Re: pkg : option to exclude some files from checksum ?

2015-11-02 Thread Lars Engels
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 12:35:10AM +0100, Xavier wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> I noticed that some ports are complaining in daily check that a checksum 
> has changed.
> 
> Example : f-prot which checksums virus definitions, which obviously changes.
> 
> Is there some macro/option in Makefile to not checksum this file ?
> 
> I hope my point is clear enough...
> 
> TIA,
> 
> Xav

make -DNO_CHECKSUM should work


pgpjnxgal6Wn1.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: pkg : option to exclude some files from checksum ?

2015-11-02 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 12:35:10AM +0100, Xavier wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> I noticed that some ports are complaining in daily check that a checksum 
> has changed.
> 
> Example : f-prot which checksums virus definitions, which obviously changes.
> 
> Is there some macro/option in Makefile to not checksum this file ?
> 
> I hope my point is clear enough...
> 
> TIA,
> 
> Xav

It is a bug in the f-prot package/ports, no ports should checksum volatile
information/db.

Bapt


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: pkg : option to exclude some files from checksum ?

2015-11-02 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 03:19:15PM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
> On  2 Nov, Lars Engels wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 12:35:10AM +0100, Xavier wrote:
> >> Hi folks,
> >> 
> >> I noticed that some ports are complaining in daily check that a checksum 
> >> has changed.
> >> 
> >> Example : f-prot which checksums virus definitions, which obviously 
> >> changes.
> >> 
> >> Is there some macro/option in Makefile to not checksum this file ?
> >> 
> >> I hope my point is clear enough...
> >> 
> >> TIA,
> >> 
> >> Xav
> > 
> > make -DNO_CHECKSUM should work
> 
> Does it make sense to include stale virus definitions in the package?
> Why not just download the up to date definitions at runtime?
> 
I agree that is what the port should do

Bapt


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: pkg : option to exclude some files from checksum ?

2015-11-02 Thread Don Lewis
On  2 Nov, Lars Engels wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 12:35:10AM +0100, Xavier wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>> 
>> I noticed that some ports are complaining in daily check that a checksum 
>> has changed.
>> 
>> Example : f-prot which checksums virus definitions, which obviously changes.
>> 
>> Is there some macro/option in Makefile to not checksum this file ?
>> 
>> I hope my point is clear enough...
>> 
>> TIA,
>> 
>> Xav
> 
> make -DNO_CHECKSUM should work

Does it make sense to include stale virus definitions in the package?
Why not just download the up to date definitions at runtime?

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


pkg : option to exclude some files from checksum ?

2015-11-01 Thread Xavier

Hi folks,

I noticed that some ports are complaining in daily check that a checksum 
has changed.


Example : f-prot which checksums virus definitions, which obviously changes.

Is there some macro/option in Makefile to not checksum this file ?

I hope my point is clear enough...

TIA,

Xav

--
Xavier HUMBERT - Unix/Win/MacOSX Sysadmin/Network Engineer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"