Re: gstat collision between sysutils/coreutils and base gstat

2011-11-01 Thread Wesley Shields
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 05:43:23PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
 On 31 October 2011 15:18, Wesley Shields w...@freebsd.org wrote:
  On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 09:21:26AM +, Chris Rees wrote:
  Hey all,
 
  Traditionally we've tended to use the 'g' prefix for GNU utilities;
  gmake, gtar etc, but apparently with stat that is a problem [1], due
  to the different gstat utility in base.
 
  I'm reluctant to simply rename the coreutils to gnu- prefixes, because
  that would upset quite a lot of things!
 
  We either need to:
 
  1) Rename to coreutils to gnu- like most of the rest of the non-GNU
  world and deal with the breakage (!)
  2) Make gstat an OPTION, off by default
  3) Be horribly inconsistent and rename gstat to gnustat
 
  I don't know if 3 is as horribly inconsistent as you think: misc/gnuls
  installs the GNU version of ls as gnuls.
 
 Which would then introduce another conflict; coreutils installs gls :(
 
 Would anyone yell too much if I _just_ changed gstat to gnustat? It
 could be a little 'quirk'...

Just rename it. It solves a conflict and is just one of those little
quirks about porting lots of software. ;)

-- WXS
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


gstat collision between sysutils/coreutils and base gstat

2011-10-31 Thread Chris Rees
Hey all,

Traditionally we've tended to use the 'g' prefix for GNU utilities;
gmake, gtar etc, but apparently with stat that is a problem [1], due
to the different gstat utility in base.

I'm reluctant to simply rename the coreutils to gnu- prefixes, because
that would upset quite a lot of things!

We either need to:

1) Rename to coreutils to gnu- like most of the rest of the non-GNU
world and deal with the breakage (!)
2) Make gstat an OPTION, off by default
3) Be horribly inconsistent and rename gstat to gnustat

Thoughts?

Chris

[1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=160060
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: gstat collision between sysutils/coreutils and base gstat

2011-10-31 Thread Wesley Shields
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 09:21:26AM +, Chris Rees wrote:
 Hey all,
 
 Traditionally we've tended to use the 'g' prefix for GNU utilities;
 gmake, gtar etc, but apparently with stat that is a problem [1], due
 to the different gstat utility in base.
 
 I'm reluctant to simply rename the coreutils to gnu- prefixes, because
 that would upset quite a lot of things!
 
 We either need to:
 
 1) Rename to coreutils to gnu- like most of the rest of the non-GNU
 world and deal with the breakage (!)
 2) Make gstat an OPTION, off by default
 3) Be horribly inconsistent and rename gstat to gnustat

I don't know if 3 is as horribly inconsistent as you think: misc/gnuls
installs the GNU version of ls as gnuls.

-- WXS
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: gstat collision between sysutils/coreutils and base gstat

2011-10-31 Thread Chris Rees
On 31 October 2011 15:18, Wesley Shields w...@freebsd.org wrote:
 On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 09:21:26AM +, Chris Rees wrote:
 Hey all,

 Traditionally we've tended to use the 'g' prefix for GNU utilities;
 gmake, gtar etc, but apparently with stat that is a problem [1], due
 to the different gstat utility in base.

 I'm reluctant to simply rename the coreutils to gnu- prefixes, because
 that would upset quite a lot of things!

 We either need to:

 1) Rename to coreutils to gnu- like most of the rest of the non-GNU
 world and deal with the breakage (!)
 2) Make gstat an OPTION, off by default
 3) Be horribly inconsistent and rename gstat to gnustat

 I don't know if 3 is as horribly inconsistent as you think: misc/gnuls
 installs the GNU version of ls as gnuls.

Which would then introduce another conflict; coreutils installs gls :(

Would anyone yell too much if I _just_ changed gstat to gnustat? It
could be a little 'quirk'...

Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: gstat collision between sysutils/coreutils and base gstat

2011-10-31 Thread Eitan Adler
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:

 Would anyone yell too much if I _just_ changed gstat to gnustat?


Probably, but you should ignore them. ;)


-- 
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org