Re: Impending update to devel/gettext

2007-02-15 Thread Ade Lovett


On Feb 15, 2007, at 20:34 , Jeremy Messenger wrote:
I have updated it in MC without bump it, but I always can bump it  
for gmkdir issue if one of my team request. Is it rare? If it is,  
then I think anyone can always reinstall it. :-)


It'll only affect you if you happen to have an old devel/gettext  
installed, sysutils/coreutils installed, and don't deinstall  
coreutils before trying to update gettext.


So year, pretty rare.  Certainly not worth a version bump.  It'll be  
0.16.1 when it goes to the main three.


Sounds good, I think that Kris said that 4.x support are going to  
be gone in our tree (include bsd.*.mk) sometime soon (unsure on  
when, but soon).


AIUI, the final sweep will be done before 3/1, which is why I chose  
that date.  If it gets delayed for any reason, then I'll wait until  
that update happens before committing.



There is no issue with GNOME 2.17/2.18 in MC so far.


Excellent.  Good to hear.

-aDe

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Impending update to devel/gettext

2007-02-15 Thread Mark Linimon
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 10:34:27PM -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> Sounds good, I think that Kris said that 4.x support are going to be gone  
> in our tree (include bsd.*.mk) sometime soon (unsure on when, but soon).

After the next -exp run.  He and I are merging our changes to do this.

mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"



Re: Impending update to devel/gettext

2007-02-15 Thread Jeremy Messenger

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:01:03 -0600, Ade Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



On Feb 13, 2007, at 00:23 , Peter Johnson wrote:
The correct fix is probably a patch to the gettext configure script to  
disable the check for gmkdir.


Hi Peter,

Please see http://www.lovett.com/ade/freebsd/gettext-4.diff

MD5 (gettext-4.diff) = 792085ea01e8242e7e0260bad3336efd

This should address your issues with sysutils/coreutils being around,  
and gettext picking up on gmkdir.


I have updated it in MC without bump it, but I always can bump it for  
gmkdir issue if one of my team request. Is it rare? If it is, then I think  
anyone can always reinstall it. :-)



Everyone,

In addition, as part of the ongoing cleanup of the tree as a result of  
the deprecation of 4.x for the ports world, devel/gettext will now FAIL  
(strangely) on 4.x.  This is on purpose, and I have no plans to change  
things back.  I'm not even going to put in a "BROKEN on 4.x" stanza,  
since work is underway to remove those from the tree.


Naturally, with the number of ports depending on devel/gettext, this  
will be a pretty good sledgehammer blow.


Sounds good, I think that Kris said that 4.x support are going to be gone  
in our tree (include bsd.*.mk) sometime soon (unsure on when, but soon).


Assuming no further issues, I will be committing this update on or  
around 1st March 2007.


Thanks to everyone who has provided input on this patch to date.


There is no issue with GNOME 2.17/2.18 in MC so far.

Cheers,
Mezz


-aDe



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD GNOME Team  -  FreeBSD Multimedia Hat (ports, not src)
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wiki.freebsd.org/multimedia  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Impending update to devel/gettext

2007-02-15 Thread Ade Lovett


On Feb 13, 2007, at 00:23 , Peter Johnson wrote:
The correct fix is probably a patch to the gettext configure script  
to disable the check for gmkdir.


Hi Peter,

Please see http://www.lovett.com/ade/freebsd/gettext-4.diff

MD5 (gettext-4.diff) = 792085ea01e8242e7e0260bad3336efd

This should address your issues with sysutils/coreutils being around,  
and gettext picking up on gmkdir.




Everyone,

In addition, as part of the ongoing cleanup of the tree as a result  
of the deprecation of 4.x for the ports world, devel/gettext will now  
FAIL (strangely) on 4.x.  This is on purpose, and I have no plans to  
change things back.  I'm not even going to put in a "BROKEN on 4.x"  
stanza, since work is underway to remove those from the tree.


Naturally, with the number of ports depending on devel/gettext, this  
will be a pretty good sledgehammer blow.


Assuming no further issues, I will be committing this update on or  
around 1st March 2007.


