Re: openntpd-5.7p4_2,2 depends on libressl-2.2.6 ?!
On Thu 2016-03-10 (19:17), Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote:
> Makefile
> OPTIONS_DEFAULT=RESSL
>
> RESSL_LIB_DEPENDS= libtls.so:${PORTSDIR}/security/libressl
>
>
> turn option RESSL to off.
I guess this is because it's a few months later but these lines are no
longer in the Makefile? (/usr/ports/net/openntpd/Makefile?)
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
courier-authdaemond supposedly not running
Hey all, wondering if anyone else's noticed this? After an upgrade courier-authdaemond starts fine, but the startup script then claims it isn't running. The script itself seems fine, and: # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/courier-authdaemond status courier_authdaemond is not running. # cat /var/run/authdaemond/pid 1348 # ps 1348 PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND 1348 10 I 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/courierlogger -facility=mail -pid=/var/run/authdaemond/pid -start /usr/local/libexec/courier-authlib/authdaemond # ps | grep authdaemond 1348 10- I 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/courierlogger -facility=mail -pid=/var/run/authdaemond/pid -start /usr/local/libexec/courier-authlib/authdaemond 1349 10- I 0:00.00 /usr/local/libexec/courier-authlib/authdaemond 1350 10- S 0:00.00 /usr/local/libexec/courier-authlib/authdaemond 1351 10- S 0:00.00 /usr/local/libexec/courier-authlib/authdaemond 1352 10- S 0:00.00 /usr/local/libexec/courier-authlib/authdaemond 1353 10- I 0:00.00 /usr/local/libexec/courier-authlib/authdaemond 1354 10- I 0:00.00 /usr/local/libexec/courier-authlib/authdaemond ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
postgresql-server fails with krb5 support
Hi all, postgresql93-server builds fine unless I add krb5 support (MIT, but doesn't seem to matter). It fails with: cc -O -pipe -DLDAP_DEPRECATED -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wformat-security -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv initdb.o findtimezone.o localtime.o encnames.o -L../../../src/port -L../../../src/common -L/usr/local/lib -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-R'/usr/local/lib' -lpgport -lpgcommon -lxml2 -lssl -lcrypto -lkrb5 -lcom_err -lz -lreadline -lcrypt -lm -o initdb initdb.o: In function `check_authmethod_unspecified': initdb.c:(.text+0x27): undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' initdb.o: In function `warn_on_mount_point': initdb.c:(.text+0x4f): undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' initdb.c:(.text+0x7b): undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' initdb.c:(.text+0x99): undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' initdb.o: In function `check_authmethod_valid': initdb.c:(.text+0x130): undefined reference to `libintl_gettext' etc -lintl gets dropped from the compile line when -lkrb5 is added for some reason. $ uname -a FreeBSD imap1 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #0: Thu Aug 16 13:53:45 SAST 2012 root@imap1:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
krb5 missing dependency
Hi all, krb5 seems to require the openssl port but doesn't pull it in at build: # /usr/local/sbin/kdb5_util create -r XXX -s /usr/local/lib/libgssrpc.so: Undefined symbol "gss_mech_krb5" /usr/ports/security/krb5/Makefile: WITH_OPENSSL_PORT= yes # pkg_info -r krb5-1.10.3_1 Information for krb5-1.10.3_1: Depends on: Dependency: libiconv-1.14 Dependency: gettext-0.18.1.1 # uname -a FreeBSD XXX 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0: Wed Feb 15 18:04:55 SAST 2012 root@XXX:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 If I install the openssl port manually and rebuild krb5 then all is fine: # pkg_info -r krb5-1.10.3_1 Information for krb5-1.10.3_1: Depends on: Dependency: openssl-1.0.1_4 Dependency: libiconv-1.14 Dependency: gettext-0.18.1.1 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
webalizer and symlinked logs
Hi all, I get the following when I try to run webalizer: Error: Can't open log file /var/log/XXX (symlink) which according to the changelog seems to be intended behaviour, and doesn't seem configurable? How is webalizer's 'Incremental' processing supposed to be handled other than writing a messy wrapper script to inform webalizer of newly rotated log files? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
make config no longer being run
s/lang/perl5.14]# date; ls -al /var/db/ports Tue Jul 17 10:19:16 SAST 2012 total 6 drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Jul 17 10:19 . drwxr-xr-x 9 root wheel 512 Jul 17 08:23 .. drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Jul 17 10:19 perl Cheers, Gareth ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: best way to bind webserver to port 80 without running as root
