Re: textproc/kibana50 and version of node.js

2017-03-30 Thread Tom Judge 

> On Mar 30, 2017, at 11:27 AM, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
> 
> Bradley T. Hughes wrote on 2017/03/30 11:10:
>> 
>>> On 30 Mar 2017, at 10:00, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>> 
>> Hi! :)
>> 
>>> we are using npm + node in version 7.8.0 and ElasticSearch in version 
>>> 5.0.2. Now we need Kibana and Kibana X-Pack but official Kibana has bundled 
>>> node v0.10 or v0.12, FreeBSD port of Kibana has dependency on node v4. It 
>>> is conflicting with already installed and used node v7.
>> 
>> This mail caught my eye. Since Node.js v0.10 and v0.12 have reached 
>> end-of-life, I wanted to see if I could find out why they were bundling such 
>> an old version. Looking at Github, it actually looks like Kibana is bundled 
>> with Node.js v6.9.5: 
>> https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/v5.3.0/package.json#L243-L246
> 
> I am sorry, it was my fault. It was information for older version of Kibana 
> (4.4.1, 4.3.2, 4.1.5)
> https://discuss.elastic.co/t/kibana-4-4-1-4-3-2-4-1-5-updated-node-js-versions-due-to-upstream-vulnerabilities/41643
> 
> I created Kibana 5.0.2 package with poudriere with modified Makefile to:
> 
> RUN_DEPENDS=  node>=0.8.0:www/node
> 
> Kibana is up and running with Node.js 7.8. I hope it will be stable :)
> 
> Miroslav Lachman


Please open a bug with this information and I will include it in the port with 
the next update to 5.3.

Tom
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [QAT] r345533: 2x leftovers, 2x success

2014-02-23 Thread Tom Judge 
There is a consistency issue here!

8.4 builds are for 5.9.0_2
9.2 builds are for 5.9.0_3 <- this is the correct one and the one that the
commit message references.

Tom


On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Ports-QAT  wrote:

> * pkg-plist cleanup
> * Create log and datadirs in rc script
> * Put logs in /var/log/activemq by default not in /var/db/activemq
> -
>
>   Build ID:  20140221200600-41384
>   Job owner: t...@freebsd.org
>   Buildtime: 34 hours
>   Enddate:   Sun, 23 Feb 2014 06:17:38 GMT
>
>   Revision:  r345533
>   Repository:
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=345533
>
> -
>
> Port:net/activemq 5.9.0_2
>
>   Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64
>   Buildstatus:   LEFTOVERS
>   Log:
> https://qat.redports.org//~t...@freebsd.org/20140221200600-41384-284124/activemq-5.9.0_2.log
>
>   Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386
>   Buildstatus:   LEFTOVERS
>   Log:
> https://qat.redports.org//~t...@freebsd.org/20140221200600-41384-284125/activemq-5.9.0_2.log
>
>   Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64
>   Buildstatus:   SUCCESS
>   Log:
> https://qat.redports.org//~t...@freebsd.org/20140221200600-41384-284126/activemq-5.9.0_3.log
>
>   Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386
>   Buildstatus:   SUCCESS
>   Log:
> https://qat.redports.org//~t...@freebsd.org/20140221200600-41384-284127/activemq-5.9.0_3.log
>
>
> --
> Buildarchive URL: <
> https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/20140221200600-41384>
> redports 
>
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: clamtk detects setuptools-0.6c11-py2.7.egg Packer.MingwGcc-2 virus

2013-05-06 Thread Tom Judge 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Rusli,

I have sent this information over to the ClamAV detection team, to
validate that the signature is correct.  Could you please send me a
copy of the file off list?


