Firefox doesn't build...
... on amd-64. simd doesn't build: sse2 not found in x86. i tried a bunch of options, didn't work. Patrick Dorion 📱 +1 438 345-4575 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Firefox doesn't build...
Hi! > ... on amd-64. > > simd doesn't build: sse2 not found in x86. i tried a bunch of options, > didn't work. Can you provide a link to the build log ? It builds here using poudriere, btw. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Firefox doesn't build...
I had the same problem. Set LLVM_PORT in lang/rust to off and recompile rust. This solved the problem with firefox. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Firefox doesn't build...
On 10 Nov 2017, at 22:43, Patrick Dorion wrote: > > ... on amd-64. > > simd doesn't build: sse2 not found in x86. i tried a bunch of options, > didn't work. See https://bugs.freebsd.org/223415. For now, rebuild lang/rust without the LLVM_PORT option. -Dimitry signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Re: Firefox doesn't build...
Dimitry Andric writes: > On 10 Nov 2017, at 22:43, Patrick Dorion wrote: > >> >> ... on amd-64. >> >> simd doesn't build: sse2 not found in x86. i tried a bunch of options, >> didn't work. > > See https://bugs.freebsd.org/223415. For now, rebuild lang/rust without the > LLVM_PORT option. That's wrong one. https://bugs.freebsd.org/223342 is the one about PORT_LLVM regression which affects www/firefox build (as opposed to runtime). ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
RE: Firefox doesn't build...
Well I'm not sure what's going on with RUST and LLVM, and the option wasn't on when I checked the config, but I'll try rebuild it, and let you know... Also, someone asked for the install log... I guess there's no need for it since it's a known issue ( I lost it ._. )... I was also having problems compiling www/firefox-ecr except with the default build settings; again, I tried a bunch of combinations, including not building components written in RUST, and it failed every single time... I'm very frustrated at this, but Chromium doesn't compile either, Opera doesn't work properly and is outdated, and I just plain want to use Firefox... It's just the best and most sensible and versatile option... I'm kinda pissed because I've been trying to build it for two whole days now (and I have insomnia because of a medication right now), and this right after I decide to wipe my system to rebuild the filesystem and datasets, and remove all binary packages I had mixed with ports (someone said on the forum it wasn't a good idea to mix-and-match, and I prefer ports, anyway... I think it's probably more performant this way, but I could be wrong). I built Xorg and PulseAudio without major problems, but now I'm trying to build what are probably the most popular pieces of software on the planet - not just on FreeBSD - and it just keeps borking, it's kind of disappointing... I don't really need my commitment to be tested right now, I need to find stability because this is starting to affect my life... I'm feeling messy/dirty... : [ Thanks for listening : \ ... and for helping... : D When I have something working, and/or when I've completely given-up, I'll run the build one last time for each, and send you the logs. Thanks for letting me know about the RUST thing, and I just wanted you guys to know I hadn't forgotten about you, I'm just trying to build various ways, and sometimes I build other things in between since it's a new system, lots of catching-up and configuring to do... Can't wait to have a working, stable, fully-functional, fully-optimized Firefox binary I can use on this system... Crazy how much goes on through just the browser, how big a place it has in probably not just my life... FreeBSD helps with that, I was suffocating in Windows, and had to reset it, which is why I'm back since the KMS video drivers are completed... not unhappy... Despite this, I'm still happy about FreeBSD, how far it's come, how strong, and oriented it is, how committed and capable the people working on it are, and what kind of individual they are... I'm rambling, I need sleep, and a hug... -_- I'm so tired, but I can't fall asleep. fml. Patrick Dorion 📱 +1 438 345-4575 From: Jan Beich [jbe...@freebsd.org] Sent: Friday, November 10, 2017 19:25 To: Dimitry Andric Cc: Patrick Dorion; ge...@freebsd.org; freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox doesn't build... Dimitry Andric writes: > On 10 Nov 2017, at 22:43, Patrick Dorion wrote: > >> >> ... on amd-64. >> >> simd doesn't build: sse2 not found in x86. i tried a bunch of options, >> didn't work. > > See https://bugs.freebsd.org/223415. For now, rebuild lang/rust without the > LLVM_PORT option. That's wrong one. https://bugs.freebsd.org/223342 is the one about PORT_LLVM regression which affects www/firefox build (as opposed to runtime). ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Firefox doesn't build...
