Re: Getting the same problem nss problem with evolution

2007-12-24 Thread Mike Bowie 

Scott T. Hildreth wrote:

===  Extracting for evolution-2.12.2
= MD5 Checksum OK for gnome2/evolution-2.12.2.tar.bz2.
= SHA256 Checksum OK for gnome2/evolution-2.12.2.tar.bz2.
===  Patching for evolution-2.12.2
===  Applying FreeBSD patches for evolution-2.12.2
===   evolution-2.12.2 depends on executable: gmake - found
===   evolution-2.12.2 depends on executable: bison - found
===   evolution-2.12.2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/intltool-extract - found
===   evolution-2.12.2 depends on file: 
/usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/gnome-mime-data-2.0.pc - found
===   evolution-2.12.2 depends on executable: pkg-config - found
===   evolution-2.12.2 depends on executable: update-desktop-database - found
===   evolution-2.12.2 depends on file: 
/usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/gnome-doc-utils.pc - found
===   evolution-2.12.2 depends on file: /usr/local/libdata/xorg/libraries - 
found
===   evolution-2.12.2 depends on shared library: nss3.1 - not found
===Verifying install for nss3.1 in /usr/ports/security/nss
===   Returning to build of evolution-2.12.2
Error: shared library nss3.1 does not exist
*** Error code 1

I am have this error installing firefox 2.0.0.11 as well, what am I missing 
here?


Thanks,
Scott.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  

Scott,

I'd try:
cd /usr/ports/security/nss  make deinstall clean reinstall

The nss3.1 can't be found, but the packages database seems to think it's 
still there, so doesn't install the port.


HTH,

Mike.

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: xmule port

2007-12-12 Thread Mike Bowie 

Gonzalo Martinez - Sanjuan Sanchez wrote:

Hi!

I have noticed that xMule has been removed from our ports tree.
Could someone say me why? I uses xmule and worked for me, but now i cant 
install it from ports.


Thank you.

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/net-p2p/xmule/Attic/

Suggests that it's no longer in active development.

HTH,

Mike.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: www/mod_python support in apache22?

2007-12-10 Thread Mike Bowie 

Chris Haulmark wrote:

Hello,

 


I am trying to get devel/subversion and www/trac working on my FreeBSD
6.x system.

 


I ran into problems related to viewing the trac's website.  I am using
lang/mod_python as part of the

requirement along with www/apache22.

 


After I googled, I found off the FreeBSD mailing list that mod_python is
not supported for apache22

and that it is shown on the mod_python's home page.

 


I do not see it anywhere.

 


This post was posted in 2005 and here is the link:

 


http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2006-March/030408.html

 


The description is not clear to me on the mod_python's website.  The
description is:



Apache 2.0.54 or later. Apache versions 2.0.47 to 2.0.53 may work but
have not been tested with

this release. (For Apache 1.3.x, use mod_python version 2.7.x).

 


I am asking that if it has changed and that mod_python is supported to
be used with apache22?

 


Chris Haulmark

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  

Chris,

I believe you will find that www/mod_python3 works very groovily with 
Apache 2.2.


I'm pretty sure I've used it with trac in the past.

Cheers,

Mike.

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Firefox 2.0.0.9 issues on 7.0-BETA3

2007-11-28 Thread Mike Bowie 

Doug Poland wrote:

On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:29:38PM -0600, Doug Poland wrote:
  

Hello,

I have a freshly installed 7.0-BETA3 i386 system and am having issues
with firefox 2.0.0.9.

Upon launching /usr/local/bin/firefox from a command line I am
immediately returned a cursor with an error code of 1.

% /usr/local/bin/firefox
% echo $?
1

I debugged both /usr/local/bin/firefox and
/usr/local/lib/firefox/run-mozilla.sh until I found the debugger
option, which I tried:

/usr/local/lib/firefox/run-mozilla.sh -g
/usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox-bin -d gdb

# /usr/local/lib/firefox/run-mozilla.sh -g \
  /usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox-bin -d gdb

MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/usr/local/lib/firefox
  
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox:/usr/local/lib/firefox/plugins:/usr/local/lib/browser_plugins:/usr/local/lib/browser_linux_plugins:/usr/local/lib/firefox
DISPLAY=:0.0
DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox:/usr/local/lib/firefox
 
LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox:/usr/local/lib/firefox/components:/usr/local/lib/firefox
   SHLIB_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox:/usr/local/lib/firefox
  LIBPATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox:/usr/local/lib/firefox
   ADDON_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox
  MOZ_PROGRAM=/usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox-bin
  MOZ_TOOLKIT=
moz_debug=1
 moz_debugger=
/usr/bin/gdb /usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox-bin -x /tmp/mozargs.VoVJBX
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and
you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under
certain conditions.
Type show copying to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type show warranty for
details.
This GDB was configured as i386-marcel-freebsd...(no debugging
symbols found)...
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox-bin -d gdb
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[New LWP
100191]
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[New Thread
0x29a01100 (LWP 100191)]
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no
debugging symbols found)...[New LWP 100191]

Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap.
[Switching to LWP 100191]
Cannot remove breakpoints because program is no longer writable.
It might be running in another process.
Further execution is probably impossible.
0x2805c3e0 in ?? () from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1

I did some googling but nothing interesting turned up.  I find it
curious that the latest build of Thunderbird works, but linux-firefox
fails like it's native sibling.

All help is appreciated...



Thought I'd try installing firefox 2.0.0.10,1 on the whim that it may
fix my problem.  No joy.

BTW, how do I get debugging symbols for firefox so that I may further
debug this?


  

Doug,

I had a 7.0-BETA2 system on a laptop for a few days and recall having a 
similar sounding problem with both firefox and firefox-devel.  IIRC, it 
turned out to be a dependency which was somehow missed in my rather 
minimal installation.  It was a few weeks back and my brain is a bit 
full, but you might see if something is lacking in the results of a ldd 
/usr/local/lib/firefox/firefox-bin.


Cheers,

Mike.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

php-magickwand broken with ImageMagick 6.3.5.10

2007-10-16 Thread Mike Bowie 

Good day all,

Per the subject, the build runs fine, but the magickwand extension no 
longer returns images and fails silently. wink


http://www.magickwand.org/ states:
** REQUIRED **  ImageMagick version :: 6.3.5-9
Last-known-good ImageMagick version :: 6.3.5-9

I upgraded ImageMagick due to the vulnerabilities listed in the 
portaudit database and after a handful of rebuilds, found that 
back-dating my ports tree to the previous version resolved the issue.


Perhaps someone could pop a version requirement / warning in the 
Makefile until such a time as support for 6.3.5.10 is included.


Much appreciated!

Cheers,

Mike.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]