kdevelop missing dependency for kde4-baseapps
uname: FreeBSD 11.0-RELESE-p9 arch: amd64 While trying to install the VirtualBox package, ran in to an issue libEGL. Found out that libEGL and libGL have been moved to mesa-libs (only documented in MOVED), Did freebsd-update, and used portsnap to make sure system was up to date. Did a pkg delete -a -f Started to rebuild the system from packages, but noticed some of the x11 and kde packages still want to install libEGL, libGL. Ended up rebuilding the ports where the packages still wanted old libEGL, libGL. Built kde4-runtime, kde4-workspace, kdevplatform, and kdevelop-kde4. Used "make missing" to identify what ports I could install from packages. After starting kdevelop, noticed the filesystem tool context menu "Create New" option only had a an empty "Create Link to Device" sub menu. Built the qt5 file manager, but still saw an empty menu. Built kde4-baseapps and all of the menu options were restored. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Opera, still functional, 'one cannot make new configs' etc since v9 v10
I installed on FreeBSD 9.3 adm64 p5, with gtk2 off. KDE4 Plasma X server. Radeon xorg driver (ATI 7750 card). Got an error about missing libfreetype.so.9, but the browser seemed to work fine. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Opera, still functional, 'one cannot make new configs' etc since v9 v10
If you run opera from a terminal window, do you get something like the problem described in: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2568408/pango-warning-failed-to-choose-a-font-expect-ugly-output If yes, then a possible work-around is: Move any pango compliant fonts to /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts mv /usr/loocal/share/fonts/* /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts Create a symlink to make /usr/loocal/share/fonts point to /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts. ln -sF /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts /usr/loocal/share/fonts ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
python --with-pydebug and google generate your project build tools
The google generate your project build tool used by some ports (chromium, firefox) is not compatible with python built with the debug option (--with-pydebug). https://code.google.com/p/gyp/source/browse/trunk/pylib/gyp/input.py starting at lines 896 to 904. Code looks for non-zero status or any output on stderr. Python built with --with-pydebug will write a references count to stderr upon exit of a python process. If input.py runs a python sub process, the pydebug output will cause input.py to assume there was an error in the sub process. Easy solution: don't build the python port with debugging. Ugly solution: patch input.py in each affected port to not treat stderr output as an error. if p.wiat() != 0 or p_stderr: if p.wait() != 0: ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
emulators/pipelight failing to build
What version of gpg and libgcrypt are you using (gpg --version)? Seems to work with gpg 2.1.0 and libgcrypt 1.6.1. However, online docs for gpg seem to indicate --verify is being used wrong in the Makefile in the port working directory. https://www.gnupg.org/documentation/manpage.html ... –verify [[=sigfile=] [=signed-files=]] Assume that sigfile is a signature and verify it without generating any output. With no arguments, the signature packet is read from stdin (it may be a detached signature when not used in batch mode). If only a sigfile is given, it may be a complete signature or a detached signature, in which case the signed stuff is expected in a file without the .sig or .asc extension (if such a file does not exist it is expected at stdin; use a single dash (-) as filename to force a read from stdin). With more than 1 argument, the first should be a detached signature and the remaining files are the signed stuff. ... Which seems to be inline with the error you are seeing. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gcc.mk
Who should I talk to regarding a change to /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gcc.mk ?
Using FreeBSD 9.3 with latest ports tree.
Line 164 of bsd.gcc.mk reads:
LDFLAGS+= -Wl,-rpath=${_GCC_RUNTIME} -L${_GCC_RUNTIME}
Think it should read:
LDFLAGS:= -Wl,-rpath=${_GCC_RUNTIME} -L${_GCC_RUNTIME} ${LDFLAGS}
Issue was found building freerdp.
During link phase the software was linking with /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6,
which was older than gcc 4.8, and missing some symbols related to wide
character support.
