Re: OS version upgrade detected. Running "pkg-static install -f pkg" recommended

[Julian H. Stacey]

Added CC: p...@freebsd.org from ports-mgmt/pkg/Makefile: MAINTAINER=
& CC: Baptiste Daroussin ,
  Julien Laffaye  from AUTHORS in pkg-1.8.7.tar.xz

> > On 13 Jul 2016, at 4:49 PM, Julian H. Stacey  wrote:
> > 
> > Hi ports@
> > With:
> >  uname -a
> >FreeBSD lapr.js.berklix.net 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT \
> >#1 r302560M: Wed Jul 13 01:28:27 CEST 2016 \
> >j...@lapr.js.berklix.net:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/LAPR.small amd64
> > 
> >  cd /usr/ports; svn up
> >Updating '.':
> >At revision 418418
> > 
> >  make fetch
> >pkg-static: Warning: Major OS version upgrade detected.  \
> >Running "pkg-static install -f pkg" recommended
> > 
> > This is an incomplete thus bad reccomendation, based on a false
> > assumption all users of ports/ only want packages. It's quite obvious
> > from "make fetch" that here one wants to fetch distfiles to recompile,
> > not install binary packages, the warning should at least also provide
> > an alternate recipe for ports/ source based users who want to
> > recompile whatever to get rid of warning.
> > 
> > What causes the warning ? a grep of Mk/* doesnt show it, 
> > It's presumably coming from Mk/ calling some pkg ?
> > In /usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg ? I fail to grep for Major
> > 
> > What text can we add to which Mk/* to state the source upgrade route ?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Julian

... Corrected to bottom post ...

Franco Fichtner wrote Wed, 13 Jul 2016 16:58:59 +0200 :

> Hi Julian,
> 
> I ran into something similar, maybe this make.conf flag helps:
> 
> CLEAN_FETCH_ENV=yes
> 
> Cheers,
> Franco

Thanks for the idea Franco, I tried but it didn't help. 
Then I looked, only usage is here:  Mk/bsd.port.mk
.if !defined(PKG_DEPENDS) && !defined(CLEAN_FETCH_ENV)
PKG_DEPENDS+=   ${LOCALBASE}/sbin/pkg:${PKG_ORIGIN}
.endif
& adding a debug shows I have ${PKG_DEPENDS}:
/usr/local/sbin/pkg:ports-mgmt/pkg


Guido Falsi wrote Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:13:55 +0200 :

> It' the "pkg-static" binary installed by the ports-mgmt/pkg port. It's
> invoked in  various ways by the ports framework.
>  
> You can ignore such warnings, they will go away once you forcibly update
> the pkg port.

cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg ; make clean ; make install ; 
make package-recursive ; cd ../../ ; make fetch  

Now OK, so that fixes it, Thanks Guido !

Patch below, & copied here:
http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/freebsd/ports/gen/ports-mgmt/pkg/patch-ja
==
*** src/main.c.orig Wed Jul 13 22:13:46 2016
--- src/main.c  Wed Jul 13 22:19:56 2016
***
*** 742,749 
errx(EX_SOFTWARE, "register pkg_shutdown() to run at exit");
  
if (!pkg_compiled_for_same_os_major())
!   warnx("Warning: Major OS version upgrade detected.  Running "
!   "\"pkg-static install -f pkg\" recommended");
  
  
plugins_enabled = pkg_object_bool(pkg_config_get("PKG_ENABLE_PLUGINS"));
--- 742,751 
errx(EX_SOFTWARE, "register pkg_shutdown() to run at exit");
  
if (!pkg_compiled_for_same_os_major())
! //warnx("Warning: Major OS version upgrade detected.  Running "
! //"\"pkg-static install -f pkg\" recommended");
!   warnx("Warning: Major OS version upgrade detected.  
Recommended: "
!   "\"pkg-static install -f pkg\" OR \"cd 
/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg;make clean;make install\"");
  
  
plugins_enabled = pkg_object_bool(pkg_config_get("PKG_ENABLE_PLUGINS"));
==


PS
Matthew Donovan wrote Wed, 13 Jul 2016 10:07:51 -0500 (17:07 CEST)

