Re: Obsoleted zope ports deprecation

2011-12-05 Thread NAKAJI Hiroyuki

Feel free to remove www/zope210.

Thanks!

(11/12/04 20:52), Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:

Good day.

I wrote to you because you are maintainers of zope ports, listed here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~rm/zope-ports-for-deprecation.html

I'm asking for your approval for this ports deprecation and removing in
one month. Deprecation reasons for each port also listed on link above.

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD Port: plone3-3.1.7_2

2010-11-10 Thread NAKAJI Hiroyuki
Plone has its own unified installer after 3.2, and it is too much
difficult for me to make an update. Finally, I gave up to update
www/plone3 last year.

http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/136779

If someone has a solution, please go ahead and become a new maintainer.

I filed a PR to mark it as BROKEN.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=152093

 In aanlktin1gojlj7hpvvhpo_avdkr8alukacj46byzp...@mail.gmail.com 
   wen heping wenhep...@gmail.com wrote:

 Yes, Plone should be update to 4, would you file a PR to fix it ?

 wen

 2010/11/10 joeb j...@a1poweruser.com:
  This port is broken and way out of date.
  It can not find the Plone-3.1.7.tar.gz file to download.
  Plone 4 is the current version.
-- 
NAKAJI Hiroyuki
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: FreeBSD Port: plone3-3.1.7_2

2010-11-10 Thread NAKAJI Hiroyuki
 In aanlkti=p2vmk-m-puwymaa+1odwkamqhriq5nn8d_...@mail.gmail.com 
   wen heping wenhep...@gmail.com wrote:

  I filed a PR to mark it as BROKEN.
  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=152093

 After add this line to the Makefile:
FETCH_CMD=
 the distfile could be fetch again,
 would you have a test and agree to close that PR if it is OK ?

You mean FETCH_ARGS=? If so, it's ok. Thanks.
-- 
NAKAJI Hiroyuki
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Amavis::SpamControl-new not found

2009-05-30 Thread NAKAJI Hiroyuki
I had same trouble. And I found a solution/workaround.

According to
http://marc.info/?l=amavis-userm=124299851715437w=2

o no need to set @bypass_spam_check_maps, just comment out
o set @spam_scanners properly, for example @spam_scanners='undef' if you
  do not want amavisd-new to check spam

The RELEASE_NOTES of amavisd-new also mentions about @spam_scanners.

Some workaround patches are available like Debian's package, but I
think this is better.

Thanks.

 In 20090515125835.gc39...@parmesan.sis.pasteur.fr 
   hum...@pasteur.fr (Thomas Hummel) wrote:

 Conclusion : 
 

 it seems to me that :

   . amavisd miss somewhere the import of the Amavis::SpamControl package (I
 don't see such import anywhere)

   . @bypass_spam_checks_maps  = (1); doesn't bypass everything since 

  $spamcontrol_obj = Amavis::SpamControl-new  if $extra_code_antispam;

is still executed.

   .  $sa_mail_body_size_limit = 1; isn't enough to fully bypass spam engine 
 since some
  messages where marked UBE.

 Thanks
-- 
NAKAJI Hiroyuki
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


maintainership request for japanese/zope-ejsplitter and japanese/zope-jamailhost

2009-02-22 Thread NAKAJI Hiroyuki

Submitter-Id:  current-users
Originator:NAKAJI Hiroyuki
Organization:  
Confidential:  no 
Synopsis:   maintainership request for japanese/zope-ejsplitter and 
japanese/zope-jamailhost
Severity:   non-critical
Priority:   medium
Category:   ports
Class:  change-request
Release:   FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT pc98
Environment:
System: FreeBSD ra333.heimat.gr.jp 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #121: Sat 
Nov 8 16:31:36 JST 2008 r...@ra333.heimat.gr.jp:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/RA333 pc98


Description:
I'd like to be a maintainer of japanese/zope-ejsplitter and
japanese/zope-jamailhost.

How-To-Repeat:

Fix:

Index: zope-ejsplitter/Makefile
===
RCS file: /net/www/home/ncvs/ports/japanese/zope-ejsplitter/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.6 Makefile
--- zope-ejsplitter/Makefile1 Sep 2008 01:51:42 -   1.6
+++ zope-ejsplitter/Makefile22 Feb 2009 14:57:05 -
@@ -7,17 +7,19 @@
 
 PORTNAME=  ejSplitter
 PORTVERSION=   0.5.1
+PORTREVISION=  1
 CATEGORIES=japanese www zope
 MASTER_SITES=  http://www005.upp.so-net.ne.jp/nakagami/Download/
 
-MAINTAINER=po...@freebsd.org
+MAINTAINER=nak...@jp.freebsd.org
 COMMENT=   A Japanese word splitter for searching text in Zope Products
 
 BUILD_DEPENDS= 
${PYTHON_SITELIBDIR}/japanese.pth:${PORTSDIR}/japanese/pycodec-zope
 RUN_DEPENDS=   
${PYTHON_SITELIBDIR}/japanese.pth:${PORTSDIR}/japanese/pycodec-zope
 