LDFLAGS includes an rpath for /usr/lib by the time bsd.gcc.mk is evaluated,
so that rpath is being searched before the /usr/local/lib/gcc## path.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD Port: sysutils/pstree
Hi! Please update pstree to version 2.35 and update the first master site to http://www.thp.uni-due.de/pstree/ . Have fun, Fred Dr. Fred Hucht f...@thp.uni-due.de Institute of Theoretical Physics University of Duisburg-Essen, D-47048 Duisburg smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
ports/lang/screamer
This port can be fixed by a patch that comments out two lines in the screamer.lisp file: *** screamer.lisp Mon Sep 1 21:59:23 2008 --- screamer.lisp~ Thu Mar 10 20:10:22 1994 *** *** 3734,3739 (defun realp (x) (typep x 'real)) ! ;;#-allegro-v4.2 ! ;;(deftype boolean () '(member t nil)) (defun booleanp (x) (typep x 'boolean)) --- 3734,3739 (defun realp (x) (typep x 'real)) ! #-allegro-v4.2 ! (deftype boolean () '(member t nil)) (defun booleanp (x) (typep x 'boolean)) -- Fred Gilham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Time is nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once. Unfortunately, it doesn't always work. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ParaView3 build and Qt4...
Hi all, I'm trying to build ParaView3 (2.9.8) on my freebsd box (6.2). I have successfully built Qt 4.2.2 and cmake 2.4.6. But when I run cmake to configure PV3, it complains about something missing related to Qt4 and X11 if I understand right: QT_X11_QMAKESPEC_LIBRARY QT_X11_QMAKESPEC_LIBRARY-NOTFOUND QT_X11_be_LIBRARY QT_X11_be_LIBRARY-NOTFOUND QT_X11_been_LIBRARY QT_X11_been_LIBRARY-NOTFOUND QT_X11_cannot_LIBRARY QT_X11_cannot_LIBRARY-NOTFOUND QT_X11_configuration_LIBRARY QT_X11_configuration_LIBRARY-NOTFOUND QT_X11_file:_LIBRARY QT_X11_file:_LIBRARY-NOTFOUND QT_X11_has_LIBRARY QT_X11_has_LIBRARY-NOTFOUND QT_X11_not_LIBRARY QT_X11_not_LIBRARY-NOTFOUND QT_X11_processing_LIBRARY QT_X11_processing_LIBRARY-NOTFOUND QT_X11_project_LIBRARY QT_X11_project_LIBRARY-NOTFOUND QT_X11_set,_LIBRARY QT_X11_set,_LIBRARY-NOTFOUND QT_X11_so_LIBRARY QT_X11_so_LIBRARY-NOTFOUND What does it mean ? Moreover, the QT_X11_* look very strange to me (not, been, has ???) ! What's wrong ? Thanks in advance. Cheers, -- Fred. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ParaView3 build...
Michael Nottebrock wrote: Try running env QMAKESPEC=/usr/local/share/qt4/mkspecs/freebsd-g++ cmake . Works much better, thanks ! By the way, PV3 does not find some ffmpeg libs, whereas ffmpeg is well installed. FFMPEG_INCLUDE_DIR */usr/local/include FFMPEG_avcodec_LIBRARY */usr/local/lib/libavcodec.so FFMPEG_avformat_LIBRARY */usr/local/lib/libavformat.so FFMPEG_avutil_LIBRARY *FFMPEG_avutil_LIBRARY-NOTFOUND FFMPEG_dc1394_LIBRARY *FFMPEG_dc1394_LIBRARY-NOTFOUND FFMPEG_dts_LIBRARY */usr/local/lib/libdts.a FFMPEG_gsm_LIBRARY *FFMPEG_gsm_LIBRARY-NOTFOUND FFMPEG_theora_LIBRARY */usr/local/lib/libtheora.so FFMPEG_vorbis_LIBRARY */usr/local/lib/libvorbis.so FFMPEG_vorbisenc_LIBRARY*/usr/local/lib/libvorbisenc.so FFMPEG_z_LIBRARY*/usr/lib/libz.so Any idea ? Cheers, -- http://scipy.org/FredericPetit ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: icc9
Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Fri, 02 Feb 2007 19:12:11 +0100): Hi there, Has somebody tried to port intel compiler 9.1 to freebsd ? Have a look at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/103979 It may or may not work for you. Hmm, fails applying patches, again :-( === Extracting for icc-9.1.043_1 = MD5 Checksum OK for l_cc_c_9.1.043.tar.gz. = SHA256 Checksum OK for l_cc_c_9.1.043.tar.gz. === icc-9.1.043_1 depends on executable in : rpm2cpio.pl - found === Patching for icc-9.1.043_1 === Applying FreeBSD patches for icc-9.1.043_1 1 out of 4 hunks failed--saving rejects to include/c++/yvals.h.rej = Patch patch-include::c++::yvals.h failed to apply cleanly. = Patch(es) patch-bin::icc patch-bin::icpc patch-include::c++::cstdio patch-include::c++::cstdlib p atch-include::c++::cwchar applied cleanly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/icc9. Thanks anyway. -- http://scipy.org/FredericPetit ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VTK 5 in ports
Thierry Thomas wrote: Work In [slow] Progress: I have just uploaded a new vtk5.tgz. math/vtk-headers5 has been removed (files get installed by vtk5), and now both math/vtk5 math/vtk-python5 build fine - but they do strange things with their libs. Reviewers welcome! Hi, Tons of thanks, Thierry ! I have successfully built mayavi2 with vtk5 so I can be happy :-)) I have also modified two related ports, vtk-data and vtk-examples. I can send you them, so you can put all them in your single vtk5.tgz file... Cheers, -- http://scipy.org/FredericPetit ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: status of migration to gfortran42 2007.1.12: currently all ports using fortran are unstable.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : News: Kris approved that migration to gfortran Unless the changes are too extensive, please proceed. so I'll proceed. Hi all, Could be this thread related to some problem I have encountered building Scipy on my freebsd boxes (6.2) ? On one of my freebsd boxes, I built/run successfully scipy 0.5.1, using the old ports, ie without gcc4.2 need. On another freebsd box, with the new ports (lapack, blas, atlas) which need gcc 4.2, building scipy is ok (with atlas or with lapack/blas), but fails to run : scipy complains that it does not find csqrt function in lapack/alapack libs. Am I doing something wrong ? What's going on ? Thanks in advance for any clue. Cheers, -- http://scipy.org/FredericPetit ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VTK 5 in ports
fred a écrit : Thierry Thomas a écrit : Could you please try the following port? http://people.freebsd.org/~thierry/ports/vtk5.tgz Sure ! ;-) Thanks a lot. I'm not yet sure how it will be committed: maybe I'll repocopy math/vtk to math/vtk44 and commit this one as math/vtk, updating the vtk-slaves ports to 5? I full agree ;-) In fact, mayavi2 needs vtk-python. So I would be very happy if you could provide vtk-python port for VTK 5. Cheers, -- http://scipy.org/FredericPetit ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VTK 5 in ports
Thierry Thomas a écrit : Could you please try the following port? http://people.freebsd.org/~thierry/ports/vtk5.tgz Sure ! ;-) Thanks a lot. I'm not yet sure how it will be committed: maybe I'll repocopy math/vtk to math/vtk44 and commit this one as math/vtk, updating the vtk-slaves ports to 5? I full agree ;-) I need it to build VTK apps such as mayavi2 paraview 2.9.x (which needs also qt4, not yet included in ports tree). Well, the latest stable paraview release is still 2.4.4! Yes,I know it. The 2.9.x (aka ParaView III) release is the dev release, and the GUI has been much improved vs the 2.5.x release. Cheers, -- Fred. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cups 1.2.7 HP LaserJet 1320 fails to work...