On Wed 2012-01-04 (02:10), Dino Vliet wrote: > suddenly I'm facing this quest on freebsd 8. I need to bind my little > webserver running aolserver to port 80. In the past I was always using port > 8080 and had my router configured to forward requests on port 80 to the > server on port 8080. However, I am planning to host my little site on a > virtual server with a hosting company and figuredI can't use the workaround I > always used. So my question is, how to bind aolserver to port 80 without > running?as root as I understood ports below 1024 can only be used by root. > I found a sysctl net.inet.ip.portrange.reservedhigh which enables me to set > it to 0. However, I don't know what the security ramifications are of using > that. Are there any other options I could consider? Hi, if your server isn't able to bind as root and then drop its ownership then you can just run the process on a higher port number and use something like pf or portfwd to forward requests to port 80 to that higher port. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
FreeBSD Port: unbound-1.3.3
Hi There, Any chance of getting the unbound port upgraded to 1.3.4 ? Thanks Gareth ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: rt dependencies
On Tue 2009-05-19 (23:18), Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > > # pkgdb -L > hence one of the common problems. you need to use pkgtools.conf or one > of the ports that wraps /etc/make.conf and pkgtools.conf into so you > only have on source. Personally, I find -L usually useless if you > select any non-default options. Ok, so typing 'make config' then 'make' would've been better than: 'make install -DWITH_APACHE2 -DWITH_FASTCGI' ? I tried 'make config' before though and it didn't give any options. Guess the easiest is to just stop using 'pkgdb -L' then. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
rt dependencies
Hi guys, after messing up an install of rt (request tracker), and then cleaning up (so I thought), I installed by doing the following: cd /usr/ports/www/rt36 make install -DWITH_APACHE2 -DWITH_FASTCGI which has installed properly, but the package database seems inconsistent. When I try to fix this the system wants to install mod_perl and apache1.3 which I don't need nor want. Sample output which just cycles: # pkgdb -L .. rsync-3.0.6: ok rt-3.6.7_1: found www/p5-Apache-DBI www/mod_perl www/p5-libapreq -> Fixed. ruby-1.8.7.72_1,1: ok .. # pkgdb -F ---> Checking the package registry database Stale dependency: rt-3.6.7_1 -> p5-libapreq-1.34 (www/p5-libapreq): p5-libwww-5.826 (score:40%) ? ([y]es/[n]o/[a]ll) [no] yes Fixed. (-> p5-libwww-5.826) Stale dependency: rt-3.6.7_1 -> mod_perl-1.31 (www/mod_perl): mod_fastcgi-2.4.6 (score:26%) ? ([y]es/[n]o/[a]ll) [no] yes Fixed. (-> mod_fastcgi-2.4.6) Stale dependency: rt-3.6.7_1 -> p5-Apache-DBI-1.06_1 (www/p5-Apache-DBI): p5-Apache-Test-1.30_1 (score:58%) ? ([y]es/[n]o/[a]ll) [no] yes Fixed. (-> p5-Apache-Test-1.30_1) What is currently installed: $ pkg_info -Ix mod apache apache-2.0.63_2 Version 2.0.x of Apache web server with prefork MPM. mod_fastcgi-2.4.6 A fast-cgi module for Apache p5-Time-modules-2006.0814 Set of modules for time manipulation Anyone got any idea what's going on? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: caching problems
On Fri 2008-02-22 (21:59), RW wrote: > Have you tried using curl to prefetch the relevant files, IIRC it adds > a header that asks for a refetch or revalidation. That may cause the > cache to update its copy, depending on whether their policy complies > with standards. i haven't tried that, not really sure what prefetching means? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: caching problems
On Fri 2008-02-22 (21:17), Emanuel Haupt wrote: > You could host the INDEX file on a mirror running a webserver on a non > standard port. Then you could add something like this > to /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf: > > ENV['MASTER_SITE_INDEX'] = "http://your.index.mirror.tld:81/"; thanx > Although adjusting the cache policy seems more reasonable to me. agreed, if only the admins were reasonable .. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
caching problems
hey guys, our proxy is caching extremely old copies of the ports index and portaudit databases from freebsd.org. our admins claim that they cache the following files i need normally: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/auditfile.tbz http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/INDEX-6.bz2 since they have no no-cache pragma directives, and our admins won't budge on their 'policy'. is the freebsd site breaking standards in this way? is it feasible to add the directives? if not my solution is to mirror the files elsewhere and specify this mirror - for portaudit i see you can specify it in /usr/local/etc/portaudit.conf, but i can't see where to specify an alternate url for 'portsdb -F' to use? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ports tree out've sync
