Re: Inkscape package troubles, "libicuuc.so.62" not found
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 09:53:28AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > I strongly suspect that you are encountering "complications" because of > a lack of consistency with respect to installed ports/packages on the > system in question. > > That is, "consistency" with respect to the state of the underlying ports > tree(s) that was/were used to build the ports & packages in question. > I broke inkscape by mistakenly deleting an old library required by the old(ish) port of inkscape. Libmap.conf provided an escape in this case. More generally, is there a way to determine what revision of the ports tree will successfully compile/run a given port, if it existed in the past? Thanks for reading, bob prohaska ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Inkscape package troubles, "libicuuc.so.62" not found
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 08:52:58AM -0800, bob prohaska wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 04:43:18PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 03:57:22PM -0800, bob prohaska wrote: > > > Using pkg delete resolved the ImageMagick vs ImageMagic6 conflict, > > > allowing > > > inkscape to build successfully from ports on an RPI3. > > > > > > Alas, I somehow deleted libicuuc.so.62, causing a runtime failure. > > > Rebuilding > > > devel/icu got version 63, so that didn't help. > > > > > > > The simple (temporary) workaround is > > > > echo 'libicuuc.so.62 libicuuc.so.63' >> /etc/libmap.conf > > > > Thank you very much, I didn't know about libmap.conf. > You're welcomed. Note, this should be considered temporary as the library version bump should indicate a change in some function interface. I've never run into an issue, but one may exists. You should probably do 'pkg check -B'. This will identify which ports depend on the missing library, and you can update those. Once 'pkg check -B' returns 100%, you can remove the contents from libmap.conf -- Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Inkscape package troubles, "libicuuc.so.62" not found
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 04:43:18PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 03:57:22PM -0800, bob prohaska wrote: > > Using pkg delete resolved the ImageMagick vs ImageMagic6 conflict, allowing > > inkscape to build successfully from ports on an RPI3. > > > > Alas, I somehow deleted libicuuc.so.62, causing a runtime failure. > > Rebuilding > > devel/icu got version 63, so that didn't help. > > > > The simple (temporary) workaround is > > echo 'libicuuc.so.62 libicuuc.so.63' >> /etc/libmap.conf > Thank you very much, I didn't know about libmap.conf. bob prohaska ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Inkscape package troubles, "libicuuc.so.62" not found
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 at 13:25, bob prohaska wrote: [...] > Is there a resolution to this dilemma, other than just waiting for > inkscape to catch up? Is it possible to determine which revision of > the ports tree can make a runnable version of a particular port? The correct thing to do is to build a set of local package repository for your RPI3 system using synth or poudriere. It appears that some of your locally installed packages are out of sync with the ports-tree, and that is a common problem with using non-chrooted/jailed port-builders. I've just built a runnable version of inkscape, so I'm pretty sure the problem is at your end rather than the ports tree. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Inkscape package troubles, "libicuuc.so.62" not found
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 03:57:22PM -0800, bob prohaska wrote: > Using pkg delete resolved the ImageMagick vs ImageMagic6 conflict, allowing > inkscape to build successfully from ports on an RPI3. > > Alas, I somehow deleted libicuuc.so.62, causing a runtime failure. Rebuilding > devel/icu got version 63, so that didn't help. > > Noticing that inkscape is now available as a package, I tried installing > that, expecting it to recover the older library needed for the current > version of inkscape. The install brought down roughly 1 GB of files, > but not the needed library. > > Is there a resolution to this dilemma, other than just waiting for > inkscape to catch up? Is it possible to determine which revision of > the ports tree can make a runnable version of a particular port? The simple (temporary) workaround is echo 'libicuuc.so.62 libicuuc.so.63' >> /etc/libmap.conf -- Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
