www/mod_auth_mysql2 should be disabled for apache24
Hello, Trying to resort to this module for mysql auth support in apache, I got the exact same problem: httpd: Syntax error on line 533 of /usr/local/etc/apache24/httpd.conf: Syntax error on line 2 of /usr/local/etc/apache24/Includes/my-ssl.conf: Cannot load libexec/apache24/mod_auth_mysql.so into server: /usr/local/libexec/apache24/mod_auth_mysql.so: Undefined symbol "ap_requires" Since ap_requires was removed with apache24 release, there is no point in building for apache24. Best regards Andreas ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Apache does not respect value in DEFAULT_VERSIONS
On 09/09/2014 08:52, Andreas Nilsson wrote: * Hello, * * I've been going through my package building setup recently, and noticed ** that apache default version has changed. * * Since I need apache-2.2 for one module I added apache=2.2 to ** DEFAULT_VERSIONS in make.conf, but to no avail. I still get apache-2.4 and ** ap24-modules. * * The only way to get apache-2.2 is to set APACHE_PORT=www/apache22 in ** make.conf. * * This seems like a bug, or at least totally pointless to have apache-stuff ** in bsd.default-versions.mk http://bsd.default-versions.mk if its ignored. * * Best regards ** Andreas Nilsson * Do you have r367706 or later? I think this was fixed last night. Would that be version of ports or FreeBSD itself? Machine is running 10.0-RELEASE-p2 with ports fetched via poudriere on the morning of Sep 8. I'll try some upgrading then. Best regards Andreas PS. please keep me in cc, I'm not subscribed to this list. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Apache does not respect value in DEFAULT_VERSIONS
Hello, I've been going through my package building setup recently, and noticed that apache default version has changed. Since I need apache-2.2 for one module I added apache=2.2 to DEFAULT_VERSIONS in make.conf, but to no avail. I still get apache-2.4 and ap24-modules. The only way to get apache-2.2 is to set APACHE_PORT=www/apache22 in make.conf. This seems like a bug, or at least totally pointless to have apache-stuff in bsd.default-versions.mk if its ignored. Best regards Andreas Nilsson ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: HOWTO articles for migrating from Linux to FreeBSD, especially for pkg?
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi! 3) The binary packages need to work out of the box 4) .. which means, when you do things like pkg install apache, it can't just be installed and not be enabled, because that's a bit of a problem; I disagree on this. For network services on linux ( apart from ssh ), I want that started very seldom. But I do want the package installed so that when I need it, it is there. Having it autostart as part of being installed is breaking KISS and in some way unix philosophy: I asked for something to be installed, not installed and autostarted. 5) .. and then we need examples of actually deploying useful scenarios, like so here's what you type to get django working right, here's how you get a default memcached that works well, here's how you bring up node.js, etc. Oh yes. I think that quite a few packages have default options that make them unsuitable for out-of-box usage, ie some lack the sane default dbi-stuff and so on. 6) Then make VMs of the above so people can just clone and install them. At least zfs-datasets ready to be run as jails would be really good too. /A -a On 17 July 2014 11:25, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi, I attend a lot of different Meetup groups in the San Francisco Bay Area / Silicon Valley. What I am seeing is the following usage pattern for new developers, especially for web apps and cloud applications. (1) On their desktop/laptop, they will generally be using a Mac running OS X. This is their desktop Unix environment. This seems to be true of almost 90% of the people that I meet. The 10% of people who run a PC laptop, will mostly be running Windows. Very few seem to run Linux on their laptops, but if they do, it will likely be Ubuntu Linux. (2) For their deployed application, generally they will deploy to a Linux environment on a server. These days, the server will very likely be in a cloud environment: Amazon, Rackspace, Heroku. For (1), encouraging people to move away from a Mac to FreeBSD for their desktop environment is a tough sell. Apple is a multi-billion dollar company, and they make beautiful hardware, and software with a fantastic end-user experience. The PC-BSD project is fighting the good fight in terms of making a usable FreeBSD desktop, but its a touch battle to fight. For (2), encouraging people to move away from Linux to FreeBSD on the server, may be something where we can get more wins. I think we can do this by having more HOWTO articles on the FreeBSD web page that explain the following: (1) We need a HOWTO article that explains for each command using apt or yum for installing packages, how can I do the same thing using pkg. Even if we have a web page with a table, contrasting the apt/yum commands, and pkg commands, that would be super useful. A lot of folks have moved away from FreeBSD, purely because they are sick of pkg_add. We need to explain to folks that we have something better, that is quite competitive to apt/yum, and it is easy to use. (2) We need a HOWTO article that explains how to set up a FreeBSD environment with some of the major cloud providers, i.e. Amazon, Rackspace, Microsoft Azure, etc. Do we have such articles today, or is anybody working on something like that? I think if we had these two HOWTO articles today, and we could aggressively point people at them, this would be a huge win for expanding the number of people who try out FreeBSD for modern server applications. -- Craig ___ freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: HOWTO articles for migrating from Linux to FreeBSD, especially for pkg?
