Re: kde3 ports expired today

2013-07-02 Thread René Ladan
On 02-07-2013 07:10, Matthias Apitz wrote:
 El día Monday, July 01, 2013 a las 08:05:37PM -0700, Jeffrey Bouquet escribió:
 
 bsdstats.org  ports stats would have that information probably
 
 http://bsdstats.org/ports.php?category=91
 
 says in column 'times in use':
 
 x11/kde3: 534
 x11/kde4:  86
 
So?

1. Collecting statistics is voluntary, so it could be that more people
have installed kde4 than kde3 but not the reporting tool
(sysutils/bsdstats).
2. There are multiple ports which do not exist anymore but are still
listed there, e.g. x11-wm/xfce with 649 users or x11/qt1 (15 users). So
either these ports are still in use (!) or the data is outdated.
3. FreeBSD releases look up-to-date, but are most people still running
single-core ( http://bsdstats.org/bt/cpus.html ) ?

René
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: kde3 ports expired today

2013-07-02 Thread Emanuel Haupt
René Ladan r...@freebsd.org wrote:
 On 02-07-2013 07:10, Matthias Apitz wrote:
  El día Monday, July 01, 2013 a las 08:05:37PM -0700, Jeffrey
  Bouquet escribió:
  
  bsdstats.org  ports stats would have that information probably
  
  http://bsdstats.org/ports.php?category=91

(bsdstats.org contact cc'ed)

bsdstats.org seems to be broken.

I get the following error when trying to access http://bsdstats.org/freebsd/

Warning: require_once(BSDSmarty.class.php): failed to open stream: No such file 
or directory in /usr/local/www/bsdstats.org/www/freebsd/index.php on line 3

Fatal error: require_once(): Failed opening required 'BSDSmarty.class.php' 
(include_path='.:/usr/local/share/pear') in 
/usr/local/www/bsdstats.org/www/freebsd/index.php on line 3

Emanuel
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: kde3 ports expired today

2013-07-02 Thread Andrea Venturoli

On 07/02/13 07:10, Matthias Apitz wrote:

El día Monday, July 01, 2013 a las 08:05:37PM -0700, Jeffrey Bouquet escribió:


bsdstats.org  ports stats would have that information probably


http://bsdstats.org/ports.php?category=91

says in column 'times in use':

x11/kde3: 534
x11/kde4:  86

matthias


We should add those who uninstalled KDE3, knowing it would soon be 
removed, but are still missing it.


I, for one, moved to XFCE before it's too late, but feel I've lost a lot.

Just my 2c.

 bye
av.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: kde3 ports expired today

2013-07-02 Thread Jim Pingle
On 07/02/13 07:10, Matthias Apitz wrote:
 El día Monday, July 01, 2013 a las 08:05:37PM -0700, Jeffrey Bouquet
 escribió:

 bsdstats.org  ports stats would have that information probably

 http://bsdstats.org/ports.php?category=91

 says in column 'times in use':

 x11/kde3: 534
 x11/kde4:  86

I feel as though I'm in the happy minority who use and enjoy KDE4. My
FreeBSD desktop/workstation is running it well but it does not have
limited resource requirements (i7-750, 8G of RAM, Radeon HD 4650).

Since Amarok and K3B outgrew their KDE3 dependencies, I've managed to
keep my system KDE3/QT3-free for a while now, though that wasn't always
easy in the past.

The only real hiccup I've had was the recent KDE4 bump that made me have
to reconfigure some things, but it ended up working better than ever in
the end. The only current complaint I have is about the atrocities they
have committed to KMail.

Resource usage and philosophical reasons aside, some people who have
been burned by KDE4 in the past may want to revisit it now, it's matured
a lot from its early days.

Personally I won't miss KDE3 at all, and I really haven't missed it for
several years now.

Jim
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: kde3 ports expired today

2013-07-02 Thread Daniel Nebdal
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
 On 07/02/13 07:10, Matthias Apitz wrote:
 El día Monday, July 01, 2013 a las 08:05:37PM -0700, Jeffrey Bouquet
 escribió:

 bsdstats.org  ports stats would have that information probably

 http://bsdstats.org/ports.php?category=91

 says in column 'times in use':

 x11/kde3: 534
 x11/kde4:  86

 I feel as though I'm in the happy minority who use and enjoy KDE4. My
 FreeBSD desktop/workstation is running it well but it does not have
 limited resource requirements (i7-750, 8G of RAM, Radeon HD 4650).