Thanks

Tom Judge
- --
Senior Research Engineer
Sourcefire Vulnerability Research Team
FreeBSD Ports Committer


On 5/4/13 7:48 AM, M Rusli wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
> I did another scan and this time I disable the PUA settings. And
> clamtk did not detect any virus.
> 
> I did double confirm with virustotal. And it did not detect
> anything.
> 
> But when I do a scan again with PUA, it detected as 
> PUA.Win32.PackerMingwGcc-2 virus.
> 
> By the way, clamav have an updated version of the virus engine to 
> version 0.97.8.
> 
> Any luck when the new update version will come in for the Freebsd
> version???
> 
> 
> On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Dave M  <mailto:dave.n...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm not sure what that file is, but you could verify with that
> package owner's upstream that it's good to go.
> 
> Keep in mind that the "threat" name is "PUA" (for potentially
> unwanted application) and seems to be warning based on the type of
> packer or compiler used.  In fact, you probably have the "Scan for
> PUAs" option checked in your ClamTk preferences, otherwise this
> would not have alerted.
> 
> Once the upstream verifies it (hopefully :), please submit the file
> to ClamAV (at clamav.net <http://clamav.net>) as a false positive, 
> assuming it is one.
> 
> Let me know if I can be of assistance.
> 
> thanks, Dave M
> 
> On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 6:04 AM, M Rusli 
>  <mailto:linuxsecuritymru...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Hi
>> 
>> I did a full scan on my computer with up-to-date virus of
>> clamtk.
>> 
>> It indicates that the 
>> /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c11-py2.7.egg
>
>> 
contains
>> PUA.Win32.PackerMingwGcc-2 virus.
>> 
>> Can you verify whether this is a PUA virus?
>> 
>> Thank you.
>> 
>> Rusli
> 
> 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRh2qyAAoJEEJSM9yB4iIWxXcIAI3ePPhwsOUur1EedxMJ51GI
k3wpqpFu063IRGvg22GOu+//jx8GOpL9oh4Cyx2F0Av1JXtN2NwAAEaEFid8gZB1
yEN8gtAz72pia/SgV+j5KDWeYWuKuhSXDlVZwYuIm9B+vy3UQ93xE1WcCkN97BtF
V8VyM8111+DL6tXTm7ik8EU5rkmJCc2vI3VjnIMWlZhJXPLPugSWBDnF9vM63gww
XDDyWYAP1bqhFnUnJXkExoBZKQJ/xP2RlInLwcytXMbAdbmAXiqPM74g2aB96685
BfQA03dv0r2idgPekff9ppVprT9/roRK6AGsGO8r0+b9aDPxfY/mfnYIXQEhd/c=
=obvO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: RFC: ports failing in jails

2012-06-13 Thread Tom Judge 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 07/06/2012 01:03, Mark Linimon wrote:

> 
> As bapt, miwi, and I have been trying to analyze the results of 
> these runs, we keep tripping over these failures.  There are too 
> many for us to tackle, so we'd like your help.
> 
> I've been trying to collect them on the following page:
> 
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsFailingInJails
> 
> Note that ATM the failures are a moving target, so some of these 
> failures may have already been fixed.  If that is the case, please
>  make a note of them in the "already fixed" section, so that when 
> reviewing errorlogs we will know to skip over those.
> 
The devel/svnmerge failure seems to be an FP related to bad resolver
configuration.

Tom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP2NUsAAoJEEJSM9yB4iIWrosH/iQ67AIe4QzGNsz6UvBGegDx
fikKflhghLpAQUdo3EMOBwRGzlmwQiAfFI1nIA/WjTAkf7RIBCo0fNYBElwVC8WE
eKcLQlPMsyw9wRKAStXissZ5VK2MJxU8WXKch3pdRRlRrt9dkcdndrqSZVERtglj
8pO51aOvjBkvAPIfGLSQJcDF84E6VqVBlN/oOvsDbXrV1ooeVazJEZoINX+EAO+A
kEj0G+OOUgzWue1Lj3D920w78VI+VNgPEPCG/ryTB+6vdastM6uPRmTyxXQcOv8W
EZ2FqUWxtVRjQP6V8siZSR+wDK5S+IQj8fTn2KEk6ReqaVjLV7ynI0ETQJgV6SQ=
=i1xw
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: FreeBSD Port: isc-dhcp41-server-4.1.2,1; Concurrent IPv4 DHCP and DHCPv6

2011-01-07 Thread Tom Judge 
Sorry for replying to my own message and top posing.