> Not sure how this is bad it just reinstalls pkg for the new ABI.
> Ports/packages is placed in the database by pkg. So you will get that
> warning when even doing pkg list

Sorry, I only meant it was bad in that it didn't tell users who
dont use packages how to fix the problem.  I could have better
written "this is [a poor reccomendation as] incomplete"


"Chris H" wrote Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:32:56 -0700 (22:32 CEST)

> It *should* read:
>  pkg-static: Warning: Major OS version upgrade detected.  \
>  Running "pkg-static install -f pkg" recommended \
>  or run "pkg-static delete -f pkg" to remove this message.
> 
> Sorry. Couldn't resist. In all honesty Julian, I too had the
> same reaction/ understanding as you, when I saw it. Took me a bit
> before it dawned on me what it was *actually* trying to tell me. :P

Ah Thanks, I hadn't thought of that !

Hopefully the authors/ maintainers of pkg will add one or the other.

Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.eu/jhs/
 Mail plain text,  No quoted-printable, HTML, base64, MS.doc.
 Prefix old lines '> '  Reply below old, like play script.  Break lines by 80.
 http://berklix.eu/brexit/#stolen_votes
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: OS version upgrade detected. Running "pkg-static install -f pkg" recommended

[Chris H]

On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 16:49:37 +0200 "Julian H. Stacey"  wrote

> Hi ports@
> With:
>   uname -a
> FreeBSD lapr.js.berklix.net 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT \
> #1 r302560M: Wed Jul 13 01:28:27 CEST 2016 \
> j...@lapr.js.berklix.net:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/LAPR.small amd64
> 
>   cd /usr/ports; svn up
> Updating '.':
> At revision 418418
> 
>   make fetch
> pkg-static: Warning: Major OS version upgrade detected.  \
> Running "pkg-static install -f pkg" recommended
> 
> This is an incomplete thus bad reccomendation, based on a false
> assumption all users of ports/ only want packages. It's quite obvious
> from "make fetch" that here one wants to fetch distfiles to recompile,
> not install binary packages, the warning should at least also provide
> an alternate recipe for ports/ source based users who want to
> recompile whatever to get rid of warning.
> 
> What causes the warning ? a grep of Mk/* doesnt show it, 
> It's presumably coming from Mk/ calling some pkg ?
> In /usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg ? I fail to grep for Major
> 
> What text can we add to which Mk/* to state the source upgrade route ?
> 
> Cheers,
> Julian
> -- 
It *should* read:
 pkg-static: Warning: Major OS version upgrade detected.  \
 Running "pkg-static install -f pkg" recommended \
 or run "pkg-static delete -f pkg" to remove this message.

Sorry. Couldn't resist. In all honesty Julian, I too had the
same reaction/ understanding as you, when I saw it. Took me a bit
before it dawned on me what it was *actually* trying to tell me. :P

--Chris


___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: OS version upgrade detected. Running "pkg-static install -f pkg" recommended

[Franco Fichtner]

Hi Julian,

I ran into something similar, maybe this make.conf flag helps:

CLEAN_FETCH_ENV=yes


Cheers,
Franco

> On 13 Jul 2016, at 4:49 PM, Julian H. Stacey  wrote:
> 
> Hi ports@
> With:
>  uname -a
>FreeBSD lapr.js.berklix.net 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT \
>#1 r302560M: Wed Jul 13 01:28:27 CEST 2016 \
>j...@lapr.js.berklix.net:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/LAPR.small amd64
> 
>  cd /usr/ports; svn up
>Updating '.':
>At revision 418418
> 
>  make fetch
>pkg-static: Warning: Major OS version upgrade detected.  \
>Running "pkg-static install -f pkg" recommended
> 
> This is an incomplete thus bad reccomendation, based on a false
> assumption all users of ports/ only want packages. It's quite obvious
> from "make fetch" that here one wants to fetch distfiles to recompile,
> not install binary packages, the warning should at least also provide
> an alternate recipe for ports/ source based users who want to
> recompile whatever to get rid of warning.
> 
> What causes the warning ? a grep of Mk/* doesnt show it, 
> It's presumably coming from Mk/ calling some pkg ?
> In /usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg ? I fail to grep for Major
> 
> What text can we add to which Mk/* to state the source upgrade route ?
> 
> Cheers,
> Julian
> -- 
> Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.eu/jhs/
> Mail plain text,  No quoted-printable, HTML, base64, MS.doc.
> Prefix old lines '> '  Reply below old, like play script.  Break lines by 80.
> http://berklix.eu/brexit/#stolen_votes
> ___
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> 