On Tue 2007-08-14 (17:47), Kris Kennaway wrote: > > similarly for portaudit: > > > > # portaudit -F > > auditfile.tbz 100% of 43 kB 1016 kBps > > portaudit: Database too old. > > Old database restored. > > portaudit: Download failed. > > That's bizarre because portaudit doesn't download from cvsup, so there > is no reason I can think why it would be old when freshly updated. for the record the web proxy i'm forced to go through is hoarding old copies of http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/auditfile.tbz and http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/INDEX-6.bz2 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ports tree out've sync
On Wed 2007-08-15 (01:44), RW wrote: > Given that no-one else is complaining, and it's a single url, the most > likely explanation for "Database too old" is that your system clock is > set to the wrong date. hi, i use ntpd (just checked again, the date/time is normal). ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ports tree out've sync
On Tue 2007-08-14 (17:47), Kris Kennaway wrote: > Are you cvsupping with a fixed tag? nope, this's my conf: $ cat /etc/cvsup.conf *default tag=. *default host=cvsup2.FreeBSD.org *default prefix=/usr *default base=/var/db *default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix compress ports-all ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ports tree out've sync
hey guys, i can't see a similar question recently so i wonder if
i've done something wrong? i've noticed for about 2 weeks that
things seem to be out've sync:
if i do a cvsup with either host=cvsup.FreeBSD.org or cvsup2.FreeBSD.org
and then a portsdb (even after removing /usr/ports/INDEX-6*)
'portversion -l ">"' returns 32 packages?
('portversion -l "<"' returns nothing)
similarly for portaudit:
# portaudit -F
auditfile.tbz 100% of 43 kB 1016 kBps
portaudit: Database too old.
Old database restored.
portaudit: Download failed.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: php5-pcre-5.2.1_4 was Re: FreeBSD Port: php5-5.2.1_3
On Tue 2007-03-13 (07:35), Eric wrote: > yes, it looks like _5 was committed some time this morning and it works. > Ive updated 3 boxes with it. if you did my earlier trick, you will have > to update your ports and reinstall php5 so it picks up the changes. yes php5-pcre-5.2.1_5 works for me too, thanx everyone ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: php5-pcre-5.2.1_4 was Re: FreeBSD Port: php5-5.2.1_3
On Tue 2007-03-13 (06:51), Eric wrote: > >edit /usr/ports/lang/php5/Makefile > > > >add --with-pcre-regex to the bottom of CONFIGURE_ARGS: > > > >reinstall php5 and php5-pcre i can confirm that this work, thanx ;) that obviously invokes the bundled version .. > Good news! it seems this is fixed with the latest php5-pcre port update. later than php5-pcre-5.2.1_3? > woot! woot indeed ;) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: php5-pcre-5.2.1_4 was Re: FreeBSD Port: php5-5.2.1_3
On Mon 2007-03-12 (23:15), Andr? B?hm wrote: > After the latest patch for pcre utf8 compatibility (php5-pcre-5.2.1_4), > I still get warnings about "Compilation failed: this version of PCRE is > not compiled with PCRE_UTF8 support at offset 0" for what looks like any > pcre-function that uses "u" as pattern modificator, while the look > behind / read ahead error has so far vanished. > > After "portupgrade -fo devel/pcre devel/pcre-utf8", I recompiled > everything twice, first "-f php5\*", then after checking > php/extensions.ini for the startup order, "-f pecl\*", then again "-f > pcre", checked php -v for startup errors and restarted apache. i get exactly the same. this's a bug report about related errors that i also get: http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=29914 and it suggests using the 'bundled' as opposed to 'external PCRE lib'. that doesn't seem like the best way gto go about it, but how would you? i don't see any bundled PCRE 'make config' options in php5? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: PHP 5.2.1
