Re: Log rotation kills squeezeboxserver CLI
On 25 June 2013 13:26, Mark Knight wrote: > Hi Ben, if you change newsyslog.conf to recreate the file with slimserv > ownership, does it fix the error (although not the warnings)? > > /var/log/squeezeboxserver/server.logslimserv:slimserv 644 3 100 * J > /var/run/squeezeboxserver/squeezeboxserver.pid Forgot to report back - yes, this fixes the problem. > > -- > Mark Knight > Mobile: +44 7880 556751. Home: +44 1223 858596 > Email: ma...@knigma.org. Skype: knigma > > > On 25/06/2013 10:35, Ben Laurie wrote: >> >> I haven't figured out why, unfortunately, but if you use SBS' CLI >> interface, it stops responding when the log gets rotated by newsyslog. >> >> Removing it from newsyslog.conf fixes the problem (obviously at the >> cost of no log rotation :-). >> >> It also logs a _lot_ of crap, btw. >> > ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: pkgng seems to be out of date?
On 25 June 2013 13:35, Ben Laurie wrote: > On 25 June 2013 12:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:53:42PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: >>> On 25 June 2013 12:32, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:56:46AM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: >>> >> On 25 June 2013 11:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> >> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:36:07AM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: >>> >> >> On 25 June 2013 11:31, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> >> >> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:36:14AM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: >>> >> >> >> ping? >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> On 22 June 2013 18:46, Ben Laurie wrote: >>> >> >> >> > $ pwd >>> >> >> >> > /usr/ports/textproc/xml2rfc >>> >> >> >> > $ make build-depends-list >>> >> >> >> > /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg >>> >> >> >> > $ make run-depends-list >>> >> >> >> > /usr/ports/lang/tcl86 >>> >> >> >> > /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/tk86 >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > But... >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > $ pkg query '%n: %do' xml2rfc >>> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: textproc/expat2 >>> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11-fonts/fontconfig >>> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: print/freetype2 >>> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/kbproto >>> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/libX11 >>> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/libXau >>> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/libXdmcp >>> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11-fonts/libXft >>> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/libXrender >>> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: devel/libpthread-stubs >>> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/libxcb >>> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: devel/pkgconf >>> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/renderproto >>> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: lang/tcl-modules >>> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: lang/tcl85 >>> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11-toolkits/tk85 >>> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/xproto >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > a) Why so many more dependencies, and... >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > b) Why different versions of tcl/tk? >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > And ... how do I fix it? >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > BTW, I use portmaster to maintain my installed ports... >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > That is how the ports tree works for eons, and that can't be fixed >>> >> >> > until we can >>> >> >> > totally get rid if pkg_install (to many corner egdes) pkg_install >>> >> >> > to work >>> >> >> > properly needs to track fully direct and indirect dependencies, pkg >>> >> >> > does not, >>> >> >> > but because the ports tree still need to be compatible with >>> >> >> > pkg_install and >>> >> >> > lots of people are still using all habits from the pkg_install >>> >> >> > time, it is very >>> >> >> > hard to remove this right now.) >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > But yes for sure this "feature" will get removed :)) >>> >> >> >>> >> >> So are you saying that pkg includes indirect dependencies, while >>> >> >> ports do not? >>> >> >> >>> >> > Yes >>> >> >> But that doesn't explain why pkg says tcl85 and ports says tcl86 >>> >> > >>> >> > That is probably a bug of run-depends not discovering you have tcl85 >>> >> > installed >>> >> > so getting to the default tcl for its dependency which is tcl86. >>> >> >>> >> I actually have both installed, so I think the bug is in pkg. I'd like >>> >> to remove ports I don't need but pkg won't let me remove tcl85, which >>> >> I think I don't really need... >>> > >>> > I think is it a bug in portmaster and/or not having fully follow 20130206 >>> > of UPDATING. >>> > >>> > pkg only registers dependencies it is being told to register by the ports >>> > tree/portmaster. >>> >> >>> >> How can I force pkg to rebuild its