Re: Portmaster -g no longer builds packages for dependencies?
On 6/18/14, 2:40 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: On 6/5/14, 10:04 AM, Dave Mischler wrote: I built a clean jail yesterday, portsnapped a new ports tree (i.e. fetch and extract) and built portmaster. Then I did "portmaster -dgGH x11/xorg". It seemed to build Xorg properly, but there were no packages built for any of the many dependencies. I tried an older portmaster version that used to work and it seemed to have the same problem. Is this difficulty due to changes in the ports tree that broke dependent package building? Any suggestions? I have avoided poudriere so far because I like having no ports tree except in the jail. This will be fixed in 3.17.6. In the meantime a workaround is to also use the -t flag. As for poudriere, where it places its ports tree is really no different than you keeping it in your jail now. It does not have to be in /usr/ports. By default it will use /usr/local/poudriere/ports/default/. I do highly recommend poudriere. Building ports on a live system is dangerous as it can leave things broken for long periods of time. Portmaster is even worse as it will uninstall ports for very long periods of time while upgrading dependencies. Portupgrade handles this situation much better, but of course has all of its own cons. The -g bug is now fixed in the released 3.17.6. It was due to a change in the ports framework, that I plan to rework a bit. For now I've put a workaround into portmaster. -- Regards, Bryan Drewery ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Portmaster -g no longer builds packages for dependencies?
On 6/5/14, 10:04 AM, Dave Mischler wrote: I built a clean jail yesterday, portsnapped a new ports tree (i.e. fetch and extract) and built portmaster. Then I did "portmaster -dgGH x11/xorg". It seemed to build Xorg properly, but there were no packages built for any of the many dependencies. I tried an older portmaster version that used to work and it seemed to have the same problem. Is this difficulty due to changes in the ports tree that broke dependent package building? Any suggestions? I have avoided poudriere so far because I like having no ports tree except in the jail. This will be fixed in 3.17.6. In the meantime a workaround is to also use the -t flag. As for poudriere, where it places its ports tree is really no different than you keeping it in your jail now. It does not have to be in /usr/ports. By default it will use /usr/local/poudriere/ports/default/. I do highly recommend poudriere. Building ports on a live system is dangerous as it can leave things broken for long periods of time. Portmaster is even worse as it will uninstall ports for very long periods of time while upgrading dependencies. Portupgrade handles this situation much better, but of course has all of its own cons. -- Regards, Bryan Drewery ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Portmaster -g no longer builds packages for dependencies?
On 6/6/14, 7:17 AM, Dave Mischler wrote: Given the case you use portmaster + pkgng, than package building is not supported yet. portmaster prints this into the console: ===>>> Package installation support cannot be used with pkgng yet, it will be disabled This worked the last time I rebuilt everything from scratch (December 19,2013): portmaster 3.17.3. I have built packages that way since but didn't build Xorg so I'm not sure that everything was still working right after that. In case it matters, I am running amd64 9-stable (now showing as 9.3-beta1). This is being tracked here: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189398 -- Regards, Bryan Drewery ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Portmaster -g no longer builds packages for dependencies?
> Given the case you use portmaster + pkgng, than package building is not > supported yet. portmaster prints this into the console: > > ===>>> Package installation support cannot be used with pkgng yet, > it will be disabled This worked the last time I rebuilt everything from scratch (December 19,2013): portmaster 3.17.3. I have built packages that way since but didn't build Xorg so I'm not sure that everything was still working right after that. In case it matters, I am running amd64 9-stable (now showing as 9.3-beta1). ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Portmaster -g no longer builds packages for dependencies?
On 05/06/2014 17:04, Dave Mischler wrote: I built a clean jail yesterday, portsnapped a new ports tree (i.e. fetch and extract) and built portmaster. Then I did "portmaster -dgGH x11/xorg". It seemed to build Xorg properly, but there were no packages built for any of the many dependencies. I tried an older portmaster version that used to work and it seemed to have the same problem. Is this difficulty due to changes in the ports tree that broke dependent package building? Any suggestions? I have avoided poudriere so far because I like having no ports tree except in the jail. Given the case you use portmaster + pkgng, than package building is not supported yet. portmaster prints this into the console: ===>>> Package installation support cannot be used with pkgng yet, it will be disabled ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Portmaster -g no longer builds packages for dependencies?
I built a clean jail yesterday, portsnapped a new ports tree (i.e. fetch and extract) and built portmaster. Then I did "portmaster -dgGH x11/xorg". It seemed to build Xorg properly, but there were no packages built for any of the many dependencies. I tried an older portmaster version that used to work and it seemed to have the same problem. Is this difficulty due to changes in the ports tree that broke dependent package building? Any suggestions? I have avoided poudriere so far because I like having no ports tree except in the jail. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