On 12 November 2017 at 05:58, Patrick Dorion wrote: > Well I'm not sure what's going on with RUST and LLVM, and the option wasn't > on when I checked the config, but I'll try rebuild it, and let you know... Make sure you build your ports using poudriere or synth. Using non-clean room build systems will usually result in a lot of lost time trying to figure out which of your installed ports breaks your current build. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Firefox (Doesn't) Build
What's the difference between using Poudriere or Synth, though? This is a clean system, I can't imagine a jail being cleaner... it was unpacked from the DVD the day before yesterday Also, how do you run PGO (profile-guided optimizations) while building in a jail? You need a running X server and access to it for that This doesn't make sense... Firefox, or any software, should build just fine on my system as it is... Everything else does, so why not Firefox? Like... I don't see why you recommend those third-party software... If you were trying to brush me off, I think that's just too low... Patrick Dorion 📱 +1 438 345-4575 From: Patrick Dorion Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2017 16:48 To: j...@chen.org.nz; li...@opsec.eu Subject: Damn, guys... I'm going to try with Synth... Howcome it's the first time I hear about this process/procedure..? I don't remember anyone ever recommending this, or even talking about this, much less the handbook or any manual page recommending this process of building in a clean environment using a helper... Not fair... ._. Anyway, I'll let you know how it goes Patrick Dorion 📱 +1 438 345-4575 From: Jonathan Chen [j...@chen.org.nz] Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2017 14:47 To: Patrick Dorion Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox doesn't build... On 12 November 2017 at 05:58, Patrick Dorion wrote: > Well I'm not sure what's going on with RUST and LLVM, and the option wasn't > on when I checked the config, but I'll try rebuild it, and let you know... Make sure you build your ports using poudriere or synth. Using non-clean room build systems will usually result in a lot of lost time trying to figure out which of your installed ports breaks your current build. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen From: Kurt Jaeger [li...@opsec.eu] Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2017 16:38 To: Patrick Dorion Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox doesn't build... [OUTPUT LOGS] Hi! > I hope this helps, and if there's anything I can try, please let me know... Use poudriere to build firefox, then 'pkg add' that locally-build firefox package. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Firefox (Doesn't) Build
Patrick Dorion writes: > What's the difference between using Poudriere or Synth, though? > > This is a clean system, I can't imagine a jail being cleaner... it was > unpacked from the DVD the day before yesterday > > Also, how do you run PGO (profile-guided optimizations) while building > in a jail? You need a running X server and access to it for that PGO is simply broken for architectures that default to libc++. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223563 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Firefox (Doesn't) Build
On 12 November 2017 at 12:16, Patrick Dorion wrote: > What's the difference between using Poudriere or Synth, though? > > This is a clean system, I can't imagine a jail being cleaner... it was > unpacked from the DVD the day before yesterday Both are clean room builds; ie where only minimal build dependancies are installed for each port build. The main difference is that: * poudriere uses jails to achieve this * synth uses unionfs+chroot to achieve this Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Firefox (Doesn't) Build
On 12/11/2017 07:14, Jonathan Chen wrote: On 12 November 2017 at 12:16, Patrick Dorion wrote: What's the difference between using Poudriere or Synth, though? This is a clean system, I can't imagine a jail being cleaner... it was unpacked from the DVD the day before yesterday Both are clean room builds; ie where only minimal build dependancies are installed for each port build. The main difference is that: * poudriere uses jails to achieve this * synth uses unionfs+chroot to achieve this Does it mean synth can't be used on ZFS? AFAIK unionfs isn't properly supported on ZFS, i.e. a file that exists in the underlying fs can't be marked as deleted in the overlying fs. GrzegorzJ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Firefox (Doesn't) Build
On 11/12/17 06:03, Grzegorz Junka wrote: On 12/11/2017 07:14, Jonathan Chen wrote: On 12 November 2017 at 12:16, Patrick Dorion wrote: What's the difference between using Poudriere or Synth, though? This is a clean system, I can't imagine a jail being cleaner... it was unpacked from the DVD the day before yesterday Both are clean room builds; ie where only minimal build dependancies are installed for each port build. The main difference is that:  * poudriere uses jails to achieve this  * synth uses unionfs+chroot to achieve this Does it mean synth can't be used on ZFS? AFAIK unionfs isn't properly supported on ZFS, i.e. a file that exists in the underlying fs can't be marked as deleted in the overlying fs. GrzegorzJ I use synth on a ZFS raid systemworks fine ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Firefox doesn't build...