dependencies? Is it even possible? >>> > >>> > portmaster -af should do it probably (I'm not a portmaster user) >>> >>> I just did a portmaster -a, that's how I got into this situation... >>> >>> What port management tool _does_ work with pkg? >> >> both portmaster and portupgrade, I'm sure what you hit is the UPDATING that >> has >> not been followed, there is a decicated part for tcl. >>> >>> >> Is there any way for pkg to check the integrity of its database? >>> >> >>> > >>> > pkg check -d will do, but imho will find nothing. >>> >>> # pkg check -d >>> x11-toolkits/py-wxPython28-common has a missing dependency: lang/tcl-modules >>> x11-toolkits/py-wxPython28-unicode has a missing dependency: >>> lang/tcl-modules >>> textproc/xml2rfc has a missing dependency: lang/tcl-modules >> >> That proves you haven't followed the 20130206 entry. > > Oh, sorry, I missed that reference the first time round. > > Hmm, just discovered "pkg updating". It'd be nice if there were a way > to skip all the things that say "rebuild everything that depends on > it", which seems kinda obvious... Hmmm. pkg updating doesn't actually show the relevant 20130206 entry - so not actually useful. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: pkgng seems to be out of date?
On 25 June 2013 12:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:53:42PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: >> On 25 June 2013 12:32, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:56:46AM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: >> >> On 25 June 2013 11:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:36:07AM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: >> >> >> On 25 June 2013 11:31, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> >> >> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:36:14AM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: >> >> >> >> ping? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 22 June 2013 18:46, Ben Laurie wrote: >> >> >> >> > $ pwd >> >> >> >> > /usr/ports/textproc/xml2rfc >> >> >> >> > $ make build-depends-list >> >> >> >> > /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg >> >> >> >> > $ make run-depends-list >> >> >> >> > /usr/ports/lang/tcl86 >> >> >> >> > /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/tk86 >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > But... >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > $ pkg query '%n: %do' xml2rfc >> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: textproc/expat2 >> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11-fonts/fontconfig >> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: print/freetype2 >> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/kbproto >> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/libX11 >> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/libXau >> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/libXdmcp >> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11-fonts/libXft >> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/libXrender >> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: devel/libpthread-stubs >> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/libxcb >> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: devel/pkgconf >> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/renderproto >> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: lang/tcl-modules >> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: lang/tcl85 >> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11-toolkits/tk85 >> >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/xproto >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > a) Why so many more dependencies, and... >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > b) Why different versions of tcl/tk? >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > And ... how do I fix it? >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > BTW, I use portmaster to maintain my installed ports... >> >> >> > >> >> >> > That is how the ports tree works for eons, and that can't be fixed >> >> >> > until we can >> >> >> > totally get rid if pkg_install (to many corner egdes) pkg_install to >> >> >> > work >> >> >> > properly needs to track fully direct and indirect dependencies, pkg >> >> >> > does not, >> >> >> > but because the ports tree still need to be compatible with >> >> >> > pkg_install and >> >> >> > lots of people are still using all habits from the pkg_install time, >> >> >> > it is very >> >> >> > hard to remove this right now.) >> >> >> > >> >> >> > But yes for sure this "feature" will get removed :)) >> >> >> >> >> >> So are you saying that pkg includes indirect dependencies, while ports >> >> >> do not? >> >> >> >> >> > Yes >> >> >> But that doesn't explain why pkg says tcl85 and ports says tcl86 >> >> > >> >> > That is probably a bug of run-depends not discovering you have tcl85 >> >> > installed >> >> > so getting to the default tcl for its dependency which is tcl86. >> >> >> >> I actually have both installed, so I think the bug is in pkg. I'd like >> >> to remove ports I don't need but pkg won't let me remove tcl85, which >> >> I think I don't really need... >> > >> > I think is it a bug in portmaster and/or not having fully follow 20130206 >> > of UPDATING. >> > >> > pkg only registers dependencies it is being told to register