-USE_PYTHON=yes
+USE_PYTHON=2.4
 USE_ZOPE=  yes
+ZOPE_VERSION=  2.10
 DIST_SUBDIR=   zope
 
 ZOPEPRODUCTNAME=   ${PORTNAME}
@@ -41,7 +43,8 @@
done; \
for d in `${FIND} -d ${ZOPEPRODUCTNAME} -type d`; do \
${ECHO_CMD} @dirrm %%ZOPEPRODUCTDIR%%/$${d}  ${PLIST}; \
-   done; \
+   done
+   @${ECHO_CMD} @dirrmtry %%ZOPEPRODUCTDIR%% ${PLIST}
 
 do-install:
@${MKDIR} ${ZOPEBASEDIR}/${ZOPEPRODUCTDIR}/
Index: zope-jamailhost/Makefile
===
RCS file: /net/www/home/ncvs/ports/japanese/zope-jamailhost/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.7 Makefile
--- zope-jamailhost/Makefile1 Sep 2008 01:51:42 -   1.7
+++ zope-jamailhost/Makefile22 Feb 2009 13:55:06 -
@@ -7,18 +7,20 @@
 
 PORTNAME=  jaMailHost
 PORTVERSION=   0.4.4
+PORTREVISION=  1
 CATEGORIES=japanese www zope
 MASTER_SITES=  http://www005.upp.so-net.ne.jp/nakagami/Download/
 EXTRACT_SUFX=  .tgz
 
-MAINTAINER=po...@freebsd.org
+MAINTAINER=nak...@jp.freebsd.org
 COMMENT=   A Zope hotfix Product to send mail in Japanese
 
 BUILD_DEPENDS= 
${PYTHON_SITELIBDIR}/japanese.pth:${PORTSDIR}/japanese/pycodec-zope
 RUN_DEPENDS=   
${PYTHON_SITELIBDIR}/japanese.pth:${PORTSDIR}/japanese/pycodec-zope
 
-USE_PYTHON?=2.4
+USE_PYTHON=2.4
 USE_ZOPE=  yes
+ZOPE_VERSION=  2.10
 DIST_SUBDIR=   zope
 
 ZOPEPRODUCTNAME=${PORTNAME}
Index: zope-jamailhost/pkg-plist
===
RCS file: /net/www/home/ncvs/ports/japanese/zope-jamailhost/pkg-plist,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -r1.1 pkg-plist
--- zope-jamailhost/pkg-plist   31 Oct 2006 10:55:17 -  1.1
+++ zope-jamailhost/pkg-plist   22 Feb 2009 14:54:08 -
@@ -3,3 +3,4 @@
 %%ZOPEPRODUCTDIR%%/jaMailHost/__init__.pyc
 %%ZOPEPRODUCTDIR%%/jaMailHost/version.txt
 @dirrm %%ZOPEPRODUCTDIR%%/jaMailHost
+...@dirrmtry %%ZOPEPRODUCTDIR%%



___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel

2008-01-30 Thread NAKAJI Hiroyuki
Hi,

I have another error with portupgrade-devel-2.4.1.

# portupgrade -a
...
** Port directory not found: japanese/dpkey7
/usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:1357:in `get_pkgname': port directory error 
(PortDirError)
from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:623:in `main'
from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:618:in `each'
from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:618:in `main'
from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:582:in `catch'
from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:582:in `main'
from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:1303:in `call'
from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:1303:in `parse_in_order'
from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:1299:in `catch'
 ... 6 levels...
from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:785:in `initialize'
from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:228:in `new'
from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:228:in `main'
from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:2110

Dpkey7 is a third-party product and I add it in HOLD_PKGS list. But now
HOLD_PKGS has no effect.

Regards,

 In [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Mark Nowiasz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 when using portupgrade-devel, I'm getting the following errors:

 ---  Session ended at: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:58:52 +0100 (consumed 00:02:01)
 /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgversion.rb:41:in `initialize': : Not in 
 due form: 'version[_revision][,epoch]'. (ArgumentError)
 from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:630:in `new'
 from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:630:in `main'
 from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:618:in `each'
 from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:618:in `main'
 from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:582:in `catch'
 from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:582:in `main'
 from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:1303:in `call'
 from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:1303:in `parse_in_order'
  ... 7 levels...
 from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:785:in `initialize'
 from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:228:in `new'
 from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:228:in `main'
 from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:2110

 portupgrade --version
 portupgrade 2.4.1

 Regards,
 Mark
-- 
NAKAJI Hiroyuki
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: anyone working on an update of www/plone to 3.0.1?

2007-10-24 Thread NAKAJI Hiroyuki
Hi,

In short answer: new port www/plone3 is available about Plone 3.0.2. I'm
a maintainer of www/plone3.

I've just received Committed mail about www/plone3 to 3.0.2.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/116148
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/117153

I made www/plone3 because it depends zope210 and it seems hard to upgrade
from zope 2.9 + plone 2.5 to zope 2.10 + plone 3.x. And, some zope/plone
products depend on plone 2.x and they may not work on plone 3.x, for
example, coreblog2. I'm not sure which products work or not work on plone3.

 In [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Palle Girgensohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

 www/plone needs updating. Is anyone working on it already? If not, I will.

 Since plone has a rather akward dependency chain, I'm looking at using
 the unified installer for installing plone, and hence use that for a
 port. Anyone else doing any work already?

 Zope, and hence Plone, is very picky about versions of python etc. The
 unified installer installs its own python 2.4.4 for example, which
 saves the admin a lot of trouble. It is not the way we do things with
 ports, I know, but plone is too picky, and it is tedious to require
 old versions of python *just* for this port.

 So, in short, anyone doing any work on this, or shall I?

 /Palle


 [1]
 http://plone.org/documentation/tutorial/installing-plone-3-with-the-unified-installer/


-- 
NAKAJI Hiroyuki
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]