Thank you for pointing this out, problem solved. > Good to hear, big thanks to Tatsuki for helping before I invested a lot of time. Cheers, Michael -- Michael Gmelin ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Several kf5 qt5 ports fail build
Updated ports and 12.1-STABLE r362185
Failures like this, anyone here having the same problem or am I alone?
Determining if the __GLIBC__ exist failed with the following output:
Change Dir:
/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/kf5-kdesignerplugin/work/.build/CMakeFiles/CMakeTmp
Run Build Command(s):/usr/local/bin/ninja cmTC_8b830 && [1/2] Building C
object CMakeFiles/cmTC_8b830.dir/CheckSymbolExists.c.o
FAILED: CMakeFiles/cmTC_8b830.dir/CheckSymbolExists.c.o
/usr/bin/cc -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing
-o CMakeFiles/cmTC_8b830.dir/CheckSymbolExists.c.o -c CheckSymbolExists.c
CheckSymbolExists.c:8:19: error: use of undeclared identifier '__GLIBC__'
return ((int*)(&__GLIBC__))[argc];
^
1 error generated.
ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
File
/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/kf5-kdesignerplugin/work/.build/CMakeFiles/CMakeTmp/CheckSymbolExists.c:
/* */
#include
int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
(void)argv;
#ifndef __GLIBC__
return ((int*)(&__GLIBC__))[argc];
#else
(void)argc;
return 0;
#endif
}
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html Port| Current version | New version +-+ science/afni| 20.1.15 | afni_20.1.16 +-+ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by:portscout! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