by the ports >> > tree/portmaster. >> >> >> >> How can I force pkg to rebuild its dependencies? Is it even possible? >> > >> > portmaster -af should do it probably (I'm not a portmaster user) >> >> I just did a portmaster -a, that's how I got into this situation... >> >> What port management tool _does_ work with pkg? > > both portmaster and portupgrade, I'm sure what you hit is the UPDATING that > has > not been followed, there is a decicated part for tcl. >> >> >> Is there any way for pkg to check the integrity of its database? >> >> >> > >> > pkg check -d will do, but imho will find nothing. >> >> # pkg check -d >> x11-toolkits/py-wxPython28-common has a missing dependency: lang/tcl-modules >> x11-toolkits/py-wxPython28-unicode has a missing dependency: lang/tcl-modules >> textproc/xml2rfc has a missing dependency: lang/tcl-modules > > That proves you haven't followed the 20130206 entry. Oh, sorry, I missed that reference the first time round. Hmm, just discovered "pkg updating". It'd be nice if there were a way to skip all the things that say "rebuild everything that depends on it", which seems kinda obvious... ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: pkgng seems to be out of date?
On 25 June 2013 12:32, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:56:46AM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: >> On 25 June 2013 11:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:36:07AM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: >> >> On 25 June 2013 11:31, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:36:14AM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: >> >> >> ping? >> >> >> >> >> >> On 22 June 2013 18:46, Ben Laurie wrote: >> >> >> > $ pwd >> >> >> > /usr/ports/textproc/xml2rfc >> >> >> > $ make build-depends-list >> >> >> > /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg >> >> >> > $ make run-depends-list >> >> >> > /usr/ports/lang/tcl86 >> >> >> > /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/tk86 >> >> >> > >> >> >> > But... >> >> >> > >> >> >> > $ pkg query '%n: %do' xml2rfc >> >> >> > xml2rfc: textproc/expat2 >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11-fonts/fontconfig >> >> >> > xml2rfc: print/freetype2 >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/kbproto >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/libX11 >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/libXau >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/libXdmcp >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11-fonts/libXft >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/libXrender >> >> >> > xml2rfc: devel/libpthread-stubs >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/libxcb >> >> >> > xml2rfc: devel/pkgconf >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/renderproto >> >> >> > xml2rfc: lang/tcl-modules >> >> >> > xml2rfc: lang/tcl85 >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11-toolkits/tk85 >> >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/xproto >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > a) Why so many more dependencies, and... >> >> >> > >> >> >> > b) Why different versions of tcl/tk? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > And ... how do I fix it? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > BTW, I use portmaster to maintain my installed ports... >> >> > >> >> > That is how the ports tree works for eons, and that can't be fixed >> >> > until we can >> >> > totally get rid if pkg_install (to many corner egdes) pkg_install to >> >> > work >> >> > properly needs to track fully direct and indirect dependencies, pkg >> >> > does not, >> >> > but because the ports tree still need to be compatible with pkg_install >> >> > and >> >> > lots of people are still using all habits from the pkg_install time, it >> >> > is very >> >> > hard to remove this right now.) >> >> > >> >> > But yes for sure this "feature" will get removed :)) >> >> >> >> So are you saying that pkg includes indirect dependencies, while ports do >> >> not? >> >> >> > Yes >> >> But that doesn't explain why pkg says tcl85 and ports says tcl86 >> > >> > That is probably a bug of run-depends not discovering you have tcl85 >> > installed >> > so getting to the default tcl for its dependency which is tcl86. >> >> I actually have both installed, so I think the bug is in pkg. I'd like >> to remove ports I don't need but pkg won't let me remove tcl85, which >> I think I don't really need... > > I think is it a bug in portmaster and/or not having fully follow 20130206 of > UPDATING. > > pkg only registers dependencies it is being told to register by the ports > tree/portmaster. >> >> How can I force pkg to rebuild its dependencies? Is it even possible? > > portmaster -af should do it probably (I'm not a portmaster user) I just did a portmaster -a, that's how I got into this situation... What port management tool _does_ work with pkg? >> Is there any way for pkg to check the integrity of its database? >> > > pkg check -d will do, but imho will find nothing. # pkg check -d x11-toolkits/py-wxPython28-common has a missing dependency: lang/tcl-modules x11-toolkits/py-wxPython28-unicode has a missing dependency: lang/tcl-modules textproc/xml2rfc has a missing dependency: lang/tcl-modules ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: pkgng seems to be out of date?