I wanted to note that this is relation to general /profile/ type rc
scripts and really has no relation to how the dhcpd one should be changed.


On 01/07/2011 02:46 PM, Tom Judge wrote:
> On 01/07/2011 02:04 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 01/07/2011 11:57, Olli Hauer wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe something like the apache22 rc script will work.
>>>
>>> Apache22 can start more than one instance and it is easy to control
>>> all or only a single instance with the apache rc script.
>>>
>>> And the best, it works without links
>>
>> With respect to those involved, the apache scripts are a good example of
>> what I don't want more examples of.
>>
>>
> 
> Hi Doug,
> 
> I think (imho) the apache style scripts are better than the one in
> openvpn for example.
> 
> The main reason for this is that they are more along the lines of how
> other platforms have implemented this feature.  Ubuntu/debian uses an
> init.d script with the same semantics as the apache script except its
> definition of a profile is a file with a .conf extension in /etc/openvpn/.
> 
> Maybe we need a more generic way of doing this rather than each port
> providing their own implementation?
> 
> Tom
> 
> This is my slightly biased opinion as I am the author of one such script
> in the tree.
> 
> 


-- 
TJU13-ARIN
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: FreeBSD Port: isc-dhcp41-server-4.1.2,1; Concurrent IPv4 DHCP and DHCPv6

2011-01-07 Thread Tom Judge 
On 01/07/2011 02:04 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 01/07/2011 11:57, Olli Hauer wrote:
> 
>> Maybe something like the apache22 rc script will work.
>>
>> Apache22 can start more than one instance and it is easy to control
>> all or only a single instance with the apache rc script.
>>
>> And the best, it works without links
> 
> With respect to those involved, the apache scripts are a good example of
> what I don't want more examples of.
> 
> 

Hi Doug,

I think (imho) the apache style scripts are better than the one in
openvpn for example.

The main reason for this is that they are more along the lines of how
other platforms have implemented this feature.  Ubuntu/debian uses an
init.d script with the same semantics as the apache script except its
definition of a profile is a file with a .conf extension in /etc/openvpn/.

Maybe we need a more generic way of doing this rather than each port
providing their own implementation?

Tom

This is my slightly biased opinion as I am the author of one such script
in the tree.


-- 
TJU13-ARIN
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Upgrading mysql50-{server,client,scripts} to 5.0.91

2011-01-04 Thread Tom Judge 
On 01/04/2011 01:03 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2011, at 10:38 AM, Tom Judge wrote:
>> Do you know if there would be any issues with MySQL 5.0.91 running on 
>> FreeBSD?
> 
> There shouldn't be.  I think ports is still at mysql-server-5.0.90_2, which 
> works fine, but I would expect that 5.0.91 would also be fine

Thanks,  seems to be ok, filed a PR for the update:

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=153690

Tom

-- 
TJU13-ARIN
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Upgrading mysql50-{server,client,scripts} to 5.0.91

2011-01-04 Thread Tom Judge 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Do you know if there would be any issues with MySQL 5.0.91 running on
FreeBSD?

