Re: Poudriere make.conf documentation question
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 10:54 AM Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 09:42:51AM -0700, Jose Quinteiro wrote: > > Hello, > > > > The Handbook says: > > "The system make.conf and this new file are combined at build time to > > create the make.conf used by the build jail." > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/ports-poudriere.html > > > > The poudriere man page and Porter's Handbook do not mention > > /etc/make.conf as a file that will get used. > > > > My simple test did not work with /etc/make.conf, but I also suspect I > > screwed something else up. > > > > Does /etc/make.conf get "combined" into the effective make.conf for > > Poudriere? > > I think that documentation is confusing as is the manpage. I think > that the webpage is refering to the first one in the list below not > /etc/make.conf, but I could be wrong. Here's the relevent bit of > the manpage: > >Create optional make.conf > You can also specify a global make.conf which will be used for all the > jails. Any of the following are allowed and will all be used in the > order shown: > >/usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf >/usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/-make.conf >/usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/-make.conf >/usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/-make.conf >/usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/--make.conf >/usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/--make.conf >/usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/--make.conf >/usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/---make.conf >/usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/hooks/plugins//make.conf Wow, you and Jose are right, that wording is really confusing. Your description is correct, Brooks. The system /etc/make.conf is not exposed to poudriere at all. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger ad...@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Poudriere make.conf documentation question
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 09:42:51AM -0700, Jose Quinteiro wrote: > Hello, > > The Handbook says: > "The system make.conf and this new file are combined at build time to > create the make.conf used by the build jail." > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/ports-poudriere.html > > The poudriere man page and Porter's Handbook do not mention > /etc/make.conf as a file that will get used. > > My simple test did not work with /etc/make.conf, but I also suspect I > screwed something else up. > > Does /etc/make.conf get "combined" into the effective make.conf for > Poudriere? I think that documentation is confusing as is the manpage. I think that the webpage is refering to the first one in the list below not /etc/make.conf, but I could be wrong. Here's the relevent bit of the manpage: Create optional make.conf You can also specify a global make.conf which will be used for all the jails. Any of the following are allowed and will all be used in the order shown: /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/-make.conf /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/-make.conf /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/-make.conf /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/--make.conf /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/--make.conf /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/--make.conf /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/---make.conf /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/hooks/plugins//make.conf -- Brooks signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Poudriere make.conf documentation question
Hello, The Handbook says: "The system make.conf and this new file are combined at build time to create the make.conf used by the build jail." https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/ports-poudriere.html The poudriere man page and Porter's Handbook do not mention /etc/make.conf as a file that will get used. My simple test did not work with /etc/make.conf, but I also suspect I screwed something else up. Does /etc/make.conf get "combined" into the effective make.conf for Poudriere? Thanks, Jose ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
