Re: [BRAINSTORMIG] name of the variable for passing command line options via make
Olli Hauer ha scritto: WITH / WITHOUT I thought this was a joke, but thinking about it, this is the best idea IMO. I agree, but silently thinking OH NO! this brings us back to the discussions from a view months ago... If I understand correct the LATE_(UN)SET parameter can be used inside the port after including bsd.port.options.mk (where I really miss it) and CMD_(UN)SET from the command line. Hmm, no, I've understood that they are simply two different proposals for the same features, i.e. command line overriding. I vote for WITH / WITHOUT. -- Alex Dupre ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [BRAINSTORMIG] name of the variable for passing command line options via make
On 2012-Sep-25, 00:15, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi, One of the missing thing since we switch to OptionNG is a reliable ability to pass options via command line that would override make.conf and config file options. Here is an implementation that do work: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/OVERRIDE_BLA.diff Now OVERRIDE_SET/UNSET doesn't seems to be the best name :) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=170180 Here are other proposition from me: LATE_SET/UNSET CMD_SET/UNSET WITH / WITHOUT -- Pietro Cerutti The FreeBSD Project g...@freebsd.org PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp pgp324gvT9ZY5.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [BRAINSTORMIG] name of the variable for passing command line options via make
[ Pietro Cerutti wrote on Tue 25.Sep'12 at 13:41:41 +0200 ] On 2012-Sep-25, 00:15, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi, One of the missing thing since we switch to OptionNG is a reliable ability to pass options via command line that would override make.conf and config file options. Here is an implementation that do work: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/OVERRIDE_BLA.diff Now OVERRIDE_SET/UNSET doesn't seems to be the best name :) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=170180 Here are other proposition from me: LATE_SET/UNSET CMD_SET/UNSET WITH / WITHOUT SET_OPT / UNSET_OPT ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [BRAINSTORMIG] name of the variable for passing command line options via make
On 25 Sep 2012 12:42, Pietro Cerutti g...@freebsd.org wrote: On 2012-Sep-25, 00:15, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi, One of the missing thing since we switch to OptionNG is a reliable ability to pass options via command line that would override make.conf and config file options. Here is an implementation that do work: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/OVERRIDE_BLA.diff Now OVERRIDE_SET/UNSET doesn't seems to be the best name :) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=170180 Here are other proposition from me: LATE_SET/UNSET CMD_SET/UNSET WITH / WITHOUT I thought this was a joke, but thinking about it, this is the best idea IMO. Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [BRAINSTORMIG] name of the variable for passing command line options via make
On 2012-09-25 13:54, Chris Rees wrote: On 25 Sep 2012 12:42, Pietro Cerutti g...@freebsd.org wrote: On 2012-Sep-25, 00:15, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi, One of the missing thing since we switch to OptionNG is a reliable ability to pass options via command line that would override make.conf and config file options. Here is an implementation that do work: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/OVERRIDE_BLA.diff Now OVERRIDE_SET/UNSET doesn't seems to be the best name :) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=170180 Here are other proposition from me: LATE_SET/UNSET CMD_SET/UNSET WITH / WITHOUT I thought this was a joke, but thinking about it, this is the best idea IMO. I agree, but silently thinking OH NO! this brings us back to the discussions from a view months ago... If I understand correct the LATE_(UN)SET parameter can be used inside the port after including bsd.port.options.mk (where I really miss it) and CMD_(UN)SET from the command line. I'm fine with the naming if we can get them in, and as long we do not force the users to use OVERRIDE_SET/UNSET monsters on the command line. -- Regards, olli ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [BRAINSTORMIG] name of the variable for passing command line options via make
On 25-09-2012 07:56, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 24/09/2012 23:15, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Here is an implementation that do work: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/OVERRIDE_BLA.diff Now OVERRIDE_SET/UNSET doesn't seems to be the best name :) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=170180 Here are other proposition from me: LATE_SET/UNSET CMD_SET/UNSET SETOPT and UNSETOPT ? As in: # cd /usr/ports/foo/bar # make SETOPT=THIS THAT UNSETOPT=THEOTHER install Since it is setting or unsetting options, and that expresses the user's wishes clearly and succinctly. I vote for this one, with WITH/WITHOUT as a good second one. René -- http://www.rene-ladan.nl:8080/ GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6 (subkeys.pgp.net) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [BRAINSTORMIG] name of the variable for passing command line options via make
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:15:24AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi, One of the missing thing since we switch to OptionNG is a reliable ability to pass options via command line that would override make.conf and config file options. Here is an implementation that do work: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/OVERRIDE_BLA.diff Now OVERRIDE_SET/UNSET doesn't seems to be the best name :) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=170180 Here are other proposition from me: LATE_SET/UNSET CMD_SET/UNSET Do you have better proposition? Do you like one of those proposition? end of the brainstorming: 1st August, the proposition that received the more votes will be chosen :) Of course 1st October should have been read here :) regards, Bapt pgpDhSO6BYJvu.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [BRAINSTORMIG] name of the variable for passing command line options via make
On 24/09/2012 23:15, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Here is an implementation that do work: http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/OVERRIDE_BLA.diff Now OVERRIDE_SET/UNSET doesn't seems to be the best name :) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=170180 Here are other proposition from me: LATE_SET/UNSET CMD_SET/UNSET SETOPT and UNSETOPT ? As in: # cd /usr/ports/foo/bar # make SETOPT=THIS THAT UNSETOPT=THEOTHER install Since it is setting or unsetting options, and that expresses the user's wishes clearly and succinctly. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
