Re: 10.0-CUR r226986 && ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp]
- message from Garrett Cooper - > > I don't know what the correct fix ist, and for the moment I > > created 'freebsd10.h' as a copy of 'freebsd9.h': > > > > # cat freebsd10.h > > #include "freebsd9.h" > > #define freebsd8 freebsd8 > > > > +Cc: maintainer > > You'll need to do more than just that. Take a look at the port history for > more details... > -Garrett I can imagine, esp. after reading the dialogs of the last PR ports/158714; that's why I cc'ed the maintainer; my ugly change above at least made compiling of KDE3 to continue; the port is broken at the moment for 10-CURRENT; matthias -- Matthias Apitz e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: 10.0-CUR r226986 && ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp
On Nov 3, 2011, at 8:25 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Thursday, November 03, 2011 a las 01:42:50PM -0400, b. f. escribió: > >> No, it is not the same. You can either masquerade, by setting UNAME_r >> and OSVERSION, or by editing the headers and scripts that define them; >> or you can use WITH_FBSD10_FIX for ports that define HAS_CONFIGURE >> (which is implied by USE_AUTOTOOLS and GNU_CONFIGURE). Right now the >> masquerading is probably safer, because there are some problems with >> the fix that are still being resolved -- and a few ports that may fail >> despite the fix. But of course if you help to test without >> masquerading, these problems will be resolved sooner. > > Well, I will try to help. > > I have set WITH_FBSD10_FIX in /etc/make.conf; the port > ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp installs: > > /usr/local/include/net-snmp/net-snmp-config.h > > with: > > ... > /* define the system type include file here */ > #define NETSNMP_SYSTEM_INCLUDE_FILE "net-snmp/system/freebsd10.h" > ... > > but the named header file is not there: > > # ls -C1 /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/free* > /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd.h > /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd2.h > /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd3.h > /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd4.h > /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd5.h > /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd6.h > /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd7.h > /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd8.h > /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd9.h > > I don't know what the correct fix ist, and for the moment I > created 'freebsd10.h' as a copy of 'freebsd9.h': > > # cat freebsd10.h > #include "freebsd9.h" > #define freebsd8 freebsd8 > > +Cc: maintainer You'll need to do more than just that. Take a look at the port history for more details... -Garrett___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: 10.0-CUR r226986 && ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp
El día Thursday, November 03, 2011 a las 01:42:50PM -0400, b. f. escribió: > No, it is not the same. You can either masquerade, by setting UNAME_r > and OSVERSION, or by editing the headers and scripts that define them; > or you can use WITH_FBSD10_FIX for ports that define HAS_CONFIGURE > (which is implied by USE_AUTOTOOLS and GNU_CONFIGURE). Right now the > masquerading is probably safer, because there are some problems with > the fix that are still being resolved -- and a few ports that may fail > despite the fix. But of course if you help to test without > masquerading, these problems will be resolved sooner. Well, I will try to help. I have set WITH_FBSD10_FIX in /etc/make.conf; the port ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp installs: /usr/local/include/net-snmp/net-snmp-config.h with: ... /* define the system type include file here */ #define NETSNMP_SYSTEM_INCLUDE_FILE "net-snmp/system/freebsd10.h" ... but the named header file is not there: # ls -C1 /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/free* /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd.h /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd2.h /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd3.h /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd4.h /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd5.h /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd6.h /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd7.h /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd8.h /usr/local/include/net-snmp/system/freebsd9.h I don't know what the correct fix ist, and for the moment I created 'freebsd10.h' as a copy of 'freebsd9.h': # cat freebsd10.h #include "freebsd9.h" #define freebsd8 freebsd8 +Cc: maintainer Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
