Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso
Hi! pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so: diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo- jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so Is it right that libodbcinst.so is installed by unixODBC-2.3.0_1 ? Yes. When attempting to install databases/libodbc++ (includes unixODBC) which would presumably fix this issue I receive the console report: unixODBC-2.3.0_1 conflicts with installed package(s): libiodbc-3.52.7 virtuoso-6.1.2_1 I need virtuoso on this system. How do I preceed? The only file where libiodbc and unixODBC conflict is in /usr/local/include/sql.h which contains the API of ODBC. Both libiodbc and unixODBC implement ODBC, so it's pretty much the same contents, but it's formatted differently. What I would suggest: cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/ make deinstall cd /usr/ports/databases/unixODBC/ make install cd /usr/ports/databases/libodbc++ make install cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/ make install cd /usr/ports/databases/unixODBC/ make deinstall cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/ make reinstall This is messy. Some other suggestion: File a PR and we bug both upstream providers to seperate their two sql.h files, so that libiodbc and unixODBC can coexist. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 310137210 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso
On 01/04/2011 09:37, David Southwell wrote: Hi pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so: diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo- jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so Is it right that libodbcinst.so is installed by unixODBC-2.3.0_1 ? When attempting to install databases/libodbc++ (includes unixODBC) which would presumably fix this issue I receive the console report: unixODBC-2.3.0_1 conflicts with installed package(s): libiodbc-3.52.7 virtuoso-6.1.2_1 I need virtuoso on this system. How do I preceed? Replace libiodbc with unixODBC They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC. -- Regards, jhell,v JJH48-ARIN ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso
Hello! 05.01.2011, 01:00, J. Hellenthal jh...@dataix.net: On 01/04/2011 09:37, David Southwell wrote: Hi pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so: diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo- jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so Is it right that libodbcinst.so is installed by unixODBC-2.3.0_1 ? When attempting to install databases/libodbc++ (includes unixODBC) which would presumably fix this issue I receive the console report: unixODBC-2.3.0_1 conflicts with installed package(s): libiodbc-3.52.7 virtuoso-6.1.2_1 I need virtuoso on this system. How do I preceed? Replace libiodbc with unixODBC They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC. Nope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features, exist in libiodbc and required by virtuoso. -- Dima Panov (flu...@freebsd.org) k...@freebsd team Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/?id=10181104157 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso
Hello! 05.01.2011, 01:00, J. Hellenthal jh...@dataix.net: On 01/04/2011 09:37, David Southwell wrote: Hi pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so: diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo- jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so Is it right that libodbcinst.so is installed by unixODBC-2.3.0_1 ? When attempting to install databases/libodbc++ (includes unixODBC) which would presumably fix this issue I receive the console report: unixODBC-2.3.0_1 conflicts with installed package(s): libiodbc-3.52.7 virtuoso-6.1.2_1 I need virtuoso on this system. How do I preceed? Replace libiodbc with unixODBC They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC. Nope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features, exist in libiodbc and required by virtuoso. OK guys now I AM confused!! Question is what will work? Kurt Jaeger li...@opsec.eu suggests: A: ___ /usr/local/include/sql.h which contains the API of ODBC. Both libiodbc and unixODBC implement ODBC, so it's pretty much the same contents, but it's formatted differently. What I would suggest: cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/ make deinstall cd /usr/ports/databases/unixODBC/ make install cd /usr/ports/databases/libodbc++ make install cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/ make install cd /usr/ports/databases/unixODBC/ make deinstall cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/ make reinstall This is messy. __ B Some other suggestion: File a PR and we bug both upstream providers to seperate their two sql.h files, so that libiodbc and unixODBC can coexist Is A likely to work or is B the only viable option? David Photographic Artist Permanent Installations Design Creative Imagery and Advanced Digital Techniques High Dynamic Range Photography Official Portraiture Combined darkroom digital creations Systems Adminstrator for the vizion2000.net network ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso
Hi! Dima Panov write: jh...@dataix.net wrote: Replace libiodbc with unixODBC They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC. Nope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features, exist in libiodbc and required by virtuoso. Ah, interesting. What's the difference ? So a drive to replace unixODBC in every port would be more useful ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 310137210 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso
divHello!/divdivnbsp;/divdivdiablo-jdk is very outdated binary, build almost ~1 year old portstree on a tinderbox with preinstalled environment./divdivplease, don't rely on it in real environment./divdivnbsp;/divdivcorrect solution is switch to builded natively package (jdk16 or openjdk6), which always will use correct system libraries/divdivof course, after build native jdk, diablo package should be dropped./divdivnbsp;/divdiv05.01.2011, 02:24, David Southwell lt;da...@vizion2000.netgt;:/divblockquotep style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; Hello!/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; 05.01.2011, 01:00, J. Hellenthal lt;a href=mailto:jh...@dataix.net%3e;jh...@dataix.netgt;/a;:/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt; On 01/04/2011 09:37, David Southwell wrote:/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt; nbsp;Hi/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt; nbsp;pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so:/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt; nbsp;diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo-/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt; nbsp;jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt; nbsp;Is it right that libodbcinst.so is installed by unixODBC-2.3.0_1 ?/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt; nbsp;When attempting to install databases/libodbc++ nbsp;(includes unixODBC)/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt; which would presumably fix this issue I receive the console report:/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt; nbsp;unixODBC-2.3.0_1 conflicts with installed package(s):/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt; nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;libiodbc-3.52.7/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt; nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;virtuoso-6.1.2_1/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt; nbsp;I need virtuoso on this system./p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;gt; nbsp;How do I preceed?/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt; Replace libiodbc with unixODBC/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; gt; They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC./p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; Nope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features, exist in/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt; libiodbc and required by virtuoso./p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;nbsp;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;OK guys now I AM confused!!/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;nbsp;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;Question is what will work?/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;Kurt Jaeger lt;a href=mailto:li...@opsec.eu%3e;li...@opsec.eugt;/a; suggests:/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;nbsp;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;A:/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;___/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;nbsp;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt;/usr/local/include/sql.h/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;nbsp;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt;which contains the API of ODBC. Both libiodbc and unixODBC implement/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt;ODBC, so it's pretty much the same contents, but it's formatted/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt;differently./p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;nbsp;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt;What I would suggest:/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;nbsp;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt;cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc//p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;make deinstall/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt;cd /usr/ports/databases/unixODBC//p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;make install/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt;cd /usr/ports/databases/libodbc++/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;make install/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt;cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc//p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;make install/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt;cd /usr/ports/databases/unixODBC//p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;make deinstall/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;gt;cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc//p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;make reinstall/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;nbsp;/p p style=margin: 0px; text-indent:
Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso
Hello! 05.01.2011, 02:27, Kurt Jaeger li...@opsec.eu: Hi! Dima Panov write: jh...@dataix.net wrote: Replace libiodbc with unixODBC They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC. Nope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features, exist in libiodbc and required by virtuoso. Ah, interesting. What's the difference ? Sorry, I'm not an odbc profi to provide a correct answer, please search in virtuoso mailinglists, reasons was published AFAIR before switching to libiodbc. So a drive to replace unixODBC in every port would be more useful ? yes. anyway, unixODBC was staled some time ago, and now no reasons to continue support it qt4/kde4 was switched to libiodbc some months ago. -- Dima Panov (flu...@freebsd.org) k...@freebsd team Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/?id=10181104157 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso
Can people please stick to plain text. This is really quite unreadable Thanks Hello! diablo-jdk is very outdated binary, build almost ~1 year old portstree on a tinderbox with preinstalled environment. please, don't rely on it in real environment. correct solution is switch to builded natively package (jdk16 or openjdk6), which always will use correct system libraries of course, after build native jdk, diablo package should be dropped. 05.01.2011, 02:24, David Southwell da...@vizion2000.net: style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px; Hello! 05.01.2011, 01:00, J. Hellenthal href=mailto:jh...@dataix.net%3e;jh...@dataix.net;: style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px; On 01/04/2011 09:37, David Southwell wrote: Hi pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so: style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px; diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo- jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so Is it right that libodbcinst.so is installed by unixODBC-2.3.0_1 ? style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px; When attempting to install databases/libodbc++ (includes unixODBC) style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px; which would presumably fix this issue I receive the console report: style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px; unixODBC-2.3.0_1 conflicts with installed package(s): libiodbc-3.52.7 style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px; virtuoso-6.1.2_1 style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px; I need virtuoso on this system. style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px; How do I preceed? style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px; Replace libiodbc with unixODBC style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px; They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC. Nope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features, exist in libiodbc and required by virtuoso. OK guys now I AM confused!! style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;Question is what will work? style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;Kurt Jaeger href=mailto:li...@opsec.eu%3e;li...@opsec.eu; suggests: style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px; A: ___ /usr/local/include/sql.h which contains the API of ODBC. Both libiodbc and unixODBC implement style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;ODBC, so it's pretty much the same contents, but it's formatted differently. What I would suggest: style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/ make deinstall cd /usr/ports/databases/unixODBC/ make install cd /usr/ports/databases/libodbc++ make install cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/ make install cd /usr/ports/databases/unixODBC/ make deinstall cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/ make reinstall This is messy. __ B style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px;Some other suggestion: style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px; File a PR and we bug both upstream providers to seperate their two sql.h files, so that libiodbc and unixODBC can coexist style=margin: 0px; text-indent: 0px; Is A likely to work or is B the only viable option? -- Dima Panov (flu...@freebsd.org) k...@freebsd team Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/?id=10181104157 Photographic Artist Permanent Installations Design Creative Imagery and Advanced Digital Techniques High Dynamic Range Photography Official Portraiture Combined darkroom digital creations Systems Adminstrator for the vizion2000.net network ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso
Quoth David Southwell on Tuesday, 04 January 2011: Can people please stick to plain text. This is really quite unreadable Thanks Agreed. At least mark HTML content as type text/html instead of text/plain. -- Sterling (Chip) Camden| sterl...@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com| http://chipsquips.com pgp1DCgSL0qA7.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso
Hello! diablo-jdk is very outdated binary, build almost ~1 year old portstree on a tinderbox with preinstalled environment. please, don't rely on it in real environment. correct solution is switch to builded natively package (jdk16 or openjdk6), which always will use correct system libraries of course, after build native jdk, diablo package should be dropped. 05.01.2011, 02:24, David Southwell da...@vizion2000.net;: Hello! 05.01.2011, 01:00, J. Hellenthal jh...@dataix.net;: On 01/04/2011 09:37, David Southwell wrote: Hi pkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so: diablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo- jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so Is it right that libodbcinst.so is installed by unixODBC-2.3.0_1 ? When attempting to install databases/libodbc++ (includes unixODBC) which would presumably fix this issue I receive the console report: unixODBC-2.3.0_1 conflicts with installed package(s): libiodbc-3.52.7 virtuoso-6.1.2_1 I need virtuoso on this system. How do I preceed? Replace libiodbc with unixODBC They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC. Nope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features, exist in libiodbc and required by virtuoso. OK guys now I AM confused!! Question is what will work? Kurt Jaeger li...@opsec.eu; suggests: A: ___ /usr/local/include/sql.h which contains the API of ODBC. Both libiodbc and unixODBC implement ODBC, so it's pretty much the same contents, but it's formatted differently. What I would suggest: cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/ make deinstall cd /usr/ports/databases/unixODBC/ make install cd /usr/ports/databases/libodbc++ make install cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/ make install cd /usr/ports/databases/unixODBC/ make deinstall cd /usr/ports/databases/libiodbc/ make reinstall This is messy. __ B Some other suggestion: File a PR and we bug both upstream providers to seperate their two sql.h files, so that libiodbc and unixODBC can coexist Is A likely to work or is B the only viable option? -- Dima Panov (flu...@freebsd.org) k...@freebsd team Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/?id=10181104157 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