 Since Amarok and K3B outgrew their KDE3 dependencies, I've managed to
 keep my system KDE3/QT3-free for a while now, though that wasn't always
 easy in the past.

 The only real hiccup I've had was the recent KDE4 bump that made me have
 to reconfigure some things, but it ended up working better than ever in
 the end. The only current complaint I have is about the atrocities they
 have committed to KMail.

 Resource usage and philosophical reasons aside, some people who have
 been burned by KDE4 in the past may want to revisit it now, it's matured
 a lot from its early days.

 Personally I won't miss KDE3 at all, and I really haven't missed it for
 several years now.

 Jim


I was about to write something similar. My work machine has been on
KDE4 for years, and though it was quite rocky in the earlier versions
it has kind of quietly disappeared into the background (in a good way)
now - while I can understand the gnome2 revival projects, I don't
quite see the point of e.g. Trinity.

--
Daniel Nebdal
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: kde3 ports expired today

2013-07-02 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
On 2013-07-02 18:31, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
 On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
 On 07/02/13 07:10, Matthias Apitz wrote:
 El día Monday, July 01, 2013 a las 08:05:37PM -0700, Jeffrey Bouquet
 escribió:

 bsdstats.org  ports stats would have that information probably

 http://bsdstats.org/ports.php?category=91

 says in column 'times in use':

 x11/kde3: 534
 x11/kde4:  86

 I feel as though I'm in the happy minority who use and enjoy KDE4. My
 FreeBSD desktop/workstation is running it well but it does not have
 limited resource requirements (i7-750, 8G of RAM, Radeon HD 4650).

 Since Amarok and K3B outgrew their KDE3 dependencies, I've managed to
 keep my system KDE3/QT3-free for a while now, though that wasn't always
 easy in the past.

 The only real hiccup I've had was the recent KDE4 bump that made me have
 to reconfigure some things, but it ended up working better than ever in
 the end. The only current complaint I have is about the atrocities they
 have committed to KMail.

 Resource usage and philosophical reasons aside, some people who have
 been burned by KDE4 in the past may want to revisit it now, it's matured
 a lot from its early days.

 Personally I won't miss KDE3 at all, and I really haven't missed it for
 several years now.

 Jim
 
 
 I was about to write something similar. My work machine has been on
 KDE4 for years, and though it was quite rocky in the earlier versions
 it has kind of quietly disappeared into the background (in a good way)
 now - while I can understand the gnome2 revival projects, I don't
 quite see the point of e.g. Trinity.

Of course KDE4 works and many people use it daily - but for me who got
used to a fairly stripped desktop with just the basics I work with all
the time KDE4 was just in the way, in fact, it made me work more on
Windows XP.

My hope now is that xfce grows just a little bit more in functionality
to be roughly a KDE3 successor.

//per
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: kde3 ports expired today

2013-07-02 Thread Daniel Nebdal
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Per olof Ljungmark p...@intersonic.se wrote:
 On 2013-07-02 18:31, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
 On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
 On 07/02/13 07:10, Matthias Apitz wrote:
 El día Monday, July 01, 2013 a las 08:05:37PM -0700, Jeffrey Bouquet
 escribió:

 bsdstats.org  ports stats would have that information probably

 http://bsdstats.org/ports.php?category=91

 says in column 'times in use':

 x11/kde3: 534
 x11/kde4:  86

 I feel as though I'm in the happy minority who use and enjoy KDE4. My
 FreeBSD desktop/workstation is running it well but it does not have
 limited resource requirements (i7-750, 8G of RAM, Radeon HD 4650).

 Since Amarok and K3B outgrew their KDE3 dependencies, I've managed to
 keep my system KDE3/QT3-free for a while now, though that wasn't always
 easy in the past.

 The only real hiccup I've had was the recent KDE4 bump that made me have
 to reconfigure some things, but it ended up working better than ever in
 the end. The only current complaint I have is about the atrocities they
 have committed to KMail.

 Resource usage and philosophical reasons aside, some people who have
 been burned by KDE4 in the past may want to revisit it now, it's matured
 a lot from its early days.

 Personally I won't miss KDE3 at all, and I really haven't missed it for
 several years now.