Thanks to everyone who has provided input on this patch to date.

-aDe

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Impending update to devel/gettext

2007-02-13 Thread Peter Johnson
I tried your gettext 0.16.1 patch, and ran into problems as I have 
sysutils/coreutils installed with NLS enabled.  The issue is that 
coreutils installs a /usr/local/bin/gmkdir which uses the gettext 
library.  An upgrade of gettext fails as the gettext configure process 
prefers gmkdir over mkdir, but the deinstall deletes the gettext 
library, so the subsequent install can't work as gmkdir doesn't work 
without the old library being installed!


The correct fix is probably a patch to the gettext configure script to 
disable the check for gmkdir.


Thanks,
Peter

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Impending update to devel/gettext

2007-02-02 Thread Martin Matuska
Thanks, found no other problems.

Ade Lovett schrieb:
> Thanks for the input.  I have cleaned up the Makefile to make it as
> portlint-happy as it's going to get, addressing the INSTALLS_SHLIB ->
> USE_LDCONFIG change, and also removed the removal of share/locale/eo,
> since that is now present in the /etc/mtree/BSD.local.dist (it wasn't
> at the initial time of writing the patch).
>
> New version can be found here:
>
> http://www.lovett.com/ade/freebsd/gettext-3.diff
>
> MD5 (gettext-3.diff) = 58446c5fbaaf3f63c8aa65526bc71210
>
> -aDe
>
> ___
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Impending update to devel/gettext

2007-01-31 Thread Ade Lovett
Thanks for the input.  I have cleaned up the Makefile to make it as  
portlint-happy as it's going to get, addressing the INSTALLS_SHLIB ->  
USE_LDCONFIG change, and also removed the removal of share/locale/eo,  
since that is now present in the /etc/mtree/BSD.local.dist (it wasn't  
at the initial time of writing the patch).


New version can be found here:

http://www.lovett.com/ade/freebsd/gettext-3.diff

MD5 (gettext-3.diff) = 58446c5fbaaf3f63c8aa65526bc71210

-aDe

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Impending update to devel/gettext

2007-01-31 Thread Martin Matuska
On Jan 30, 2007, at 23:27 , Ade Lovett wrote:

> In the true spirit of "oh crap, let's fix this thing properly", I now  
> present to you:
> 
> http://www.lovett.com/ade/freebsd/gettext-2.diff
> 
> MD5 (gettext-2.diff) = 97d80b61281f6bc5aa88362a970b50a3
> 
> This significantly reworks the original 0.16.1 update, removing the  
> (IMO) relatively useless OPTIONS, and makes the port NOPORTDOCS-safe  
> as requested in ports/106998.
> 
> The previous diff has been removed -- if you've already downloaded  
> it, my apologies, please use this one instead.
> 
> Thanks,
>   -aDe

The new gettext port seems to be working. Compiles and installs correctly.

a) To make it little more portlint-happy:

Is the deprecated INSTALLS_SHLIB knob necessary?
USE_LDCONFIG=   yes

b) My tinderbox reports this issue at the end:

-- TINDERBOX LOG BEGINS --



===>  Building package for gettext-0.16.1
Creating package /tmp/packages/All/gettext-0.16.1.tbz
Registering depends: libiconv-1.9.2_2.
Creating bzip'd tar ball in '/tmp/packages/All/gettext-0.16.1.tbz'
Deleting gettext-0.16.1


=== Checking filesystem state
list of files present before this port was installed but missing after it was 
deinstalled)
./usr/local/share/locale/eo missing
./usr/local/share/locale/eo/LC_MESSAGES missing
Deleting libtool-1.5.22_3
Deleting libiconv-1.9.2_2

=== Checking filesystem state after all packages deleted

list of files present on clean system but missing after everything was 
deinstalled)
./usr/local/share/locale/eo missing
./usr/local/share/locale/eo/LC_MESSAGES missing

build of /usr/ports/devel/gettext ended at Wed Jan 31 14:50:58 UTC 2007

-- TINDERBOX LOG ENDS --

This eo locale (Esperanto) is not in the charset.alias list. I am asking 
myself, why tinderbox reports
the directory was present on the system prior to installing gettext-0.16.1