On 25 June 2013 11:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:36:07AM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: >> On 25 June 2013 11:31, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:36:14AM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: >> >> ping? >> >> >> >> On 22 June 2013 18:46, Ben Laurie wrote: >> >> > $ pwd >> >> > /usr/ports/textproc/xml2rfc >> >> > $ make build-depends-list >> >> > /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg >> >> > $ make run-depends-list >> >> > /usr/ports/lang/tcl86 >> >> > /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/tk86 >> >> > >> >> > But... >> >> > >> >> > $ pkg query '%n: %do' xml2rfc >> >> > xml2rfc: textproc/expat2 >> >> > xml2rfc: x11-fonts/fontconfig >> >> > xml2rfc: print/freetype2 >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/kbproto >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/libX11 >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/libXau >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/libXdmcp >> >> > xml2rfc: x11-fonts/libXft >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/libXrender >> >> > xml2rfc: devel/libpthread-stubs >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/libxcb >> >> > xml2rfc: devel/pkgconf >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/renderproto >> >> > xml2rfc: lang/tcl-modules >> >> > xml2rfc: lang/tcl85 >> >> > xml2rfc: x11-toolkits/tk85 >> >> > xml2rfc: x11/xproto >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > a) Why so many more dependencies, and... >> >> > >> >> > b) Why different versions of tcl/tk? >> >> > >> >> > And ... how do I fix it? >> >> > >> >> > BTW, I use portmaster to maintain my installed ports... >> > >> > That is how the ports tree works for eons, and that can't be fixed until >> > we can >> > totally get rid if pkg_install (to many corner egdes) pkg_install to work >> > properly needs to track fully direct and indirect dependencies, pkg does >> > not, >> > but because the ports tree still need to be compatible with pkg_install and >> > lots of people are still using all habits from the pkg_install time, it is >> > very >> > hard to remove this right now.) >> > >> > But yes for sure this "feature" will get removed :)) >> >> So are you saying that pkg includes indirect dependencies, while ports do >> not? >> > Yes >> But that doesn't explain why pkg says tcl85 and ports says tcl86 > > That is probably a bug of run-depends not discovering you have tcl85 installed > so getting to the default tcl for its dependency which is tcl86. I actually have both installed, so I think the bug is in pkg. I'd like to remove ports I don't need but pkg won't let me remove tcl85, which I think I don't really need... How can I force pkg to rebuild its dependencies? Is it even possible? Is there any way for pkg to check the integrity of its database? > > I'll try to figure out that bug. > > regards, > Bapt ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: pkgng seems to be out of date?