On Mon 2007-03-12 (11:28), Karol Kwiatkowski wrote: > > hi, i've just run into this too. what if devel/pcre-utf8 has now been > > removed? > > devel/pcre now has UTF-8 support enabled by default. Use devel/pcre or, > if you already have devel/pcre-utf-8 installed, 'portupgrade -o > devel/pcre pcre-utf8' should take care of that (add '-f' if necessary). hi, yea thanx, i saw '-DSUPPORT_UTF8' flags when recompiling devel/pcre. (i only ever had devel/pcre installed). after recompiling almost all related packages i don't get undefined symbols when loading pcre.so anymore, but i still get preg-replace() and preg-match() errors on certain .php pages. eg: Warning: preg_match() [function.preg-match]: Internal pcre_fullinfo() error -3 in /usr/local/www/phpBB2/includes/sessions.php on line 293 other errors including a bit've binary output on one've the pages: http://asylum.za.org/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: PHP 5.2.1
On Sun 2007-03-04 (19:26), Uwe Grohnwaldt wrote: > > For the error "lookbehind assertion is not fixed length" or > > "lookahead..." this will work again after deleting devel/pcre and > > installing devel/pcre-utf8 instead, afterwards recompile php5-pcre and > > other dependencies. > > I have found that afterwards the pcre-functions in php work fine, this > > also occures in some pear-libs, and hit my Horde installation... > > > > For Wordpress with php5.2.1 I suggest you take also a look at > > http://trac.wordpress.org/ticket/3886, which is a bug that shows up in > > wordpress after upgrading to php5.2.1 for all web visitors behind > > proxies (like squid). > > Hi, > good hint. a portupgrade -frR pcre-utf8-7.0 and portupgrade -frR > php5-pcre-5.2.1_3 later, my problems are blown away :) hi, i've just run into this too. what if devel/pcre-utf8 has now been removed? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portupgrade of xorg - imake not found
On Thu 2007-03-01 (20:27), gareth wrote: > On Sat 2006-02-11 (23:24), Rob B wrote: > i've deinstalled and rebuilt imake but the same error comes up. is it > safe to set FORCE_PKG_REGISTER? would that even make a difference since > reinstalling doesn't? woa, sorry looks like i replied to the wrong year .. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portupgrade of xorg - imake not found
On Sat 2006-02-11 (23:24), Rob B wrote: > I'm having all sorts of bother trying to build anything related to xorg. > > Seems as though imake has it's knickers in a twist: > > ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for xorg-libraries-6.9.0 > /bin/cp > /usr/ports/x11/xorg-libraries/files/nls-Compose-microsoft-cp1251 > /usr/work/usr/ports/x11/xorg-libraries/work/xc/nls/Compose/microsoft-cp1251 > /bin/mkdir -p /usr/work/usr/ports/x11/xorg-libraries/work/xc/lib/XThrStub > /bin/cp /usr/ports/x11/xorg-libraries/files/XThrStub-Imakefile > /usr/work/usr/ports/x11/xorg-libraries/work/xc/lib/XThrStub/Imakefile > ===> xorg-libraries-6.9.0 depends on executable: imake - found > ===> xorg-libraries-6.9.0 depends on shared library: drm - found > ===> xorg-libraries-6.9.0 depends on shared library: freetype.9 - found > ===> xorg-libraries-6.9.0 depends on shared library: fontconfig.1 - found > ===> Configuring for xorg-libraries-6.9.0 > cd ./config/imake && make -D INSTALLS_DEPENDS -f Makefile.ini > BOOTSTRAPCFLAGS="" CC="cc" > rm -f ./config/makedepend/Makefile.proto > ./config/imake/imake -I./config/cf -s > ./config/makedepend/Makefile.proto -f ./config/makedepend/Imakefile > -DTOPDIR=../.. -DCURDIR=./config/makedepend > ./config/imake/imake: not found > *** Error code 127 > > Stop in /usr/work/usr/ports/x11/xorg-libraries/work/xc. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11/xorg-libraries. > *** Error code 1 > > Anyone else seeing this? I've tried re-updating my ports tree, I've > blown away the workdir ... still happens. i've been getting similar for awhile: ===> Installing for imake-6.9.0_1 ===> imake-6.9.0_1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8 - found ===> Generating temporary packing list ===> Checking if devel/imake-6 already installed ===> imake-6.9.0_1 is already installed You may wish to `make deinstall'' and install this port again by `make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. If you really wish to overwrite the old port of devel/imake-6 without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" in your environment or the "make install" command line. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/imake-6. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/xorg-libraries. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade.63866.114 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=xorg-libraries-6.9.0 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=6.9.0 make ** Fix the problem and try again. ---> Skipping 'x11-servers/xorg-server' (xorg-server-6.9.0_5) because a requisite package 'xorg-libraries-6.9.0' (x11/xorg-libraries) failed (specify -k to force) etcetc. i've deinstalled and rebuilt imake but the same error comes up. is it safe to set FORCE_PKG_REGISTER? would that even make a difference since reinstalling doesn't? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: phpBB patch?