 Jim


 I was about to write something similar. My work machine has been on
 KDE4 for years, and though it was quite rocky in the earlier versions
 it has kind of quietly disappeared into the background (in a good way)
 now - while I can understand the gnome2 revival projects, I don't
 quite see the point of e.g. Trinity.

 Of course KDE4 works and many people use it daily - but for me who got
 used to a fairly stripped desktop with just the basics I work with all
 the time KDE4 was just in the way, in fact, it made me work more on
 Windows XP.

 My hope now is that xfce grows just a little bit more in functionality
 to be roughly a KDE3 successor.

 //per

I haven't tried it, but Razor-Qt looks like a reasonable environment
as well - though you need to add apps, like, oh, the KDE4 ones.
Which might not be quite what you were after. x)
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


kde3 ports expired today

2013-07-01 Thread René Ladan
Hi,

the KDE3 ports (263 of them) expired today. They were marked for
removal since December 30, so the plan is to remove them soon.

Regards,
Rene
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: kde3 ports expired today

2013-07-01 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Monday, July 01, 2013 a las 09:59:48AM +0200, René Ladan escribió:

 Hi,
 
 the KDE3 ports (263 of them) expired today. They were marked for
 removal since December 30, so the plan is to remove them soon.
 
 Regards,
 Rene

Hi,

We have (perhaps) all seen this in UPDATING and while compiling qt3*
ports; I think, it is not a good idea deleting the KDE3 ports (which do
compile) from our ports tree, while the KDE4 ports do not compile, at
least not on i386 architecture. See the PR's about automoc4 and others.

Just my humble opinion

matthias

-- 
Matthias Apitz   |  /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribbon.org
E-mail: g...@unixarea.de |  \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail
WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ |   X  - No proprietary attachments
phone: +49-170-4527211   |  / \ - Respect for open standards
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: kde3 ports expired today

2013-07-01 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:20:22AM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
 El día Monday, July 01, 2013 a las 09:59:48AM +0200, René Ladan escribió:
 
  Hi,
  
  the KDE3 ports (263 of them) expired today. They were marked for
  removal since December 30, so the plan is to remove them soon.
  
  Regards,
  Rene
 
 Hi,
 
 We have (perhaps) all seen this in UPDATING and while compiling qt3*
 ports; I think, it is not a good idea deleting the KDE3 ports (which do
 compile) from our ports tree, while the KDE4 ports do not compile, at
 least not on i386 architecture. See the PR's about automoc4 and others.
 
 Just my humble opinion
 
   matthias
 

Problem is that kde3 is not maintained anymore upstream, not security reviews
are performed any more etc. It has been deprecated for 6 month, and no one came
up to:
1/ take maitainership of kde3
2/ import the maintained and supported trinity project.

regards,
Bapt


pgpafB2fpOfKe.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: kde3 ports expired today

2013-07-01 Thread René Ladan
2013/7/1 Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de:
 El día Monday, July 01, 2013 a las 09:59:48AM +0200, René Ladan escribió:

 the KDE3 ports (263 of them) expired today. They were marked for
 removal since December 30, so the plan is to remove them soon.


 We have (perhaps) all seen this in UPDATING and while compiling qt3*
 ports; I think, it is not a good idea deleting the KDE3 ports (which do
 compile) from our ports tree, while the KDE4 ports do not compile, at
 least not on i386 architecture. See the PR's about automoc4 and others.

This looks like two different things to me, and maybe the absence of
KDE3/QT3 will accelerate fixing KDE4/QT4 on i386 and other affected
architectures.

René
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: [kde-freebsd] kde3 ports expired today

2013-07-01 Thread Raphael Kubo da Costa
Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de writes:

 We have (perhaps) all seen this in UPDATING and while compiling qt3*
 ports; I think, it is not a good idea deleting the KDE3 ports (which do
 compile) from our ports tree, while the KDE4 ports do not compile, at
 least not on i386 architecture. See the PR's about automoc4 and others.

To be fair, the problem with the random automoc crashes seems to be
specific to i386 on CURRENT (we do have binary packages for our released
versions after all) and dim@ was already taking a look at that a few
days ago.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: kde3 ports expired today

2013-07-01 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
On 2013-07-01 11:38, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
 On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:20:22AM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
 El día Monday, July 01, 2013 a las 09:59:48AM +0200, René Ladan escribió:

 Hi,

 the KDE3 ports (263 of them) expired today. They were marked for
 removal since December 30, so the plan is to remove them soon.