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: OS version upgrade detected. Running "pkg-static install -f pkg" recommended

[Guido Falsi]

On 07/13/16 16:49, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Hi ports@
> With:
>   uname -a
> FreeBSD lapr.js.berklix.net 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT \
> #1 r302560M: Wed Jul 13 01:28:27 CEST 2016 \
> j...@lapr.js.berklix.net:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/LAPR.small amd64
> 
>   cd /usr/ports; svn up
> Updating '.':
> At revision 418418
> 
>   make fetch
> pkg-static: Warning: Major OS version upgrade detected.  \
> Running "pkg-static install -f pkg" recommended
> 
> This is an incomplete thus bad reccomendation, based on a false
> assumption all users of ports/ only want packages. It's quite obvious
> from "make fetch" that here one wants to fetch distfiles to recompile,
> not install binary packages, the warning should at least also provide
> an alternate recipe for ports/ source based users who want to
> recompile whatever to get rid of warning.
> 
> What causes the warning ? a grep of Mk/* doesnt show it, 
> It's presumably coming from Mk/ calling some pkg ?
> In /usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg ? I fail to grep for Major
> 
> What text can we add to which Mk/* to state the source upgrade route ?
> 

It' the "pkg-static" binary installed by the ports-mgmt/pkg port. It's
invoked in  various ways by the ports framework.

You can ignore such warnings, they will go away once you forcibly update
the pkg port.

-- 
Guido Falsi 
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: OS version upgrade detected. Running "pkg-static install -f pkg" recommended

[Matthew Donovan]

Not sure how this is bad it just reinstalls pkg for the new ABI.
Ports/packages is placed in the database by pkg. So you will get that
warning when even doing pkg list
On Jul 13, 2016 9:59 AM, "Franco Fichtner"  wrote:

> Hi Julian,
>
> I ran into something similar, maybe this make.conf flag helps:
>
> CLEAN_FETCH_ENV=yes
>
>
> Cheers,
> Franco
>
> > On 13 Jul 2016, at 4:49 PM, Julian H. Stacey  wrote:
> >
> > Hi ports@
> > With:
> >  uname -a
> >FreeBSD lapr.js.berklix.net 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT \
> >#1 r302560M: Wed Jul 13 01:28:27 CEST 2016 \
> >j...@lapr.js.berklix.net:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/LAPR.small amd64
> >
> >  cd /usr/ports; svn up
> >Updating '.':
> >At revision 418418
> >
> >  make fetch
> >pkg-static: Warning: Major OS version upgrade detected.  \
> >Running "pkg-static install -f pkg" recommended
> >
> > This is an incomplete thus bad reccomendation, based on a false
> > assumption all users of ports/ only want packages. It's quite obvious
> > from "make fetch" that here one wants to fetch distfiles to recompile,
> > not install binary packages, the warning should at least also provide
> > an alternate recipe for ports/ source based users who want to
> > recompile whatever to get rid of warning.
> >
> > What causes the warning ? a grep of Mk/* doesnt show it,
> > It's presumably coming from Mk/ calling some pkg ?
> > In /usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg ? I fail to grep for Major
> >
> > What text can we add to which Mk/* to state the source upgrade route ?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Julian
> > --
> > Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys Eng Consultant Munich
> http://berklix.eu/jhs/
> > Mail plain text,  No quoted-printable, HTML, base64, MS.doc.
> > Prefix old lines '> '  Reply below old, like play script.  Break lines
> by 80.
> > http://berklix.eu/brexit/#stolen_votes
> > ___
> > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> >
>
> ___
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"