On Thu 2007-02-01 (23:24), LI Xin wrote: > > ah, thanx for the link. so this's the only thing that changed? : > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/www/phpbb/files/Attic/security-patch-includes-sessions.php?annotate=1.2 > > Yes. The only change is that the patch is removed and PORTREVISION bump. thanx ;) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: phpBB patch?
On Wed 2007-01-24 (19:51), Gordon Stratton wrote: > On 1/24/07, gareth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >hi, portupgrade just upgraded phpbb-2.0.22 to phpbb-2.0.22_1. > >it used phpBB-2.0.22.tar.bz2 from www.phpbb.com (same as before), > >and as far as i can tell the .php files are the same (and naturally > >the database is untouched). does anyone know what this upgrade > >was meant to achieve? > > >From the log[1]: > --- > Remove previously added security patch against session table > exhaustion, as it causes more problems in the latest phpbb > version. Users are advised to drop and re-create their > session tables (phpbb_sessions, phpbb_sessions_keys) without > using "HEAP" tables. ah, thanx for the link. so this's the only thing that changed? : http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/www/phpbb/files/Attic/security-patch-includes-sessions.php?annotate=1.2 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
phpBB patch?
hi, portupgrade just upgraded phpbb-2.0.22 to phpbb-2.0.22_1. it used phpBB-2.0.22.tar.bz2 from www.phpbb.com (same as before), and as far as i can tell the .php files are the same (and naturally the database is untouched). does anyone know what this upgrade was meant to achieve? - gareth ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: phpBB
On Fri 2006-12-29 (05:29), LI Xin wrote: > gareth wrote: > > hi, i have phpbb-2.0.21 installed, and see version 2.0.22 is ready to > > be upgraded to by portupgrade. i've never been through an upgrade of > > phpBB and was wondering what exactly portupgrade does? > > > > i see i can add the code changes from 2.0.21 to 2.0.22 for the webpages > > from phpbb.com, which i will do since my board is fairly heavily modded > > (and then you run an update_to_latest.php which updates the database). > > > > i assume portupgrade just updates the webpages, so that i can restore > > my own pages after it thinks it's done (and leaves things like > > update_to_latest.php to the user)? > > portupgrade would do pkg_delete and then make install. So yes, it just > updates the php files, and yes, you will need to do update_to_latest.php > your own. ok, thanx. as long as it doesn't touch the database i'm happy. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
phpBB
hi, i have phpbb-2.0.21 installed, and see version 2.0.22 is ready to be upgraded to by portupgrade. i've never been through an upgrade of phpBB and was wondering what exactly portupgrade does? i see i can add the code changes from 2.0.21 to 2.0.22 for the webpages from phpbb.com, which i will do since my board is fairly heavily modded (and then you run an update_to_latest.php which updates the database). i assume portupgrade just updates the webpages, so that i can restore my own pages after it thinks it's done (and leaves things like update_to_latest.php to the user)? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portupgrade
On Mon 2006-12-04 (00:23), Kris Kennaway wrote: > OK, good to know. Can you report further details to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will do. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portupgrade
On Mon 2006-12-04 (05:42), gareth wrote: > strange, thanx, am trying another mirror .. yup, our country's mirror wasn't up to date. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portupgrade
On Sun 2006-12-03 (22:30), Kris Kennaway wrote: > Those versions are all a couple of weeks stale, so I guess your ports > tree really isn't up-to-date. strange, thanx, am trying another mirror .. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portupgrade
On Sun 2006-12-03 (22:04), Kris Kennaway wrote: > Let's move this to the correct mailing list (note reply-to)... sure, the original question then since we've moved lists: On Mon 2006-12-04 (04:21), gareth wrote: > hi, portupgrade doesn't seem to be doing anything? this's the session: > > # portversion -l "<" > gnupg < > p5-Compress-Zlib< > p5-IO-Socket-SSL< > p5-PathTools< > portupgrade < > rsync < > spamass-milter < > # portupgrade -aF > What does portversion -l '<' -v say about the old and new versions? # portversion -l '<' -v gnupg-1.4.5_1 < needs updating (port has 1.4.5_2) p5-Compress-Zlib-1.42 < needs updating (port has 2.001) p5-IO-Socket-SSL-1.01 < needs updating (port has 1.02) p5-PathTools-3.23 < needs updating (port has 3.24) portupgrade-2.1.3.3_1,2 < needs updating (port has 2.2.2,2) rsync-2.6.8_2 < needs updating (port has 2.6.9) spamass-milter-0.3.1_1 < needs updating (port has 0.3.1_3) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: fetch info
On Thu 2006-11-09 (16:08), Kay Abendroth wrote: > You could run portupgrade|portinstall -F to fetch only. > So, if you don't have lsof installed you would type: > > portinstall -F sysutils/lsof && portinstall sysutils/lsof > > And to upgrade a lot of installed ports: > > portupgrade -F -a && portupgrade -a wow, didn't expect it to be this elegant ;) thanx for the replies guys. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
fetch info
hey guys, i'm struggling to find out how to do this, for example from the help page: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports-using.html # cd /usr/ports/sysutils/lsof # make >> lsof_4.57D.freebsd.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. >> Attempting to fetch from ftp://lsof.itap.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/lsof/. ===> Extracting for lsof-4.57 how do i figure out before typing make what that url is? (the filename part seems to be under 'distinfo'). for instance i'd like to download all the necessary tarballs before running 'portupgrade' to make the actual upgrade quicker. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portupgrade portupgrade leaves an error....