El dÃa sábado, noviembre 11, 2017 a las 01:25:38a. m. +0100, Jan Beich escribió: > Dimitry Andric writes: > > > On 10 Nov 2017, at 22:43, Patrick Dorion wrote: > > > >> > >> ... on amd-64. > >> > >> simd doesn't build: sse2 not found in x86. i tried a bunch of options, > >> didn't work. > > > > See https://bugs.freebsd.org/223415. For now, rebuild lang/rust without > > the LLVM_PORT option. > > That's wrong one. https://bugs.freebsd.org/223342 is the one about PORT_LLVM > regression > which affects www/firefox build (as opposed to runtime). Hello, I've read this mail thread and the PR, but I'm now unsure what to set or unset; Someone (Walter Schwarzenfeld) said here: Set LLVM_PORT in lang/rust to off and recompile rust. This solved the problem with firefox. If I run 'make config' in lang/rust, there is no LLVM_PORT option, only PORT_LLVM and the generated options file is: # This file is auto-generated by 'make config'. # Options for rust-1.21.0_1 _OPTIONS_READ=rust-1.21.0_1 _FILE_COMPLETE_OPTIONS_LIST=DOCS GDB LLNEXTGEN PORT_LLVM SOURCES OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=DOCS OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=GDB OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=LLNEXTGEN OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=PORT_LLVM OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=SOURCES What should I set or unset exactly? Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ g...@unixarea.de, ⌂ http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045 Public GnuPG key: http://www.unixarea.de/key.pub ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Firefox doesn't build...
Sprry. I puzzled the name of the option. I meant PORT_LLVM. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Firefox (Doesn't) Build
On 13 November 2017 at 00:03, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > On 12/11/2017 07:14, Jonathan Chen wrote: >> >> On 12 November 2017 at 12:16, Patrick Dorion >> wrote: >>> >>> What's the difference between using Poudriere or Synth, though? >>> >>> This is a clean system, I can't imagine a jail being cleaner... it was >>> unpacked from the DVD the day before yesterday >> >> Both are clean room builds; ie where only minimal build dependancies >> are installed for each port build. The main difference is that: >> * poudriere uses jails to achieve this >> * synth uses unionfs+chroot to achieve this > > > Does it mean synth can't be used on ZFS? AFAIK unionfs isn't properly > supported on ZFS, i.e. a file that exists in the underlying fs can't be > marked as deleted in the overlying fs. synth uses unionfs for read-only access to the build-host's files; eg: ports-dir, system binaries. In normal operation, all build artifacts are generated onto on an isolated tmpfs filesystem. There are no additions/removals on the build-host's filesystem. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Firefox (Doesn't) Build
On 13 November 2017 at 07:33, Jonathan Chen wrote: > On 13 November 2017 at 00:03, Grzegorz Junka wrote: >> On 12/11/2017 07:14, Jonathan Chen wrote: >>> >>> On 12 November 2017 at 12:16, Patrick Dorion >>> wrote: What's the difference between using Poudriere or Synth, though? This is a clean system, I can't imagine a jail being cleaner... it was unpacked from the DVD the day before yesterday >>> >>> Both are clean room builds; ie where only minimal build dependancies >>> are installed for each port build. The main difference is that: >>> * poudriere uses jails to achieve this >>> * synth uses unionfs+chroot to achieve this >> >> >> Does it mean synth can't be used on ZFS? AFAIK unionfs isn't properly >> supported on ZFS, i.e. a file that exists in the underlying fs can't be >> marked as deleted in the overlying fs. > > synth uses unionfs for read-only access to the build-host's files; eg: > ports-dir, system binaries. In normal operation, all build artifacts > are generated onto on an isolated tmpfs filesystem. There are no > additions/removals on the build-host's filesystem. Sorry, this is not true. The build logs and generated packages *do* affect the build-host's filesystem; but the build operations do not. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Firefox doesn't build...
El dÃa domingo, noviembre 12, 2017 a las 06:52:56p. m. +0100, Walter Schwarzenfeld escribió: > Sprry. I puzzled the name of the option. > I meant PORT_LLVM. Ok, but this seems to be unset by default: # This file is auto-generated by 'make config'. # Options for rust-1.21.0_1 _OPTIONS_READ=rust-1.21.0_1 _FILE_COMPLETE_OPTIONS_LIST=DOCS GDB LLNEXTGEN PORT_LLVM SOURCES OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=DOCS OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=GDB OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=LLNEXTGEN OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=PORT_LLVM<* OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=SOURCES or I'm wrong? matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ g...@unixarea.de, ⌂ http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045 Public GnuPG key: http://www.unixarea.de/key.pub signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Firefox doesn't build...
Yes, it is unset by default. I changed it to reduce compile time. (Maybe, some other do it for the same reason). ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Firefox doesn't build... [OUTPUT LOGS]
Hi! > I hope this helps, and if there's anything I can try, please let me know... Use poudriere to build firefox, then 'pkg add' that locally-build firefox package. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