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Navdeep Parhar npar...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/17/14 13:12, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 17 July 2014 13:03, Alberto Mijares amijar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Hi!
3) The binary packages need to work out of the box
4) .. which means, when you do things like pkg install apache, it
can't just be installed and not be enabled, because that's a bit of a
problem;
No. Please NEVER do that! The user must be able to edit the files and
start the service by himself.
Cool, so what's the single line command needed to type in to start a
given package service?
Aren't sysrc(8) and service(8) for this kind of stuff?
They sure are.
Well, pkg install $service ; sysrc ${service}_enable=YES would do.
Although some services have different names than the packge, which is sort
of annoying.
I wouldn't mind though if pkg via dialog or some such mechanism asked if
wanted it enabled. Or via pkg-message told me howto enable it.
/A
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: HOWTO articles for migrating from Linux to FreeBSD, especially for pkg?
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: On 17 July 2014 13:15, Navdeep Parhar npar...@gmail.com wrote: On 07/17/14 13:12, Adrian Chadd wrote: On 17 July 2014 13:03, Alberto Mijares amijar...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi! 3) The binary packages need to work out of the box 4) .. which means, when you do things like pkg install apache, it can't just be installed and not be enabled, because that's a bit of a problem; No. Please NEVER do that! The user must be able to edit the files and start the service by himself. Cool, so what's the single line command needed to type in to start a given package service? Aren't sysrc(8) and service(8) for this kind of stuff? Yup, and if the default is going to be off, then you want the instructions to be type this in, not edit this file. There's odd things too, like oh look I installed xorg, but then I can't run it without enabling hald/dbus, then starting it.. oh wait, no mouse, so I have to reboot for them to come up right kind of crap. That's the kind of thing that turns people away. But this is more of a desktop/laptop setup, right? If services had an option ( the ones provided via ports anyway) for autostart, and package sets for different use cases was provided, like server and desktop say, there could for desktop be the default to have the option set for autostart and for server the option would be to not autostart. /A ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
databases/qdbm fails
Hello, databases/qdbm port fails to build on 9.2 amd64, see attached log. I would guess it ignores CFLAGS. Best regards Andreas qdbm-1.8.78_1.log Description: Binary data ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT] Xorg 7.7 ready for testing!
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Andreas Nilsson andrn...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Ivan Klymenko fi...@ukr.net wrote: В Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:48:41 +0300 Alexander Yerenkow yeren...@gmail.com пишет: Is this fresh installation or you were upgrading? I'm preparing now live image with new xorg, and don't saw such errors. But I had yesterday's src/ports tree. Forgot to add - to svn r501 everything is fine build and working... I checked out the xorg repo yesterday and it built just fine ( on 9.0-RELEASE with drm-all.14.5-releng9.0.patch ). I actually did this in a clone of my root-dataset so I started with pkg_delete -a :) ) Just a thought: shouldn't the new intel driver be part of the OPTIONS of the new xorg-drivers? I'll write back with the results when I get back into the office. Regards So after upgrade to 9-stable xorg-7.7 starts just fine. Lets hope it keeps running. I would prefer to have xorg-7.7 becoming the default version of X, at least on 9 and above. And how does the nvidia binary blob work with xorg-7.7? Regards Andreas ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT] Xorg 7.7 ready for testing!
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Ivan Klymenko fi...@ukr.net wrote: В Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:48:41 +0300 Alexander Yerenkow yeren...@gmail.com пишет: Is this fresh installation or you were upgrading? I'm preparing now live image with new xorg, and don't saw such errors. But I had yesterday's src/ports tree. Forgot to add - to svn r501 everything is fine build and working... I checked out the xorg repo yesterday and it built just fine ( on 9.0-RELEASE with drm-all.14.5-releng9.0.patch ). I actually did this in a clone of my root-dataset so I started with pkg_delete -a :) ) Just a thought: shouldn't the new intel driver be part of the OPTIONS of the new xorg-drivers? I'll write back with the results when I get back into the office. Regards ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
