Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng

2012-10-10 Thread Victor Balada Diaz
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 03:44:21PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 If you are using the ports tree on a FreeBSD current setup, then you are
 concerned by the announce.
 
 As nvidia-drivers has been fixed and is now properly working with pkgng, the
 ports tree as been switch by default to use pkgng on FreeBSD Current based on
 version = 117 which was the version when we tested the switch code.
 
 Make sure to read UPDATING (from ports) to correctly migrate your system or 
 find
 instruction to make your system still running with legacy pkg_install tools.
 
 regards,
 Bapt

Hello Baptiste,

Thanks a lot for your hard work.

I've been using pkgng for a while on 9.0 and it's been a great experience.

Right now you can use pointyhat packages[1] if you use old pkg tools. Is
there any plan to create binary packages more often than once per release?

Regards.
Victor.

[1]: http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-10-packages-latest/
-- 
La prueba más fehaciente de que existe vida inteligente en otros
planetas, es que no han intentado contactar con nosotros. 
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng

2012-10-10 Thread Victor Balada Diaz
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 06:31:49PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
 Yes there is http://pkg.FreeBSD.org (no website in there no need to try to
 there) which will point you to pkgbeta.freebsd.org where some packages 
 resides.
 
 Unfortunatly the package building cluster needs some time to get more reliable
 and thus the packages out there are not updated very often.
 
 regards,
 Bapt

Is there anything we can do to help with build cluster reliability?

Regards.
Victor.
-- 
La prueba más fehaciente de que existe vida inteligente en otros
planetas, es que no han intentado contactar con nosotros. 
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Jython as PYTHON_VENDOR in bsd.python.mk

2012-03-20 Thread Victor Balada Diaz
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 01:12:59PM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I'm trying to port django-jython[1] to FreeBSD. Jython[2] is a python 
 interpreter 
 written in java. Django is a popular web framework written in python. For it
 to work under java i need django-python which have some database specific 
 drivers.
 
 The problem is that while i tried porting, seems i can't use bsd.python.mk 
 because USE_PYTHON
 doesn't have a way to recognize jython as a python interpreter.
 
 Does anyone know what's the best approach for porting this? I think that 
 maybe jython should
 be added as python vendor in the same way we have JAVA_VENDOR for java.
 What do you think?
 
 Thanks a lot.
 Regards.
 
 [1]: http://code.google.com/p/django-jython/
 [2]: http://www.jython.org/

Hello,

At least can someone think on a good alternative way of porting that package?

Thanks a lot.
Regards.

-- 
La prueba más fehaciente de que existe vida inteligente en otros
planetas, es que no han intentado contactar con nosotros. 
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Jython as PYTHON_VENDOR in bsd.python.mk

2012-03-16 Thread Victor Balada Diaz
Hello,

I'm trying to port django-jython[1] to FreeBSD. Jython[2] is a python 
interpreter 
written in java. Django is a popular web framework written in python. For it
to work under java i need django-python which have some database specific 
drivers.

The problem is that while i tried porting, seems i can't use bsd.python.mk 
because USE_PYTHON
doesn't have a way to recognize jython as a python interpreter.

Does anyone know what's the best approach for porting this? I think that maybe 
jython should
be added as python vendor in the same way we have JAVA_VENDOR for java.
What do you think?

Thanks a lot.
Regards.

[1]: http://code.google.com/p/django-jython/
[2]: http://www.jython.org/
-- 
La prueba más fehaciente de que existe vida inteligente en otros
planetas, es que no han intentado contactar con nosotros. 
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org