Hi the list, I try to use my HP LaserJet 1320 (usb) with cups 1.2.7 and the following ports installed: foomatic-db-20061214, foomatic-db-engine-20061214, foomatic-db-hpijs-1.4, foomatic-filters-3.0.2_4, hplip-1.6.7. My printer is well detected during boot: ugen1: Hewlett-Packard hp LaserJet 1320 series, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 3 but when I want to setup it (with mozilla ui), it does not find my HP. Any suggestion ? Thanks in advance. -- http://scipy.org/FredericPetit ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VTK 5 in ports
Hi the list, Does anyone knows when VTK (5.0.2, the last release) will be included in ports tree ? I need it to build VTK apps such as mayavi2 paraview 2.9.x (which needs also qt4, not yet included in ports tree). Cheers, -- http://scipy.org/FredericPetit ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: www/dotproject out of date and vulnerable
So how about this: Update the version to 2.0.4 to avoid the vulnerability. Modify Makefile to require PHP4: DEFAULT_PHP_VER=4 WANT_PHP_WEB= yes IGNORE_WITH_PHP=5 Add to the files/pkg-message.in to inform the user that they must have a remote or jailed mysql 3.23 or make the published patches. Fred --- Alex Dupre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kris Kennaway ha scritto: Damn, how many messages should I read?! :-) If there is no problem with using the mysql 5.x client, then just use mysql 5.x and be done with it. You need to figure out whether or not that is true. If it is false, then there's clearly a problem for you I bet the client will have no problems with mysql 5.0, so this seems a good solution to me. This whole discussion came about because you were trying to look for a way to force everything (including php4-mysql) to link to mysql 3.x, which is currently impossible to achieve satisfactorily without further work on your part. And adding a php4-mysql3 port is not trivial and I'm against it since MySQL 3.23 is unsupported. If dotproject *must* depends on mysql 3.23 it has to be marked NO_PACKAGE, otherwise the above (temporary, until the sql scripts will be updated) solution is ok. -- Alex Dupre __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: www/dotproject out of date and vulnerable
PR sent. Thanks very much for all of your advice, Fred --- Alex Dupre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fred Cox ha scritto: So how about this: Update the version to 2.0.4 to avoid the vulnerability. Modify Makefile to require PHP4: DEFAULT_PHP_VER=4 WANT_PHP_WEB= yes IGNORE_WITH_PHP=5 Add to the files/pkg-message.in to inform the user that they must have a remote or jailed mysql 3.23 or make the published patches. They need MySQL 3.23 server for running sql scripts. Local, remote, jailed or virtual is not important. Fine for me. -- Alex Dupre __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: www/dotproject out of date and vulnerable
--- Simon Barner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Fred, thanks for your work on this port. Could you please resubmit the update as a unified diff and send it as a problem report (PR). I'm on my way towards doing that, but I want to get it right beforehand. I want to be able to require MySQL 3.23. That requirement doesn't seem to work because of the indirect dependency through php4-mysql. I'm looking for clues on how to get this to work. Thanks, Fred Otherwise your work will probably get lost in the vast amount of email that gets posted on freebsd-ports. More information in the Porter's Handbook http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/ Very brief summary: cp -R portdir portdir.orig edit files in portdir diff -ruN portdir.orig portdir port.patch send-pr -a port.patch -- Best regards / Viele Grüße, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Simon Barner [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: www/dotproject out of date and vulnerable
For my second iteration of installing this through the original port, I was able to install mysql323-client and php4 before installing dotproject, and everything worked. So it appears that php4-mysql will use mysql323-client if it's already installed. I haven't dug through the code to see how that is done, though. There are patches out there for making things work with MySQL 4 and 5. However, they are not officially supported. I am debating putting the patches in for MySQL 5, but if someone goes to the trouble of installing MySQL 3.23 before installing php4-mysql and dotproject, I think it will break. Is there any way of getting the dotproject dependency on MySQL 3.23 to be stronger than the php4-mysql default dependency on mysql5-client? Thanks, Fred --- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 12:23:55PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote: This is the first time I've tried to modify a port, and I'm having a bit of trouble because this port requires MySQL 3.23 and PHP 4. Those dependencies weren't specified in the port before. I've gotten PHP4 by adding: USE_PHP=gd mysql session DEFAULT_PHP_VER=4 WANT_PHP_WEB= yes IGNORE_WITH_PHP=5 Trying to get it to install MySQL 3.23 client seems to be stymied by the php4-mysql default dependency on the MySQL 5 client. I haven't actually figured out how it specifies this dependency, since the php4-mysql/Makefile is very empty. Basically if php4-mysql wants mysql5 then there is no way around it for your port. You will need to create a php4-mysql3 port that specifies the mysql 3 dependency and use that instead. Is it really a requirement to use this old version of mysql? Kris __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: www/dotproject out of date and vulnerable
