Re: a little confuse with case-sensitive name ports and multiple ports with some name
And i forget to say for one else problem with {archivers,mis}/deco:
both of them produced one binary file in /usr/local/bin/deco.
cd /usr/ports/archivers/deco
make install
...
(i have deco archivers)
pkg_add -r deco
(deco/NC-clone replace /usr/local/bin/deco)
pkg_which /usr/local/bin/deco
[Updating the pkgdb format:bdb_btree in /var/db/pkg ... - 718 packages found
(-1 +1) (...). done]
deco-3.9_4 deco-1.6
pkg_delete -f deco-3.9\*
..
On Thursday 16 April 2009 20:16:25 Oleg Ginzburg wrote:
On Thursday 16 April 2009 19:52:38 Chris Rees wrote:
2009/4/16 Oleg Ginzburg oleg.ginzb...@nevosoft.ru:
Hello maillist!
I have two examples of ports with which arises some complexities by
operation with pkg_add and argument -r.
One of ports is security/keepassx. His name is registered in
lowercase, however at installation in/var/db/pkg is registered as
KeepAssX. If to try to install port with pkg_add -r keepassx it will be
fail and it will be correct with pkg_add -r KeepAssX. Probably it is
an error in naming of port?
One more problem with port - deco. It is present at two locations:
% cat /usr/ports/{archivers,misc}/deco/pkg-descr
Deco is a Un*x script able to extract various archive file formats.
Supported archive formats: 7z, ace, ar, arc, arj, bz2, cab, cpio, deb,
flac, gz, jar, lha, lzma, lzo, rar, rpm, tar, zip, zoo.
WWW: http://hartlich.com/deco/
A clone of Norton Commander for Unix. Text-based,
full featured file manager intuitive interface.
WWW: http://deco.sourceforge.net/
Whether there is a way to specify to what category to me it is required
to download package of deco?
whereis -sq deco
/usr/ports/archivers/deco - its archivers
By command pkg_add -r deco - I've receive in the system fine NC-clone,
but not the archivers.
When number of port with equal name will be increase - expected results
may can not coincide with result pkg_add, and case-sensitive naming
port make works a bit difficult .
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Try appending the version number?
Do you mean pkg_add -r deco-N.M (in my example?)
% pkg_add -r deco-3.9_4
Error: FTP Unable to get
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-
current/Latest/deco-3.9_4.tbz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no
access)
pkg_add: unable to fetch
'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-
current/Latest/deco-3.9_4.tbz' by URL
[r...@oleg lftp]# lftp
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-current/Latest/
cd ok, cwd=/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-current/Latest
lftp ftp.freebsd.org:/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-current/Latest ls
| grep deco-3.9
lrwxr-xr-x 1 1006 1006 21 Feb 22 01:30 deco.tbz - ../All/deco-3.9_4.tbz
- on ftp servers packages without version as i see.
Anyway, its not protect in situation with equal name and equal version of
diffrent ports.
Or use portinstall -PP archivers/deco
Ok, this may be solution. BTW, portinstall still not in FreeBSD base system
;)
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: a little confuse with case-sensitive name ports and multiple ports with some name
2009/4/17 Oleg Ginzburg oleg.ginzb...@nevosoft.ru:
And i forget to say for one else problem with {archivers,mis}/deco:
both of them produced one binary file in /usr/local/bin/deco.
cd /usr/ports/archivers/deco
make install
...
(i have deco archivers)
pkg_add -r deco
(deco/NC-clone replace /usr/local/bin/deco)
pkg_which /usr/local/bin/deco
[Updating the pkgdb format:bdb_btree in /var/db/pkg ... - 718 packages found
(-1 +1) (...). done]
deco-3.9_4 deco-1.6
pkg_delete -f deco-3.9\*
..
OK, that's seriously annoying. That can't possibly be by design
By the way, please don't top-post
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/mailing-list-faq/etiquette.html
Chris
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: a little confuse with case-sensitive name ports and multiple ports with some name
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:45:46AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
2009/4/17 Oleg Ginzburg oleg.ginzb...@nevosoft.ru:
And i forget to say for one else problem with {archivers,mis}/deco:
both of them produced one binary file in /usr/local/bin/deco.
cd /usr/ports/archivers/deco
make install
...
