Re: Re: [RFC] lang/pypy
On Sunday, 10 March 2013 00:37:15 poyop...@puripuri.plala.or.jp wrote: Hi, good work, David. Hi Kuro It compiles, packages and works flawlessly here for replacement of 1.9 so far for a week. Great, thanks. Good to know :-) On my compile box, amd64/Athlon64 5050e 2.6GHz 2 core/8GB, memory requirement for translation processes is far less than warning shown. It prevents build with | warn: this system has insufficient memory, expected at least 9227MiB RAM however my translation processes under -DPYPY_IGNORE_MEMORY take 2GB for normal binary and 2.5GB for sandboxed one so they aggregate 4.5GB to run parallel. This is good news. Could you please detail how you measured peak memory? I might need to retest the port. This is far less than expected, no page thrashing, no hang, no stuttering. It does not matter being with pypy1.9 or pypy2.0 (yes, I built twice for 2.0 self hosting. Not tried with cPython.) So I think this warning is a bit excessive that makes everyone just put PYPY_IGNORE_MEMORY=1 in their make.conf. Just in my case. I'll disable the test for now and revise my estimation. Thanks for reporting back. Regards signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [RFC] lang/pypy
Hi David, At Sun, 10 Mar 2013 21:18:12 +0300, David Naylor wrote: however my translation processes under -DPYPY_IGNORE_MEMORY take 2GB for normal binary and 2.5GB for sandboxed one so they aggregate 4.5GB to run parallel. This is good news. Could you please detail how you measured peak memory? I might need to retest the port. I heuristically measured them with top(1) RESources, amount of ZFS ARC and swap increased. Oh and free memory after one of translation process finised. I'm afraid I couldn't provide reproducible method for environments for others. I'll disable the test for now and revise my estimation. Thanks for reporting back. I wonder where so much difference of memory usage between yours and mine comes from. 5.5GB vs 2.5GB on the same platform (64bit/pypy) is not so negligible. -- Kuro poyop...@puripuri.plala.or.jp PS. like this, please. thanks for the offer. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [RFC] lang/pypy
Hi, good work, David. It compiles, packages and works flawlessly here for replacement of 1.9 so far for a week. On my compile box, amd64/Athlon64 5050e 2.6GHz 2 core/8GB, memory requirement for translation processes is far less than warning shown. It prevents build with | warn: this system has insufficient memory, expected at least 9227MiB RAM however my translation processes under -DPYPY_IGNORE_MEMORY take 2GB for normal binary and 2.5GB for sandboxed one so they aggregate 4.5GB to run parallel. This is far less than expected, no page thrashing, no hang, no stuttering. It does not matter being with pypy1.9 or pypy2.0 (yes, I built twice for 2.0 self hosting. Not tried with cPython.) So I think this warning is a bit excessive that makes everyone just put PYPY_IGNORE_MEMORY=1 in their make.conf. Just in my case. -- kuro ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