Would you recommend doing the partial job of updating the port for the vulnerability and requiring PHP4 while I work on the ultimate solution? Thanks, Fred --- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:15:53PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote: For my second iteration of installing this through the original port, I was able to install mysql323-client and php4 before installing dotproject, and everything worked. So it appears that php4-mysql will use mysql323-client if it's already installed. I haven't dug through the code to see how that is done, though. Yep, you can't rely on that though of course. If the user already has the php4-mysql port installed, or installs it from a package, it will use the default settings. The only solution is what I previously said. Kris __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: www/dotproject out of date and vulnerable
--- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Will fail to package is pretty far from perfection in my book :) I don't believe I ever said that. It builds fine and even runs, it just has lots of bugs. Can you let me know what I said that gave you that impression? Fred Mark the port FORBIDDEN if you have to, but a port that will not build with default settings should not be committed. Kris __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: www/dotproject out of date and vulnerable
--- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 03:25:45PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote: --- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Will fail to package is pretty far from perfection in my book :) I don't believe I ever said that. It builds fine and even runs, it just has lots of bugs. Can you let me know what I said that gave you that impression? Based on what we've discussed, the proposed changes to the port will make it fail to build with default settings (since mysql 4 will be installed), for example on the package build cluster. I missed that requirement. So basically, until it can run with PHP 5 and MySQL 5, it's not good enough to be a port. Restricting it to run with PHP 4 will mean that it will be rejected? Fred Kris __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: www/dotproject out of date and vulnerable
--- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 04:00:14PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote: --- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 03:25:45PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote: --- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Will fail to package is pretty far from perfection in my book :) I don't believe I ever said that. It builds fine and even runs, it just has lots of bugs. Can you let me know what I said that gave you that impression? Based on what we've discussed, the proposed changes to the port will make it fail to build with default settings (since mysql 4 will be installed), for example on the package build cluster. I missed that requirement. So basically, until it can run with PHP 5 and MySQL 5, it's not good enough to be a port. Restricting it to run with PHP 4 will mean that it will be rejected? No, I guess you've still misunderstood. I don't know how many times I can say this, but let me try to explain once more: your port should be buildable with the default settings of all ports involved. This means that you can't place special requirements like you have to first install mysql 3.x, then install the php4-mysql port, then install this port, because that is too non-generic and will not be true on systems that already have php4-mysql installed with the default mysql client. The solution, which I explained several messages ago, is to make an alternative php4-mysql3 port, which always depends on mysql 3.x, and use that instead of php4-mysql (it may need to conflict with php4-mysql, I don't know). This really isn't very hard and you perhaps could have done it already by now :) When I was trying to install this in first place, I couldn't install mysql323-client when mysql5-client was already installed. It refused to install. I had to install it into a jail by itself with msyql323 and php4. I assume that will break the requirement that it be buildable with defaults, assuming that some other port that requires mysql has already been built. Is that a bad assumption? Thanks for the education, Fred Kris __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: www/dotproject out of date and vulnerable
--- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 04:19:23PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote: No, I guess you've still misunderstood. I don't know how many times I can say this, but let me try to explain once more: your port should be buildable with the default settings of all ports involved. This means that you can't place special requirements like you have to first install mysql 3.x, then install the php4-mysql port, then install this port, because that is too non-generic and will not be true on systems that already have php4-mysql installed with the default mysql client. The solution, which I explained several messages ago, is to make an alternative php4-mysql3 port, which always depends on mysql 3.x, and use that instead of php4-mysql (it may need to conflict with php4-mysql, I don't know). This really isn't very hard and you perhaps could have done it already by now :) When I was trying to install this in first place, I couldn't install mysql323-client when mysql5-client was already installed. It refused to install. I had to install it into a jail by itself with msyql323 and php4. Right, they conflict. There's nothing you can do about that; they want to install files on top of each other, breaking one or the other installation. I assume that will break the requirement that it be buildable with defaults, assuming that some other port that requires mysql has already been built. Is that a bad assumption? Yes, with the above solution mysql 4.x or 5.x do not get installed when