 Regards,
 Rene

 Hi,

 We have (perhaps) all seen this in UPDATING and while compiling qt3*
 ports; I think, it is not a good idea deleting the KDE3 ports (which do
 compile) from our ports tree, while the KDE4 ports do not compile, at
 least not on i386 architecture. See the PR's about automoc4 and others.

 Just my humble opinion

  matthias

 
 Problem is that kde3 is not maintained anymore upstream, not security reviews
 are performed any more etc. It has been deprecated for 6 month, and no one 
 came
 up to:
 1/ take maitainership of kde3
 2/ import the maintained and supported trinity project.

While I have full respect for this decision I am another example of one
that looses his desktop...

Actually, I'm not really using KDE3, but rather xfce but with the apps
from KDE3 like konsole, kwrite, ksnapshot and a few others that I failed
to see any good replacements for.

And security, well, not sure if this is that important for a desktop? At
least we're warned.

And KDE4 is not an alternative, tried several times but gave up.

Just my two öre.

//per
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: kde3 ports expired today

2013-07-01 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Monday, July 01, 2013 a las 10:26:13PM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark 
escribió:

 While I have full respect for this decision I am another example of one
 that looses his desktop...
 
 Actually, I'm not really using KDE3, but rather xfce but with the apps
 from KDE3 like konsole, kwrite, ksnapshot and a few others that I failed
 to see any good replacements for.
 
 And security, well, not sure if this is that important for a desktop? At
 least we're warned.
 
 And KDE4 is not an alternative, tried several times but gave up.

Are there any numbers how many FreeBSD(!) users are using KDE3 or KDE4?
If not, what about a well organized(!) straw poll? Just to see, if we are all
hunting in the right direction.

matthias
-- 
Sent from my FreeBSD netbook

Matthias Apitz, g...@unixarea.de, http://www.unixarea.de/ f: +49-170-4527211
UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370)   
  
UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: kde3 ports expired today

2013-07-01 Thread Naram Qashat

On 07/01/13 16:40, Matthias Apitz wrote:

El día Monday, July 01, 2013 a las 10:26:13PM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark 
escribió:


While I have full respect for this decision I am another example of one
that looses his desktop...

Actually, I'm not really using KDE3, but rather xfce but with the apps
from KDE3 like konsole, kwrite, ksnapshot and a few others that I failed
to see any good replacements for.

And security, well, not sure if this is that important for a desktop? At
least we're warned.

And KDE4 is not an alternative, tried several times but gave up.


Are there any numbers how many FreeBSD(!) users are using KDE3 or KDE4?
If not, what about a well organized(!) straw poll? Just to see, if we are all
hunting in the right direction.

matthias


I currently use KDE3, I never liked the direction KDE4 took. I did contemplate 
porting Trinity over to FreeBSD, but I never really had the time to do it, 
mainly because of how they are so scattered on how to build it (plus their build 
instructions are haphazard at best).


Even though the ports have expired, I'll probably continue to use KDE3 on my 
desktop.


Thanks,
Naram Qashat
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: kde3 ports expired today

2013-07-01 Thread Jeffrey Bouquet
bsdstats.org  ports stats would have that information probably

Here, I've installed snotes, xxdiff and a few others (qt33...)  not kde3 per 
se...




 
Subject: Re: kde3 ports expired today
 


Are there any numbers how many FreeBSD(!) users are using KDE3 or KDE4?
If not, what about a well organized(!) straw poll? Just to see, if we are all
hunting in the right direction.

    matthias
-
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: kde3 ports expired today

2013-07-01 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Monday, July 01, 2013 a las 08:05:37PM -0700, Jeffrey Bouquet escribió:

 bsdstats.org  ports stats would have that information probably

http://bsdstats.org/ports.php?category=91

says in column 'times in use':

x11/kde3: 534
x11/kde4:  86

matthias

-- 
Matthias Apitz   |  /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribbon.org
E-mail: g...@unixarea.de |  \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail
WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ |   X  - No proprietary attachments
phone: +49-170-4527211   |  / \ - Respect for open standards
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org