On Thu 2006-07-13 (11:43), gareth wrote: > hi, i tried all've that, but when i get to 'pkgdb -F', this's what it says: > > # pkgdb -F > ---> Checking the package registry database > [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... > /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db: unexpected file type or format -- Invalid argument; > rebuild needed] [Rebuilding the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... > /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db: unexpected file type or format -- Invalid argument: > Cannot update the pkgdb!]: Cannot update the pkgdb!] > # ok, don't mind me, i was deleting /usr/ports/INDEX*, but when i delete pkgdb.db as well, it works (i think, still chugging away ..) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portupgrade portupgrade leaves an error....
On Mon 2006-07-03 (05:56), Donald J. O'Neill wrote: > OK, then you're going to have to get a bit more aggressive. This is what I > did > to take care of the problem on my 6.1-STABLE system: > > mv /usr/ports/INDEX-6.db --> INDEX-6.db.org > mv /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db --> pkgdb.db.org > > pkg_delete portupgrade-2.1.3.1,2 > pkg_delete ruby18-bdb-0.5.9 > pkg_delete ruby18-bdb1-0.2.2 > pkg_delete db4-4.0.14_1,1 > pkg_delete db41-4.1.25_3 > pkg_delete db42-4.2.52_4 > > I left db43-4.3.29, It would be needed later and reomoving it would cause too > many other things to have to be rebuilt (or I get a bite in the ass if I > don't). > > 'cd /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade' > 'make conf' ?- select bdb4, it'll use db43 as that's what's installed. > 'make package-recursive' > > 'pkgdb -F'fix the dependencies and rebuild pkgdb.db > portversion -v |grep needs??rebuilds portsdb (and rechecks pkgdb.db) and > I > find out what ports need upgrading. > > 'portsnap fetch update' > 'portversion -v |grep needs' > > It works and I now have a working portupgrade-2.1.3.2,2 > > I did a lot of reading about this problem and a lot of looking at > dependencies > using pkg_info -r and -R to come up with the way I corrected the problem. I > have two other 6.1 systems (one STABLE, one RELEASE) to fix the problem on. > They are a little different as they don't have the same things installed on > them that are on my personal system, but they are similar in what I'm going > to do to fix them. hi, i tried all've that, but when i get to 'pkgdb -F', this's what it says: # pkgdb -F ---> Checking the package registry database [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db: unexpected file type or format -- Invalid argument; rebuild needed] [Rebuilding the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db: unexpected file type or format -- Invalid argument: Cannot update the pkgdb!]: Cannot update the pkgdb!] # ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portupgrade portupgrade leaves an error....
On Fri 2006-06-30 (20:44), Donald J. O'Neill wrote: > pkg_delete portupgrade-whatever the number, pkg_add -r portupgrade. This gets > you an older version of portupgrade. > > I ran into the same problem today. It's a way around the problem until it's > fixed. i tried that: # pkg_delete portupgrade-2.1.3.2,2 # pkg_add -r portupgrade Error: FTP Unable to get ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5.3-release/Latest/portupgrade.tbz: Not Found pkg_add: unable to fetch 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5.3-release/Latest/portupgrade.tbz' by URL (sure enough the url doesn't exist) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