you build your port on a clean system (no ports installed, and no non-default settings), only mysql 3.x, so there's no conflict. If someone has mysql 4.x or 5.x installed already, they get a warning from the conflict checking telling them it's impossible to install the port without first deinstalling mysql 4.x and 5.x, which is true and unavoidable. With your proposed version, a conflicting mysql version would first be installed by php4-mysql and the build of your port will subsequently fail when it tries to install mysql3 (or vice versa, depending on which happens first), which is precisely the problem. Actually, it doesn't. It goes ahead and installs it, even though I specified these: WITH_MYSQL= yes WANT_MYSQL_VER= 323 IGNORE_WITH_MYSQL=5 Starting with a system that had no MySQL or PHP installed on it, I did a make install in the dotproject port with the Makefile and distinfo I specified earlier. It seems to look for mysql.so, and if that's found, it doesn't worry about the version. See the log at http://fcox.net/dp.log, when no mysql or php was installed on the system. Perhaps this is a bug in the dependencies system. Hope this has clarified things sufficiently now, It certainly presents a certain model, but my experience doesn't match up with it. That's why I was confused, Fred Kris __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: www/dotproject out of date and vulnerable
--- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 05:15:45PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote: Actually, it doesn't. It goes ahead and installs it, even though I specified these: WITH_MYSQL= yes WANT_MYSQL_VER= 323 IGNORE_WITH_MYSQL=5 Starting with a system that had no MySQL or PHP installed on it, I did a make install in the dotproject port with the Makefile and distinfo I specified earlier. It seems to look for mysql.so, and if that's found, it doesn't worry about the version. OK, so it's just silently broken, which is worse. It's still better than the current situation. See the log at http://fcox.net/dp.log, when no mysql or php was installed on the system. Perhaps this is a bug in the dependencies system. Dunno without investigating. Anyway, the correct solution is the same. OK, so if you had a pointer on how to depend on that alternate version, it would help. Right now, the dependencies are specified with the WITH and IGNORE variables, but it seems that with your proposal I won't be able to do that. Maybe tonight I will fall asleep reading the Porter's Handbook. Fred Kris __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: www/dotproject out of date and vulnerable
--- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 06:02:52PM -0700, Fred Cox
wrote:
--- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 05:15:45PM -0700, Fred
Cox
wrote:
Actually, it doesn't. It goes ahead and
installs
it,
even though I specified these:
WITH_MYSQL= yes
WANT_MYSQL_VER= 323
IGNORE_WITH_MYSQL=5
Starting with a system that had no MySQL or
PHP
installed on it, I did a make install in the
dotproject port with the Makefile and distinfo
I
specified earlier.
It seems to look for mysql.so, and if that's
found, it
doesn't worry about the version.
OK, so it's just silently broken, which is
worse.
It's still better than the current situation.
Publishing packages that will not run because
they're linked to the
wrong libraries is, again, not my idea of better.
There is no linkage problem. It's a client/server
problem.
PHP4 is perfectly happy being linked with the MySQL 5
client libraries, it's the database server that needs
to be 3.23. The SQL used in dotProject is legal for
3.23, but not 5.
See the log at http://fcox.net/dp.log, when no
mysql
or php was installed on the system.
Perhaps this is a bug in the dependencies
system.
Dunno without investigating. Anyway, the
correct
solution is the
same.
OK, so if you had a pointer on how to depend on
that
alternate version, it would help.
Copy the php4-mysql port to php4-mysql3 and make the
presumably
trivial change to make it use mysql 3 instead of
whatever the default
is.
It's not trivial. The current Makefile is trivial,
but a change to do what you're suggesting will need to
be more complex.
Here's the current php4-mysql Makefile:
CATEGORIES= databases
MASTERDIR= ${.CURDIR}/../../lang/php4
PKGNAMESUFFIX= -mysql
.include ${MASTERDIR}/Makefile
The ${MASTERDIR}/Makefile doesn't refer to mysql at
all.
Personally, I don't see how it knows it's supposed to
link MySQL in there. Perhaps it's because PHP4
defaults to including MySQL support, so this isn't
really doing anything. I haven't read far enough to
know for sure.
Right now, the
dependencies are specified with the WITH and
IGNORE
variables, but it seems that with your proposal I
won't be able to do that. Maybe tonight I will
fall
asleep reading the Porter's Handbook.
OK.
Kris
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: www/dotproject out of date and vulnerable
--- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 06:25:50PM -0700, Fred Cox
wrote:
It's still better than the current situation.
Publishing packages that will not run because
they're linked to the
wrong libraries is, again, not my idea of
better.
There is no linkage problem. It's a client/server
problem.
PHP4 is perfectly happy being linked with the
MySQL 5
client libraries, it's the database server that
needs
to be 3.23. The SQL used in dotProject is legal
for
3.23, but not 5.
Then you haven't explained yourself very well,
because at the start of
this thread you were talking about a conflict
between the mysql 3 and
mysql 5 *clients*, not servers.
I haven't been able to verify for sure that using a
MySQL 5 client library against a MySQL 3.23 server is
supported. I can't find any references on the
MySQL.com site.
In any case, you can't install mysql5?-client and
mysql323-server together using the ports.