On 25 June 2013 11:31, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:36:14AM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote: >> ping? >> >> On 22 June 2013 18:46, Ben Laurie wrote: >> > $ pwd >> > /usr/ports/textproc/xml2rfc >> > $ make build-depends-list >> > /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg >> > $ make run-depends-list >> > /usr/ports/lang/tcl86 >> > /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/tk86 >> > >> > But... >> > >> > $ pkg query '%n: %do' xml2rfc >> > xml2rfc: textproc/expat2 >> > xml2rfc: x11-fonts/fontconfig >> > xml2rfc: print/freetype2 >> > xml2rfc: x11/kbproto >> > xml2rfc: x11/libX11 >> > xml2rfc: x11/libXau >> > xml2rfc: x11/libXdmcp >> > xml2rfc: x11-fonts/libXft >> > xml2rfc: x11/libXrender >> > xml2rfc: devel/libpthread-stubs >> > xml2rfc: x11/libxcb >> > xml2rfc: devel/pkgconf >> > xml2rfc: x11/renderproto >> > xml2rfc: lang/tcl-modules >> > xml2rfc: lang/tcl85 >> > xml2rfc: x11-toolkits/tk85 >> > xml2rfc: x11/xproto >> > >> > >> > a) Why so many more dependencies, and... >> > >> > b) Why different versions of tcl/tk? >> > >> > And ... how do I fix it? >> > >> > BTW, I use portmaster to maintain my installed ports... > > That is how the ports tree works for eons, and that can't be fixed until we > can > totally get rid if pkg_install (to many corner egdes) pkg_install to work > properly needs to track fully direct and indirect dependencies, pkg does not, > but because the ports tree still need to be compatible with pkg_install and > lots of people are still using all habits from the pkg_install time, it is > very > hard to remove this right now.) > > But yes for sure this "feature" will get removed :)) So are you saying that pkg includes indirect dependencies, while ports do not? But that doesn't explain why pkg says tcl85 and ports says tcl86 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Log rotation kills squeezeboxserver CLI
I haven't figured out why, unfortunately, but if you use SBS' CLI interface, it stops responding when the log gets rotated by newsyslog. Removing it from newsyslog.conf fixes the problem (obviously at the cost of no log rotation :-). It also logs a _lot_ of crap, btw. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: pkgng seems to be out of date?
ping? On 22 June 2013 18:46, Ben Laurie wrote: > $ pwd > /usr/ports/textproc/xml2rfc > $ make build-depends-list > /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg > $ make run-depends-list > /usr/ports/lang/tcl86 > /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/tk86 > > But... > > $ pkg query '%n: %do' xml2rfc > xml2rfc: textproc/expat2 > xml2rfc: x11-fonts/fontconfig > xml2rfc: print/freetype2 > xml2rfc: x11/kbproto > xml2rfc: x11/libX11 > xml2rfc: x11/libXau > xml2rfc: x11/libXdmcp > xml2rfc: x11-fonts/libXft > xml2rfc: x11/libXrender > xml2rfc: devel/libpthread-stubs > xml2rfc: x11/libxcb > xml2rfc: devel/pkgconf > xml2rfc: x11/renderproto > xml2rfc: lang/tcl-modules > xml2rfc: lang/tcl85 > xml2rfc: x11-toolkits/tk85 > xml2rfc: x11/xproto > > > a) Why so many more dependencies, and... > > b) Why different versions of tcl/tk? > > And ... how do I fix it? > > BTW, I use portmaster to maintain my installed ports... ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
pkgng seems to be out of date?
$ pwd /usr/ports/textproc/xml2rfc $ make build-depends-list /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg $ make run-depends-list /usr/ports/lang/tcl86 /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/tk86 But... $ pkg query '%n: %do' xml2rfc xml2rfc: textproc/expat2 xml2rfc: x11-fonts/fontconfig xml2rfc: print/freetype2 xml2rfc: x11/kbproto xml2rfc: x11/libX11 xml2rfc: x11/libXau xml2rfc: x11/libXdmcp xml2rfc: x11-fonts/libXft xml2rfc: x11/libXrender xml2rfc: devel/libpthread-stubs xml2rfc: x11/libxcb xml2rfc: devel/pkgconf xml2rfc: x11/renderproto xml2rfc: lang/tcl-modules xml2rfc: lang/tcl85 xml2rfc: x11-toolkits/tk85 xml2rfc: x11/xproto a) Why so many more dependencies, and... b) Why different versions of tcl/tk? And ... how do I fix it? BTW, I use portmaster to maintain my installed ports... ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: texinfo vs. emacs...