Tom
- -- 
TJU13-ARIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNI2koAAoJEMSwVS7lr0OdtKcIAITSu/eIYxg2HJ24pZl7lDpv
MCqbC1JMvYrGJ48plo5n9226TyL8Z5GBH/Xsx/fQixiox2o+IvBI9UocdMorUbMv
NuALGd94//69c748wibNJ76smVIBzB2a8DFa74FhYqDBSW6CLSVJaZFG7ApkaLZ7
Z++PUvJUev39a/FncvOkAQAPHzrAOOq3vcwk7AeJHYC0/WTWS0bW9Pm2ELKmBxEP
sjRFI3CeIZB+yfdINTjuPdqFw9KSHPVVg77eq6HjZ3bCLrJffktMyPC3+mpfTVJ6
8CFctRtRWkIao1eNZElZLmViCFanmpOxK1Fa3Rld2C6NJ7dTLPW1tYt5xoS9G2o=
=SbzR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: devel/pecl-intl: what's up?

2011-01-04 Thread Tom Judge 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 12/27/2010 02:55 PM, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> I'm trying to upgrade roundcube, and pecl-intl isn't building.
> 
> Removing the IGNORE shows a number of linker errors.  I found PR#153438 
> http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=153438 suggesting that the patches 
> are no longer needed. Removing them makes the build complete successfully.
> 
> The resulting roundcube seems to be running fine, as well as other PHP apps I 
> have on the same box (mediawiki).
> 
> 
> Stefan
> 


Ok so it seems that these patches are conditional on the version of PHP
that is installed.

If you are trying to install with PHP 5.2 then you don't need the patch
files if you are using PHP 5.3 then you do need them.  I will create a
patch to address this.

Build logs for builds without the patches present:

http://tinderbox.tomjudge.com/tb/errors/8.1-PECL-5.3-amd64/pecl-intl-1.1.2_2.log

http://tinderbox.tomjudge.com/tb/logs/8.1-PECL-5.2-amd64/pecl-intl-1.1.2_2.log


TJ

- -- 
TJU13-ARIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNI137AAoJEMSwVS7lr0Od9loIAKKLzt8mvrlPLgARKXVFEjtH
9pZ9jMRWXD0HWMgdaiFBbZdVri3r5GlkgIw1qclbE+y0VE2TMmZWn0AA0rk0v6Ja
KsRi64CZ9o/YBVdtQf9Wsb5RnI76cxA5M8XRhH68lrTvXdLMbvBnoBrvWCjz77A+
1JHhcroimdTVD0ABdA8u2soaPH3gXWVy0kkMPYRthpipodqxHsHpOFCA23ipw35G
7AfEVaOIoKZzczTgqFGLrKbmNSIrFf2kf85gtNHk6c+cQv38ktsV9E+5jLsYinTi
zV76/HhLY0TPuVro2JB2B05M7qSnpF0o6//qDNqFWrP35kT5RMMqFic/cR50AQM=
=w1wT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Strange problem with skype on RELENG_6 KERNEL since the end of may.

2007-06-19 Thread Tom Judge 

Tom Evans wrote:

On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 23:40 +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote:

On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:29:09 -0500
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

A RELENG_6 kernel from May 21 works fine with skype but boot a newer  
kernel and skype seems to be blocking port 80.   Apache logs show  
nothing.  I can find no logs errors anywhere but a telnet to port 80  
answers with what would seem to be binary chars.  I close skype and  
all is back to normal.  I had originally thought that it had to do  
with the new xorg installation but it seems to be something in the  
kernel.  The configurations were the same, basically GENERIC with all  
the pf stuff.

Hi,

Skype has an option to listen on tcp/80 and tcp/443 for incoming connections,
because it assumes somehow that firewalls will be configured to allow that
traffic in (some Windowze world assumption, i guess).

In the tools menu,  go to Options, Advanced, untick the option that reads "Use
port (sic) 80 and 443 as alternatives for incoming connections".

Apply, exit skype, restart it.

confirm with 


sockstat -4 | grep skype | grep \*:80

that skype is NOT listening on port 80 (you shouldn't see any output back from
that cmd) ( similar for 443)



Doesn't this imply that the OP was running Skype as root?


Yes if the sysctl's below net.inet.ip.portrange all have there default 
values.


Tom
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"