Typically, people installing this would have the web
server and the mysql server on the same machine, so
the best solution (other than dotproject finally
supporting modern versions of the software) would be
to link against mysql323-client. However, there is no
build problem with linking against mysql5?-client.
dotproject is a set of scripts.
--
Trying to get it to install MySQL 3.23 client seems
to
be stymied by the php4-mysql default dependency on
the
MySQL 5 client. I haven't actually figured out how
it
specifies this dependency, since the
php4-mysql/Makefile is very empty.
--
So, does it or does it not require the mysql 3.23
client in
php4-mysql and dotproject?
I don't know for sure. Practically speaking, for most
users, it does.
Your objection to doing an interim fix while I try to
figure out how to do what you suggest doesn't apply
though, because there is nothing broken at the package
build or linkage level. There is only a potential
protocol problem with using different versions of the
client and server together.
Copy the php4-mysql port to php4-mysql3 and make
the
presumably
trivial change to make it use mysql 3 instead of
whatever the default
is.
It's not trivial. The current Makefile is
trivial,
but a change to do what you're suggesting will
need to
be more complex.
Here's the current php4-mysql Makefile:
CATEGORIES= databases
MASTERDIR= ${.CURDIR}/../../lang/php4
PKGNAMESUFFIX= -mysql
.include ${MASTERDIR}/Makefile
The ${MASTERDIR}/Makefile doesn't refer to mysql
at
all.
Personally, I don't see how it knows it's supposed
to
link MySQL in there. Perhaps it's because PHP4
defaults to including MySQL support, so this isn't
really doing anything. I haven't read far enough
to
know for sure.
Look in bsd.php.mk for the rest.
More studying,
Fred
Kris
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www/dotproject out of date and vulnerable
www/dotproject is still 2.0.2, even though 2.0.4 came out in June to address an XSS vulnerability. See http://www.dotproject.net/ for details. I've sent mail to the maintainer and the contact for portaudit, with no response in over 2 weeks and 1 week respectively. Portaudit does not report any problem with dotproject. What's the next step? Fred Cox __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Port: jpgraph-1.20.4a
This port does not install properly. I fails to create the lang sub directory and copy the language files into it. This causes a locale error. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFC: Merging X11BASE to LOCALBASE
What about duplicated file names?
On my desktop:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l /usr/{X11R6,local}/man/whatis
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 162506 Jul 8 04:15
/usr/X11R6/man/whatis
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 48606 Jul 8 04:15
/usr/local/man/whatis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l
/usr/{X11R6,local}/share/applications/mimeinfo.cache
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 13 May 7 14:20
/usr/X11R6/share/applications/mimeinfo.cache
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 13 May 7 14:20
/usr/local/share/applications/mimeinfo.cache
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l
/usr/{X11R6,local}/share/mime/XMLnamespaces
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Mar 26 00:05
/usr/X11R6/share/mime/XMLnamespaces
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 56 Mar 26 00:05
/usr/local/share/mime/XMLnamespaces
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l
/usr/{X11R6,local}/share/mime/aliases
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Mar 26 00:05
/usr/X11R6/share/mime/aliases
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2038 Mar 26 00:05
/usr/local/share/mime/aliases
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l
/usr/{X11R6,local}/share/mime/globs
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 92 Mar 26 00:05
/usr/X11R6/share/mime/globs
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 12850 Mar 26 00:05
/usr/local/share/mime/globs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l
/usr/{X11R6,local}/share/mime/magic
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 12 Mar 26 00:05
/usr/X11R6/share/mime/magic
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 11275 Mar 26 00:05
/usr/local/share/mime/magic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l
/usr/{X11R6,local}/share/mime/subclasses
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Mar 26 00:05
/usr/X11R6/share/mime/subclasses
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3202 Mar 26 00:05
/usr/local/share/mime/subclasses
--- John Merryweather Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dejan Lesjak wrote:
Hello,
There were a couple of debates already concerning
/usr/X11R6 as prefix for X11
ports and a bunch of other ports that currently by
default install there.
Quite some people were, when creating a new port
that depends on X11,
wandering whether to put it in X11BASE or
LOCALBASE. More than once a
question of whether the prefix /usr/X11R6 should
be just dropped or at least
only retained for core X11 distribution. With the
upcoming X.org 7.x ports
there is perhaps the opportunity to do the prefix
merger along that.