On 21 June 2013 20:38, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 21/06/2013 17:32, Ben Laurie wrote:
>> On 21 June 2013 15:55, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>>> On 21/06/2013 14:34, Ben Laurie wrote:
>>>> Installing texinfo-5.1.20130419_1...pkg-static: texinfo-5.1.20130419_1
>>>> conflicts with emacs-24.3,3 (installs files into the same place).
>>>> Problematic file: /usr/local/info/info.info.gz
>>>>
>>>> There doesn't seem to be any clean way to fix this ... hints?
>>>
>>> Add
>>>
>>> PERMISSIVE : yes
>>>
>>> to ${LOCALBASE}/etc/pkg.conf
>>>
>>> It's not really clean in that it just allows packages to stomp over each
>>> other's files, but it lets you get the job done.
>>>
>>> The conflict you're seeing is a bug somewhere between those two
>>> packages. One or other of them should probably be patched to rename the
>>> offending file. Please raise a PR so that at least gets onto the radar
>>> of the package maintainers.
>>
>> Will do - where's the RT?
>
> It's Gnats I'm afraid: http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html or send-pr(1).
>
>> Also, is there an env flag that does the same thing?
>
> As bapt said, PERMISSIVE=yes in the environment will have the required
> effect.
>
> However, did you know that info(1) is in the base system? If all you
> want to do it read info pages, there's no actual need to install texinfo
> from ports.
texinfo is getting installed as a dependency for octave
>
> Cheers,
>
> Matthew
>
> --
> Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
> PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey
>
>
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: texinfo vs. emacs...
On 21 June 2013 15:55, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 21/06/2013 14:34, Ben Laurie wrote:
>> Installing texinfo-5.1.20130419_1...pkg-static: texinfo-5.1.20130419_1
>> conflicts with emacs-24.3,3 (installs files into the same place).
>> Problematic file: /usr/local/info/info.info.gz
>>
>> There doesn't seem to be any clean way to fix this ... hints?
>
> Add
>
> PERMISSIVE : yes
>
> to ${LOCALBASE}/etc/pkg.conf
>
> It's not really clean in that it just allows packages to stomp over each
> other's files, but it lets you get the job done.
>
> The conflict you're seeing is a bug somewhere between those two
> packages. One or other of them should probably be patched to rename the
> offending file. Please raise a PR so that at least gets onto the radar
> of the package maintainers.
Will do - where's the RT?
Also, is there an env flag that does the same thing?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Matthew
>
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
texinfo vs. emacs...
Installing texinfo-5.1.20130419_1...pkg-static: texinfo-5.1.20130419_1 conflicts with emacs-24.3,3 (installs files into the same place). Problematic file: /usr/local/info/info.info.gz There doesn't seem to be any clean way to fix this ... hints? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
make {run,build}-depends-list vs. pkg_info -r?
I am confused...
