Broken Ports Tree Neochat/kquickimageeditor r560251
Hello Adriaan , https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=560251 Seems to cause poudriere to puke due to a missing line in graphics/Makefile for new port dependency you added. You might have already seen/been alerted of this/fixed it. But either way below is the patch I did to fix the build in my local tree. diff --git a/graphics/Makefile b/graphics/Makefile index 1d11f34cdaeb..cc9b17f15ee2 100644 --- a/graphics/Makefile +++ b/graphics/Makefile @@ -409,6 +409,7 @@ SUBDIR += kooka SUBDIR += kphotoalbum SUBDIR += kqtquickcharts +SUBDIR += kquickimageeditor SUBDIR += krita SUBDIR += ksnip SUBDIR += kxstitch ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Linux-steam-utils
Hi All, Alex S has done a lot of hard work on a steam port and many other things on freebsd in this area. Can we get some eyeballs on his steam port. Much Appreciated. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244207 Hope you don't mind this email alex just saw lack of response for some really fantastic work. Also of interest NVshim: Shim to use vulkan with freebsd because nvidia doesn't build certain libraries with there drivers. https://github.com/shkhln/nvshim linuxlator-steam-utils: The repo that the above port pulls from https://github.com/shkhln/linuxulator-steam-utils ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: PKGSUFFIX for poudriere Help needed
Thanks that gives me a real good starting point. On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 8:02 AM Mathieu Arnold wrote: > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 12:37:55PM -0500, Nick Wolff wrote: > > I'm trying to get zstd packages built locally with poudriere but > something > > is failing. I've set PKGSUFFIX=.tzst in my make.conf for the branch and > it > > shows up in poudriere logs > > ( /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/ixlab-master-make.conf ) > > > > But I'm still getting txz packages. > > I've successfully used PKG_NOCOMPRESS in make.conf. and not sure what I'm > > doing wrong here. > > PKG_NOCOMPRESS is the knob used to swtich from .txz to .tar, so that it > is not compressed. > > If you want to change the compression, you probably have to do this, in > make.conf: > > PKG_SUFX= .tzst > > in poudriere.conf: > > PKG_REPO_META_FILE=/usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/meta > > And create that file with this content: > > version = 1; > packing_format = "tzst"; > > You may have to fiddle with the packing_format, I don't know what the > exact string is. > > -- > Mathieu Arnold > ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
PKGSUFFIX for poudriere Help needed
I'm trying to get zstd packages built locally with poudriere but something is failing. I've set PKGSUFFIX=.tzst in my make.conf for the branch and it shows up in poudriere logs ( /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/ixlab-master-make.conf ) But I'm still getting txz packages. I've successfully used PKG_NOCOMPRESS in make.conf. and not sure what I'm doing wrong here. Thanks, Nick Wolff ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Re: exFAT is no longer encumbered
Sounds like something the foundation might be able to help with. On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 6:41 AM Carmel NY wrote: > On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:51:41 -0700, Adam Weinberger stated: > >On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 6:38 PM Kevin P. Neal > >wrote: > >> > >> On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 01:01:52AM -0600, Greg Rivers wrote: > >> > As of last August, Microsoft have relaxed the patent restrictions > >> > on exFAT[1]. > >> > > >> > Can the Makefile LICENSE_PERMS_MSPAT restrictions be removed from > >> > sysutils/fusefs-exfat? Might exFAT make it into the FreeBSD base > >> > system (like msdosfs) one day? > >> > > >> > > >> > [1] > >> > < > https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/opensource/2019/08/28/exfat-linux-kernel/ > > > >> > > >> > >> I'm not sure that counts as a license. IANAL, but I'd like to see an > >> explicit granting of a license to anyone at no cost, and the license > >> needs to be transferable. > >> > >> The way Berkeley eliminated the advertising clause was good. Simply > >> saying "Microsoft is supporting the addition of" doesn't really say > >> anything. It's a statement of corporate direction and nothing else. > > > >Expanding on what Kevin said, > > > https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/legal/intellectualproperty/mtl/exfat-licensing.aspx > >suggests that (a) exFAT is still patented and restricted as before, > >and (b) GPLv2 licensing was granted only for the Linux kernel module > >that they submitted. > > > >The BSD License grants the ability to use BSD-licensed code in > >commercial products, so I'm not sure that Microsoft would want to > >relax their licensing for us. As Kevin said, IANAL. > > > ># Adam > > I imagine that someone could actually inquire. It would cost nothing > and end this FUD that is surrounding this subject. > > http://aka.ms/celaiplicensing > > -- > Carmel > ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