(i have deco archivers)
pkg_add -r deco
(deco/NC-clone replace /usr/local/bin/deco)
?pkg_which /usr/local/bin/deco
[Updating the pkgdb format:bdb_btree in /var/db/pkg ... - 718 packages
found
(-1 +1) (...). done]
deco-3.9_4 deco-1.6
pkg_delete -f deco-3.9\*
..
OK, that's seriously annoying. That can't possibly be by design
It is because misc/deco is not marked as having a conflict with
archivers/deco, but archivers/deco does have a conflict with misc/deco
recorded. If you were to install misc/deco before archivers/deco the
situation would become obvious.
One of the two should probably change their pkgname so that pkg_add -r
can properly find it. Right now pkg_add appears to get misc/deco, even
if you want archivers/deco.
Opening a PR for both these is likely the next best step.
-- WXS
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
a little confuse with case-sensitive name ports and multiple ports with some name
Hello maillist!
I have two examples of ports with which arises some complexities by operation
with pkg_add and argument -r.
One of ports is security/keepassx. His name is registered in lowercase,
however at installation in/var/db/pkg is registered as KeepAssX. If to try to
install port with pkg_add -r keepassx it will be fail and it will be correct
with pkg_add -r KeepAssX. Probably it is an error in naming of port?
One more problem with port - deco. It is present at two locations:
% cat /usr/ports/{archivers,misc}/deco/pkg-descr
Deco is a Un*x script able to extract various archive file formats.
Supported archive formats: 7z, ace, ar, arc, arj, bz2, cab, cpio, deb,
flac, gz, jar, lha, lzma, lzo, rar, rpm, tar, zip, zoo.
WWW: http://hartlich.com/deco/
A clone of Norton Commander for Unix. Text-based,
full featured file manager intuitive interface.
WWW: http://deco.sourceforge.net/
Whether there is a way to specify to what category to me it is required to
download package of deco?
whereis -sq deco
/usr/ports/archivers/deco - its archivers
By command pkg_add -r deco - I've receive in the system fine NC-clone, but not
the archivers.
When number of port with equal name will be increase - expected results may
can not coincide with result pkg_add, and case-sensitive naming port make
works a bit difficult .
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: a little confuse with case-sensitive name ports and multiple ports with some name
On Thursday 16 April 2009 19:52:38 Chris Rees wrote:
2009/4/16 Oleg Ginzburg oleg.ginzb...@nevosoft.ru:
Hello maillist!
I have two examples of ports with which arises some complexities by
operation with pkg_add and argument -r.
One of ports is security/keepassx. His name is registered in lowercase,
however at installation in/var/db/pkg is registered as KeepAssX. If to
try to install port with pkg_add -r keepassx it will be fail and it will
be correct with pkg_add -r KeepAssX. Probably it is an error in naming of
port?
One more problem with port - deco. It is present at two locations:
% cat /usr/ports/{archivers,misc}/deco/pkg-descr
Deco is a Un*x script able to extract various archive file formats.
Supported archive formats: 7z, ace, ar, arc, arj, bz2, cab, cpio, deb,
flac, gz, jar, lha, lzma, lzo, rar, rpm, tar, zip, zoo.
WWW: http://hartlich.com/deco/
A clone of Norton Commander for Unix. Text-based,
full featured file manager intuitive interface.
WWW: http://deco.sourceforge.net/
Whether there is a way to specify to what category to me it is required
to download package of deco?
whereis -sq deco
/usr/ports/archivers/deco - its archivers
By command pkg_add -r deco - I've receive in the system fine NC-clone,
but not the archivers.
When number of port with equal name will be increase - expected results
may can not coincide with result pkg_add, and case-sensitive naming port
make works a bit difficult .
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Try appending the version number?
Do you mean pkg_add -r deco-N.M (in my example?)
% pkg_add -r deco-3.9_4
Error: FTP Unable to get
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-
current/Latest/deco-3.9_4.tbz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no
access)
pkg_add: unable to fetch
'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-
current/Latest/deco-3.9_4.tbz' by URL
[r...@oleg lftp]# lftp
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-current/Latest/
cd ok, cwd=/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-current/Latest
lftp ftp.freebsd.org:/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-current/Latest ls |
grep deco-3.9
lrwxr-xr-x 1 1006 1006 21 Feb 22 01:30 deco.tbz - ../All/deco-3.9_4.tbz
- on ftp servers packages without version as i see.
Anyway, its not protect in situation with equal name and equal version of
diffrent ports.
Or use portinstall -PP archivers/deco
Ok, this may be solution. BTW, portinstall still not in FreeBSD base system ;)
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