In audio/squeezecenter, I get:
# make {run,build}-depends-list
/usr/ports/archivers/p5-Compress-Zlib
/usr/ports/audio/faad
/usr/ports/audio/flac
/usr/ports/audio/mac
/usr/ports/audio/sox
/usr/ports/converters/p5-Encode-Detect
/usr/ports/converters/p5-JSON-XS
/usr/ports/databases/mysql50-client
/usr/ports/databases/mysql50-server
/usr/ports/databases/p5-DBD-mysql
/usr/ports/devel/p5-Time-HiRes
/usr/ports/graphics/p5-GD
/usr/ports/lang/perl5.8
/usr/ports/net/mDNSResponder
/usr/ports/security/p5-Digest-SHA1
/usr/ports/textproc/p5-XML-Parser
/usr/ports/textproc/p5-YAML-Syck
/usr/ports/www/p5-HTML-Parser
/usr/ports/www/p5-Template-Toolkit
/usr/ports/databases/mysql50-client
/usr/ports/lang/perl5.8
/usr/ports/sysutils/p5-File-Which
but:
# pkg_info -r squeezecenter-7.3.3
Information for squeezecenter-7.3.3:
Depends on:
Dependency: expat-2.0.1_2
Dependency: openssl-1.0.1_2
Dependency: mDNSResponder-333.10
Dependency: mp4v2-1.9.1
Dependency: libvpx-1.0.0
Dependency: perl-5.8.9_7
Dependency: p5-YAML-Syck-1.19
Dependency: p5-XML-Parser-2.41
Dependency: p5-HTML-Tagset-3.20
Dependency: p5-HTML-Parser-3.69
Dependency: p5-Digest-SHA1-2.13
Dependency: png-1.5.10
Dependency: jpeg-8_3
Dependency: gpac-libgpac-0.4.5_6,1
Dependency: x264-0.123.2189_2
Dependency: pkg-config-0.25_1
Dependency: opencv-core-2.3.1_4
Dependency: freetype2-2.4.9_1
Dependency: gd-2.0.35_8,1
Dependency: p5-GD-2.46_1
Dependency: p5-common-sense-3.4
Dependency: p5-Time-HiRes-1.9725,1
Dependency: p5-AppConfig-1.66
Dependency: p5-Template-Toolkit-2.24
Dependency: orc-0.4.16
Dependency: schroedinger-1.0.11
Dependency: libltdl-2.4.2
Dependency: p5-DBI-1.621
Dependency: mysql-client-5.0.95
Dependency: p5-DBD-mysql-4.021
Dependency: mysql-server-5.0.95
Dependency: p5-JSON-XS-2.32
Dependency: p5-Encode-Detect-1.01
Dependency: libiconv-1.14
Dependency: mac-3.99.4.5_1
Dependency: libogg-1.2.2,4
Dependency: libvorbis-1.3.3,3
Dependency: libtheora-1.1.1_2
Dependency: libmad-0.15.1b_2
Dependency: libid3tag-0.15.1b
Dependency: libao-1.1.0_1
Dependency: lame-3.99.5
Dependency: gsm-1.0.13
Dependency: flac-1.2.1_2
Dependency: libsndfile-1.0.25_1
Dependency: faad2-2.7_3,1
Dependency: faac-1.28_2
Dependency: ffmpeg-0.7.12_2,1
Dependency: sox-14.3.2_4
Dependency: p5-IO-Compress-Base-2.015
Dependency: p5-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.054
Dependency: p5-IO-Compress-Zlib-2.015_1
Dependency: p5-Compress-Zlib-2.015
Why are the dependencies so different? e.g. the p5*Compress* ones...
What's going on?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
www/py-nevow doesn't build
[EMAIL PROTECTED] py-nevow# make install ===> py25-nevow-0.9.18_1 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/twisted/web/__init__.py - found ===> py25-nevow-0.9.18_1 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/docutils/__init__.py - found ===> py25-nevow-0.9.18_1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.5 - found ===> py25-nevow-0.9.18_1 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/twisted/__init__.py - found ===> py25-nevow-0.9.18_1 depends on shared library: intl - found ===> Configuring for py25-nevow-0.9.18_1 Traceback (most recent call last): File "setup.py", line 8, in import setupcommon File "/disk1.1/usr/ports/www/py-nevow/work/Nevow-0.9.18/setupcommon.py", line 2, in from nevow import __version__ as version File "/disk1.1/usr/ports/www/py-nevow/work/Nevow-0.9.18/nevow/__init__.py", line 5, in from nevow._version import version File "/disk1.1/usr/ports/www/py-nevow/work/Nevow-0.9.18/nevow/_version.py", line 2, in from twisted.python import versions ImportError: cannot import name versions *** Error code 1 Seems this is a deficiency in twisted rather than in py-nevow. Ports were last updated March 14th (in order to try to fix this problem, which it didn't). -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.links.org/ "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