Moving X11 prefix to LOCALBASE would simplify
above dilemma. It would be also
more similar to where linux distributions are
going (at least Gentoo, Debian
and Fedora deprecated /usr/X11R6 in favour of /usr
which, while
not /usr/local is the location of where all
packages install - depending on
X11 or not). If I remember correctly from previous
discussions, it would be
more convenient to people with separate mounts for
installed packages as
well. /usr/local is also the default value for
--prefix configure option for
X.org packages.
So it is general intention to go with /usr/local
or rather ${LOCALBASE} as
prefix for X11 ports. If anyone feels that this is
horribly wrong, please
speak up.
On behalf of x11 team,
Dejan
What impact (if any) would the doubling or tripling
of the number of
files in ./bin have on searching along PATH? Would
we be shooting
ourselves in the foot if we did this?
jmc
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFC: Merging X11BASE to LOCALBASE
Those man pages for whatis are pretty radically
different in size. Maybe they are mergeable, but
there's going to be a fair amount of work doing that
for all possible conflicts.
I don't have all the ports installed on my machine, so
this is not a complete list.
Fred
--- michael johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/12/06, Fred Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about duplicated file names?
On my desktop:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l
/usr/{X11R6,local}/man/whatis
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 162506 Jul 8 04:15
/usr/X11R6/man/whatis
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 48606 Jul 8 04:15
/usr/local/man/whatis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l
/usr/{X11R6,local}/share/applications/mimeinfo.cache
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 13 May 7 14:20
/usr/X11R6/share/applications/mimeinfo.cache
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 13 May 7 14:20
/usr/local/share/applications/mimeinfo.cache
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l
/usr/{X11R6,local}/share/mime/XMLnamespaces
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Mar 26 00:05
/usr/X11R6/share/mime/XMLnamespaces
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 56 Mar 26 00:05
/usr/local/share/mime/XMLnamespaces
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l
/usr/{X11R6,local}/share/mime/aliases
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Mar 26 00:05
/usr/X11R6/share/mime/aliases
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2038 Mar 26 00:05
/usr/local/share/mime/aliases
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l
/usr/{X11R6,local}/share/mime/globs
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 92 Mar 26 00:05
/usr/X11R6/share/mime/globs
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 12850 Mar 26 00:05
/usr/local/share/mime/globs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l
/usr/{X11R6,local}/share/mime/magic
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 12 Mar 26 00:05
/usr/X11R6/share/mime/magic
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 11275 Mar 26 00:05
/usr/local/share/mime/magic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l
/usr/{X11R6,local}/share/mime/subclasses
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Mar 26 00:05
/usr/X11R6/share/mime/subclasses
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3202 Mar 26 00:05
/usr/local/share/mime/subclasses
alot of this could be merged, ie: all the .cache
files
are dynamicly updated when ports that have mime
info or have icons are installed or deinstall.
--- John Merryweather Cooper
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dejan Lesjak wrote:
Hello,
There were a couple of debates already
concerning
/usr/X11R6 as prefix for X11
ports and a bunch of other ports that
currently by
default install there.
Quite some people were, when creating a new
port
that depends on X11,
wandering whether to put it in X11BASE or
LOCALBASE. More than once a
question of whether the prefix /usr/X11R6
should
be just dropped or at least
only retained for core X11 distribution. With
the
upcoming X.org 7.x ports
there is perhaps the opportunity to do the
prefix
merger along that.
Moving X11 prefix to LOCALBASE would simplify
above dilemma. It would be also
more similar to where linux distributions are
going (at least Gentoo, Debian
and Fedora deprecated /usr/X11R6 in favour of
/usr
which, while
not /usr/local is the location of where all
packages install - depending on
X11 or not). If I remember correctly from
previous
discussions, it would be
more convenient to people with separate mounts
for
installed packages as
well. /usr/local is also the default value for
--prefix configure option for
X.org packages.
So it is general intention to go with
/usr/local
or rather ${LOCALBASE} as
prefix for X11 ports. If anyone feels that
this is
horribly wrong, please
speak up.
On behalf of x11 team,
Dejan
What impact (if any) would the doubling or
tripling
of the number of
files in ./bin have on searching along PATH?
Would
we be shooting
ourselves in the foot if we did this?
jmc
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
