Re: Debug version of firefox
On 5/5/19 8:56 am, George Mitchell wrote: I tried compiling a debugging version of firefox: cd /usr/ports/www/firefox; make clean; make WITH_DEBUG=yes install The resulting binary had no debug symbols. What did I do wrong? -- George WITH_DEBUG may not modify Firefox's actual makefile to do what you want. I would see if you need to monkey patch './configure' with a flag or two. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
lang/mono: Update to 4.0.3.19
Hi all, Please note that I have submitted a patch, which updates Mono to 4.0.3.19 in Ports. The patch is available as a PR here, but has been left untouched for quite a while: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201883 If there is no interest in maintaining this port, I am willing to put my hand up to become the port maintainer going forward. We are still working on finalising the porting effort of CoreCLR and Roslyn to FreeBSD, and an up to date Mono is critical to make this possible. Thanks, Anders ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: lang/mono Updated to Mono v4.0.1
Thanks. I have submitted the PR here: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200118 On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Matthew Seaman matt...@freebsd.org wrote: On 11/05/2015 06:48, Anders Jensen-Waud wrote: As part of our effort to port CoreCLR and the Roslyn compiler collection to FreeBSD, it has been necessary for us to have a working version of Mono v4.0.1 on FreeBSD. The version in Ports is on version 3.x, which is getting quite old. So I updated the port Makefile to 4.0.1.28, the most recent available version from the Mono team. The patch is available from here: https://github.com/ajensenwaud/mono4-freebsd-ports/tree/master/mono Given that this is an update to an existing ports infrastructure, would you still like an shar file submitted to the list? Or do you prefer a separate patchset? Can you generate a diff against the original ports tree, and open a ticket in Bugzilla (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/query.cgi?format=advanced) and attach the diff to the bug report -- make sure to mention 'lang/mono' in the subject of the bug report, as this will get the report auto-assigned to the right people. You'll smooth the way for getting your update applied if you can also attach the output of 'poudriere testport' showing your updated port compiling successfully and passing all the internal ports regression tests. One thing though: you should remove the PORTREVISION=1 at line 6 of Makefile -- that number gets reset to nothing when the main PORTVERSION increases. Cheers, Matthew ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
lang/mono Updated to Mono v4.0.1
Hi all, As part of our effort to port CoreCLR and the Roslyn compiler collection to FreeBSD, it has been necessary for us to have a working version of Mono v4.0.1 on FreeBSD. The version in Ports is on version 3.x, which is getting quite old. So I updated the port Makefile to 4.0.1.28, the most recent available version from the Mono team. The patch is available from here: https://github.com/ajensenwaud/mono4-freebsd-ports/tree/master/mono Given that this is an update to an existing ports infrastructure, would you still like an shar file submitted to the list? Or do you prefer a separate patchset? Cheers Anders ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