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Impending update to devel/gettext

2007-01-30 Thread Ade Lovett


On Jan 30, 2007, at 16:52 , Ade Lovett wrote:


Hi folks,

I'm looking for some early adopters to try out an upgrade of devel/ 
gettext to 0.16.1


In the true spirit of "oh crap, let's fix this thing properly", I now  
present to you:


http://www.lovett.com/ade/freebsd/gettext-2.diff

MD5 (gettext-2.diff) = 97d80b61281f6bc5aa88362a970b50a3

This significantly reworks the original 0.16.1 update, removing the  
(IMO) relatively useless OPTIONS, and makes the port NOPORTDOCS-safe  
as requested in ports/106998.


The previous diff has been removed -- if you've already downloaded  
it, my apologies, please use this one instead.


Thanks,
-aDe

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Impending update to devel/gettext

2007-01-30 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 20:55, Beech Rintoul wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 January 2007 15:52, Ade Lovett wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I'm looking for some early adopters to try out an upgrade of
> > devel/ gettext to 0.16.1 -- I've already built a few relatively
> > large consumers of gettext which seem to be fine; the issues are
> > much more likely to be run-time rather than compile-time, so a
> > pointyhat -exp build is unlikely to be amazingly useful in terms
> > of feedback.
> >
> > The patch can be found at
> > http://people.FreeBSD.org/~ade/gettext.diff -- all the usual
> > disclaimers apply in terms of blowing up your computer, setting
> > fire to your house, eating your first-born and so on.
> >
> > Ideally I'd like to commit this in about two weeks or so.  Please
> > send any comments directly to me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -aDe
>
> I can't get the patches to apply cleanly. can you provide a .tgz or
> a shar of the port, and I'll be happy to test it.
>
> Beech

Never mind, my downloaad was corrupted.

Beech

-- 
---
Beech Rintoul - Sys. Administrator - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/"\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign  | Alaska Paradise Travel
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail  | 201 East 9Th Avenue Ste.310
 X  - NO Word docs in e-mail | Anchorage, AK 99501
/ \  - Please visit Alaska Paradise - http://www.alaskaparadise.com
---











___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Impending update to devel/gettext

2007-01-30 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 15:52, Ade Lovett wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm looking for some early adopters to try out an upgrade of devel/
> gettext to 0.16.1 -- I've already built a few relatively large
> consumers of gettext which seem to be fine; the issues are much
> more likely to be run-time rather than compile-time, so a pointyhat
> -exp build is unlikely to be amazingly useful in terms of feedback.
>
> The patch can be found at
> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~ade/gettext.diff -- all the usual
> disclaimers apply in terms of blowing up your computer, setting
> fire to your house, eating your first-born and so on.
>
> Ideally I'd like to commit this in about two weeks or so.  Please
> send any comments directly to me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Thanks,
>   -aDe

I can't get the patches to apply cleanly. can you provide a .tgz or a 
shar of the port, and I'll be happy to test it.

Beech


-- 
---
Beech Rintoul - Port Maintainer - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/"\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign  | FreeBSD Since 4.x
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail   | http://www.freebsd.org
 X  - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release:
/ \  - http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html
---



___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Impending update to devel/gettext

2007-01-30 Thread Ade Lovett

Hi folks,

I'm looking for some early adopters to try out an upgrade of devel/ 
gettext to 0.16.1 -- I've already built a few relatively large  
consumers of gettext which seem to be fine; the issues are much more  
likely to be run-time rather than compile-time, so a pointyhat -exp  
build is unlikely to be amazingly useful in terms of feedback.


The patch can be found at http://people.FreeBSD.org/~ade/gettext.diff  
-- all the usual disclaimers apply in terms of blowing up your  
computer, setting fire to your house, eating your first-born and so on.


Ideally I'd like to commit this in about two weeks or so.  Please  
send any comments directly to me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thanks,
-aDe

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"